« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Feingold for Obama's VP choice - Opinions?
I’m curious as to what voters might think about Senator Barack Obama selecting Senator Russ Feingold as his Vice Presidential nominee?
I’ve done a little research on the man and there are some rather interesting points to point out about him.
Yes, he’s a liberal for the most part; but he has conservative views too, like the budget, pork barrel spending, campaign reform, wanting English to be the official langauge and he fights for our Constitutional rights every day.
Russ is considered the ‘maverick’ of the Democratic Party, just as Senator McCain is considered to be in the Republican Party.
He’s from Wisconsin, he’s Jewish and his grandparents are immigrants from Russia. He’s a Rhodes Scholar.
During Feingold’s last election, 2004, he won counties in Wisconsin that supported George W. Bush for President.
Did you know he was awarded the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award? He also cosponsored the bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (Take Note: He cosponsored with Senator John McCain on the “McCain-Feingold Act). He was also the only Senator to vote against the USA Patriot Act.
On August 17, 2005, Feingold became the first U.S. senator of either party to suggest a firm date for American withdrawal from the Iraq war.
Feingold looked into running for President but in the end decided against it, partly because of his divorce. In his parting comments however, he warned his supporters against supporting anyone for the presidency who voted for the Iraq War, whether they later regretted it or not, saying his first choice for president in 2008 was someone who voted against the war, and his second choice is someone who wasn't in Congress but spoke out against the war at the time.
On February 22nd 2008, he stated that he voted for Barack Obama as the Democratic Party nominee for the 2008 Presidential Election.
Feingold's primary legislative focus has been on campaign finance reform, fair trade, policies, health care reform, conservation and environmental protection, a multilateral foreign policy, Social Security, civil liberties and wasteful spending.
Feingold was the only Democratic senator to vote against a motion to dismiss Congress's 1998–1999 impeachment case of President Bill Clinton.
Feingold is also a well-known advocate for reductions in pork barrel spending and corporate welfare. Citizens Against Government Waste, the Concord Coalition, and Taxpayers for Common Sense, three nonpartisan organizations dedicated to those causes, have repeatedly commended him.
In 2006, Feingold introduced a resolution in the Senate to censure President Bush. This was a result of allegations of illegal wiretapping. Just today, Feingold tried his best to stop the FISA bill from being passed. Feingold again called for Bush's censure in July 2007 for his management of the Iraq war.
Feingold has been supportive of a universal health care plan since he first ran for Senator of Wisconsin.
For more information please google his name.
Senator Feingold, like John McCain once was, is known for not always standing with his Party on every issue. He’s a good speaker and debater.
If Senator Obama were to introduce Feingold as his VP nominee, it would ‘shock’ the political pundits and even the Republican Party. If, as the media claims, Senator Obama is moving to the center politically, by having Senator Feingold at his side, he’s keeping the Democratic base very happy.
Opinions?








Comments (28)
He might rally the GOP base more than Sen. Clinton.
July 9, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
What GOP base? Seriously, those folks are scattered all over the place right now, thanks to the economy.
I think a key difference in this election is going to be that social concerns (abortion, gay marriage) are not going to be important. Those are the rallying points of the so-called "GOP base".
July 9, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd love it if you were right, but what makes you think this is true?
July 10, 2008 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
He might rally the GOP base more than Sen. Clinton.
I don't think he'd do that. I think the Clinton-hate among the GOP base is really very personal, a hatred of everything Clinton. Admittedly, a lot of us on the left have developed something similar watching Team Clinton, Bill and Hillary's antics during the primary, but I don't think it's as deep-seated and personal.
I do think he'd be tarred with the "liberal" label, and that would rally the GOP base some, but not to the same personal degree.
Bluebell's AG idea downthread is an interesting one. I've still been thinking Edwards, but maybe... or, as Bademus suggests, we still need him in the Senate. We sure as hell need more progressives there, as this week's abominable FISA vote show.
I know... have him pick Feinstein for... I dunno... something. Anything to get her out of the senate. Maybe he could create a new Cabinet position for... statuary or something. Human cryogenics? Interstate highway shoulder maintenance? Just a thought.
July 10, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. Got off topic. By me Feingold is about the best there is, and I'm just not sure how much negativity the whole "liberal" thing still carries. It's clear that Americans' positions are considerably to the left of inside-the-beltway wisdom, both among the political and among the chattering classes. Still, that dreaded label still seems to be, as Alterman puts it, radioactive.
He also has run, consistenly, as a solid progressive, and has solidly trounced his opposition, putting the lie to the oft-repeated claim that Dems have to "move to the center" (whatever that is) to win. He's no triangulator. I'm hoping O can get out of his current triangulation funk and realize that he could do it too. Maybe Feingold's the one to show him the way.
July 10, 2008 8:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican's are wanting McCain to pick a very CONSERVATIVE for his VP to make THEIR BASE happy - what's the difference. Both can pick on each other -- at least Feingold didn't get us where we are today in two wars an economy in the tank, etc...
July 9, 2008 11:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd love Feingold.
I'd also love Bob Wexler.
I think Joe Biden will get the nod and that's not a bad choice, either.
July 9, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Feingold would go a long way to start mending fences with the far left if Obama goes that way, I would love to see him as the VP candidate. I don't know if that would be an important consideration for him or if Feingold is even interested.
July 10, 2008 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I would love for Feingold to be Obama's running mate. I have a tremendous amount of respect for him.
While watching Russ Feingold on MSNBC tonight with Rachael Maddow that thought occurred to me, too.
Biden would be a so-so choice IMHO. While he may have foreign experience credentials he tends to be more hawkish. Furthermore Biden pushed for dividing Iraq into 3 separate states. Iraqis strongly disliked that approach.
I would be thrilled if Obama picked Feingold. They would make a good match IMHO.
July 10, 2008 2:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he'll pick Jesse Jackson. Can you imagine what it would be like today in the MSN and on line if a white politician had said something about castrating a black politician? Way back when, the Reverend Booker T. Bonner explained to me why he was working so hard for racial equality. Bonner's problem wasn't what happened when a while man killed a black man. It was what happened when a black man killed a black man. At that time in Texas it was treated aboiut like a misdemeanor in most jurisdictions. So where the hell is the outcry?
July 10, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Again, you contribute nothing useful or valid to the conversation - just another attempt to disrespect and throw discussion off track. Gotcha.
July 10, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, Billy, with respect to the topic of the post, what was your point exactly?
July 10, 2008 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fiengold isn't a candidate for anything. If you think Russ Feingold would consider running with Obama now, you don't know Feingold. The issue is integrity. Obama's speeches to black men are really aimed at sucking up to white men and women. Jackson is disgusted by it. I don't doubt Feingold is, too. I know I am.
July 10, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about Dodd?
July 10, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Biden best. He's not only a tough son of gun; he's also quick and smart as they come.
July 10, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Biden too, he voted yes to start the Iraq war though.
July 10, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just fear Biden slipping at the tongue again. I love the guy too tho.
July 10, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
doubly down on the liberal vote would give up the independent and swing vote. remember, there are still large swaths of the country where 'liberal' is a dirty word and Obama's ability to pull in voters in those areas is what makes him so dangerous to repubs. another liberal senator on the ticket writes those areas off completely and hands them over to the repubs. look at the like on the TPM election homepage about the latest poll in north dakota. that would switch real quick if he picked Feingold.
note, I really like and respect Senator Feingold. he's courageous in a congress that has little of it. but he's a bad electoral pick for a first term liberal senator running for the white house.
July 10, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
should read 'doubling down'!
July 10, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for a welcome injection of common sense. Feingold? Yeah, right.
July 10, 2008 6:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
People don't always vote for people who match them in policy -- they also vote for people of conviction who have different ideas about policy. That is true for few in the Senate as much as it is true for Russ Feingold, who I am proud to claim as my Senator.
July 10, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
He might be better as Attorney General.
July 10, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
He might be even better as one of the few voices of reason in the Senate, doncha think?
And if he is the man I think he is, he would laugh in the face of the Obama staffer who floated the idea of joining that administration in any capacity.
July 10, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Feingold is great, but we need him in the senate IMO. I'd like to see someone with some serious foreign policy cred in the VP spot.
July 10, 2008 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, "foreign policy cred" too often means someone of the same ilk that got us into Iraq and can't wait to get us into Iran.
July 10, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I completely disagree. Iraq was a mistake taken under false pretenses, there are plenty of people who never thought it was a good idea that have excellent FP credentials like Bill Richardson and Wesley Clark.
July 10, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a Progressive Patriot!!!! And I proudly wear a sticker (with Russ Feingold Chair) on my car!!! I love Senator Feingold. For whatever reason, which I do not understand, people have identified Russ Feingold with the "far left" (which, if he personifies that, I am proud to e a part of). But really Russ Feingold represents the best of our Constitutional principals. I adore him but believe that too many people don't "get" it.
July 10, 2008 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't fathom that Feingold would even be interested in being Obama's VP. He was my early favored candidate when he was considering running. I'd be really disappointed in him if he was interested in being VP.
July 10, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment