« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Faith in One Another as Americans?
Obama and McCain recently offered distinct definitions of patriotism. McCain said it means doing what's best for your country no matter what. Obama said it means having faith in one another as Americans.
Many here are aware of a long-running survey question that has been asked using identical wording and offering identical answer choices going back to at least the early 1960s: "How much of the time do you think you can trust the government in Washington to do what is right--just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time?" (prefaced by instructions asking the respondent to think about government in general)
Forty-five years ago or so, something like 60-65 percent of respondents said either all or most of the time they trusted the government to do the right thing. With short-term fluctations such as just after 9/11 (64% answered just about always or most of the time on 9/25/01-9/27/01), that figure has plummeted to where far less than half of respondents give either of those replies.
I am wondering if a parallel question, along the lines of the following, has been asked in any reputable survey going back many years: "Do you trust a typical fellow American citizen to do the right thing just about always, most of the time, or only some of the time?"
If any of you reading this are aware of such a question and data collected on the responses over the years I'd be interested and appreciative if you could share that information.
I would like to be able to look at a graphic overlay of the responses over the decades to these two questions to see whether they tend to move in parallel or not.
Social trust is of course vitally important for the health of our country, and for the success of a progressive political agenda. I find Obama's choice to make this the focus of his definition of patriotism interesting in that McCain went for the abstract definition while Obama gave a more interpersonal definition.
I suspect more Americans would find McCain's definition familiar and comfortable. Not sure who, in addition to one of my college professors, said it's a whole lot easier to love one's country than it is to love an individual human being, warts and all.
But that outlook may be pertinent in how many Americans today think about the idea of patriotism and what it means. To the extent Obama means to move patriotism away from the realm of comfortable, currently undemanding and too often cheap abstraction, and make it both more real and more demanding, that seems to me all to the good.












Comments (6)
Nice blog and a very interesting question.
I would tend to agree that as trust in government goes down, our trust in one another suffers as well, especially when we have been used as pawns in a 40 year partisan war. My wife and I were discussing this just this morning as we were yet again nearly run down in a crosswalk.
If the DC police department isn't interested in enforcing the laws and creating an environment for trust, why should we put our lives in jeopardy by assuming against contrary evidence that someone is going to stop for a crosswalk.
We also think it is intentional. The broken window policing theory has been around for quite some time and shown to be very effective. The only conclusion we could come to is that we live in the society we have allowed our leaders to create in the absence of direct citizen involvement.
If we can once again trust each other independent of the institutions that control us, the nationwide grassroots movement we need to fix our many systemic failures would be more likely to come into being.
That is why they don't care if we trust them, because our distrust (not to mention our disinterest) doesn't stop with our representatives in government.
July 12, 2008 10:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jason, thanks for the kind words. Thanks also to both you and Ben for your thoughts on this.
July 14, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll bet you find a lot more trust in your fellow American in rural and small-town America, where people are more likely to have grown up with their neighbors. Of course, there's also Charlottesville, where I have a very good impression of my fellow citizen there. I'm comparing this to Jason's comment above. For example, I fully expect cars to stop in Charlottesville when I step into the crosswalk, although I do look just to make sure. They fail to stop probably less than 5% of the time. I'm guessing those are out-of-towners. ;)
So, perhaps trust in our fellow American has declined for a variety of reasons, including our move towards urbanization, or something resembling it.
As for their competing definitions of patriotism, I think they're both apt. As JFK said, "Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country."
July 12, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Funny thing, on an individual basis around the neighborhood, there is a great deal of trust.
It is just the lack of public safety from people passing through the adds to a sense of "lawlessness" that has been promoted, I think, as a tactic to keep inner cities in disarray.
Then again, I am pretty well fed up with government in general, so it may just be simple incompetence rather than a plot to keep us docile and divided.
July 12, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
What an interesting question. I would love to see that overlapping comparative graph and hope that you find the information you need to construct it.
One of the things I value about TPM is the opportunity to see how other people think --sort of the premise of Being John Malcovich. Thanks to you, and Jason, for illuminating what goes on behind your eyes. I'll watch for your graph.
July 12, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
wwstaebler: Thank you for the supportive words, and you're welcome. Likewise I will look for your byline.
July 14, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment