« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Are You Who You Think You Are?
Hi there, come on in. Another long and active day, so let's chat. That is, of course, if there's anything left in you.
Many of you have spent hours discussing, arguing, harrassing, debating ... thinking, caring, discovering, understanding. As well as all points in between. Tiny, tiny points. Bits of information and opinion dissected like a frog in high school. Eaten, chewed and spit up. Tasted, swallowed and digested. Necessary jewels of wisdom set in golden prongs of putrid vomit. Or visa versa. Your choice. But isn't it always?
What we fiercely defend and valiantly declare to take to our death without consideration leads to it. Those who draw a line in the sand without seeing the sparkle of the phosphorous left behind go blind. Disease spreads on the shoulders of ignorance that rest on the body of a decaying corpse once known as communication.
I'm cynical tonight because I fear the overwhelming defense of perceived insult or degradation leads to the suffocation of others. Not accidentally, but with malice of forethought. That scares the shit out of me.
What consoles me is the knowledge that many do not take the bait of banality. Many decry such mediocre expressions of self worth as unjust and prejudicial. Not just for themselves but for all. That makes me proud.
So I ask you to think about it. Look at it and decide once and for all. Are you who you think you are?









Comments (104)
Melissa, I've been thinking about this all night and trying to figure out how to express my thoughts on the issue. I think you're absolutely right about the suffocation of others.
I would only add that agitators are real and they are here. That's a fact of life and none of us can prevent them from being here. They sow their poison seeds and then sit back and wait. Their intended result is exactly what you fear. By taking the sometimes irresistible bait, we give them what they want, and it winds up being the whole community's loss as we fight each other instead of ignoring them in the first place.
July 22, 2008 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
How do they sow their seeds? With words. Letters strewn together that then create sentences. Lord, with all the strife and pain in the world, we still can't get beyond words?
It is not in the original word that the battle begins, but in the response.
July 22, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, the battle begins in the original words, like the slap of a glove across the check. The battle is won in providing the exact opposite response that the first strike is intended to provoke.
July 22, 2008 11:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
As might be said on the battleground. I disagree. We each have the power over our own fate, allowing another's venom to decide my action is not expressing my voice. It is dissenting to theirs.
July 22, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. But dissent can be just as powerful as action. I think we're making basically the same argument.
July 22, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You may be right.
July 22, 2008 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Words have power. A lot of it, sometimes. Don't dismiss them as "just words" lightly.
July 23, 2008 5:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's the power of words that makes me love them. But it's the reaction to them that matters, not the words themselves.
July 23, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
In a way - but without the words there would be no reaction.
July 23, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Orlando and Melissa,
I think we just have to be lamps in the darkness and do none harm, speak none harm, and think none harm.
We all are looking for the good society, "the Beloved Community" as Martin Luther King termed it, and hope to find it here at TPM and are sometimes disappointed at the contention.
But Orlando is right, we can ignore the sources, or return good in their direction, no matter what.
What does it say in the Bible?
Then Peter came to him and asked, “Lord, how often should I forgive someone who sins against me? Seven times? “No, not seven times,” Jesus replied, “but seventy times seven!”
Don't be down too long, Melissa, you are one of the bright lights around here!
July 22, 2008 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then Jesus said, "But on that 491st time, nail 'em to the wall!"
July 23, 2008 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
perhaps He was speaking figuratively....
July 23, 2008 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Melissa --
You are on fire tonight in the insight-leads-to- wordsmithing department: "...Those who draw a line in the sand without seeing the sparkle of the phosphorous left behind go blind. Disease spreads on the shoulders of ignorance that rest on the body of a decaying corpse once known as communication."
Apparently you are in distress -- vis a vis TPM, today? -- as I am also? What are you thinking about, in particular?
I am deeply dismayed by what I read, in particular, today. I have become so fond of TPM as a venue that I have been rationalizing cruelty, calling it gifted wit, as I have been rationalizing bare bones misogeny, calling it urbane old boy bonding.
But what it really is is (Damn, there's that Bill Cinton definition of is/is coming up again).. Start again. What it really is is a manipulative game by a few very bright, but very dysfunctional men, who have declared certain threads on TPM their arrogant playground -- let other participants beware.
I could go on, but I may be feeling stress in a different way than you, or Orlando, experience it. Suffice it to say that I am actually in pain over this, and must then ask myself why I would subject myself to it, much less participate in the set-up.
Your thoughts?
July 22, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still fairly new here (arrived June) as a poster but have visited the website since the beginning via links from Buzzflash.
It seems a fairly typical internet forum in terms of the group dynamics. Aggressive voices, quiet voices, witty voices, reflective voices, snark, wit for wits sake, injokes, old boys clubs, ingroups outgroups, etc. etc. Just like high school in fact.
What is interesting here is the reflexive exploration of posting-qua-posting. Some of the most read and commented threads have as a topic nothing more than the ethics of posting/identities/language etc.... There is a lot of serious thinking going on about what it is to be a member of a disembodied community such as we have here. That is what is absolutely fascinating.
Overall the quality of posts here on everyone's part is in the top echelon of the forums I have visited. A lot of really good writers and thinkers here of all ages and backgrounds.
Off the topic slightly I know, but I just got on "rant mode". Something I do easily!
July 22, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. The interactions here are nothing out of the ordinary. But the level of introspection is definitely higher than usual.
Some say this is like high school. I say high school is what you get when you put a group of people together for a while.
July 23, 2008 4:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lux. Great comment. And to the one who walks with no shoes - great post. That's all I have to say for right now. ;)
July 23, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Terribly afraid you won't like them, wwstaeblr.
I don't have a problem with manipulation when it is words on paper. Or on a blog. I choose to ignore, or engage. If I choose to engage then I'm ready for the fight. If I choose not, and they continue to berate then they are clearly on their own. Let them spout their majesty to their heart's content. Let those who swallow the generosities of lies rejoice.
I am me. That is my responsibility.
July 22, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Melissa--
Why would I not like your thoughts, Melissa? These posts have gotten out of order, but if your thoughts pertain to personal responibility in terms of interaction, I've already ackowledged that in my response to Orlando and LumUmbraDei.
Did I miss something else?
July 22, 2008 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mentioned a manipulative game ... and to let other participants beware. That is all I meant in my reference.
July 22, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I get plenty stressed and sometimes even about the small stuff. I've learned from experience though that returning anger toward a person who initiated it for the express purpose of generating ill feelings hurts me, not them.
So, I try my best to ignore it. Because that hurts them and leaves me calm. I like Lux's idea even better--return the light in their direction. Kill them with kindness. Maybe I'll try it.
I don't want to leave you thinking that I never fall into the trap. Just tonight, a new chatter in the "other" chat room took on the persona and even the avitar of another. I'm not sure what the point was, other than to upset and offend. But I got mad and I lashed out when I should have just ignored.
The point is, these things are not going away, just like the other stressors in life are not going away. We find ways to cope in "real" life. We should seek to do so here so that we are the ones defining the community, not leaving it to the self-appointed wrecking balls.
And p.s. I see the bare bones misogeny as well in the posts of several men here. I often even write a scathing comment. Then, I usually erase it before submitting and I move on. It's not my job to educate the willfully ignorant.
July 22, 2008 10:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's not my job to educate the willfully ignorant."
You could not be more correct if you won the spelling bee. The ignorant will unfortunately remain, but the intelligent will simply laugh.
July 22, 2008 11:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Today, readytoblowagasket and a few others attacked me quite personally for no obvious reason. These boys need to cool the testosterone and juice up the norepinephrine.
July 22, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm amazed at that Ripper, I took you for one of the community members that everyone likes. If this was a high school, you would be one of the "popular kids"!
July 22, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think those guys were from the JV football team.
July 22, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
An apt anaology. Apt and hilarious.
July 22, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. Where did you get your avatar?
July 23, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
You mean physically where did I get it or why did I pick it?
July 23, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I can barely make it out. Tell me all about it.
July 23, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's Tilda Swinton as Orlando (in the movie). Orlando is taken from the Virginia Woolf book about a nobleman who lives for 400 years and at some point along the line morphs into a woman.
July 23, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
And why choose it for your own?
July 23, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the androgynous aspect. I'm not sure if I spelled that right. It's late and I'm off to bed with no time for dictionary.com. But, I digress.
There's a little bit of mystery in androgyny. I'm so NOT mysterious. That's probably why I like it.
July 23, 2008 12:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
'Night, thank you.
July 23, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, pleasant dreams.
July 23, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
But - big question, drum roll please - did you laugh?
July 22, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish I could say I did. They were actually quite nasty, intimately personal and totally disregarded any facts in favor of their own. I cringed and tried to stay calm. Got smeared for that, too.
July 22, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Laugh now, Ripper. Out loud and with strength, enjoying every ignorant moment.
July 23, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, Melissa. And you, too, Lux and Orlando.
July 23, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Mama said there'd be days like this, there'd be days like this, my Mama said.."
July 23, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sincere thanks to you both, Orlando and LuxUmbraDei: I know the essential truth in what you both say and recommend -- I just too easily forget them.
Everything, in the end, is about choice. Because I am responsible for my choices, I must choose more wisely from now on.
July 22, 2008 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
thanks for kind words WW. I tried replying but forgot to check the box!
July 22, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
I could use a drink. May I get one from the fridge?
July 22, 2008 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not until you've reflected on heavy topics for at least twenty minutes.
July 22, 2008 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
See above or see my most recent posts. Been there. Fought the good fight for media accountability. Had someone describe me as angry about my wife and other wonderful things while they dragged my real-world name around as often as possible. I feel like a bloody Gus in need of a Bloody Mary.
July 22, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gosh, I'm not that cynical!! Orlando, what would you like?
Sox, get down.
July 22, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure, help yourself. Bring me a glass of wine while you're at it?
July 22, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reds or whites?
July 22, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you have any good Zins in there?
July 22, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
A lovely Nappa Valley one, as a matter of fact.
July 22, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that anywhere near Menddocinno?
Just joking!!!!! I'll grab a glass. Tonight, maybe two, if the hostess doesn't mind...
July 23, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Would a true hostess ever mind?
Good to see 'ya
July 23, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
White Zinfandel, please.
Sox, please lay down. He doesn't want you in his lap!
July 23, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yada, yada! Is someone getting me glass or not?
July 23, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
White Zin, as the lady ordered!
July 23, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
About time. Thanks! ;)
July 23, 2008 12:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I got waylaid by the beauty of that garden you have out back. You must have been inspired by Alan Lacey or someone like that...
July 23, 2008 12:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
How did you know? It's my pride, although the dogdays of summer...
Sox!
July 23, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi WWStaebler,
In Yva's very popular thread today, workerbee brought up the idea of retaliation for wrongs, arguing that not to do so was an act of enabling bad actors.
A powerful argument.
But nonviolence is also very powerful. Martin Luther King never spoke ill in his speeches toward people like Bull Connor and Lester Maddux.
He was always trying to find the good in people and respond to that only.
Its amazing what happens when we return an open hand for a clinched fist...
July 22, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Missed this "open had for clenched fist"... thank you for the re-direction, which is absolutely right.
July 22, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or not until you've laughed, as Melissa so appropriately suggested, for twenty minutes (as Orlando suggested.)
July 22, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Laughter. Much better idea.
July 22, 2008 11:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lux, I'm with you generally but it is so complicated. For myself, I prefer the open hand approach but when standing up for others, sometimes you need to bring the hammer.
In a forum like this though I think that dissent sowers are mostly in need of attention. So, I try to feel sorry for them and remember that people who put negative energy into the world don't feel good about themselves when looking in a mirror.
I try really hard. I don't always succeed.
July 22, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Me neither!
July 23, 2008 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Me three.
July 23, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Falling asleep at desk. Thank all of you. Best to Sox; Everest says "hay," as always. If any of you like whites, try the Founder's Estate (or is it Grand Estate?) Columbia Crest Chardonnay 2004,or 2006. Sleeper wine, just won awards. From your neck of the woods, LUD, or nearby. G'night. Sweet dreams.
July 23, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good night. Sleep well.
July 23, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's a good wine! There are several Yamhill Valley wineries I can recommend, but that's for another day...
July 23, 2008 12:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Laughter is the best medicine. When you can't laugh out loud, for whatever reason, laugh internally, to yourself. When you can't laugh at all, even to yourself, please question yourself. When you can't question yourself, well.....you're basically screwed.
That's my take on life. Take it, or leave it.
July 23, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
White, red, zin or Bloody Mary, Lis?
July 23, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Right now, I think I'd like a Bloody Mary. With celery stick.
Thanks!
July 23, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
C'mon, Lis! Always laugh at stupid! It's the least we can do -
July 23, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a nice group of people!
Ah well, I'm off to bed also! 'Night all!
July 23, 2008 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Off to Neverland with me. Goodnight, and thanks for the lovely company and hospitality.
July 23, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Melissa, a highly rec'd post.
Ripper, a very well-made bloody mary (complete with celery stick, thank you!!).
To all, an eventful night it was, but all I want to see soon is the back of my eyelids. Tomorrow comes too soon...
...and who knows what tomorrow may bring?
Wishing everyone a happy tomorrow, I remain, truthfully yours,
LisB
July 23, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks so much for all who cared to respond. Love to all - Melissa
July 23, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Melissa,
I'm sorry you had to come up against those and their words that upset you....I wasn't able to read most posts today, so I obviously missed the vitriol.
Our ability and right to communicate freely can be costly. Messages, no matter how couched, can deliver salvation or ruin to the recipient(s).
That old adage, 'It's not what you say, but how you say it', is incomplete. I submit it's the 'motivation' that sets the foundation and tone of the message. No matter the venue.
Words should not be thoughtlessly scattered about like cheap confetti, but rather thoughtfully dispensed as befitting their value.
'Free Speech' is but the result of 'Freedom'. And Freedom is priceless, but certainly not without cost.
The sticks and stones of words do cause wounds and pain.
I'm glad you have Sox - she must know you're in need of a hug, she won't leave your side.
Do you want some of the hot chocolate I brought? It's soothing and comforting. Can you guess the secret ingredient?
July 23, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, thank you. Yes, hot chocolate. I'm reallly sorry it took so long.
I haven't said, but mean - love the new look!
July 23, 2008 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
There's another swing up on the trapeze - wanna come 'fly' with me sometime? Don't worry, there's a big safety net.
So, are ya feelin' a bit better? Anything you want to share? Want me to call Guido to go pay a visit to anyone in particular?
July 23, 2008 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tempting, for sure. But for now I will be kind. The swing? Totally awesome. So free, so unassuming.
Love ya, Aunt Sam.
July 23, 2008 1:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
I used to go to the park and swing sometimes - happy or sad - it was really freeing. Peaceful.
I'll put Guido on 'hold' for now.
July 23, 2008 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Keep him on the ready, OK? Good to have a gal in the know....
You're too cool.
July 23, 2008 2:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Melissa. How are you today?
July 23, 2008 1:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi, Cricket. Well enough, and you?
July 23, 2008 2:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well. Tired. Painted the kitchen today. uh!
July 23, 2008 2:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, but what matters is ... how looks ye kitchen? ;)
July 23, 2008 2:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Below. :-)
July 23, 2008 2:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Freshly painted. ;-)
Have to put everything back in its space tomorrow. *groan* Also, storm brewing outside. Big thunderheads.
Been quiet here, looks like.
July 23, 2008 2:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Melissa?
July 23, 2008 2:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hi! Still there?
July 23, 2008 2:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah. I'm reading Monica's post.
July 23, 2008 2:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had to step away for s few.
Sorry, Cricket.
July 23, 2008 3:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Storm. Love = stout?
July 23, 2008 3:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm pretty sure I have no idea what that means. Anyone have a thought? Love = stout???? If I tried hard enough, I could probably explain the love. But STOUT? I was fast asleep apparently, but even in dreams I don't know where I was.
SO sorry, Cricket!
July 23, 2008 7:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK?
July 23, 2008 2:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think I am who I am. Does that answer the question?
July 23, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes. Do you think you will still be that person five years from now? Next week? I wonder if we remain true to our "gut" throughout, or if life changes the core.
July 23, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will not be the same person in five minutes, let alone in five years. But I probably won't be a completely different person.
July 23, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thinking is something is something that happens in the vast, immeasurable realm of AMness.
July 23, 2008 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before you learned the word blue, what color was the sky? Social conformity is not a requirement for survival. We don't need to follow other peoples' rules. If I choose to call a daisy a parsnip, it changes nothing. Are you who you think you are? Without words, who do you think you are?
July 23, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neither wise nor virtuous, I.
Drifting in the long grass,
Sitting on the warm stones;
Somewhere wood strikes wood.
July 23, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, but without words, and their commonly agreed-upon definitions, how can you express who you think you are, even to yourself?
July 23, 2008 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Raising his hands to the sky, the old man's fingers became like ten lamps of fire.
"If you would, you could become all fire." he replied."
from Wisdom of the Desert Fathers, Benedicta Ward, Cistercian Press.
My own take on this is that when one is all fire then one truly can answer "who am I" The whole body is one mouth expressing eloquently.
"Miraculous powers...chopping wood, drawing water"
Hearing the morning bell, one taste....
Rinsing one's face, all the sutras completely revealed.
Rant, over.
July 23, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
This thread will be dropping away soon, and maybe that makes it easier to write this, knowing that it may soon vanish.
I am not who I think I am. I assign myself virtues I don't live up to. I give myself credit for insight when it's mostly observation. Wit when it is hackery. Intelligence when it is trickery. I lie and call it necessary. I claim strength when I am weak; I blame fate when it is merely choice. And I know she will never love me, and yet I pretend, and let her pretend, that she does.
This is not the person I see myself as. But I know it is the person I am.
Thanks for the question, Melissa. it felt good to say that.
July 23, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
A few of us are still monitoring the thread!
anyway, what you write can be said of most of us except the relationship issue. The rest of the self-criticism may be valid but also universal...we're all like that.
I think that post took a lot of virtue, a lot insight, a lot of intelligence, and a good deal of truthfullness!
And essentially, alot of strength and deep resource.
July 23, 2008 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's beautiful. What makes your words so lovely is the reaction, the emotion, they create.
July 23, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment