« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Yay PUMAs!!!
P issed-off
U nprincipled
M cCain
A ssisting
S tooges!
Yay!
P uppets
U nconvincingly
M asquerading
A s
S elf-directed
Yay!
P owerless
U nder
M cCain's
A uthoritarian
S way
Yay!
OK - I got it out of my system - thanks for your indulgence : : :
Advertisement
Comments (11)
That made me lol.
June 24, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
And today after release of the LA Times/Bloomberg poll:
Plaintively, Uncontrollably Mewing AntiObamists
June 24, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know I'm gonna look really stupid right now, having been here for a few months (reading as well as posting blogs), but I still don't know what PUMA stood for in the first place.
I can only recommend this post because I love it when people twist acronyms into new meanings. I love creativity.
If anyone cares to tell me what PUMA really stands for, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, I recommended this post for the reasons stated in this comment, and therefore did my job, and will leave.
June 24, 2008 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Party Unity My Ass.
Seriously.
June 24, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeezus. Seriously? That's just....sad.
June 24, 2008 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I mean, I was no Clinton lover, and I made it obvious to anyone who would listen, but I would still vote Dem in November (holding my nose, but still). It's the issues, not the winning candidate, that matters.
June 24, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of PUMAs, looked in on hillaryis44.org lately? Don your fireproof suit first.
Has anyone yet figured out exactly who is behind hillaryis44? The whole thing is a mystery. The verbiage on the site always says "we" -- we think, we believe, we this and we that. No names are tied to this, no one can find out any info from the whois listings. Personally I think there's a really incredible story here, how this "we" whoever "they" are managed to rile up so many people. And yet even the riled-up ones have absolutely no idea who the leader is that they're following!
Even the sleuths at Kos haven't cracked this one yet (at least that I know of).
June 25, 2008 11:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ben Smith (at Politico)claimed to have solved the mystery, but the evidence sounds pretty thin to me. Here's a link to the story:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/A_campaign_mystery_solved_HillaryIs44.html
June 25, 2008 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone have proof PUMA was indeed started by 'disgruntled' HRC supporters and not RNC stooges?
June 25, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll bet if you dig deep into the muck, you'd find PUMA was created by Republican dirty tricksters. Also hillaryis44.com.
P uny
U nconvincing
M ass
A nger
S yndrome
June 25, 2008 8:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Will Bower, who supposedly started the whole thing, did give a whopping $89 to her campaign. I'd bet that he puts more money into PUMA every day.
June 25, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment