Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

We, The People

We are the American people, strong and proud.   White and black, brown and yellow, man and woman, adult and youngster.  Brother, sister, father, mother, uncle, aunt, grandparent, grandchild.   We are Irish and Scottish and German and French, we are gentile and Jew, African and Asian, Dane and Swede. We are the end product of history's greatest ethnic smelting process. 

We are Catholic and Protestant, believer and agnostic, Christian and Muslim and Buddhist and Wiccan and six thousand other religions and creeds and belief systems as well.  We have faith, or we have no faith; we are idealists and cynics, we are Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives, Libertarians, independents, progressives, socialists, communists, objectivists, everything and nothing. 

We believe in a day's work for a day's pay, an  honest job for an honest man, in hard work and clean living.  And we believe in something for nothing, that it's better to be lucky than smart, and that you never give a sucker an even break. 


In God we trust, all others pay cash.

We are the rich white men who first declared independence from the imperial yoke, and we are the poor black men and women they owned.  We are the red men who were pushed off their land to make way for the railroads, and the yellow men who built the railroads at gunpoint and in chains, and the white men who slaughtered and enslaved in pursuit of, and then sold tickets for and rode on, those railroads. 

We are the soldiers who slaughtered in trumped up wars to increase American territory, and we are the brown people of Mexico and Hawaii who were murdered in those wars, and we are the poor men who bought the cheap beans and pineapples that resulted from those wars and the rich men who profited from those sales. 

We are the labor leaders whose skulls were broken on picket lines, and the Irish cops who swung the night sticks.   We are the flower people who burned their draft cards while chanting "Hell no, we won't go" and we are the riot shielded peace officers who lobbed tear gas in response.  We are protesting college students, and the National Guardsmen who gunned them down.   We are the Quakers who refused to be sent off to combat, and the MPs who locked them up in Leavenworth.   We are the men and women of color who refused to sit in the back of the bus any more, and the thousands of others who marched along side them, and we are the racist crackers who turned firehoses and loosed vicious dogs in response.   We are the Ku Klux Klan and the Black Panthers, the Weathermen and the FBI.

However much we may hate the Illinois Nazis, we are the Illinois Nazis.

 We are not Iraqi, or Iranian, but someday we may be, and then, we may be ashamed at what we once did to ourselves, but for now, those people aren’t our people, and thus aren’t really people at all, so we really don't care all that much.

We are the American government, which is by the people, for the people, and of the people.  We are the voters and the voted on, the successful and the also-ran, the incumbent and the challenger, the winners and losers, the high and the low.

We are those who know the secrets, and those who are ignorant of their very existence.  We are those who vote to go to war, and those who actually go.  We are the people in charge of our children’s safety, who prey on those children in Internet chat rooms while sitting on the floor of Congress.  We are those who pay bribes, and those who take them, those who peddle influence and those who purchase it, those who break laws, and those who decline to prosecute.   We are the activist judiciary, the unitary executive, the mostly supine legislature.   We are those who impeach over acts of adultery, and refuse to impeach over crimes against humanity. 

We did not have sex with that woman, but we believe strongly in the rule of law.

We triangulate and count the cost, we hoard our political capital and choose our battles.  We stand on principle when it won’t cost us votes, we stall investigations and classify reports.  We rig the vote, we cage the polling lists, we demand ID to prevent vote fraud. 

We believe in old time religion and San Francisco values, we support the troops and we stay the course, we swear to uphold and defend the Constitution, and then we vote to get rid of habeus corpus.

All men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of justice.

And the beatings will continue until morale improves.

We are mostly unaware of the ironies implicit in every action of our political system. 

We believe in change, and we should, because we are seeing change right now.  Change That We Can Believe In is all around us; it is the change from “I will filibuster any bill that contains retroactive immunity for the telecoms” to “National security trumps immunity and I will vote for this bill even if it contains immunity”.  And we can like it, or lump it, because in November, we can vote for the liar we like a little less than the liar we like a little more, or we can vote for the liar we like a little more than the liar we like a little less.

We, The People, the American people, the Great Unwashed, are being bent over the table and greased up for another major screwing, and what is the prescription for our ailment, the solution to our problem, the new direction forward?

We can bite the pillow and take it like grown ups.

Yes.  Yes, We Can.

Because, you know, doing anything else might actually cause us some serious discomfort. 

At least we're used to being screwed by politicians and their promises.

Hell, some of us seem to have learned to like it.

 

 

 


Comments (10)

Oh dude. That is just so, so harsh.

I suppose if you really felt strongly about that you could go start the real revolution. Seriously, you go on ahead; I'm right behind you, brother. Let me know when you have a plan for dealing with the military, the police, and the mob of angry citizens who don't agree with you.

Or you can do what everyone else in the history of representative democracy has done. Compromise. Choose the greatest available good, or, failing that, the least available evil.

Or you can do what everyone else in the history of representative democracy has done. Compromise. Choose the greatest available good, or, failing that, the least available evil.

It's funny how suddenly, Change We Can Believe In and Yes, We Can! has transmuted into doing what everyone else in the history of representative democracy has done... which is to say, compromise. Choosing the greatest available good, or, failing that, the least available evil.

Wouldn't another phrase for this be Politics As Usual?

Wasn't this political campaign supposed to be the start of something new, something different, something revolutionary? Weren't we supposed to be, you know, changing things?

I guess we really can't, after all.

I didn't need the confirmation, but thanks, anyway. Validation is always pleasant, even from a scoffer.

It's called not putting the cart before the horse. Or sine non qua for the Latin inclined. You are holding a candidate accountable for things only a president can do. Not very sporting of you.

A) I'm not scoffing. I agree with almost everything you said except with your characterization of compromise on the FISA bill as sodomy.

B) There was a candidate that candidate that met all of your criteria and more. His name is Dennis Kucinich, and no one will vote for him. In 2004, I was the only one at my precinct caucus to vote for Kucinich. This year he gave up the campaign before he got to Minnesota. But his name was still on the ballot, and if he had not actually asked people not to vote for him I might have.

C) Having failed to get the best, I looked for the next best. At the time it appeared to be Barack Obama. And he still looks like the best of the rest to me, probably because I never, never, never assumed that he was the second coming of Thomas Jefferson. In this analysis I was greatly aided by... Barack Obama. In his book "The Audacity of Hope" he actually warns his supporters that they will be disappointed in him from time to time.

D) Maybe we can't change everything. Maybe not right away. Not without blood in the streets and bodies hanging from the trees. Maybe you fight the battles you can win, and protect yourself in the battles you can't so that you can fight again another day. Maybe... just maybe... you have to give in to some of the "Politics as Usual" in order to get some of the "Revolution." That is how we have "revolution" in this country so that we don't have to kill people (or die for that matter).

E) ABSOLUTELY, I think that Obama was wrong to cave on FISA. I hope to Ghod that IF it gets passed that Telecom Immunity gets tested in court as unconstitutional and that it is eventually overturned. But Telecom Immunity is a skirmish on a flank of a battle, not the whole war. I don't expect Barack to fight all the battles. I just don't. I have read him, and watched him, and listened to him, and studied him enough that, WITHIN BOUNDS, I trust him to know what he can and can't accomplish.

F) EVEN IF I THOUGHT YOU WERE COMPLETELY RIGHT, I would still be in Obama's camp, working my ass off to get him elected. If liberals had not abandoned Humphrey just because Johnson was an ass, then it is very possible that the presidency of Richard M. Nixon (2nd worst in the history of the USA) would never have happened. Barack is going up against a guy who says he is going to continue the worst policy mistakes if the Number ONE guy in that hall of shame. Obama would have to be SIGNIFICANTLY MORE two-faced than LBJ before I abandon him.

Not the rallying cry you wanted? Sorry, here in the trenches things get a little dirty sometimes.

With all due respect? You need to get laid.

Or drunk.

Or simply out more.

This is Pride Weekend in San Fran. Come on out - you may get lucky.

It's called not putting the cart before the horse. Or sine non qua for the Latin inclined. You are holding a candidate accountable for things only a president can do. Not very sporting of you.

Really? A President can filibuster a bill in the Senate? Wow. I had no idea.

What I am actually doing is holding the candidate responsible for promises the candidate made, and is now breaking. Along the way, I'm holding myself and all my fellow supporters of that candidate responsible for expecting that candidate to keep his promises, instead of making excuses about it.

I understand that nobody at TPM is interested in reading anything bad about our very own Magical Negro, but I can't help that.

With all due respect? You need to get laid.

Or drunk.

Or simply out more.

This is Pride Weekend in San Fran. Come on out - you may get lucky.

I don't need to go to Frisco to get fucked. I just need to continue believing in the Magical Negro. But if I'm going to do that, yeah, a lot of booze would certainly help. Thanks.

I don't expect Barack to fight all the battles. I just don't. I have read him, and watched him, and listened to him, and studied him enough that, WITHIN BOUNDS, I trust him to know what he can and can't accomplish.

I don't expect him to fight all the battles, either.

I no longer expect him to keep his promises, either, which makes me inexorably sad, and somewhat angry.

As he apparently either cannot or will not keep his promises, I no longer trust him to know what he can or can't accomplish.

No, let's shorten that.

I no longer trust him.

Full stop.

avatar

Doc, I usually agree with 99% of what you write.

The above, though, is in that other 1%.

Obama detailed his objections to the original FISA bill (IIRC, on a dKos diary, but I'm too lazy to look it up). The compromise DOES answer a lot of his original objections (though it clearly doesn't go as far as I'd like).

I think Obama is taking what he believes the best possible bill is for now - because it's politically expedient, and because it's better than what was proposed for now.

Obama detailed his objections to the original FISA bill (IIRC, on a dKos diary, but I'm too lazy to look it up). The compromise DOES answer a lot of his original objections (though it clearly doesn't go as far as I'd like).

After a while, you get tired of repeating yourself.

Rhetorical questions:

Did Obama promise to filibuster any FISA bill (or any other bill, for that matter) that contained telecom immunity?

Does this bill contain telecom immunity?

Is Obama going to filibuster it?

If the answer to the first two is 'yes', and the last is 'no', then I see little in my assertions for others to disagree with. Senator Obama made a campaign promise that got him votes, and now that he feels those votes are safely in the vault, he is breaking that campaign promise... in my opinion, to get more votes that are not yet safely in the vault.

It may be understandable, it may be forgivable, but regardless of what it 'may' be, here is what it is... politics as usual. Which is not what Senator Obama is supposed to be about.

I remain entirely disappointed in Senator Obama. Will I vote for him? Well, probably. Unless Ron Paul somehow pulls off an insurrection at the Republican Convention and steals the nomination. In that case, all bets are off.

I don't really have the slightest belief that that could actually happen, but, y'know, behavior like this on Senator Obama's part makes me at least a little bit wistful.

I do not accept the political equation that says Obama has to support the FISA bill no matter what. Poll after poll indicates that (a) a majority of Americans are no longer placing security ahead of all other concerns, (b) a majority of Americans are stating to once again value their civil liberties and (c) a majority of Americans do not want the telecoms to have retroactive immunity.

Obama could continue to do now what he has done so successfully throughout the primaries... stand up and lead. Will he have to denounce two thirds of his own party? Yeah, he will, but (a) that helps us replace those idiots in 2008, and (b) it's not like they're going to carry grudges past 2008 if Obama wins the White House. Politicians always have an uncanny instinct for which asses they need to kiss at any given time; the Craven Dems right now are simply going crazy, trying to figure out which ass that is. After the next Presidential election, that will be much clearer to them.

I dream of a Congress full of men and women of character; who, rather than trying to figure out which powerful figure or lobby this vote will either please or affront, will simply take the action that seems proper to them for their constituents, and for the nation as a whole, at any given time. That equation right there is complex enough to give the wisest both head and heartaches. I suppose naked pragmatism does indeed simplify such complex matters, but jesus, I'm sick of that shit.

Obviously, I also dream of a White House and a Supreme Court similarly staffed with people of character, and, obviously again, this is merely a fantasy that can never, ever be realized in this crappy world. But for months now Obama has been exploiting that fantasy to fulfill his own political ends, and while I suppose I should appreciate him giving all us dreamers such early notice that it's time to wake up now, well, I'm not going to apologize for feeling goddam aggravated about it, and more than a little abused.

What he said. Damn! Why can't I write shit like this?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address