Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Myth of Sandman and American Gods

Time for a little Sunday book review...

The first thing that throws people off about Sandman is that it's a graphic novel, also known as a comic book. But that only determines form, not content.

The main - but not always central - character is Sandman, more often referred to as Dream or Morpheus. There is a main story arc with many branches and subplots. Sandman is a collection of stories inspired by a great number of sources. Greek, Egyptian and Norse mythology, Bible and Christian myth, Shakespeare, old African and Arabian stories, modern urban myths, plus a number of original stories. There are of course occasional hat tips to comic book heroes, but not too many of those.

Dream and his siblings are the Endless - far older and more powerful than gods, although not omnipotent (after all, having more than one omnipotent entity inevitably leads to trouble). They are, roughly in order if seniority, Destiny, Death, Dream, Desire, Despair, Destruction, and Delirium (formerly Delight).

Death is one of the more prominent characters in Sandman - she is Dream's older sister and she's... rather unorthodox. She's not evil or even threatening, she's actually very nice - if inevitable. And she usually looks like a goth chick, although like the other Endless, she can look any way she wants to if she wishes to blend with the crowd.

Many of the stories are about humans, from purely mythological (Orpheus) to real historical personages (Emperor Norton). Much of the plot is set in contemporary (ie. circa 1990) America and Britain, as well as in the Dreaming, the domain of Lord Morpheus. There are plenty of excursions to other times and places, both real and imagined.

The stories were all written by Neil Gaiman, but the drawing and coloring was done by a number of different artists. The main characters are always recognizable, and the distinct visual styles add to the variety.

Originally, Sandman was published by Vertigo as monthly issues between 1989 and 1996. There are ten volumes total, each encompassing about 10 issues. Some of the volumes contain a single storyline, others are collections of very loosely connected stories.

Sandman
is clearly meant for adult readers. To fully appreciate the stories, it helps to have at least cursory knowledge of the many sources it draws upon. The stories are - like most of Gaiman's work - quite original and unpredictable, even when the author recycles well established characters and plots. Definitely not what might be called conventional.

That is no doubt part of the reason why Sandman won many accolades and is reportedly the only comic book to have made it to the NYT hardcover bestseller list to date. Norman Mailer is quoted describing Sandman as "a comic book for intellectuals".

The only drawback is that the entire Sandman, either hardcover or paperback, is outrageously expensive. I don't know if it's just a rip-off or if full color printing is really that costly.


I should also mention another book by Neil Gaiman (text only, no graphic novel) called American Gods. Compared to Sandman, American Gods is structured very differently with far tighter storyline (it wasn't written and published over the period of eight years, after all) but is similarly packed with myth. The premise of the book is that all immigrants to America brought their gods with them... and the gods are still around, disguised as ordinary people.

The book is also a kind of a road trip across America, no doubt inspired by Gaiman's own travels (Neil G. lives in the US, but is British). American Gods is truly a pantheon, with characters based on Norse, Anglo-Saxon, Egyptian, Indian, Slavic, and West African mythology (and more).

Interestingly, there are several puzzles - or clues - hidden in plain sight. The names of several characters give them away, if you know how to decode eg. "Mr. Wednesday".

In my opinion, American Gods is longer than it needs to be but not at all bad, and certainly chock full of myth and a good read overall. Recommended reading for anyone interested in myth, especially blending of ancient and modern myth.

Discuss.


Comments (37)

ohmm....ohmm....ohmm

the buddha hums
the sandman sleeps


I'm actually not sure the Sandman ever sleeps.

long before your time --the 50's, there was a song on the radio that went like this:

Hey Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream
Make him the cutest that I've ever seen
PLease turn on your magic beam,
Mr. Sandman, bring me a dream

Also, there's the sandman from Smiley's People

Neil Gaiman's SANDMAN - Yeah, yeah. Good stuff, go read it, etc etc. I love Gaiman's SANDMAN, so does everyone else, and it's especially nice to read it all these days, because if you do, you can skip AMERICAN GODS, where he basically retreads all the cool concepts from SANDMAN with dumber and more boring characters. (I wanted to type 'without the pretty pictures', but, unfortunately, other than for brief artistic insurrections by Shawn McManus and Charles Vess, the artwork Gaiman works with on SANDMAN is near universally a horror to have to look upon. Gaiman unfortunately prefers 'interesting' artists to good ones.)

But, yeah, Gaiman's SANDMAN is definitely worth reading. Especially if you're trying to get that hot non-geek babe you know who just WON'T read comics to change her mind. SANDMAN will nearly always do it, especially if you start out with "Dream of a Thousand Cats". Chicks absolutely cannot resist that story.


I rather like Jill Thompson's work on Sandman. I don't agree with the characterization that the Sandman artwork is a horror to look upon. Don't agree at all. I don't like all the art equally (of course) but none of it is bad.

As for American Gods, I read it before Sandman, which no doubt influenced my perception.

I like the art even when it sucks. Sometimes I like it better that way. There's deep beauty in functional imperfection. I don't know if this will make sense, but there are some bands whose versions of their own songs always sound a little half finished--sort of like sketches or demos. Dylan comes to mind. The Replacements. Neil Young. P.J. Harvey. The Beatles. Al Green. Iron and Wine. For me, those sketches are far more interesting than the more polished cover versions that other artists release later. You hear a little bit of the work in the recording itself. A little bit of the process.

When I lived in New Mexico, I was endlessly fascinated by the joinery in the pueblos. It's the imperfection that I love. The view into the bare functionality. Something like that, anyway. I once wrote in one of my notebooks, after spending a day studying and sketching the vigas and corbels of Albuquerque's pueblos: "God is in the joints." The crappier artists who work on Sandman appeal to me in a similar way. It's like I'm looking into the work instead of at it.

http://www.nmhomes.com/pics/corbel.jpg

What would you say about someone like me who didn't grow with comics (I wasn't allowed to read them)? How do I get over that old
impact? Do you know anyone that has had that experience and
changed? I ordered the book(s) and am determined to get into it.
And I like video games.

Hard for me to say. I didn't exactly grow up with comics either. When I was a kid, something like Batman or Superman or Spiderman or Hulk simply wasn't available to me. I did read comics, but nothing any of you guys would ever have heard of. And comics were strictly for kids.

It's important to keep in mind that "comic book" or "graphic novel" describes form, not content. It's simply a storytelling vehicle like a book, film, or a play.

I had a minor epiphany when I discovered that Japanese anime movies don't have to be for kids (and I don't mean hentai). Movies like Jin-Roh or Perfect Blue are purely adult movies and the fact they're animated seems almost accidental.

As a side note, I believe that animated movies are a purer form of storytelling than live action movies, for two reasons: one, they're much more about content than form, and two, there are no actors and therefore no baggage, each character starts with a clean slate.

Interesting. Never thought about the "pure" story-telling aspect.
The only movie from comics recently that I kinda liked was the Spiderman stuff. Can't get into the Ring thing at all. Well, when I get the Sandman, I'm going to give it a try with this idea--thinking of it as pure story-telling thing.

But in that vein, wouldn't a book be the purest?

Yes and no. Books are certainly a very pure form of storytelling. But... here's a silly but real life example.

Every day when I walk to work, I pass by a water treatment facility where, for whatever reason, they keep sheep (Barbados Blackbelly I think - one of the sheep is practically black). In spring there were little lambs of course, now after a few months the lambs are about two thirds sized. The other day I stepped a little closer to the fence to take a look. One of the lambs started running towards me, only it wasn't quite running. It was something between running and jumping, sort of like a little kid in a bouncy mood, it looked really cute and pretty funny.

The point is that I can never quite describe the movement in words. But if I could show you a three-second movie clip, you'd immediately understand what I was talking about.

So, these adult/myth comics are between books and movies in impact?

Good question. In a way, maybe. But I wouldn't generalize too much. The differences between individual works of the same genre are greater than the differences between genres I think.

There's something oddly satisfying about having someone else paint the mental picture for you, without being so precise that it completely cuts you off from participation. Movies can be too distracting, while books sometimes require more effort than you might be in the mood to expend. For me, a graphic novel is the perfect compromise.

Here is something for you to think about, Cypher. If a hundred people see a movie, they see the same movie. If a hundred people read a novel, they read a hundred different novels. That's because each reader is of a certain age, sex, level of education, variety of life experiences and so on. He or she imagines the characters, descriptions, and action slightly differently. Reading a novel is a creative experience. A novel is a joint creation between author and reader. That is why we are inevitably disappointed when we see a movie based on a novel that we've read. I can tell you from much experience that writing a novel is adult play. Similarly reading one is adult play. This all does not mean that reading a novel is superior to watching a movie or flipping through a comic book; they are just different.

avatar

No comic books? Not a one?

None for me. Not allowed. Books and TV. And the other stuff.

Gaiman's good. Maybe great. Alan Moore - fucking genius. Looks like Rasputin, but Watchmen - wonderful. Vendetta - solid. Swamp Thing? Another world. The Bleu would get it.

People still aren't getting that little ole comic books (and animated movies) were stomping their "reasoned debate." Shit, even for analysis. You wanna critique Tony Blair? "Neverwhere" - in book or tv - did it. The columnists? Ha.

Black Friars.

avatar

I have to disagree with your description of the plot of American Gods. It's more about a battle between the Old Gods and the new ones, and how Gods are created and how they die, rather than just the old gods were brought over by immigrants and live among us. There were great ideas in American Gods -- the Techno-kid, the midea god, but I think he didn't flush it out as well as he could have. It's a constante themse of his -- Gods exist as long as someone beleives in them, and the things we worship now are gods in and of themselves. Plus, he was lazy with his names -- Shadow and Mr. Wednesday? C'mon. Shadow?? as a character name.

American Gods was a good concept that didn't really work all played out. Anasi Boys was better, as was Neverwhere. But they were both tighter stories. And even there, h got caught in his own cuteness too often.

As for the Sandman, it was a great run, but has some real lags in it. A Game of You -- even the Kindly Ones -- were pretty weak stories, especially for stories abouot stories.

As much as I have loved his writing, his biggest problem may be he's already written his opus(es) -- "Seasons of Mist" and "The Wake" collections of Sandman. Seasons of Mist was just a great idea played out as well as it could be (with one meaningless interlude). The Wake was just beautiful. All the way around, from the first picture to the last words. Throw in "Men of Good Fortune" and "Sunday Mourning" for a little human perspecive, and that's a body of work he could be proud to show his grandchildren. He'll have a tough time topping those, and I wish him well in the efforts.

I don't actually think I described the plot of American Gods... yes, it's about a battle, it's also about a journey, it's about belief and myth. It's about many things rather than any single thing. And yes, of his books, the plot is the most rambling for sure.

Of Gaiman's books, I think I liked Stardust best, at least when I first read it. But then Smoke and Mirrors had some real gems in it. Gaiman's version of Snow White is a killer, and We Can Get Them For You Wholesale is a brilliant short story, funny and chilling at the same time.

Sandman is hard to live up to, I'd agree with that. But we'll see, maybe Gaiman still has a good story or two in him.

see, this is where I think you would really like structural anthropology. Decoding the deep structure would allow the most interesting comparisons of all types.

Really great stuff Codegen, and a nice Sunday read. Am a major Neil Gaiman fan, btw.

So am I - you'd never have guessed I bet :) Warning: completely useless information follows.

With me the funny thing is that Sandman was almost the last of Gaiman's works I read. The first was either Stardust or Good Omens, I can't remember which. But I do clearly remember being mildly starstruck by Stardust, a book which I sort of randomly picked up at a grocery store because I liked the cover (a habit of mine which produced several highly positive results over the years). Subsequently I got - and enjoyed - Neverwhere and Smoke and Mirrors, and bought hardcover editions of American Gods and Anansi Boys before they were available in paperback.

Because I was never much into comics, I never heard of Sandman when it was first published. And when it started coming out, I was probably too young to appreciate it anyway. But a friend who is a huge comic book fan kept telling me about how great Sandman was. He had the entire run, but at his parents' house - several hundred miles away. He never got around to hauling the comics to town, and I never found the inclination to spend the not entirely insubstantial number of greenbacks on a bunch of comic books.

While traveling, I picked up Endless Nights at an airport - maybe in Cincinnati or in Phoenix, I don't remember exactly. I really liked some of the stories, others not so much. And I didn't understand why there was no Sandman in it. In retrospect I realize that Endless Nights isn't all that representative of Sandman.

Fast forward several years. Different country, different friend. This one had the presence of mind to take his Sandman books with him when he moved away from parents. He loaned me all ten volumes (a bundle of considerable bulk and weight, I should add).

A few days later I was through reading all ten volumes and found myself ordering the ever so slightly overpriced Absolute Sandman edition simply because I realized that Sandman was something I had to have. And hey, the big black books with silver or gold lettering look very impressive in my bookcase, especially as long as visitors don't realize they're comic books. The third (and penultimate) volume arrived just a few days ago...

I was into comics but superhero stuff. I actually didn't read Sandman but was into science fiction and fantasy novels. My cool friends were into Sandman but I first read Gaiman same way you did -- through Good Omens.

I only read Sandman the first time like 4 years ago. A neighbor was moving and put out a a copy of the seventh compilation, an off place to start. But I very quickly bought all the rest and have since read it several times.

And American Gods and Anansi Boys even Coraline.

The guy is just so damned smart and stylish. And I love his fashion advice. He wears black because it goes with everything. Well, everything black.

Have met Gaiman since and he's a real gent. Loves his sushi. I wound up at a big sushi dinner with him, Frank Miller and a bunch of guys from DC.

But I digress into geekiness.

Hey, what's wrong with geekiness? Or digressions?

Black is an excellent color to wear (IMO) but in California it can get a mite impractical. Especially when the sun is shining, which is only most of the time.

The friend who loaned me Sandman is a big sushi fan... maybe there's some connection. He's also a Tori Amos fan, and Tori is friends with Neil. I'm not into sushi but I was a Tori Amos fan long before I knew of the Gaiman connection.

I've not read Coraline yet but it's on my list.

Was also a Tori fan before Neil but they are close. Rumor used to be that Delirium was based on Tori but I think it was later revealed that Delirium was based on the novelist Kathy Acker, another Gaiman pal.

And I heard Delirium was also based on Jill Thompson...

I think the Delirium character predates Gaiman's acquaintance with Amos, but I can easily believe that there is a bit of Tori in Delirium. As usual, the truth is a little complicated.

wait...there are ten volumes? I order two. No wonder it was cheap.

I've only seen one animated movie I liked. It was Finding Nemo. But it was in German. Does that count? I don't know what it is. Oh I lied. I like the one of about the penguins. Okay, there may be hope for me.

Deutsch oder Englisch, das macht kein Unterschied.

Try some Miyazaki. Princess Mononoke, Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind, My Neighbor Totoro, Porco Rosso, Laputa: Castle in the Sky, Spirited Away. All of them very good, and available with decent English voiceovers (falls du kein Japanisch verstehst, genauso wie ich).

Incidentally, Neil Gaiman adapted the English dialog for Princess Mononoke.

Thanks Codegen, I can't promise I'll see all of these, but I'll copy the list and who knows, maybe I'll become a convert. And next time I look at one, I'll think about what you said above, the thing about content vs. form.

Und ich kann KEIN Japanisch ausser Kyo wa i ten ki des nei which I think means "it's a nice day today."

Vielen Dank and Gute Nacht.

Try Jan Švankmejer - not the type of animation you're thinking about, but exactly the point. Also the New York Film Academy or Spike and Mike or someone puts out yearly animation bests - unfortunately Disney and feature-length animation overshadow the more interesting work.

See one or two of those movies... and either you'll want to see the rest or you won't.

"American Gods" is overly simplistic tripe and inconsistent in its own logical universe, in my not very humble opinion. Gaiman, particularly because of the Sandman series, is one of the authors I have most respect for which probably made my disappointment in the story even stronger. A similar but far better text by Gaiman, in collaboration with the brilliant Terry Pratchett, is "Good Omens."

For those yearning for text, my recommendation of the true skill of Gaiman would be the short story collection "Fragile Things" which is absolutely beautiful. Little bite sized pieces of narrative heaven.

To continue with similar tones on the graphic novel front, I would propose reading Alan Moore's "Watchmen," another truly great achievement which has won several prominent literature awards and mentions.

Hell, anything by Alan Moore.

Just goes to show how everything is relative. I read American Gods before I read Sandman and thought it was quite good. Not brilliant like Good Omens but good.

Fragile Things... I don't know. It just didn't grab me. It's not bad but it lacks sharpness and definition. I liked Smoke & Mirrors much better.

As for Alan Moore, I've not read Watchmen (yet) but V for Vendetta is definitely very, very good.

avatar

I think Moore is over-rated -- I thought Watchmen was -- for the time -- really revolutionary. But a recent rereading didn't hold up so well. The whole pirate thing in the middle may have been for effect, but it really intertupted s story that didn't need to be interrupted. I think the same thing about Miller, too, though Dark Knight (the first one) is still VERY strong.

One exception for Moore, though -- "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?". That was a masterpiece.

Thanks for the topic.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address