« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Media Conspiracy The Media Won't Touch
In a story for tomorrow's Washington Post, writer Eli Saslow reveals that white supremacist groups opposed to Obama are attracting new members online. The story frustrates me to no end, because it is one small facet of a much larger and more insidious story that I've been trying to get the MSM to cover for months now. Here is the headline, byline and lead graf of the Post story:
Hate Groups' Newest TargetBig deal, you say. No. It's even bigger than that.
White Supremacists Report an Increase in Visits to Their Web Sites
By Eli Saslow
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 22, 2008;
Page A06
Sen. Barack Obama's historic victory in the Democratic primaries, celebrated in America and across much of the world as a symbol of racial progress and cultural unity, has also sparked an increase in racist and white supremacist activity, mainly on the Internet, according to leaders of hate groups and the organizations that track them.
Everyone knows the GOP is trying to steal the election by swiftboating Obama. But how are they actually doing it? What are the mechanics of smearing played out now in real time? Where did the "Muslim" rumor start? Who's pushing the Rezko and Ayers smears? Who's trying to tie Obama to Hamas?
There is a media conspiracy you very probably don't know much about, but I have documented one small part of it and will tell you what I know. I believe it is the key to understanding GOP tactics in the coming general election.
First, you need to understand that I am no conspiracy enthusiast. I believe Booth, Oswald, Ray and Sirhan each acted alone.
The conspiracy I speak of involves a concerted effort by the Far Right to generate smears about Barack Obama and push them from fringe media into mainstream press accounts. It is a conscious effort involving hundreds of online websites, powerful players in the Christian Right such as James Dobson and willing pawns in broadcast and print.
I sent emails in late March to several prominent journalists. The recipients included Michael Isikoff of Newseek, Mike Allen of Politico, and Pete Jackson of the Associated Press bureau in Pittsburgh. All of them expressed an initial interest that soon fizzled and never resulted in a story. Isikoff, in particular, led me to believe I needed to do more legwork before he would look into it. This is the last email I sent him on the subject:
Michael,
Thank you for hearing me out.
WHAT THIS EMAIL CONTAINS:
1. My contact information
2. An overview of what I've found
3. A summary of what I think it all means
4. A specific example of the viral transmission of a malicious lie about Obama from its source in the extremist underground through three other media, where it finally emerged in the reader comments in the online Washington Post
-------------------------------------
1. My contact info
xxxxx xxxxxx
St Louis MO
314-xxx-xxxx
-------------------------------------
2. What I've found In short, I've traced one of the many conduits of manufactured paranoia about Sen. Obama from its source in extremist groups through Radical Right media to mainstream media. The individuals involved in passing along this particular lie include a Pennsylvania man who describes himself as running a private investigations firm composed of ex-military and ex-CIA but who, in fact, sponsors articles describing Muslims as "apes" and Sen. Obama as "Barack Hussein Osama Obama"; the host of a nationally syndicated Christian Right radio program available to 1,100 stations including U.S. military; and a conservative who describes himself as "currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police."
CONTINUED IN COMMENTS - PLEASE REC
Advertisement












Comments (19)
Please note, the continuation of this post has been submitted and is being held for approval by the blog owner, not me.
June 21, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I will re-attempt my continuation in small parts:
June 21, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
June 21, 2008 11:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have tried three times, unsuccessfully, to post in these comments the final remaining part of my email to several prominent journalists. The portion ommitted traces a lie from its earliest known incarnation on the website of one Doug Hagmann at http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/AboutUs
to the syndicated network radio program "The Laurie Roth Show"
to Jim Kouri, self-described as "currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police" and a writer for an organization funded by James Dobson to disseminate stories into mainstream press
to the reader comments of the Washington Post, where Kouri's article was repeatedly pasted in its entirety.
June 21, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, this has been going on for quite some time.
Check out Robert Greenwald's "Fox Attacks" at Youtube.
His traveling press corp nor the national media did him no favors in squelching these rumors.
This is one of the reasons that Obama has piloted "Fight the Smears" at his website, asked supporters to contribute only to his message campaign, and tightened his traveling press coverage to the "waaaa's" of the MSM.
And I wouldn't worry too much about the articles from the Washington Post since McCain's campaign adviser has financial/ideological connections to the Post.
June 21, 2008 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
What you write of and what I've capsulized here are but tiny tips of an enormous and virulent iceberg. I suspect I could not post the remainder of my email because of the content. It is extreme.
And the point I'm trying to make is that there are 10,000 points of darkness converging on Obama with one mission and a thousand weapons of deceit that are pushing into the MSM from many directions. This is why the MSM tone is consistently skeptical, almost universally negative about Obama.
"Fight the Smears" is great. But it will have its hands full. And worse, the MSM seems not to discriminate among sources or care about the origins of smears. It is no longer the gatekeeper against a very powerful amateur and semi-pro media influence.
June 21, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then it'll be our job to pummel the media with requests to expose these creeps--finally.
Thanks for your efforts, Ripper.
June 22, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, Ripper: rejoin reality! Pretty nice out here.
June 22, 2008 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Mandy. Check out the reality I've posted about and consider not being condescendingly naive.
June 22, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper! Come back! PLEASE!! We need you down here help to save the country, not lost in fantasy.
June 22, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very funny. Follow the links. Google the names. Think. It isn't hard and requires no leaps of imagination, only a willingness to do a small amount of homework.
June 22, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
By the way, the reason the MSM won't discuss this is because the MSM (nearly all of it, not just FOX) are complicit dupes, relying on "stories" bubbling up from the sewers of lesser media.
What's new is that Far Right operatives are aware of the MSM's reliance on first-level reporting by other media. These operatives have created the mechanisms to take advantage of the media's "accuracy firewalls" by piping their filth through enough conduits until credible media sources willingly repeat it. It's like money laundering, only the thing being diverted and given the appearance respectability isn't money, it's lies.
Check out Kouri at:
http://www.thenma.org/NMA%20Staff%20Writers.htm
then check out who owns NMA:
http://www.heritagenewmedia.com/
June 22, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus Ripper. I'm checking out your links, but for now I say, keep going.
June 22, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is horrible, unsurprising, and nothing new. Look at what they said about Adams and Jefferson, Lincoln, Smith. Our political culture has always had this debased undercurrent, and while it's abhorrent and evil, it's only deeply significant when, as with McCarthy, it ascends to governance. Right now, we're on the verge of having a liberal black President. I am not dismissing your point about bigots and extremists who deride our leaders as dupes of our enemies or fundamentally committed to hurting the republic, but it does come with the territory, and we've been living it for 230 years and counting.
June 22, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, but it is new, articleman.
True, we have been living with a culture of smears for some time, and in recent years, coordinated smears. But I am shocked at the nature of the current smear machine, which is both coordinated AND decentralized (making it hard to counter), media savvy (using ALL the levers of old and new media) and focused (able to penetrate mainstream press accounts) in ways that we have NOT lived with even in the last presidential election.
June 22, 2008 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isikoff is a total jerk. Too bad you tried to work with him. Try a "real" journalist like Sy Hersh.
June 22, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the tip.
What seems new to me in all this is that there appears to be a conscious effort to launder these smears through several layers and levels of media in order to gain coverage and credibility in the MSM. This laundering is a new strategy I have not seen before.
June 22, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ripper, interesting post, But I can't let this go without commenting:
"I believe Booth, Oswald, Ray and Sirhan each acted alone."
Come on now. Booth, Axelrod, et al. killed Lincoln (yes, Booth was the lone gunman), wounded Secretary of State Seward and had second thoughts about killing VP A. Johnson. Grant was also to be targeted by Booth but at the last minute the General changed plans and went to Philadelphia instead of Ford's theater. Oswald acting alone - no way. I have a ton of recommended readings on that. Ray and Sirhan acting alone is also problematic although the JFK assassination is my area of expertise.
Back to your main point - Obama is in for hell, but I think he will fight his way through it.
June 22, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it to be very interesting how a half truth, or outright lie, regarding certain political issues finds its way into the mind of American citizens.
Great blog.
June 22, 2008 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment