Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Media Conspiracy The Media Won't Touch

In a story for tomorrow's Washington Post, writer Eli Saslow reveals that white supremacist groups opposed to Obama are attracting new members online. The story frustrates me to no end, because it is one small facet of a much larger and more insidious story that I've been trying to get the MSM to cover for months now. Here is the headline, byline and lead graf of the Post story:

Hate Groups' Newest Target
White Supremacists Report an Increase in Visits to Their Web Sites
By Eli Saslow
Washington Post Staff Writer


Sunday, June 22, 2008;
Page A06

Sen. Barack Obama's historic victory in the Democratic primaries, celebrated in America and across much of the world as a symbol of racial progress and cultural unity, has also sparked an increase in racist and white supremacist activity, mainly on the Internet, according to leaders of hate groups and the organizations that track them.
Big deal, you say. No. It's even bigger than that.

Everyone knows the GOP is trying to steal the election by swiftboating Obama. But how are they actually doing it? What are the mechanics of smearing played out now in real time? Where did the "Muslim" rumor start? Who's pushing the Rezko and Ayers smears? Who's trying to tie Obama to Hamas?

There is a media conspiracy you very probably don't know much about, but I have documented one small part of it and will tell you what I know. I believe it is the key to understanding GOP tactics in the coming general election.

First, you need to understand that I am no conspiracy enthusiast. I believe Booth, Oswald, Ray and Sirhan each acted alone.

The conspiracy I speak of involves a concerted effort by the Far Right to generate smears about Barack Obama and push them from fringe media into mainstream press accounts. It is a conscious effort involving hundreds of online websites, powerful players in the Christian Right such as James Dobson and willing pawns in broadcast and print.

I sent emails in late March to several prominent journalists. The recipients included Michael Isikoff of Newseek, Mike Allen of Politico, and Pete Jackson of the Associated Press bureau in Pittsburgh. All of them expressed an initial interest that soon fizzled and never resulted in a story. Isikoff, in particular, led me to believe I needed to do more legwork before he would look into it. This is the last email I sent him on the subject:

Michael,

Thank you for hearing me out.

WHAT THIS EMAIL CONTAINS:
1. My contact information
2. An overview of what I've found
3. A summary of what I think it all means
4. A specific example of the viral transmission of a malicious lie about Obama from its source in the extremist underground through three other media, where it finally emerged in the reader comments in the online Washington Post


-------------------------------------
1. My contact info
xxxxx xxxxxx
St Louis MO
314-xxx-xxxx

-------------------------------------
2. What I've found In short, I've traced one of the many conduits of manufactured paranoia about Sen. Obama from its source in extremist groups through Radical Right media to mainstream media. The individuals involved in passing along this particular lie include a Pennsylvania man who describes himself as running a private investigations firm composed of ex-military and ex-CIA but who, in fact, sponsors articles describing Muslims as "apes" and Sen. Obama as "Barack Hussein Osama Obama"; the host of a nationally syndicated Christian Right radio program available to 1,100 stations including U.S. military; and a conservative who describes himself as "currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police."

CONTINUED IN COMMENTS - PLEASE REC


Comments (19)

Please note, the continuation of this post has been submitted and is being held for approval by the blog owner, not me.

I will re-attempt my continuation in small parts:

I am a regular reader of online media and often post or read comments appended to articles in the online Washington Post. One of the many comments that attack Sen. Obama in malicious and distorted ways included the pasted-in text of an entire article written by Jim Kouri on another website. This article strongly suggested Sen. Obama funneled money through his dealings with Tony Rezko to Middle Eastern terrorists. I tracked this article to its source, where I found the author was really writing about the "revelations" in a radio program aired over the USA Radio Network (1,100 affiliate stations). Later, I discovered the program, "The Laurie Roth Show," most likely got its information from the guest that day -- a guest who runs his own extremist website and who is now a weekly regular guest of the show.
3. I call it the New McCarthyism, a widespread and rabidly xenophobic effort to smear the patriotism of -- and permanently disable -- politicians such as (most often but not exclusively) Sen. Barack Obama. It is a semi-coordinated campaign of fear and malicious innuendo not seen since the days of Joseph McCarthy and that exceeds even the Swiftboating of John Kerry in its roots and ambition.

It is differentiated -- at least in my mind -- from the usual hardball politics even of the 527 groups by its utter abandonment of fact, logic and ethics. It most closely resembles the Red baiting of the McCarthy era or the Nazi propaganda of 1930s Germany in its appeal to public fears of an INTENTIONAL national betrayal, its blatant and willful disregard for fact and its mission to destroy reputations and careers. (In the last few days, I searched Google for the phrase "New McCarthyism" and found a Nov. 12, 2007, article in The Nation that detailed a strikingly similar campaign against Muslim academics and confirmed my independently formulated description of the New McCarthyism: "There is an undeniable security threat, but as in the 1950s the New McCarthyites use it as a base for demagogy. Their distinguishing feature is not concern about this threat but cynical indifference to the truth or decency of their charges." http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071112/cohler-esses )

Rather than being coordinated by a senator and his staff, the attacks are often self-coordinated (viral) and are spread through an exceptionally large and influential underground network of people feeding off one another's paranoia until the lie breaks through the "buzz threshold" and emerges into mainstream media. Rather than exposing the lies and their source, mainstream media treats each bit of innuendo or malice as a separate story. In fact, most of the lies and distortions are traceable back to the network of extremists.

The New McCarthyism'sl "image terrorists" operate under none of the usual journalistic restraints such as ethics, sources, facts or logic, but play on the same fears of another 9/11 used over more than six years by the Bush Administration. The New McCarthyism includes use of "old media" such as radio and print, but more significantly, launches its attacks using the web's exponentially expanding ability to spread viral messages through email, online newspaper feedback forums, diaries, articles, blogs and audio/video services such as YouTube.

I have tried three times, unsuccessfully, to post in these comments the final remaining part of my email to several prominent journalists. The portion ommitted traces a lie from its earliest known incarnation on the website of one Doug Hagmann at http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/AboutUs

to the syndicated network radio program "The Laurie Roth Show"

to Jim Kouri, self-described as "currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police" and a writer for an organization funded by James Dobson to disseminate stories into mainstream press

to the reader comments of the Washington Post, where Kouri's article was repeatedly pasted in its entirety.

Yeah, this has been going on for quite some time.

Check out Robert Greenwald's "Fox Attacks" at Youtube.

His traveling press corp nor the national media did him no favors in squelching these rumors.

This is one of the reasons that Obama has piloted "Fight the Smears" at his website, asked supporters to contribute only to his message campaign, and tightened his traveling press coverage to the "waaaa's" of the MSM.

And I wouldn't worry too much about the articles from the Washington Post since McCain's campaign adviser has financial/ideological connections to the Post.

What you write of and what I've capsulized here are but tiny tips of an enormous and virulent iceberg. I suspect I could not post the remainder of my email because of the content. It is extreme.

And the point I'm trying to make is that there are 10,000 points of darkness converging on Obama with one mission and a thousand weapons of deceit that are pushing into the MSM from many directions. This is why the MSM tone is consistently skeptical, almost universally negative about Obama.

"Fight the Smears" is great. But it will have its hands full. And worse, the MSM seems not to discriminate among sources or care about the origins of smears. It is no longer the gatekeeper against a very powerful amateur and semi-pro media influence.

Then it'll be our job to pummel the media with requests to expose these creeps--finally.

Thanks for your efforts, Ripper.

avatar

Hey, Ripper: rejoin reality! Pretty nice out here.

Hey Mandy. Check out the reality I've posted about and consider not being condescendingly naive.

avatar

Ripper! Come back! PLEASE!! We need you down here help to save the country, not lost in fantasy.

Very funny. Follow the links. Google the names. Think. It isn't hard and requires no leaps of imagination, only a willingness to do a small amount of homework.

By the way, the reason the MSM won't discuss this is because the MSM (nearly all of it, not just FOX) are complicit dupes, relying on "stories" bubbling up from the sewers of lesser media.

What's new is that Far Right operatives are aware of the MSM's reliance on first-level reporting by other media. These operatives have created the mechanisms to take advantage of the media's "accuracy firewalls" by piping their filth through enough conduits until credible media sources willingly repeat it. It's like money laundering, only the thing being diverted and given the appearance respectability isn't money, it's lies.

Check out Kouri at:

http://www.thenma.org/NMA%20Staff%20Writers.htm

then check out who owns NMA:

http://www.heritagenewmedia.com/

avatar

Jesus Ripper. I'm checking out your links, but for now I say, keep going.

I think it is horrible, unsurprising, and nothing new. Look at what they said about Adams and Jefferson, Lincoln, Smith. Our political culture has always had this debased undercurrent, and while it's abhorrent and evil, it's only deeply significant when, as with McCarthy, it ascends to governance. Right now, we're on the verge of having a liberal black President. I am not dismissing your point about bigots and extremists who deride our leaders as dupes of our enemies or fundamentally committed to hurting the republic, but it does come with the territory, and we've been living it for 230 years and counting.

Oh, but it is new, articleman.

True, we have been living with a culture of smears for some time, and in recent years, coordinated smears. But I am shocked at the nature of the current smear machine, which is both coordinated AND decentralized (making it hard to counter), media savvy (using ALL the levers of old and new media) and focused (able to penetrate mainstream press accounts) in ways that we have NOT lived with even in the last presidential election.

avatar

Isikoff is a total jerk. Too bad you tried to work with him. Try a "real" journalist like Sy Hersh.

Thanks for the tip.

What seems new to me in all this is that there appears to be a conscious effort to launder these smears through several layers and levels of media in order to gain coverage and credibility in the MSM. This laundering is a new strategy I have not seen before.

Ripper, interesting post, But I can't let this go without commenting:

"I believe Booth, Oswald, Ray and Sirhan each acted alone."

Come on now. Booth, Axelrod, et al. killed Lincoln (yes, Booth was the lone gunman), wounded Secretary of State Seward and had second thoughts about killing VP A. Johnson. Grant was also to be targeted by Booth but at the last minute the General changed plans and went to Philadelphia instead of Ford's theater. Oswald acting alone - no way. I have a ton of recommended readings on that. Ray and Sirhan acting alone is also problematic although the JFK assassination is my area of expertise.

Back to your main point - Obama is in for hell, but I think he will fight his way through it.

I find it to be very interesting how a half truth, or outright lie, regarding certain political issues finds its way into the mind of American citizens.

Great blog.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

November 16-20

http://orbooks.com/files/going-rouge-small.jpg

Coming Soon



November 30-December 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address