Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Pluribus ≠ Parasites

Both of my parents were Kansas Republicans.  I have a vague recollection of some low-level animosity toward FDR and I knew at the time that Dewey was the candidate for whom my parents had voted, but, in genereal, politics and polemics of any knind were not part of my middle-class, middle-America life growing up. It was a typical *American*, small-town, church on Sunday, Jack Benny on the radio, ice cream socials in the summer, Saturday night movies in the main street theater or the drive-in existence.

So it was with some consternation and trepidation that I found myself, my two young children and my (now ex) husband headed for a post overseas.  To illustrate how long ago this was, we flew onthe long-defunct Braniff International Airways.  The coach cabin had four wide seats across, two on each side, and enough leg room that a 6'6" man was comfortable throughout the long flight.  The service and meals were five star (or nearly so it seemed to me at the time).  My year-old son took his steps inthe aisle which was much broader than airlinger aisles are today.

As the plane took off for points known geographically, but unknown in any other sense to me, I thought literally about the "amber waves of grain" we were passing over and wondered what I had gotten myself into.  The experience of living abroad was extraordinary, of course.  I loved it and quite naturally it broadened my worldview considerably.  In fact, I was not entirely thrilled with the idea of returning to the States after five years away. 

I long ago became an urban Democrat and I delight in finding people who like to discuss politics.  While I have moved in an entirely different direction, I still remember how it felt to be a *real (raised as a Republican) American*. My life was filled with pride of country and patriotism. You're thinking "how naive" probably and you would be right.  But you have to remember those were the days before cable television, and before the Kennedy-Nixon televised debate, and it was even before the Huntley Brinkley Nightly News.  Compared to today we were isolated.

Which brings me finally to an article by Mark Schmitt in The American Prospect: Can Identity Politics Save the Right?  According to Schmitt

[t]raditionally, the phrase "identity politics" has referred to the Democratic coalition's caucuses, interest groups and competitive claims of wrongs to be righted and rights to be granted. Identity politics on the left, according to this very conventional wisdom, opened the door to an alternative politics of national identity on the right.
Schmitt notes elsewhere that neocon pundit David Frum considers these traditional Democratic Party constituencies - what Frum calls the pluribus in e pluribus unum - to be parasites. Because the Republican Party is bankrupt of ideas he adds


[t]hat this year the Republican argument is reduced to its barest essence: Americans versus "pluribus", unprotected by the politeness of issues or safer symbolism,


which is the origin of McCain's slogan: The American President Americans Are Waiting For.


Schmitt concludes


if it works, it will be in part because we--by which I mean the media and many Democrats believe it will.  We are easily spooked by the confident swagger of the Republicans, who not so long ago were plotting permanent world domination.

So will it work?  Will we continue to be spooked by possible repercussions if we stand firm on principle?  Will Obama's rapid fire and firm rebuttals to GOP attacks keep them at bay?  Will the Republicans succeed in painting themselves as the only *real Americans*?  Will enough people fall for this shallow ploy? As a former *real American* I have hope that it won't work, but I'm not convinced we have enough self confidence yet to stop them.


Comments (3)

avatar

I enjoyed your post. It always fascinates me how utterly transformative living (as opposed to holidaying) in another country is.

With regard to your fundamental premise/question, it seems to me that identity politics are the most powerful when the hip-pocket nerve isn't in play. We saw that strongly in the primary where there was so little effective difference in actual policies.

What's really worrying now is how quickly & shockingly the issues have changed from being seen as the perfect backdrop for Democrats to favouring McCain and the GOP.

The polls are dreadful. 62% nationally want offshore drilling. 61% of Floridians think offshore drilling would lower the price of gas and support McCain's position, not Obama's. ".. when voters are told McCain supports offshore drilling, his lead goes up to 11 percentage points — shattering conventional wisdom that offshore drilling is a killer issue in the Sunshine State."
(Washington Times, `the polls giveth'). 51-41 want more nuclear power plants. Only 47% think global warming is a function of human activity.
Mccain has a big lead over Obama on perceptions of who'd handle terrorism best. (The last poll I saw was 41-30 (Yahoo, April) and I saw that confirmed this week on one of the cable shows.

The media is really helping McCain in portraying Iraq as a glowing success now.

This whole campaign is turned upside down at the moment and who knows where it will be in three months time? But I'd bet a great deal that, if the hip pocket nerve is at stake, then identity politics will only sway those voters who can afford them.


Wonderful post, gettex. I'm glad you were able to get it posted at last!

You know, I think the Republicans don't realize it, but they're quickly becoming irrelevant. There are quite a few reasons for this, but I think the two most powerful reasons for the rapid evaporation of their power in the American public are (1) serious survival issues (economic) have supplanted our previous preoccupation with fear of terrorist attack; and (2) new voters, who simply can't see any relevance to the Republican identity mongering, have become energized and are participating in politics.

The last seven years have been helpful to the extent that greater numbers of Americans have become alarmed at the direction our government has taken, both domestically and internationally. The people who currently populate the Republican Party have set the agenda over the last decade, and Americans are generally very displeased with the results. As a result, greater numbers of us are paying attention to politics becoming engaged.

Many are alarmed at the economic realities that hit them personally. Hard. We can't simply tune out the reality of gas and food prices, mortgage foreclosures and plummeting real estate values putting us "under water" in home equity, Interstate Highway bridges crumbling, job loss, erosion of our incomes and savings, health care costs etc. Hearing the Republicans' phony talk about patriotism and fear of the others doesn't help fix any of those problems. They have nothing to offer.

The young first-timers and the previously-apathetic moderates, who have become motivated to get out and vote this time, don't view existence through that "real (raised as Republican) American" perspective you described. The Republicans' old anti-liberal scare language simply makes no sense to them--it's obsolete. The language still has a lot of meaning to the old-time Republicans who learned to hate "the Godless, anti-American liberals" (whoever the hell they are) but the young and the moderates (formerly apolitical)--they're saying, "What the hell are they babbling about? They're not saying anything about what to do about all these problems we're having!"

It's funny how rapidly obsolescence can set in, isn't it?

Thanks, Fran and Laura.

I live is a part of the country that is crawling with Republicans. I feel completely disenfranchised because I have nothing but bush backers to represent me. It feels like the 20-30% who are still backing him are living on my street, or certainly in my state. We're still fighting the commies here. Maybe the demographics make me especially sensitive to the disaster that awaits if they were to win.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


September 15-20

Book Cover

September 22-27

Book Cover

September 29-October 3

Book Cover

October 6-10

Book Cover

October 13-17

Book Cover

October 20-24

Book Cover

December 1-5

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address