« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Olbermann Special Comment Needed Monday Night
An Open Letter to Keith Olbermann
It seems to me that you owe it to your viewers, and to yourself, to make a special commentary Monday night regarding Sen. Clinton's speech today where she officially dropped out of the race.
I'm a long time fan of Countdown and I enthusiastically supported the two special commentaries you made in regards to Clinton over the course of these primaries. On Saturday afternoon, however, it seems that you misread her speech. Jeremy Gerard writes at the HuffingtonPost: "...Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews started spinning the speech. Their first words were concerned with the number of minutes Clinton spent 'patting herself on the back' before mentioning Obama, and whether her endorsement would be perceived as strong enough to send her supporters into the Obama camp."
Admittedly, I didn't see you or Mr. Matthew's commentary on the speech live. Immediately after it was over I was on the phone with my father talking about what a surprisingly wonderful speech it had been. "More than I had ever expected," my dad noted. "Perfect," I replied, "and impressive." I figured that everyone would agree with that assessment and, for the most part, I've been correct.
Then I read Gerard's piece and was shocked to learn that you had been so wrong during your initial commentary. I was shocked because I'm a huge admirer of your political instincts. I don't often think that you're wrong but in this case you clearly was. And I think you should own up to it.
A special commentary about this on Monday night, directed either specifically at yourself or a more general "pro-Hillary" commentary to thank her for her speech today, would go a long way in keeping my level of respect for you high. One thing I've always liked about you is that you've always been quick to admit when you're wrong.
Today, you were. Hillary gave a wonderful speech. I'm not sure I'll ever forgive her for some of the things she did during the course of this campaign, but before this speech I was certain I never would. Now I have to admit there's a chance I will. After speaking with pro-Hillary supporters the feeling seems mutual. They seem more likely, after this speech, to support Obama then they had been before.
In other words it was a successful speech, Mr. Olbermann. You and Matthews were wrong in your initial assessment of it. I think it'd be a wonderful thing if you aimed that special-commentary gun at yourself this time, or at least used it to give Clinton the thanks she deserves.
Sincerely,
jmk
P.S. If, of course, Gerard misrepresented your initial commentary after the speech (like I said I never watched it live) you should instead put him on your "worst persons" list. If you do that, though, make it the bronze.





Comments (14)
are you kidding?
keith and tweety bird were gushing over the speech...
June 8, 2008 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched MSNBC and I distinctly remember getting the sense that both Keith and Chris were recognizing the speech as being historic, important, genuine and well-delivered. Then throughout the entire day the buzz on Hillary and her speech has been reverent and respectful with politician after politician coming on to heap praise upon her.
Gerard is absolutely reading too much into it.
June 8, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
He blasted her for the RK assassination debacle, perhaps rightfully so. I think he will give a gracious commentary on Monday because, on this count, she deserves one.
June 8, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
keith is so in the tank for obama it is frightening. personally, i think the media is feely guilty that they helped to influence the election to get bush in over gore. they were also derelict in the run up to the iraq war.
this major quilt has them feeling they have to make it right. they have longed moved from reporting the news to deciding how to influence our election process. when jonathan alter stated they were upset that the clintons were rude to them in the beginnning of the primary and that a few of them had decided it was time to turn the page on the clintons i was truly blown away by the arrogance. i have a feeling when mccain wins they are going to look back and realize they are the main ones who lost the dems another election for putting the weakest candidate forth for election.
June 8, 2008 2:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Just stop. let it go.
June 8, 2008 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I sit here analyzing an analysis of an analysis of an analysis to give my analysis of whether an analyst's analysis was correct when analyzing an analyst's analysis and suddenly the words analysts and analysis have lost all meaning and substance, as if they ever did in the first place.
June 8, 2008 3:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched MSNBC the whole time, and Olbermann and Matthews absolutely gushed over Clinton's speech. The point Gerard makes probably references the fact that they broke it down into several parts, while admiring how beautifully she moved from one step to the next in order to draw her audience along with her from the grief to the next step. I don't know if either of them used the term "patting herself on the back," but if they did, it wasn't part of a longer, negative narrative.
Seriously. They loved it at much as I did.
June 8, 2008 8:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wish Olbermann would simply retire his "special comments".
June 8, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody owes Clinton a thing. She's run a divisive campaign, seeking to stoke resentment along racial lines (see the comment by her supporter, NJ's Andrews, who apparently has since been shut down).
The amplification of every sexist remark, no matter by whom, to anger women, plus Clinton's jumping on Obama as "elite" and even dismissing economists who didn't support a gas tax holiday as "elite," were the second and third tracks of the resentment-stoking divide/conquer strategy.
It didn't get her the nomination but it shouldn't all be forgotten in a willfully blind call to kumbaya. You can't obliterate an ugly smear of a presidential campaign with one speech (that was mostly about her, anyway, no matter how giddy people get about her throwing in a gratuitous "yes we can.")
Those who do not learn from history,as the old saying goes, are doomed to repeat it. Those who don't recognize how they've been manipulated by politicians, are going to be manipulated in the same ways by subsequent politicians.
Her campaign strategy was all about exploiting bias. Nobody owes her a special comment for finally stopping. It's more important to remember that she wouldn't stop even on the night she definitively lost and only did due to overwhelming pressure.
June 8, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Olbermann is a disgrace to journalism. That he closes is show with a line from a great TV journalist deepens my disgust. He's just the other "O" on cable, both more interested in celebrity than truth. I'm embarrassed that MSNBC would use such a biased opinion as an anchor on an election night.
June 8, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Go eat some white meat...
June 8, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tell me when you know the names of the notes above the 12th fret, deadhead.
June 8, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
They did talk about how she went "about six minutes in" before mentioning Obama. At some point, though I believe not strongly enough, they did say she needed to work up to it because her audience, after all, was her supporters. I think he does need to say something Monday night that avoids such nitpicking.
June 8, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm waiting for Hillary to apologize for tearing Obama apart and hurting his chances in Nov.
No kidding, this Hillary made everything different by her speech is quite frankly nauseating. She hurt the nominee and the party- make no mistakes- and some of those wounds may not be healed in time.
Who cares what Olbermann thinks, really. But if has to make a special comment, better it have a lot of caveats.
Thank you for a great speech, but pls don't forget you f'ked up the party for a lot of us before calling it a night
June 8, 2008 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment