Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Mr. Obama's Neighborhood Revisited

avatar

It's a questionable undertaking at best to set out to refuting anything published by the Weekly Standard--it usually violates the "teaching the pig to sing" principle, wherein trying to teach the pig to sing wastes your time and annoys the pig.

Having said that, I knew it was only a matter of time before someone, as in this Weekly Standard post, attempts to smear Obama with the "alienness" of his home neighborhood in Hyde Park.  This is of a piece with David Brooks's statement on MSBC that Obama wouldn't eat at an Applebee's.

One of the many ironies here is that Brooks is an alum of the University of Chicago.  In fact, Brooks's 25th college reunion was just last week.  I know because my boss, also an alum, was his classmate.  (My boss also got better grades than Brooks did in political economy.)  I haven't yet ascertained whether Brooks made it back to his alma mater for the reunion.

If he had, and if he had a lick of insight, I wonder if he would perceive the Hyde Park neighborhood of today significantly transformed from the one he knew as a college student?  From the grim days of white flight, urban renewal and "mote building," Hyde Park is now a center of an ever-expanding ring of re-developing urban neighborhoods.  Hyde Park has long been an ethnically and economically integrated neighborhood, but I have the strong conviction that integration is now more welcomed and less grudging than it was 20 or 30 years ago.  The black middle class, which has always sustained Hyde Park as much or more than the University of Chicago, has continued to attract African American professionals to the neighborhood.  The area is home to growing list of quality public and private schools -- like many "college towns," Hyde Park is very education- and kid-focused and friendly.  Crime in Hyde Park is low by urban standards, often lower than the much tonier Lincoln Park neighborhood on Chicago's more glamorous North Side.

In short, Hyde Park looks a lot like many stable-to-prosperous suburbs or smaller towns in America:  somewhat insular, kind of dull, but very family-focused.  Or, just the sort of place that the National Review should feel at home; and, the U of C is even the intellectual home of Milton Friedman and Antonin Scalia.  However, Hyde Park DOES distinguish itself with its remarkable ethnic and economic diversity, and therein lies the biggest surface difference that NRO and Brooks want to exploit.  For, being on the "scary" South Side of Chicago, Hyde Park doesn't succeed very well, still, in attracting the kind of chain stores and restaurants common in the suburbs.  We have a Boston Market, and that's about it.  So Brooks is right, I guess, in that Obama may not have much experience at Applebee's, but that's as much Applebee's fault as Obama's.

What Obama does have is 53rd Street.  When the U of C demolished much of the neighborhood in order to save it, back in the 1950s and 1960s, one of the biggest casualties was the commercial zones along 55th Street.  As a result, even though it is smaller, narrower, etc., 53rd has become the default commercial strip for the area.  53rd is home to some of our few national chains (Dunkin Donuts, Baskin Robbins, Boston Market, Starbuck's) and an even larger number of local spots too numerous to mention.  A few stand out.  There's Leona's, a local Chicago chain very similar to Applebee's, which opened in the nabe a few years ago.   53rd Street also has Rajun Cajun, a soul food meets Indian restaurant (I kid not) run by a delightful family from Gujarat by way of Kenya.  They took over the Soul Food restaurant spot and kept the fried chicken, greens and mac 'n cheese to retain the customer base, but now also serve the soul alongside dal, chana masala, and lamb curry. 

Finally, and most significantly, there is Valois.  Obama is (was) a Valois regular.  Valois (pronounced Val-oyz, in case you wondered) proudly sports the motto "see your food." It is one of the last of that dying breed -- the urban lunch counter/cafeteria.  The cooks are Greek and the serving staff hail from, well, all over.  The food is reliable, affordable and decently nutritious (if you so choose).  You can get scrumptious ham off the bone, one of the city's best Reubens, prime rib and mashed potatoes, sometimes short ribs or a lamb shank, fantastic baked chicken.  It's a meeting ground for the neighborhood -- SRO residents, police, tradespeople, local shop keepers, sports fans, college students, young families wanting an alternative to the Golden Arches.  In fact, it's unique sociology was chronicled in a book about the cross-cultural connections forged at the Valois's often scarce tables.

In short, Valois is the kind of place you go when you don't have an Applebee's.  Or, maybe it's the kind of place you have in your neighborhood before you have an Applebee's.  I don't know.  I DO know Valois (despite the name) is as rock-solid American as they come.  Whether you come from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Mississippi or Nebraska, the food at Valois is sure to hit the spot.

I don't know if David Brooks ever ate at Valois during his college years.  Maybe he was a regular.  Maybe he was afraid to set foot north of 55th Street.  If he missed out on Valois then or during the recent reunion weekend, he missed an opportunity to understand what is so appealing about Obama -- his embrace of classical American ideals, with that embrace strengthened by and inflected through a celebration of America's stunning and unprecedented diversity.


Comments (9)

Oh how little you understand about real Americans! Real Americans, by the way, are at the salad bar at Applebee's. Applebee's doesn't have a salad bar, you say? What an unamerican utterance. It made me choke on my flag lapel pin.

Good lord. You wouldn't catch me dead in an Applebee's. If I wanted to eat microwaved frozen food, I'd do it at home.

avatar

I don't have anything against Applebee's. I got some food from there when taking care of my mom in Texas last year. It was not half bad. It certainly has healthier options than the typical fast food joint.

I just wanted to note that Applebee's, along with lots of other national retail, tends to ignore neighborhoods in places like the South Side of Chicago, even though those neighborhoods look demographically similar to the suburbs they locate in. It could be lingering racism, but I think it's even more likely just ignorance and unfamiliarity. There are certainly Applebee's in Chicago suburbs that have large black populations. My guess is Applebee's (like many retail chains) doesn't know HOW to business in urban America, and therefore tends not to.

I wouldn't mind an Applebee's somewhere in my 'hood, especially if it came with, say, a Target! (There is a very nice Target now only 30 blocks north, but something closer would be even more delightful).

Applebee's, as well as Chili's, and all the "TGI McFunsters" of the world (Thank you, Anthony Bourdain!) want large parking lots around them, and often are required to have them by local zoning codes. This is very expensive in a core urban area, and a large square footage of land put to non-revenue-generating use in order to be able to merely open the doors is not a good business practice.

Funny you should mention the 2 together.

Here in DA BRONX there's a new smallish shopping center, a couple of years old, on 225th & Broadway next to the Marble Hill Housing Projects (city-owned low income, 11 buildings, 1600 units) on the #1 subway.

It has only one big store, that store is Target because Target liked the location and they were welcome there (big box stores are not welcome everywhere in the tri-state area.)

The center has a street level Applebee's.

The Target store is a madhouse with people coming from allover the Bronx and upper West Manhattan including Harlem, really noisy, long lines, and they can't keep the shelves stocked.

The Applebee's always seems crowded with people of many colors. Surbuban chain restaurants are still very much interesting exotica here, especially for those type of working class peeps who don't have a car and don't travel much outside of the reach of the subway system. A lot of those people like clean nice inexpensive sit-down restaurants. The greasy spoon mom & pop take out places glamorized in Spike Lee movies about the boros are not so cool when that is all you've got and all you've ever had.

I think the stores there got tax incentives from the city but I am not sure because I didn't follow the story that closely.

avatar

Yeah, but the 225 and B'way Target is just across the Elevated 1 from Riverdale, which, its location notwithstanding, has little to do with DA Bronx.

I disagree and I know both nabes well, can do particulars if you want to get into it. I am a Kingsbridge resident now, used to live in northern Riverdale (north of wealthy private Fieldston, on Yonkers' border.) Riverdalians almost all have cars and don't go down there, they go to Westchester to shop big box or mall stores.

It's not Riverdale, it's Kingsbridge and is very lower middle class and extremely mixed, very rainbow.

That shopping center, I've been there often enough to know, and its demo is heavily Kingsbridge, Washington Heights, Inwood and Harlem people, majority of shoppers are Hispanic, black and immigrants of other "colors"--Fillipinos, SE Asians, Arabs--you see Islamic and Hindu attire often enough--subway users almost all, plain old whites are a minority of shoppers. The parking lot always has spaces in it, it's never full, but the stores always are. Seriously, I've been in quite a few Targets around the country and I've never seen a Target store so unable to keep stock on its shelves or with such long lines to pay.

There is southern Riverdale on the other side, it is on a hill and you have to take a bus from the subway to get there, and it is heavily Orthodox Jewish in middle class apartment buildings; they have their own little shopping area of Mom & Pop kosher shops and you don't often see them down in the Kingsbridge area.

The real Riverdale of wealth, Fieldston, is not accessible by subway, it's north of the subway, it's actually a private community with its own security, that's how it happened that a wealthy area was maintained within the Bronx through the bad days of the 70's, if you understand the urban history. It's actually a joke to anyone living in this area that stores in the 231st area subway stop put "Riverdale" in their name, it's Kingsbridge trying to sound fancy. People in the real Riverdale get in their cars and don't ever see Kingsbridge or any other part of the Bronx south of 240th unless there's a traffic jam on the highway. We're sorta untouchable mass transit people to them. :-)

I really take umbrage to the suggestion that Kingsbridge is not the "real" Bronx, because I think it is, it's as real as it can get, and I like it, especially as an antidote to working in the unreality of Manhattan of today. It's nothing like Riverdale, either.

Hyde Park is dominated by the University, but at least half the population has no connection to the university. Most university students are liberal, that's true , but Chicago famously has a faculty that runs the gamut with some of the most important scholars of every ideological stripe. Without a doubt, the University is the most intellectually intense place you will ever be.

Hyde Park is certainly a middle class, upper middle class to wealthy neighborhood, but this is not some gated community. If you walk a few city blocks in any direction you are in several of the poorest neighborhoods in the city. It is as close to racially diverse neighborhood as you will find in Chicago. People unfamiliar with Chicago geography may not realize that Hyde park is smack in the middle of one of the largest black ghettos in America (and by ghetto I mean a neighborhood intentionally constructed to keep a certain population within certain boundaries.

I seriously doubt David Brooks ever went to the Leather Lounge, or Alexander's to hear some of the best jazz anywhere in America, to The Other Place, or Leon's for Ribs. White folks go to the Checkerboard. They don't go to The Other Place.

Finally, three words:

Harold's Chicken Shack


avatar

Economides -- the Ultra Man avatar rawks!

One clarification -- Hyde Park has long had household incomes slightly below the median of the city of Chicago (I have occasion to look at these things every year or so). I've never done enough research to determine whether it is the student population dragging down the average or a result broadly reflective of the community.

Also, while there is no doubt that large swaths of the South Side of Chicago were once a fairly rigidly enforced ghetto, I don't think that's a fair characterization anymore. Everyone who wanted to move out probably has, and more recent newcomers (like myself) are here because we want to be -- it's affordable, close to the lake, close to downtown, close to work, great schools, etc. Redevelopment, like in many formerly forbidding New York nabes, has really taken hold throughout the South Side, from the Loop down to 63rd street (and somewhat beyond). Obama fits that mold of newer residents to a tee.

I intentionally didn't mention Harold's because a) I wanted to avoid the stereotype, and b) the 53rd Street Harold's has REALLY gone down hill in quality the last 10 years, in my experience. Now that it's perfectly safe and respectable to go there, the food isn't very good -- I swear they're taking those wings off the chicks just after hatching.

Chicago foodies seem to agree that two best places for BBQ on the South Side are Barbara Ann's (at Cottage Grove and 76th) and Uncle John's (at 69th and Calumet). Both are the result of the amazing Mack, one of the world's great pitmasters.

Artappraiser and Lawton -- I really appreciated the discussion of Target and Applebee's in the Bronx. I think it helps confirm the notion that the chains don't operate in built-up urban areas because their business models don't fit them--but they are slowly learning to adapt, where it makes money to do. Chicago (and even suburban Oak Lawn) now have more urban Target stores that fit a built-up landscape better.

At a deeper level, the whole urban/Applebee's/alien argument reflects the demographic divides of the 20th century. Obama, by his very person, represents a younger, less racially polarized America. The young people (of all ethnicities) buying condos in Bronzeville in Chicago just don't see the "Otherness" as threateningly as earlier generations, and Obama is their standard-bearer.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address