You've probably heard by now that the Supreme Court let
Exxon off the hook for $2 billion in punitive damages for the 1989
Exxon Valdez oil spill, the worst in the nation's history.


To put that $2 billion into perspective: That's roughly the net profit
Exxon earns every three weeks, but not enough to "rebuild the dying
town and businesses the Valdez has left behind," as Dahlia Lithwick
pointed out on Slate a few months ago.

Yet it's a bit much for five business-friendly members of this Supreme
Court.


Talk about judicial activism. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pointed
out in her dissent, the court had little to no legal basis for reducing
the punitive damages awarded by lower courts. "The new law made by the
court should have been left to Congress," she wrote. 



Why is the current conservative court so boldly crossing the line that,
if you believe most right-wingers, should "separate law-interpreting
from law-making in our courts"?


For answers, check out the March New York Times Magazine story on
"Supreme Court, Inc.", which notes the increasing frequency with which
the nation's highest court is siding with corporate interests. In its
first two terms, the Roberts Court has ruled in favor of corporate
defendants in every antitrust case it took on. Every single case.


As the Times Magazine notes, "A generation ago, progressive and
consumer groups petitioning the court could count on favorable majority
opinions written by justices who viewed big business with skepticism."
But no more. Further, it notes that this sea change in the court
"represents the culmination of a carefully planned, behind-the-scenes
campaign over several decades to change not only the courts, but the
country's political culture."


Change of a different nature is in the air this year. But if we're
going to repair the damage being wrought by this court in the Exxon
Valdez case and others, if we're going to someday replace the corporate
judges who now dominate our federal courts with judges who rule
according to the law and in favor of the people, we need to raise our
voices, we need to organize our friends and neighbors, and we need to
start now.
Click here
to send a message to Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, to make a
commitment to stopping future corporate judges from joining the Supreme
Court.