« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
James Dobson, amateur God expert....
By
now, most Americans have heard the name James Dobson. They know that he
his one of the most influential leaders of the Christian conservative
movement in this country. They assume, therefore, that he must be
either an ordained minister or a noted theologian to have achieved such
preeminence. But in fact he is neither. His area of expertise is
psychology in which he holds a doctoral degree. His theological
expertise is self-bestowed, based upon the fact that he comes from a
long line of Nazarene evangelicals. And that his father was an
itinerant evangelist.
I have slightly better credentials
vis-a-vis the subject of theology in so far as I studied to be a Roman
Catholic priest for 11 1/2 years, was ordained a deacon, and hold a
Masters of Divinity degree. That more than qualifies me to make the
following comment: James Dobson doesn't know crap about theology. Oh
he's well-versed in the narrow fundamentalist view of the Bible as the
true Word of God as written. But he shows absolutely zero understanding
of the complexity of the Bible as an historical and sociological set of
writings in addition to it's primary purpose as a tool for teaching
moral values and a belief in a higher Being.
Dr. Dobson would
probably be amazed to learn that the story of creation found in Genesis
has its roots in most of the early civilizations which had almost
exactly the same stories which can be found in the reference work The Ancient Near-Eastern Texts.
He would be further amazed to learn that the writers of the biblical
books drew heavily upon their experience of the world around them. They
then took those beliefs and practices of the so-called "pagan" cultures
and redacted them to conform to and confirm the unique monotheistic
belief of the Jewish people.
Okay. enough of the mini-theology
lesson. The point is, is that Dobson is no more qualified to comment or
question Barack Obama's own belief and understanding of Christianity
and the Bible then I am to comment on and question Dr. Dobson's. Faith
and belief in a Supreme Being are unique to every believer. It can't be
stamped out with a cookie cutter so that every one blindly and
unquestionally follows a rigid dogma.
And it is because of this
rigid extreme fundamentalist form of Christianity propagated by Dobson,
et al that has brought us to where we are now.
Over the last
thirty years or so, the Republican party has appropriated or co-opted
most of what we once thought of as "American" values. From the
"sanctity" of marriage between a man and a woman, to the "right to bear
arms", to sexual abstinence for the un-married, these titans of moral
rectitude have lead the fight for America, the Christian nation. With a
blazing cross held high, they have succeeded in turning the message of
the Christ into a political manifesto.
Marx's
definition of religion as the "opiate of the masses" no longer obtains.
Religion now is the crack cocaine of the masses. No longer do the
oligarchs and dictators use religion as a soporific to keep the masses
in a perpetual state of malleability and acquiescence but rather it has
become a powerful stimulant to urge the masses forward to do battles
against the forces of evil that would destroy our Christian nation.
And
just like crack cocaine, the Republicans brand of Christianity is just
as highly addictive and self-destructive. And just like the pusher on
the street touting the reasons why you just gotta try some because
it'll make you feel real good, the Republican pushers use religion as
something you gotta have to overcome your fear of those evil-doers.
So
it's really just classic stimulus-response psychology. The more you
take, the more you need. Until you can't imagine your life without it.
The line that gets you coming back for more is: "See! The faith of our
Christian nation has protected us since 9/11. Don't lose faith brothers
and sisters for if you do we shall surely perish. And we must have
strong Christian leaders to keep up the fight."
Political
mumbo-jumbo has been seamlessly blended with biblical mumbo-jumbo. But
you see, the just like the Wizard of Oz, you must never, never let them
see the man behind the curtain pulling the strings and levers.
What
Dr. Dobson and all the other self-anointed have never understood is
that the foundation of Christianity is the belief that the Christ is
the fulfillment of all the prophesies of the Old Testament. While
Christianity has its roots in the Old Testament, it has been surplanted
by the teachings of Christ contained in the writings of the New
Testament authors.
It would be nice if occasionally Dr. Dobson
and others of his persuasion would remeber that the God they profess to
believe in is not the angry vengeful God of the Old Testament but
rather the loving God whom Christ called His Father.








Comments (22)
Hallelujah!
June 25, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for this, Thom. What is, in fact, happening in the Religious Right movement is the conflation of conservative political ideology with conservative Christian ideology. In other words, they are cherry-picking biblical doctrine and repackaging it, to sell the idea that the Conservative political agenda is God-ordained - endorsed by God. Separation of Church and State - it got a lot of attention from our country's founders - it is a fundamental concept in our Constitution. And yet, more than two centuries later, we have elements who continue to use religion to advance their political agendas. Bademous shared an article yesterday that suggested that this issue is receiving attention and generating discussion within Christian circles. I hope so.
June 25, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I find it distinctly unsettling that the Christian Right so fundamentally misunderstands the revelation of Jesus.
The gospels specifically and expressly align political power and kingdoms with Satan. When the devil comes to tempt Christ, the final temptation is the offering up of all political power to Jesus if only He worships him.
However, we find the religious right hooked at the hip to political power in the form of the republican party.
Do they even read their own bibles?
June 25, 2008 9:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
As far as they're concerned, they really don't need to. When religion is manipulated to gain access to power, then what use does a Bible have other than to serve as a tool in that ascent?
June 25, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The theological element of the religious conviction articulated by Dobson and other fundamentalists is obviously weak as you correctly point out.
However, the scary aspect of their religious conviction is their belief that God reveals the divine plan to them. Having received at least a portion of the divine plan, Dobson and other are able to point out the many ways in which God punishes America for the wicked ways of American culture. Their followers accept their conclusions without ever considering why God would choose a fundmentalist as the modern day Moses.
June 25, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
In general a very cogent and well-written article. I have but two small, nay pedantic, issues.
1. Dr. Dobson is not an amateur "god expert". He is paid for it. That is the fundamental and principle difference between being an amateur and a professional. Skill, knowledge or ability has no relevance to that particular distinction.
2. Dr. Dobson is not honestly an "expert" on God. The degrees he's earned (he has 16 honorary degrees) are not in theology, but in child development. He is a psychologist. He is not a theologian. He just plays one on TV.
June 25, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
So it would be more accurate to call him an uncredentialed god "expert". Or perhaps a "god expert without portfolio". Or perhaps a scum-sucking douchbag.
Yes, that seems more likely.
June 25, 2008 5:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
How can anyone claim to have the skinny on the divine who does not worship His Noodliness, the Flying Spaghetti Monster? How can Dobson profess knowledge of the One Book when he has probably never read, let alone studied, the Gospel of the FSM?
O foul, pagan apostate! Arrrgh!
Those of us who have been touched by His Noodly Appendage know that Pastafarianism is the Only True Faith. Repent! Repent! before it is too late.
Make marinara, not war!
June 25, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, I'm going to have to go for the deliberately obtuse angle and point out that for Dobson to be an apostate, he would have had to have believed in the FSM at one point. Those photos of him drinking from the beer volcanoes were obviously doctored.
June 25, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone is BORN believing in the FSM. Certainly you knew that.
June 25, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The church of the IPU would like to have a word with you…
June 25, 2008 8:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post, Thom. I especially related to the penultimate paragraph. Thomas Jefferson, who we do not think of as a partcularly religious person in the traditional sense, figured that out when he created the Jefferson Bible. It is a partcularly useful book for those who, whether participants or not in an organized church, accept the Gospel of Jesus and try to live by it. As far as I can tell Dobson and his followers would denounce Jesus if He were among us today as a dangerous radical, and maybe even worse: a liberal Democrat.
June 25, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
"insofar" is one word. Otherwise, I am in total agreement with you.
June 25, 2008 6:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's likely that God has a really big problem with those who assume to know what he would do if he were in X situtation.
June 25, 2008 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The above comment was intended for concurrence with ronalley.
June 25, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
(emphasis added)
Thom, I think you've made a deeper, relevant point here than you even intended.
June 25, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good point, Aubie84, though, as someone with the same name as the author (though I spell my first name correctly :) I gotta go with his fully intending that point, since, like me, he must have a vast intelligence.
It's important that someone other than seculars point out the divisiveness of Dobson's remarks. He didn't have to read Obama's statement as such a firebrand issue; While most people would agree that abortion is not a good thing, women should be included in the discussion, rather than a bunch of white men in religious garb telling them how to run their lives and denouncing them out of hand. The Religious Right's support for the war is another way in which the lack of discussion is apparent. Rah rah, or you're a commie terrist-supporting mooslem. The war on drugs; man, there's a lot of talking that needs be done on a host of issues.
June 26, 2008 4:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I fully concur. This is what I emailed to Dobson yesterday.
It is unfortunate, Dr. Dobson, that you have this outsized influence among conservative evangelicals, and quite a money machine based in Colorado Springs.
Some of your early work, such as "Dare to Discipline," was pretty good stuff. As a parent I benefited from it when raising our kids in the 80s and 90s. I also shared your lectures in film with various church groups, so other parents could benefit from your insights. And this early work fit with your training (your Doctorate
in child development). If only you had stuck with what you knew best.
But I fear that the influence you began to garner during that time went to your head, and you began to expound on stuff that you are often dead wrong, including urging Christian to try to force their values into US government laws. Jesus didn't do that, neither did any of his Apostles. But that doesn't matter to you, does it, Dr Dobson; I fear power and influence is the name of the game for you.
And so you keep making a mess of yourself and of Christianity when you expound on things you don’t
know all that much about. As far as I know, you do not have any theological training, nor are you a scholar in Biblical studies.
I'm a conservative evangelical myself, with a Master of Divinity degree, and a lifelong student of the Bible (which I suspect, on a personal level, so are you). But you do not speak for me nor for many of us who may be conservative in personal values, and strong in our belief that God is our Creator, and that through the
Hebrew Scriptures and the Christian New Testament, we are able to gain a glimpse of His will for our lives.
But I challenge you, Dr Dobson, to indicate chapter and verse in these Holy Scriptures where we are called upon to use our vote to make the United States of America a Christian nation.
Besides, any student of religious history within this country knows that this has been tried before from time to time, and fortunately failed. One of those times was in the late 1880s and during the 1890s, when laws were introduced to indeed make of this country a Christian nation.
But Jesus, whom you claim to follow, told Pilate, just before he was to be crucified, he said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my followers would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. As it is, my kingdom comes from and is based elsewhere.”
If you want to obey a command of Jesus, Dr Dobson, stick with seeking to make disciples FROM ALL nations (not just from within the USA), as Jesus commissioned His followers to do (Matt 28:19,20).
At the same time, Jesus DID NOT COMMAND ANY (and that includes you, Dr Dobson) TO MAKE THE
NATIONS THEMSELVES INTO FOLLOWERS OF JESUS.
Religious history is replete with the abuse and atrocities carried out by Christians against fellow believers and against so called "infidels" when they had control of armies and the reins of government.
Dr Dobson, you might be surprised to know that some of us conservative Bible believing Christians fear more from the repression people like you would create were the US to become a Christian nation in your likeness, than from honest of heart followers of Muhammad, Buddha, or even from atheists. Not that these other groups have not repressed Christians and other believers when they've had control of national powers. Unfortunately, that is human nature. We want to control, and to control what everybody else is
supposed to do and believe.
The point is, governments have their appropriate role to fulfill, and so do believers. And sometimes believers, like Daniel & Joseph, have served in high positions within the preeminent political power of their time. They faithfully discharged their appointed duties beyond reproach. But they didn't try to make Egypt
or Babylon (respectively) into (in those days) Hebrew nations. Yet Daniel in his post was instrumental in leading King Nebuchadnezzar to become a humble servant of the Lord, to recognize Daniel's God as the true God, eventually.
In my humble opinion, as a fellow believer, how about not belittling a fellow believer (Senator Barack Obama) over issues beyond your area of expertise (funny thing that one of our pastors shared much the same thing with us in church the other day, raising similar questions which Senator Obama was raising; how we are to conduct ourselves in our personal lives and in the public arena, and how we are to apply what at times appear to be contradicting commands and laws, and or at other times very difficult to carry out standards imposed on us by Jesus Himself).
Instead how about praying that God will give him wisdom,should he be elected President of our country, that he might lead our country with justice and wisdom. (And I would hope the same if John McCain is elected our president.)
Marcellus Antonio
June 26, 2008 5:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sign up here, if you're so inclined. The tide may be finally turning against the religious right's gangster religiosity.
http://jamesdobsondoesntspeakforme.com/
June 26, 2008 8:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hold a Masters of the Universe degree.
June 26, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm curious Thom, about what you have taught catholics about the Bible.
Have you made a point to inform believing Christians about the Bible's origins or is that knowledge for graduate level theology students only?
If you have told parishioners, how do they respond? I'm really very interested to know.
One of my concerns is that while people like Dodson distort religious information, mainline church leaders suppress information, and thus are complicit in their own way in believers' ignorance and confusion.
June 26, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
My generation of RC clergy certainly did. I have no idea what today's clergy teach. I found the people to be highly receptive to this biblical exegesis since for the first time they were not just told what to believe but why we believe. Putting the Bible into an historic and sociological perspective came as a (pardon the pun) revelation to them.
June 26, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment