Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Is McCain determined to lose Florida in November?

Far be it for me to offer campaign advice to John McCain, but I've got to say that I am extremely puzzled (and rather delighted) by his seeming willingness, perhaps eagerness, to antagonize voters in Florida. 
Today, speaking to Republican donors and oil moguls in Houston, McCain called for allowing offshore oil drilling. This is high risk in Florida, where the population and elected officials of both parties overwhelming oppose lifting the drilling ban. In a state where tourism is a major part of the economy, and where the 1,300 miles of coastline and beaches define the geography and identity of the state, people are understandably not eager to gamble with a repeat of the Santa Barbara oil spill of 1969.
But that isn't all:
McCain is opposed to the creation of a national hurricane insurance fund -- something high on the agenda of Gov Crist and voters living in this hurricane-prone state. How ironic that he gives speeches condemning the Bush response to Katrina and Rita, but opposes something the federal government could do now to give some peace of mind and practical support for people living in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia and Texas. Maybe he was too busy chewing birthday cake with George Bush a few Augusts ago to understand why people in those states need and deserve this insurance.
Of course there is also his well-publicized vote against an appropriations bill that would have funded Everglades restoration -- despite the fact that Republicans and Democrats alike fought hard to get this "earmark" into the omnibus bill (which was the only practical way to get the measure funded). John McCain stood with George W Bush (who vetoed the bill) -- but it became law anyway when the Democrats in Congress (and some sane Republicans as well) overrode that veto. (McCain claimed that he in fact is in favor of the Everglades plan - going so far as to do an Everglades photo op to replace his vote against -- so he was "against it before he was for it"?)
And John McCain is stuck in a rabid anti-Castro time warp that is popular with a dying generation of original Cuban exiles, but is increasing questioned by younger Cuban-Americans, recent exiles, and people who still have family on the island. By adopting a hard line embargo position, siding with the Bush administration's refusal to loosen rules on frequency of family visits and the amount of remittances to family members still in Cuba, McCain provides an opening for Obama to make a significant dent in the formerly solidly Republican Cuban-American vote in south Florida. Witness the friendly reception Obama got when he spoke to the Cuban-American National Foundation recently -- a sign that many people realize that 40+ years of non-engagement and the embargo haven't succeeded in changing the government in Cuba. If Obama can improve on Gore's 20% performance among Cuban-American voters in 2000, it flips the balance in Miami-Dade and the state. And with three strong Democratic candidates challenging the 3 south Florida Republican members of congress representing predominately Cuban districts, there is every reason to believe that Democratic total there will improve significantly.
And last, but certainly not least, let's not forget his support for Bush attempt to privatize Social Security, and his own contradictory confused statements on the subject. McCain doesn't get that in the YouTube age, you can't just pretend you didn't say something when there is video of it available. Senior citizens have always been (justifiably) frightened of politicians playing games with the income many of them barely scrap by on. In a state where the senior vote is as large and organized as Florida, this could be the issue that Democrats will be able to use to remind older voters that McCain may be old, but he is no friend of the elderly.
Of course, in addition to these issues with particular resonance in Florida, voters there will also be voting on the Iraq debacle, the tanking economy, the growing income disparity in America, global warming, and other issues that work in Obama's favor.
None of this is to say that Florida is a slam dunk for Obama -- far from it. Democrats will have to work like hell to win here -- there is such a large Republican voting base that they will be highly competitive there, Maybe John McCain is figuring that he can coast on the time he spent in Pensacola and Joe Lieberman trying to scare south Florida's Jewish voters --- but if he keeps doing things to alienate Florida, it just won't be enough. 
There has been much buzz over the last few days about the Obama campaign's position that he can win without winning Florida by changing the map in other places. But let's be absolutely clear -- McCain has virtually no chance of being getting to 270 if he can't carry Florida. 








Comments (22)

avatar

An encouraging read. Thanks. I hadn't heard about him being opposed to the Hurricane Fund.

I have to say I'm not convinced the offshore drilling will work against him. So long as he's talking about it being further offshore - a 150 mile barrier instead of the current 50 mile one - the hysterical climate now on oil prices might change the nature of the reaction. When you have even Crist and Martinez looking for ways to support him you know that public attitudes are changing.

Excellent idea!

Modified, somewhat, this post would be a great post to your local papers.

avatar

Governor Crist of Florida has been very vocal about his opposition to off shore drilling. Until today....
Message from California insiders say McCain had a slim chance there before, but no longer.

My understanding is that McCain has phrased it in the form that states should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to allow off-shore drilling. That might be enough plausible deniability to get him a pass from many Floridians. Time will tell, I reckon.

avatar

its a no win for mccain.

Unfortunately, Obama is viewed with suspicion by the Cuban community in Florida and his relationship with Jews is still tenuous. Obama could win Florida, but he's got his work cut out for him.

McCain appears to be determined to lose in every state. If there's a position to be taken, count on McCain to take the wrong one. He's like a compass that always points south. Bush is an anchor and McCain is, inexplicably, embracing all things Bush and repudiating his earlier opposition to these policies. It's like watching a train wreck.

avatar

What's with this Quinnipiac Florida poll? Obama 47, McCain 43...
(Done before yesterday's shift on drilling)

Does anyone know what Quinnipiac's track record's like?

avatar

Yes, Quinn has a good record. It was very good predicting the presidential result in FL in 04, giving Bush a bigger lead tham most polls, which showed the state a tossup. But Bush won by 5 points there, and Quinn came out looking good.

Poll 6/18: In Florida Obama holds small lead over McCain

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/POLL_2008_FLORIDA?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2008-06-18-06-03-10

Obama doesn't need Florida per se, but if he can get it, Election Night will be over very early.

avatar

Perhaps off topic, but does anyone else wonder........ if the steep rise in gas prices may be an intentional ploy/manipulation of the public to try one last time to force legislation [before BushCo loses office].... legislation so desired by the oil giants to give them the offshore and Alaska drilling legislation? Haven't the Republicans tried every year to push this through?

I think so. Neocon Fred Kagan (I think) wrote an article about how high gas prices could help the Republicans.

He may be going for the whole enchilada: losing all 50 states and D.C.

I'm hoping that after this election the Republicans look at the 1974 election as "the good old days".

I'm trying to look at this from McCain's point of view. I think he knows he's fooked, so why not try anything and see if it works? What does he have to lose, other than dignity and self-respect?

avatar

Um, pretty sure dignity and self-respect are already lost as he's shown with his flip-flops, panderings, enabling GOP racist buttons and of course, his daily gaffes.

avatar

He's desperate and looking at public attitudes. Reuters/Zogby - "Some 59.6 percent of Americans surveyed in the poll released on Wednesday said they would favor government efforts to boost domestic drilling and refinery construction to cool record prices".

Take that in conjunction with the recent Pew polling on attitudes to global warming - only 45% of Americans now accept that global warming, if they think it exists, is due to human activity. Only 27% of republicans think it is.

He's taking the gamble that Obama won't be able to persuade working class folk who are dreadfully impacted by these high prices that his approach is more rational and optimal than McCain's.

I view it as a "Hail Mary" pass by McCain as he tries to take a net "negative" for Republicans and incumbants (high gas prices) and turn it into a positive. But it's a really bad misread of the mood of the public, as Florida and California residents are strongly opposed. Add to that today's call for 45 new nuke plants, which seems like an idiotic mood no matter how one slices it.

Americans may not like $4 per gallon gas, but they like nukes even less. Besides, not satisfied to put Florida in play, he's now pushing Nevada into the Obama column too. Idiotic move. (PS: Any shot he might have had to contest California is now DOA.)

Given that a big part of the run-up in oil is due to rampant speculation, we could easily see a huge fall in gas prior to the election. While overall that would benefit Republicans, McCain would still be locked in on these stupid positions. Color me baffled.

This could help with the ladies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBALqvp08Vk

On the more serious topic though it seems to me that some political stability in the middle east would bring down oil prices a hell of a lot faster than the years it will take for drilling and refining operations to ramp up enough here. Just think of all the permitting and wrangling that would take place before a bit or brick were even laid. Pull us out of Iraq leaving some sense of stability there while not invading Iran would be a better place to start.

You will be surprised how little seniors would be affected by offshore drilling. If they are similar to east cost seniors, what they value the most is predictability in politics. They would expect a white republican saying all familiar key words, and will react positively when they see one. Especially for Jewish seniors, concerned with Israel's fate

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


September 1-4

Book Cover

September 8-12

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover

October 6-12

Book Cover

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address