« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Is John McCain Going Senile?
What do you think? I think he's losing it and it will only get worse.
Advertisement

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
What do you think? I think he's losing it and it will only get worse.
The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars
House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor
Special Guests
Big names and big brains
Special Features
Pressing topics and trends
Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.
All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall


Comments (56)
Quick answer: Who are you and what is this place?
June 10, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to see video of him going into his crazy tirades. You know there is video out there. There has to be.
June 10, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
In three months Lieberman will be helping him with his shoelaces.
June 10, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
The guy spent more than five years as a prisoner of war, that's gotta leave a mark:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain
I'm sure this is delineated in painful detail elsewhere, but on cursory research just now, this is what I've discovered about John McCain's Vietnam experience.
December 1966, McCain's assigned to the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal.
July 1967, a tragic fire on the Forrestal kills 134. McCain transfers to the USS Oriskany.
October 1967, McCain is shot down and captured.
March 1973, McCain is sent home.
June 10, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean he may be unfit because he was a prisoner of war and tortured? If memory serves, Buchanan, Bush or both used that against him in one of the primaries. I'm sure the McCain campaign is praying that Obama or a surrogate makes that mistake. It's called "swiftboating."
June 11, 2008 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree that it doesn't sound like good strategy, but if your argument is that Bush used it against him in the primary (I know you said Bush or Buchanan), then I'd have to point out that Bush did end up becoming the Republican nominee (and, sadly enough, President), so…
But still, I agree that it doesn't sound like a good strategy to me.
June 11, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Definitely not a good strategy. However, I'd imagine it's already in the minds of some voters. I know one personally.
June 11, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since when is the simple truth considered "strategy?"
We don't even need to promote it, proactively, as the days roll by, the truth about "Johnny" will become part of the everyday internet and media dialogue, and there won't be any need for some sleazy swiftboating, the facts will stand without any embellishment.
Are we allowed to print the word "Songbird" without being called swiftboaters? Or is just the mention of it a violation of this new politics-of-honor code?
I don't think we need to rein in the horses before they are even out of the gate.
I wonder how over 4,000 dead Americans feel about that kind of restriction. If lies can get us into war, shouldn't the truth be allowed to get us out of war?
June 11, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
What I believe is that the MSM is not going to do the job - when have then done it recently? And it's going to be the little buzzwords that reach the voters who do not get their news on the internet.
Some will get their information from biased radio, and some from MSM, and some simply from word of mouth. A lot of voters don't seek out political information at all, and yet many of them still vote - often on a single issue or a single thought/belief.
If word of mouth conveys concerns about McCain - real ones, not fake or manufactured - then it's going to have an influence. I never underestimate the power of the "word on the street." So I'm morally against swiftboating anyone, but I'm not against starting the word on the street campaign that tells the truth or warns people about what they aren't hearing from the candidate or the MSM.
June 11, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the idea that his recent performances have shown serious lapes of memory and odd shifts of policy - which may be more related to his pandering, but could also be based on his failing grasp on reality, are all good themes for our campaign against him, and quite possibly legitimate, because senile or otherwise mentally impaired leaders with access to nuclear weapons are really a big no-no.
June 10, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The better half and I have both wondered if he's going senile right in front of our eye's.
He's got a serious You Tube problem, and I have a feeling its going to get worse before it gets better as the general moves along.
June 11, 2008 6:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
You can see the ad now -
Who is John McCain?
Followed by a series of clips where he says one thing and then says the opposite.
Who is John McCain?
Ouch! Especially since it's attacking a perceived strength. Obama's supposedly the one we don't know anything about and could possibly be a secret radical liberal according to some Wash. Times propagandist. Breaking news for Wash. Times - for the past 8 years dangerous radicals have been living in the White House and "ru(i/n)ning" the country!
June 11, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I looked it up and the mean age of people with dementia (also called Age-Related Cognitive Decline) is 72.4. From another article on dementia I found:
June 10, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
The age argument isn't good enough. There are one hell of a lot of voters over the age of 72 and even more darn close to it. You can't alienate tens of millions of voters by branding them as demented.
I do have concern about McCain, but the concern needs to be specific to his health. His bouts with melanoma are another source of concern.
June 10, 2008 9:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking from experience, I can tell you that "senior moments" are real and they are not a flaw we can afford to have in our president. I am convinced this is what is affecting McCain.
Using dementia/senior moments against him is not fair IMO, but I believe people will draw the same conclusion I have if his slipups are brought to the fore.
June 10, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would like to keep this thread open and alive. I don't have personal animosity toward McCain, but I have a deep commitment to preventing him from becoming president. If a legitimate concern about his possible diminished mental capacity could be spread about, it would be helpful. On the other hand, there are a lot of people in the US houses of Congress who might need to be examined on that basis, too. So they probably wouldn't be happy about this thread.
June 10, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's getting worse, even in the short time he's been the GOP's presumptive nominee. I'm also thinking that half a dozen debates would tell the tale more effectively than we ever could.
June 10, 2008 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure if it's so much that it's been getting worse as it might just be that the added physical stress of campaigning is making it more evident. There are a lot of coping strategies for dealing with mental decay that have been documented by psychologists, but when you add extra demands those coping strategies are unable to compensate.
June 11, 2008 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Raider, I am totally certain that McCain is mentally incompetent and I am astounded that ANYONE takes him seriously.
No joke.
June 10, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's mostly competent by the standards I'm considering, but I think he's showing signs of lapses, especially in memory and his ability to state messages clearly. Perhaps it's not something that is (yet) at the pathological state (in contrast to his policies), but if we're considering someone who would then have at least 4 years in the Oval Office, I think it should give people at least one more reason to hesitate and NOT vote for him.
I'm trying to get some discussion going about how to get people thinking against his candidacy.
June 10, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I think he's showing signs of lapses, especially in memory and his ability to state messages clearly."
My belief is that he is unable to speak clearly because he cannot think clearly.
June 10, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe one of the first signs of dementia and early warnings of Altzhiemers (sp.?) is the inability to smell lemon. Perhaps someone could take a fresh cut lemon to one of his 'gatherings' and give him the sniff test. (Need video with sound for documentation.) I'll be glad to provide the lemon.
Seriously, just today he confused Bill with Beer. Everyday he's got at least one gaffe. Shouldn't there be some type of IQ or mental test given to Presidential candidates? This would be a good thing on so many levels. Of course, the primary candidate field may be a bit sparse.
June 10, 2008 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like Bush.
June 11, 2008 1:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Don't forget his college nickname "McNasty" and his known tendency for hotheadism. He's gonna explode on camera before long, and who knows what'll come out.
June 10, 2008 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCaca?
June 11, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
all over the camera!
June 11, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not sure the bar for Presidents is all that high. Reagan held office with dementia, and no one seemed to notice. Maybe some kind of zen-like state of dementia is the new direction Reagan turned America toward and McCain is going to get us back on track. Wouldn't it be ironic if, compared to McCain, Bush was based in reality after all?
June 11, 2008 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reagan hid his dementia behind a veneer of affability (wave, laugh, pretend you can't hear, chuckle, move along) and had Nancy running interference an awful lot (although, I have to say that I saw it long before they came out and admitted that he had Alzheimer's). And he was already well-settled into office, before the dementia was really settling in itself, I think.
McCain is definitely off. I would attribute it to the "strains of the campaign," but he hasn't even really faced that yet. I can't see how he's going to keep it together all the way to August, let alone November.
June 11, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
They've actually published their strategy over at McCain for President or whatever they call it. To tell the truth, they're not in such bad shape right now. They think Obama's gaffes are going to let them take a lot of Appalachia off the table, and they may be right. I don't know if you watched McCain in the Republican debates or not, but he is pretty strong in exchanges. My guess is Obama will try to keep the debates to a minimum. When he debated Clinton, he looked like a schoolboy, raising his hand for attention. If he does that on stage with McCain, he is not going to come off as Presidential. After the first Obama/McCain debate, we may understand better what Clinton meant by the CIC threshold.
June 11, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
He was restrained in his debates with Hillary and I don't think that was a good thing. He won't do that with McCain. I think he's going to whoop ass there.
I don't know - I don't want to underestimate, but I see McCain just sinking before our eyes. He's committing gaffe after gaffe and Obama handling himself quite well in that area. We'll see.
June 11, 2008 9:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched all of the debates and thought he won most of them. Then the pundidts would come on and explain why he lost. Then they would go to the focus group that agreed with me. Then the pundits would scratch their heads and go back to expalining why he lost. I do not get it.
One thing his campaign is trying to get is debates that are more unmoderated. I think if it was just the candidates on stage with a chess clock he would stomp McCains a**.
June 11, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Reagan developed signs of dementia, as I remember, only after he had been president for some time. Moreover, he was a master of one-liners that had nothing to do with anything, but seemed to make everyone happy, and he was almost always a gifted and confident speaker. I think McCain is already showing more erosion than Reagan did, and he's just beginning to campaign for the office.
It's one thing to be concerned about a sitting POTUS, especially one who has a strong overall popularity, but it's another thing entirely to be considering electing someone into office who could prove incapable of executing the office reliably. I think there are dozens of reasons to be worried about McCain, ranging from his policies (of course) to his rather startling ability to do 180-degree turns on his views at a moment's notice, to his shift from "maverick" to "neocon lapdog," and I think we need to hammer on all of them.
My goal is to "swift-boat" McCain, not with lies, but with truth and with plausible concerns.
June 11, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
And McCaveman is making bloopers with no heat on him!!!! Can you imagine what happens when Obama starts bearing down on him in a crackling debate?
McCaveman will cave in.
The debates -- where Obama won't be constrained like he was previously with fellow "democrat" Hillary -- will be where Obama wraps up this whole election.
McCaveman is zesty in calling for them now. But soon he will dread that decision.
June 11, 2008 8:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Fortunately for Democrats, there is some truth to the "straight talk" image, in that McCain seems incapable of keeping himself from blurting out his true (authoritarian/plutocratic/heartless) feelings about sensitive political issues in public forums. It makes his campaign's attempts to cover up with denials and bland policy declarations laughable!
The guy is such a transparent berserker. Any Obama/McCain one-on-one debates will be a mind-blowing study in contrasts, a Republican strategist's worst nightmare! I'm not being flippant - look for McCain's people to be scrambling for ways to minimize/restrict/cancel debates in the coming months.
June 11, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't necessarily think he's demented. There are an awful lot of people, some quite young, smart and educated, who get their words and facts mixed-up occasionally. They can lead rich and fulfilling lives, but they probably cannot successfully pursue certain careers that require the ability to think on ones feet and express oneself clearly at all times - e.g. newscaster, stand-up comedian, politician.
June 11, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's the trajectory of his mental faculties that people are really noticing. He didn't seem this bad 8 years ago…
June 11, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've got to wonder...He's been somewhat uh...less than sharp these days. He's unfoccussed, looks awful, he's got the short-term memory of a dope-head and does not seem to even be in control of his own campaign.
I think he's a puppet at this point - got a whole bunch of lobbyists' hands up his butt controlling him. Too many in fact. That's why he's constantly flip-flopping.
June 11, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Character is the issue here. Focus on character. (if there is any dementia, it takes you off the track of a good argument. dementia can affect personality, but this man has a long history of temper tantrums and I'd recommend we focus on that)
Character. That, to me, is the huge difference between Obama and McShame.
Any memory problems come out in terms of bad policy statements. Focus on the policy nuttiness. He's giving us plenty of that!
June 11, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he is clearly showing signs of dementia. It is causing him to be a walking gaffe machine. It is the gaffes that are going to hurt him. We need to focus on the specifics of what he says and treat him like he means what he says. We do not need to bring an accusation of dementia in to the campaign for his dementia to defeat him.
June 11, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am in total agreement. Take everything he says in total seriousness.
Then attack his points as dangerous nonsense!
June 11, 2008 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is important if there is a concern regarding his mental capibilities that there be a recording of those utterances that substaniate that claim.
It can be difficult but the things said can be catagorized as follows:
1 Mis-speaking, such as the "beer" as opposed to "bill" mistake in the last couple of days.
2 Pandering, changing positions or not highlighting positions held to gain votes. Seeking Hillary voters without letting them know he is "anti-choice" for women. Or seeking Evangelical endorsements he never sought during his first presidential run.
3 Flip-flopping, changing positions to curry favor with the Neo-Cons who are bankrolling his campaign. Against tax cuts before he was for them.
4 Ignorance, such as his lack of understanding between Sunni and Shia.
5 Denials of saying something he said. He has repeatedly denied saying things where there is actual proof he said them. His denials have have been explained on MSNBC as his inability to understand how the new "internet" age has affected campaigns, where in the past a candidate could say anything to a group to address their concerns then go down the road and say something completely different and not have it come back to haunt them because there was no record of the change in positions.
6 Diminished mental capabilities. Hard to prove which of his mis-speakings can be attributed to this catagory. But I have no doubt some of them could be. Seventy-two years old is not a factor. My grandmother was sharp as a tack at 92 years old. My aunt and uncle in their 80s are also very sharp and show no evidence of diminished mental abilities. However, the pressure placed on the President of the United States ages a person considerably. These pressures combined with age make the questions very relevant and keenly important.
Each of the above demonstrates someone who is getting very tangled up in his words and whose real positions are unknown outside of his Iraq/Iran positions.
Someone with more savvy than I needs to document and catagorize each of this man's "gaffes" to show how completely incompetent, ignorant, and dishonest he is along with questions regarding his current and future mental capabilities.
This record needs to be easily accessable to all on an ongoing basis and updated as he continues to add to his demonstrations that he is in fact not fit to be the President of the United States.
Maybe someone needs to set up a web site to document all of these with youtube links. Then have the site linked at the major blogs such as TPM.
June 11, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good beginning, Jester. When I think about how we, on this and other sites, are informed and considering the issues, in contrast to those who really don't pay any attention and pick up any meme floating around in the ether and vote accordingly (flip-flop, swift boat, etc.), I think it's all the more important that the memes in this campaign reflect the sound bites that will make those less involved voters hesitate to push the button for McCain.
I personally fear that some voters, not racists by any stretch of the imagination, will still hesitate to push the button for an African American with a Muslim-sounding name. These people need to see Obama as a fantastic future president - one of the brightest and most capable men running for this office in decades -someone who truly represents them in contrast with McCain's neocon masters - but I fear that little hesitation that might yet appear within people who are not in any other way racist.
Sad to say, I think in American politics today, it's the memes that matter.
So we need memes on McCain that make people hesitate. And I agree totally that age is not the issue. My father turns 90 this year and is,like Jester's family, as sharp as can be. It's watching the decline of McCain, not the age issue, that suggested to me this discussion thread. And there are numerous other problems with McCain, and I'm sure we'll hit on all of them.
June 11, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Regarding those who will not vote for Obama because of his race I see in two catagories.
The first of which can never be reached as their intrenched ideas are still widely held in swaths of this country and are still promoted in whole communities. Sadly it will take a few more decades before these people can be enlightened to the ignorance of racism.
The second are those whose position can be altered if the proper logical arguments are placed before them. I have in fact turned these types of people in my own life by simply asking them if they love their prejudice more than they love this country.
Our country's future depends on them to get past skin color and evaluate the man and his visions for this country. If they will listen to his speeches without looking at him, they find his message very inspiring and speaking to the issues that touch their lives.
I used this method in one case and turned him from a Clinton supporter to Obama. This person never thought he would ever vote for a black man. So it is not an impossible task and it demonstrates that you don't just give up in the face of prejudice but try to enlighten those who are reasonable. Every vote added will make a difference in November.
I am doing my part to seek out these people and attempt to find those willing to put prejudice aside and vote for Obama because it is in their interest.
June 11, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I couldn't agree more. Thank you so much for that, Jester.
June 11, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
As for Obama's name, reasonable people have been swayed by the emails that have questioned Obama's possible Muslim background. Added to that is the "Is he patriotic enough" meme. Add his personal connection to a 60's radical and the combination becomes a perfect storm for the Republicans to tap into the fears they have created in the last several years.
What percentage of the electorate holds these fears near and dear to their hearts, I think is unknowable. Can their fears be allayed, I doubt it. I can only hope it only affects that same 28% that still thinks Bush is doing a good job, who would never vote for a Democrat even if their life depended upon it.
June 11, 2008 12:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The right wing wants McCain to lose, so Obama (in the mind of Conservatives) can set the stage for a Conservative resurgence in 2012. They're dreaming; but still, they won't really help McCain.
Conservatives are in a world of pain. I had to laugh when DeLay called Obama a Marxist. Hey, that'll really resonate.
McCain's fighting a lonely battle here, and it sure doesn't help that he's making mistake after mistake.
No matter the reason - character, policies, mental acuity - he's definitely not fit to be President. But unlike Bush, who was even less fit, he has no apparatus.
June 11, 2008 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain displays either the classic symptoms of the onset of dementia, or he is pilfering from Limbaugh's medicine cabinet.
Swinging on a pendulum between childishly giddy and morbidly serious might also be a sign of bipolar disorder, as are the conflicting images of the intense angry man and the laid-back funny guy.
What one must consider is which one has their finger on the buttons?
June 11, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
John McCain has always been what he is now-It isn't age it is John McCain. THe media loved him becasue he was always good for a quote. Usually from left field. Ironically, it is only now that the full glare of public attention is upon him that you can get a real view of the man. Sadly, there is still too little attention being paid to his history, his attitudes, his philosophy. While,I can honor his surviving being a prisoner of war-I do not beleive that that is a major qualification for President or Commander in Chief. His military career was definitely unspectacular. How is it that the amn who seems to rely on his oppostion to lobbyists and his Mr.CLean image was invovled in Savings and Loan scandals and other uses of government to support large corporations? How is the pillar of Military expereince the one to oppose better vet benefits? How is it that the Vietnam hero used is office to oppose Vietnam MIA families searching for Pentagon records. John McCain isnt so much senile as arrogant and wrongheaded with little gravitas.
June 11, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I personally have always questioned how being a POW makes you qualified to lead armies, navies and air forces. Graduating low in your class at the Naval Academy a thousand years ago hardly does it. Someone pointed out that FDR never set foot in the battlefields of France, but somehow managed to help lead us to victory in WWII. I'd put my faith in Obama before anyone else currently in politics. I guess I respect intelligence and the ability to listen and consider all the facts and information available. And I'm pretty sure Obama wouldn't fire every general or admiral who disagreed with his policies or positions - a very dangerous precedent.
June 11, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is John McCain Going Senile?
Going????
How does one approach the subject of Dementia? Or how does on not NOT approach it in dangerous world of terrorist!
We’re supposed to give this person the codes to the “football” - remember. It is becoming more and more evident that McCain’s faculties are not up to par as is the fact, that would not be swiftboating. I think we have a right to ask for independent medical evaluation from McCain - I mean who knows, maybe he is just seriously dull witted.
If we live long enough, age happens to every one of us, just a fact of life. There are sound reasons as to why US commerical flight pilots are required to retire at age 70, because it is an acknowledge fact that our reasoning skills deteriorate with age. If the Republican Party waits to long - it'll be all to obvious that the man is suffering from an age related system - and what is the GOP going to do about it - pretend it doesn't matter and they don't care?
June 11, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
In addition to age-related changes in reasoning abilities and memory that happen to most of us, some are additionally impaired by changes in the brain due to increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, either hereditary or related to medications.
(I'm not a doctor and didn't even stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, so I would welcome a real medical opinion on this)
Remember that McCain's medical records were scheduled to be released a month or so earlier than they were. I think the delay may have been related to the fact that his doctors switched his cholesterol med around that time from one with at least anecdotal links to mental confusion to one with fewer mental-related problems. His good cholesterol (HDL), necessary for long neuronal connections that are essential to complex thought, was low initially and decreased further under his medical regimen.
It could well be that his handlers wanted a little time to pass after discontinuing the cholesterol-lowering drug that was getting so much attention at the time and instead release his medical records without prior notice later and when a lot else was going on so they didn't get the kind of coverage they would have gotten had they been released when originally scheduled. I saw no coverage of the cholesterol-confusion issue at the time, though I didn't have time to follow it closely. There's a lot at stake for pharmaceutical companies, which have redirected their efforts from less profitable drugs like antibiotics that are used infrequently to drugs like cholesterol-lowering meds that are taken daily by millions of people. Media attention to McCain's situation could cause lots of people to reconsider the trade-offs of drugs they take.
Blood-brain barrier permeability works both ways: good things can move out of the brain, while toxins can move in, obstructing normal functioning of synapses. I think McCain could well be experiencing the effects of both processes, to a degree that it would impair Presidential decision-making. I agree with other TPM posters who have predicted that this impairment will be acknowledged before November and McCain will be replaced with another Republican candidate, with much less time for vetting.
So yes, I think his impairment is serious, and especially so when combined with his course reversals on most issues (made for political reasons) - it really seems that he can't keep his new positions straight.
June 11, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I believe is that the MSM is not going to do the job
Hey, that is what Josh Marshall's blog is for, right? I mean, the MSM didn't and wouldn't do anything about Gonzales and this administration's political firing of attorneys either, but that did that stop Josh and netroots from doing something about it, hell no.
Surely the Republicans are fools if they think the liberal netroots and the vast new voter turn out folks are going to just ignore the deteriorating handicap that McCain is evidencing everytime he opens his mouth.
I mean, the REAL reason Hillary isn't the nominee today is foremost the cause of liberal bloggers, who were for Obama almost exclusively and presented an undeniable unity. It is also why Gonzales has been fired and why social security privatizing went down in flames. I honestly think if it were not for the internet, this type of townhall meeting apparatus we have here with the internet, we would probably being experiencing a civil war like atmosphere taht we almost had during the Vietnam War. It is a non-violent means of expression, which provides an outlet for emotions. Hell, we almost don't need the media anymore.
June 11, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain's mental fitness is not an issue as long as his wife has a good astrologer to help her run the country. This technique has already produced the poster administration for conservative Republicanism.
June 11, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK I'm certainly not as sharp as I was in my 40's, but I'm not demented either.
I'm definitely not sharp enough to run for president, but then, I never was - which I think is the case with a lot of us and more obviously, with McCain. I support Jestor's six points, without getting into dementia.
A person shouldn't be considered for president if he/she isn't very sharp, energetic, articulate and versed in the issues.
June 11, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
On that note, here he is ... looking sharp as a bowling ball:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkkTFVIxMQs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUeeIoNxkEk
June 11, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
unfair! In both cases it looks like he had his eyes DOWN, not shut. One tape was so short he could have been blinking.
Besides, briefly shutting one's eyes in a meeting is not a sign of senility, last I heard. Unless a lot of the people I work with are senile.
In his position, it's dumb to shut his eyes, knowing he could be recorded that way, but it's not a sign of senility.
June 11, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment