Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Impeachment Is Kewl!

Hey everybody!  MonicaL checking in on a subject near and dear to this avatar's heart -- impeachment!  I noticed that Dennis Kucinich wrote several hundred articles of impeachment last week, and that at least one of the bloggers in this wonderfully anonymous community has written many posts in support!  Several of them essentially simultaneously!  As I know better than most of you, Impeachment Is Kewl!  So let's support Dennis Kucinich in his patriotic bid to restore sanity to our government.  I am writing to add my reasons to the bonfire.
 
Representative Kucinich, our elfin friend with the hot wife, is fed up.  He's not going to take it anymore!  "It" being President George W. Bush.  So far, so good, there's one thing any sane person can agree about.  To get Bush, he has _thirty-five_ articles of impeachment to prove it.  Count 'em!  I did.  And the neat part is, they aren't just all about Iraq.  Article 30:  Bush is destroying Medicare.  Never mind taking back the government and fixing Medicare -- impeachment on you, bad boy!  Here's another neat one:  Article 11:  Establishment of Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq.  Gee, I thought the Congress that Dennis was in could unfund that.  I guess I'm mistaken!  Or maybe the whole Congress gets impeached for voting for it!  Or maybe just the people who voted to fund the bases!  What a totally cool definition of impeachment.  We can impeach people for doing things voted on in a democratic process.  That should deter anyone from voting against us in the future!
 
I saw where some pompous lawyer windbag on TPM told Dennis' impeachy blogger fan that only backward countries use the courts to get to their political opponents, and that the whole thing was taking the worst page from Ken Starr's book.  The blogger says the lawyers are wrong, and that we need to get back to being like the Framers!  He has a point, especially when he says we need to investigate Nancy Pelosi for stifling impeachment!  She didn't get us into Iraq, so impeaching her makes us a bunch of framers!  Impeachment on you, Nancy!  And if you disagree, this post will crawl up through your screen and impeach you!  It's what in logic is called an infinite regression.  Emphasis on regression.
 
I also really like the totally cool impeachment articles that go against what Democrats voted for, and the history of American foreign policy.  Article 12 says that Bush can be impeached for waging a war over oil.  Never mind all the Democrats who voted to authorize the use of force, I suppose we're impeaching them.  It was really polite for Representative Kucinich to wait until after the primaries to train his impeachment ray gun on Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and all their AUMF buddies in the Senate!  John Kerry too!  Dennis is a team player!  While I disagree with the war, I thought we waged wars of expansion in the 19th Century.  Better dig up James K. Polk and impeach him!  Or why not give Texas back to Mexico?  It's too humid anyway, and the food sucks!  Spanish-American War?  After we give back Puerto Rico and Guam, which I'm sure Dennis has been trying to do on principle since 2003 too, let's impeach McKinley!  Fair's fair!
 
But back to this silly voting thing.  I guess the American people voted for this war of aggression in 2004 when Bush beat Kerry.  Is there any way we can impeach them too?  Maybe the 35% of us who were smart enough to know the war was all lies on the front end can just imprison the other two-thirds of us who didn't.  Sounds like fun to me, but until you've been intimidated by U.S. Marshals in a fancy hotel until you make a proffer to the Independent Persecutor in an impeachment, you have no idea how much fun impeachment can be!
 
One other little point about another article.  Dennis wants to impeach Bush for invading Iraq without a declaration of war.  That occurred in March 2003.  Is there a reason Dennis waited seventy-five months to seek impeachment?  Did he write these totally cool articles of impeachment and just, like, misplace them?  Were they in the normal-looking business suit he never wears, and then Elizabeth Kucinich got it out to dry clean it before a fundraiser and said, honey, I found those thirty-five awesome articles of impeachment you lost in the spring of 2003?  Or is it some kind of existential joke, like if he went on C-SPAN2 and said he was going to stay on camera reciting pi until the war ended?  I don't know, it just seems funny to wait until thousands of troops, and tens of thousands of civilians die in a bogus war to suddenly get all I'm-going-to-put-my-enemies-in-jail and all that.  Seems like a sincere person might have tried this earlier.  But I must be wrong, he's showing so much principle!
 
Don't be an appeaser of the Bush-lovers!  Don't listen to wussy lawyers!  In fact, don't listen to anybody except Dennis Kucinich.  After all, Nancy Pelosi is just in the bag for W.   So step up to the anonymous message board with the same courage our elvin friend showed by holding these articles for five years.  Impeachment Is Kewl! 


Comments (29)

Your cute and a genius.

Monica, thank you for giving Sunday night a smart post, after all the spamming about that stupid bloody Conan game from make liu and the rather odd "other posts" tonight from "other posters" whom I don't know.

I will say this: I agree with Nancy Pelosi that impeaching Bush at this late point in the game makes no sense. Much as I think Bush is an idiot who allowed his criminal VP to take over the White House and Iraq within just a few years of each other, I do agree that it's a little too late to try to impeach Bush and/or Cheney. Even starting proceedings at this late date might help us prosecute the two later for war-crimes, every liberal yells, but....let's just get them the hell away from the White House and put a sane person there first. One step at a time.

Is this post kewl or not kewl? I'm gonna think about that some more once my sides stop hurting. Too funny.

But, Monica...don't you think lawyers are kind of...sexy?

They have to be in their forties, and Ivy-heeled.

They drive me, and any young woman of discernment, mad.

Very funny. Actually, lawyers are a bunch of selfindulgent assholes. I don't like being made fun of, articleman. I think the Smurf is making fun of lawyers.

That's funny, articleman. Most of the lawyers I know (including my utterly brilliant little sister) are young women of discernment.

The point of impeachment isn't only to remove someone from office. It is to record and officially investigate crimes and misdemeanors, to bring the truth to light. Whether it resulted in Bush/Cheney & Co being ousted isn't the whole deal, it's getting the truth out. It should have been done a long time ago. These people have committed numerous crimes against humanity and against our system of government. They have thumbed their collective noses at Congress and at the rule of law, and soiled the Constitution.

If a real trial of their crimes was conducted, they would be out on their asses and hopefully in jail where they belong. I consider them traitors, personally.

Thanks, MonicaL for reminding us. Got me fired up again.

avatar

The Impeachment process will go nowhere unless We, The People, (en masse) contact our members of Congress and tell them to move forward. If they receive multitudes of communications from their constituents, they would (at least) begin the process. And perhaps the MSM et al. would even cover it. (?) It truly is our call (pun intended).
But, that isn't going to happen - because the vast majority of We, The People, won't take the time and energy to call, e-mail, snail mail or whatever it takes to get this done.
We have the politicians We, The People, elect and keep in office. Interesting program tonight that over half of Americans don't even know we have 100 Senators, that 80% surveyed at the time of the Iraq invasion believed that Saddam was responsible for 9/11 and the list goes on about how uninformed (without factual knowledge) most of We, The People, are about our government's processes.
Ignorance about the basic structure of our 'Democracy' is a choice made by most of We, The People, of the United States of America. (Proof in point - look at the percentile of registered voters who actually vote in our local, state and federal elections. And of this group how many do you think cast their vote based on facts they've taken the time and energy to become informed about regarding the candidates and issues on the ballot?)
Thus, We have the Government we deserve.
P.S. This election could be the beginning of We, The People, accepting our responsibility to do our part to safeguard our Nation. We cannot continue to blame those We, The People, elect and keep in office.
I AM EVER HOPEFUL!

An unimpeachable argument. PS - anyone tell you you look cute in black?

avatar

Wow! Tough talk from a prom queen. Tell us prom queen what have you done these past few years in regards to anything important - big or small? Following American Idol doesn't count.

If you break out of your bubble you may find that there are literally hundreds of millions of people around the world who know that Bush/Cheny are war criminals. Barking dogs don't diminish the beauty of the moon, yapping prom queens don't deminish the work of Dennis Kucinich.

Supposed to be snark.

It's not Monica. It's one of many (I've counted 5 so far) avatars of some dude in drag making as Monica.

Serial cross-dressing? Tri-state shopping spree?

Laughing out loud, Desi, please tell me it's not you. That mushroom cloud smiling makes me wonder.

Something wicked this way comes...

That's right. Drunk on Dandelion Wine, I'm looking for Mr. Dark. ;-)

Project: Avatar Liberation.

I'm looking for Avatar Libation. A Gin Fizz for a mushroom cloud looks about right.

My back porch?

I got the sapphire and cool glasses. You bring the fiz. We'll watch the grass grow.

All ginned up and ready to go.

Impeachment is one thing, but removal from office is another. The whole thing takes too long and is politically very divisive and nasty. It's good to get these things on record, though, and Kucininich is a dogged critic of Bush, and an appropriate person to bring this forward.

Jan 20, 2009 isn't far off, and I agree with Pelosi that impeachment is really a non-starter at this point.

They can be tried in the Senate after January to make the point stick home - no matter how far you run, you can't hide. There is no statute of limitations.

A hopeful message. Thanks, Des.

Yes, Kucinich is a leader of great stature and unimpeachable character. And of course, he tried to introduce impeachment in early '07 (Cheney first), as have others. Pelosi has stalled this for a year and a half. She is not necessarily breaking any law in blocking impeachment but she is shirking her duty. It is not too late to start the process and open the government up to expose what has been done in our name.

FISA came about post watergate with the revelations of our government illegally spying on us. Pelosi, Reid and company are going to immunize telecoms and thereby forever cover up the illegal spying of the admin shortly (and weaken FISA to a degree). As Greenwald has asked, what have they done that a Republican-controlled Congress would not have? What are Congressional leaders hiding by either blocking investigations or allowing the admin to stonewall? Or is this just a look-the-other-way deal to get back the WH?

It has taken the Supreme Court to strike down the unconstitutional powers that the Congress (allowed by Reid and Pelosi) gave to Bush (and the stripping of habeas in the MCA did not just apply to non-American citizens). How does it serve the American people to let this gang of crooks hide forever the crimes and abuses of power that can only be imagined (beyond those that have leaked out). Is the next president going to return to the honest rule of law? How will we know?

The decision to impeach or not should be made on grounds of Constitutional principle, not political gamesmanship. Impeach Bush and Cheney now to protect future generations from their egregious precedents. It's never too late. By keeping impeachment "off the table", Pelosi is either a fool or complicit in their crimes. Perhaps both.

avatar

Don Key , you and raider 99 are right - the impeachment process is the grand jury - the Senate is the tryer of facts - the prosecutor after the indictment . We can have Conyers , Waxman et al lay out the indictments before the election - and then have the Senate try the case after the general election , after Obama takes office .
The reality is that this will likely not happen because Madam Speaker & other democratic leaders are complicit in war crimes with bushcheney -
(Remember the gang of eight - four democrats & four republicans -that covered up the torture at Gitmo ) .
We can only pray that there will be criminal charges pressed after the general election against
these fascist that have hijacked our collective good name .
In related action -good news - the Supreme Court did reinstate our habeas corpus rights -bet that pissed bushcheney off to no end ( NEEENER ,NEENER !!) .

avatar

Impeachment is a necessary part of the democratic process and is not to be used or ignored lightly. There are certain crimes and actions that would make the process necessary all the way up to Jan. 19, 2009 lest we forgo our right and duties as citizens. If our elected officials refuse to carry out their duties then their office should also be forfeit.

we may have to resort to 'citizens' arrests'! it may take tens of thousands of us too, what with Blackwater-type thugs taking out the first few waves of us ...

or, maybe it's done 'incrementally': a few disappearances here and there; eventually the whole gang is gone ... we finally 'render' them to deep deep black holes ...

the corporate media can't quite make it out ... or follow the blood-soaked path ...

MonicaL, I felt compelled to come back here and let you know that I have no fucking clue about who you are and who you are related to. The thread died before I got back to rectifying any misunderstanding. I hope we are clear.

I think it has something to do with Donner, but I do poorly with the backroom relations and multiple personalities (except my own voices of course)

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address