Yes, I would like to know that, too, that would help fill the guessing game gaps. Myself I don't look at it from a partisan angle, not in the least. I look at it like this: this primary stage is always so maddeningly vague about what the future might hold, even the position papers are pandering. They all do vague pander crap which leaves you with nothing zip nada reality-wise, especially if they are a relatively new face. Unless you have an executive record for them, you don't have a clue what their cabinet and policy actions are going to look like, you are running on faith. I don't look at it like I am trying to figure out who to root for, I look at it as ok, I already cast my single vote of preference, but then it goes on and the majority wins, there's not much I can do about that, it's the rules in this here democratic republic. And then I have to figure out what the heck the winner is really going to try to be doing, because he/she hasn't really gotten to talking about that much yet, he/she has been busy selling his/her personality. And I don't get why more people don't want to do that, that they think figuring things out about the candidate while a campaign is still going on is bad thing to do. Maybe if more people did that, campaigns wouldn't be like they are, they'd actually deal with stuff that matters....

Did that whine make any sense? ;-)