Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

For the First Time In My Adult Life...

avatar

A funny thing happened today... something I didn't expect.
 
I was making lunch for my soon to be 79-year old mother and she asked me what was going on in the wacky world of politics. During much of this election, she has tried to avoid the daily temper tantrums of Hillary, or the latest tirade from Bill. So periodically, I'll tell her to flip over to which ever channel and watch Barack or Michelle. About the only thing she'll voluntarily turn to is Keith Olbermann.  Special Comments from Keith often have her whooping and applauding. When Keith goes off, it's back to Cops or some crime show.

Saturday we watched the RBC proceedings from our separate favorite tv watching rooms, and periodically I'd check on her. We both noticed how much James Roosevelt, one of the co-chairs looked like his grandfather, Franklin. We'd talk about the parallel of politics then and now. We cheered when it was over, happy with the result.

So today, while making lunch, I started to ask her if she ever thought she'd see in her lifetime -- let alone mine -- a black man running for president. A black man as the Democratic party's <i>nominee?</i> Did you ever think you'd see this day come?

Except that I couldn't quite get the words out. Unexpectedly, just as I had that thought, I had glanced at my mom, sitting at the dining room table, playing a quick game of solitaire while waiting for lunch -- much the same way I and my four siblings used to sit patiently at the table before thousands of lunches or dinners entertaining ourselves.  Did you ever think you'd see the day?

I was born the same year as Brown versus Topeka B.O.E. and I didn't think I would see it. My dad, who passed away in 2000, saw the Millenium, but not this.Neither did my uncle on my mother's side, nor my paternal grandfather. My grandmother, who passed away in 2004, didn't live to see it. Nor did any of her five sisters and one brother. Their parents -- my great grandparents died within months of each other young, very young, leaving their six children behind. The eldest, one of my great aunts, was barely into her teens, the youngest, my great uncle was a toddler. My great grandparents and their parents would have lived through the last vestiges of slavery, and all of Jim Crow in South Carolina.

I imagine their dreams were never of a black man becoming President, but of just living free.

So, just as I was about to ask the question that I know a lot of working, hard working Americans, <b><i>black Americans</b></i> are asking each other, that montage of images flashed through my mind and I was choked up. I was on the mountaintop looking at a panoramic view of past and future. How far we have come, how far we have yet to go. But... WOW! How far we have come. I saw the promised land. Too many didn't live to see what I see.

So I didn't ask Mom if she ever thought she live to see the day... Because I know what her answer would be. No. Neither of us did.

But for the first time in my adult life...


Comments (115)

Jade: Thanks for this post. I cannot believe that we are this close to seeing a mixed race man as the Democratic candidate for President. It is stunning and prideful, and stupendous. I, too, am very very proud of this country. What a long way we have come to get to this place. I am just bursting! I know your mother is proud. So am I!

Well Written. Thanks for an important perspective.

Rec'd.

I always enjoy your post and comments.

You're an excellent writer.

Truly moving, Jade.

Too often we talk about the firsts - first woman, first black man, first hispanic, as political milestones, but we forget about the people they impact.

Thank you for sharing.

Jade, I've been thinking about you and your mom today, and I think you should ask her. I would bet that she would love to talk about it, and from a selfish standpoint, I'd love the privilege to know her answer.

Very nice. Thanks for sharing that excellent article.

Good luck with your mother. I know how hard it can be to care for an elderly parent. It's very good of you to share your life with her.

Thank you for allowing us to share this intensely personal moment. Sometimes I am glad that my parents and grandparents missed the heartache of one thing or another. But tonight I am sad that not one of them lived to see this: a triumph of Obama's do-the-right-thing-even-when-it's-hard ethics they believed in and lived by. My father used to say that "straightshooters always win," even when his own life experience ultimately belied that. How delighted he would be to see his belief justified.
P.S. A mother of 79 who watches Keith is a remarkable woman. Thank you for so obviously making her life better, by being there.

avatar

My thanks to you all...

O thanks for sharing that. It's so very wonderful to read.


Yes we can! Finally.

You know it is a good post when it has more recomends than coments.

avatar

She's probably been waiting to see a woman President, but was too senile to remember.

avatar

Leave it to Otto to show his flaming red ass like a baboon in the zoo.

If I offended any real baboons, I apologize.

HA!

Beautiful post BTW, thanks for that (the post and the laugh).

Otto, can you do me a really, really big favor tonight (or tomorrow, if you've gone to bed already)....can you please click on my personal profile and read all of my comments tonight? Because I've been apologizing to you upside down and backwards all night, and you don't seem to have seen that.

Of course, if you have indeed read my apologies and you're still intent on shooting off cruel and hurtful one-time comments that include no intelligent counter-argument nor any follow-up comment to explain your position more clearly, why....

...you owe me nothing but your empty hat.

Trying to place nice with you,
Lis
xoxo
with an emphasis on the oooos

Oops. I meant "play" nice.

Jade, your story touched me very much and deserves all the nice comments. Thank you for sharing it. If you ever want to play dual-solitaire, meet me at Obama's Innauguration next year in DC. I'll be there, and hope you will be too!

avatar

Otto You are crass, cruel and small minded. You repulse me.

avatar

Hey, Otto! Have you always been a dick?

avatar

What a sad, pathetic comment, Otto. And what a moving post, Jade. Thanks!

avatar

Beautiful post Jade. Please check this out. It's much the same story told from the other side of the divide that we hope will finally be bridged

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/14/144654/918/838/371386

markg8, that dkos story just made me cry.

Give me your hat so I can wipe the tears away with your sweatstained rim, will ya?

Thanks, bro.

Jade, I know just how you feel. Well said.

Lovely post, Jade. Thanks for sharing.

avatar

Great post - thanks.

avatar

I'm only 32 years old and from the state of Alabama. I'm also African-American. I wasn't born during the time of civil rights. I was born during a time where I still had to fear the KKK. My grandmother, who passed away in 2001, would always tell me about the civil rights movement and how it affected her in some way. She told me how she cried when John died and when Martin died. She was a first. One of the first African-American women to attend nursing school in Mobile, Alabama. She always said when it was time for a Presidential election, "I may never see the day that a black man will become president or the day that Alabama will vote for a black man to run our country. I hope it happens in your lifetime."

On February 5, 2008, my state carried Obama overwhelmingly. I cried not just for me, but for my grandmother, who couldn't be here to see that day. I know that in my heart, she was smiling down from heaven. Because the unthinkable happened. A state that many people is one of the most racist states in the nation, voted for a black man!

My trip to Denver is dedicated to my grandmother, Etta Lee Kirksey Chestnut, my hero.

LaKeisha Chestnut
Obama Delegate

Indeed that is a 3 hankie post.

My little Non-African American mother would have absolutely fallen in love with Barack Obama - I just know it. I've missed her more lately than I have in some years.


Thanks for that post.

That was a three hankie post!

avatar

Jade, Loved this touching message. My 82 year old mom and I have also shared some great moments this election cycle. In addition to her patience in listening to me on my soap box, she has never been to a political rally and in fact neither have I, until last week. Being surrounded by 16,000 Americans from every race, color and creed, all cheering for the same promise of a better country is something that literally moved me to tears. Thank you for sharing your wonderful experience with your readers. I hope in this special year, writing like yours might help our country to learn to cherish the many first times that are just waiting for us to wake up to.

And, Jade, not just "running" for president.
This November should be historic.

avatar

Jade, wonderful post. This crazy, wacky, embittering, enrolling long campaign trail; bring to mind bitter-sweet memories such as when Conrad Edwards and I could not go to the movies or eat a meal together off post. Or when I was on assignment in Alabama when a so-so golf clubhouse was integrated for the very first time and many more.
Thanks Jade!

Not to play Otto.

It's been only 36 years since George Wallace was splitting the ticket, appealing to the intolerant racist vote, and took a bullet - one that would change the election and one that would change his life - having his paralyzed ass wiped by a black woman who can keep a smile on her face can bring a bit of humility to the soul. And he did in fact change, quite a bit. He was a much better man crippled than when he stood in the door of that college and said only whites will pass. He was a much better man having made that humiliating journey from arrogant self-righteousness to complete dependence.

There's a city in northern Alabama called Huntsville. Many people don't know about it, because Selma and Birmingham got all the attention (MLK made a conscious decision to protest where they'd send out the dogs - no use spending a day in the sun for no story). But in 1963, 4 black students were kept from entering elementary schools in Huntsville, and then the federal government stepped in and they got to stay. And most people from Huntsville have no idea this happened, right there, in its schools. Huntsville is a weird town. It had a missile range there, and somewhere in the 1950's the government decided to locate the German V-2 scientists and the budding space program development there, so a sleepy town of 17,000 mushroomed into 140,000 overnight, many transplanted northerners, building the rockets for the NASA with the rumble of booster tests shaking the city. But still, black kids couldn't go to a decent elementary school. During the 1970's, Huntsville turned into a mini-technology boom that brought expansion and continued to change the face of the city, so that these days you see Indians and Vietnamese and Chinese and blacks and whites on the high-tech campuses, and hear much more than just the staccato of German voices. The surrounding redneck and poor black scrabble towns have steadily become suburbs as roads cut through the hills to produce Greater Huntsville, which is not quite the same thing as a northeast metropolis, but is still quite the change.

So in the 45 years since those little kids were told they couldn't enter the school, in the 36 years since Governor Wallace was shot, things have changed quite a bit in Alabama. Not perfect, but quite a move from there to here.

I appreciate the expression of identity politics in this thread. I think it's the most normal thing in the world, and something to be happy about. I think it's unusual to deny identity politics, as if it's bad to be yourself, bad to work for improvements for those closest to you, whether family, community, profession or other affiliation.

50 years ago, most black people in Alabama were resigned to a poor second-class existence. Now they can look at a black man, one of their own, with the real chance to be president, as symbolizing this new age where they can be anything they want to be. And it's refreshing for any minority - because once that color divide is opened up, there's not much essential difference in whether the person is brown or yellow or red. We all know it's been a white society since conception with horrible periods of racial intolerance to blacks, Native Americans, Hispanics, Chinese and Japanese to prove it. But even though there are problems of inequality that will likely always remain, you are now on a basic intrinsic level accepted and equal.

But I would ask that while you're enjoying your time in the sun, that you look across at the others who've been moving while you've been moving, whether it's those 4 Jewish boys killed protesting 45 years ago or the proud white southerners who've learned to adapt their concept of pride or those engineers who work every day in this melting pot and their kids who go to the new schools or the people who gladly move into mixed neighborhoods or those white voters who stepped into a voting booth and chose either of the candidates without worrying about what color they were.

Because sometimes I get the feeling that people think of this as a zero sum game - for one group to get ahead, another has to get behind. But we know from economics this isn't true - everyone's pay can rise even if some pay rises faster. We know from society this isn't true - there's no happiness debit if a second group finds life easier and less stressful. But for 50 years people have been looking at Alabama whites as a bunch of backwards racists - you'd be hard pressed to find a movie about the south that doesn't show some stereotyped symbol of racial hatred or a quaint backwards religious family clutching the Bible as they say grace. And it grates, just like all the in-breeding jokes about the Appalachians. One-third of the white Democratic voters chose Obama, and certainly a good portion of the 2/3 who chose Clinton did so for good reasons that didn't include race.

So perhaps we can take a breather from the stereotypes about the South, to admit that we've all come a long way in these years, that the intolerance of 50 years ago no longer exists in that entrenched fashion even if we have loads of room for improvement, that all Americans of whatever color are working together these days to lend a helping hand, and that the days when kids were locked out of schools are gone and have been replaced with a process where most can find a hand up no matter how poor they are if they're willing to work hard. Because we've all worked hard these last 50 years to bring this chapter to a close - through our votes, our attitudes, our tax dollars and donations, and in a hundred other ways that make a difference. And the curious thing about this is that lots of whites worked towards this fairer society not because they had anything to gain personally, in many ways quite the opposite, but simply because it was the right thing to do. And it's not just about a single candidate - it's about where you can live, work, study, relax. It's about opportunity in America, and that's now open for all.

avatar

Thanks for your good writing and your case for a fairer view of the south and progress, Desidero.

Desidero - I hope, despite the fact that you don't like me, that you've seen at least couple of the posts I've left all over the internet defending the south steadily and for years against what I see as east coast liberal establishment prejudice against the south.

I agree with you - we've come an astoundingly long way. When I was a kid, a biracial couple down here would stop traffic. Not any more - it's as common as a same race couple these days and that has been the single biggest change I've seen.

Still trying to figure out the "4 Jewish boys killed 45 years ago."

Things have changed greatly for the south. But plenty of institutionalized racism in a state like Mississippi has simply moved underground, and has stopped being violent when it became clear that people who lynch can end up in jail themselves.


You know where the last lynching in this country took place? Not the south.

There is institutionalized racism all over this country and anyone who fails to see that is fooling him or herself.

The south is not any more racist than Boston, Mass, which had riots for weeks over integrating the schools.

There all kinds of "lynchings" surely. And recent murders of gay couples in places like Oregon count among them. Any kind of murder over intolerance is a lynching. The South has a special prominence in these matters. Again, what constitutes a lynching
is a matter of semantics perhaps. The guy dragged to death some years back in Texas was a clear cut lynching in the old fashioned wordage while the murder of two Lesbians in Oregon was clearly a hate- crime in the new word usage. It was however a crime that would not be acknowledged by Oregon authorities. Not a happy moment for Oregon's gay community in a state with a reputation for tolerance.

Racism and its attendant violence varies in from state to state and within the regions of a state. My experience as a person and also as a reader shows that clearly. Speaking also as a partner in one of those interracial marriages.

The racism in the deep south where many of the worst murderers are still around is an historical reality and has profound and unspoken effects on politics.

Speaking particularly of Mississippi this varies, as mentioned before, from county to county. Jackson is quite different from Neshoba county for example. Some fifty years back they were kind of the same, though straight- out murder in the old style was more likely to be done elsewhere, even a few miles north in Madison County. In Jackson it would only be cheered.

The difference between Jackson and Neshoba today is perhaps a good model for what is happening elsewhere. Jackson has become cosmopolitan. A fine journalist there was important in reopening old murders and bringing the murderers into court.

But consider Neshoba. I did a double take on the "4 Jewish boys" unsure of what Desirido had in mind as he's usually quite precise when it comes to history. I've got to think that he was referencing the murders of three civil rights workers in Neshoba, in 1964 -- two Jews and one black. Their names were Andy Goodman, Mickey Schwerner and James Chaney. I would provides links here but I'm not that good at it.

These murders were quite notorious, world wide in fact. And when Ronald Reagan announced his run for president in the tiny little town of Philadelphia, Miss. where the murders took place, and several of the murderers including the police that took part in them were in his audience, guess what ? This was understood in the south and elsewhere as a political message. You need not rely on me for that information as it has been discussed widely in political history. This is the kind of thing that still plays to racism when a candidate addresses a particular group, organization, whatever, and the Obama situation with his church
resonates here as nasty material for racist sentiment but from a slightly different angle.

As for institutionalized racism in Mississippi, I cite a story about a lecturer at MSU, not far from Neshoba. Ten years ago MSU was 40 per cent black. Nationally known for its sports teams. The speaker was there to give a lecture on a topic not related to civil rights, but had been a civil rights worker in that area, and with direct experience with the Neshoba lynchings. The speaker asked the student affairs provost if they might want some appearance at the Black Student Union Forum, which meets to discuss, among other things, issues of race on campus. The answer was no. The black students were never told that this particular speaker had that experience. Another provost told the speaker that they really didn't want to talk about these things because Mississippi had been a lot better off before the civil rights movement. The speaker was also taken to a quaint little museum of what they called "Negroes in American History" which contained the worst kind of racist literature in the form of blackface sheet music in such volume as to be a cultural kind of lynching.

Last I checked, MSU is a state supported university. Provosts work for a state supported institution. They are the Power Structure there. If that's not institutionalized racism, well, tell what is?

Finally, as part of an interracial couple who have traveled widely in America and elsewhere, I can assure you that there is still a profound racism and sense of danger in areas of the deep south one never encounters elsewhere in America --Idaho a bit, but less so.

To all racists, whoever they may be or wherever they lurk, whether KKK, skinheads, rednecks, bubbas, cossacks, Chetniks, Afrikkaners, KGB....and to all deniers of racism caught up in some feel-good liberalism, I say "kiss my ass," but you won't shoot it, 'cause I see you coming.

Or that's what I would say if I wasn't the kind lady in the picture from the 19th century.


Well you are in a position to speak to something I am not in the position to speak to and I can only defer to your experience.

I'm sorry that has been your experience.

Not at all personal, Tena. Just a chance to write about history, the great equalizer for us all.

O dear - I didn't mean to suggest it was all personal with you.

But you do have experience here that I cannot claim, love - I can't argue with someone's experience when I'm in no position to do that.

:)

One more thing - since you brought up homosexuality, I feel compelled to point out that Dallas, Texas is considered the 2d most gay/lesbian/transsexual friendly, if now down right welcoming, city in the United States.

I'm down with that, Tena, but I'm talking about those bad-ass counties in other regions of Texas. Friendly white people and more tolerant these days, especially the younger set. Unbearably beautiful country also, and deep with the powerful sweetness of good old boy and girl culture, dancing, and drinking. That is a culture that is not known for its interest in non-whites. That's changing, certainly, especially with the more accepted couplings of whites with Mexicans and Indians (still can't make that Native American wordage work for me,....guess I'm a racist). I'm looking forward to the day when Mr. Obama becomes Mister President. Part of that is the old "they call me Mr. Tibbs." But part is also a deep wish for America and the rest of the world to move one step more away from racism. It's a dream that will never be realized fully in my opinion. I have the audacity of hope but the heart of a realist.

"They call me Barack HUSSEIN Obama" --and "Keep Hope Alive."
Or as sung in the great song from the striking white miners of Kentucky and West Virginia, that went down the sweet smelling Appalachian byway to the deep red clay of Mississippi --
"Which side are you on, boys, which side are you on?

In addition to institutionalized racism and Brown v. Board, I'd like to throw in public education as being a pretty big source of this. The racism is still there coupled as it always has been with classism. Property tax as a way to fund schools is one of the most terrible elements forwarding this.

I agree with you on this. I wish I saw a solution. What about you?
See anything that might make progress here? America's school system can't approach that of Germany or France for example --interesting in that these old world countries were one so deeply rooted in strict social divisions. Of course they have moved to various socialist attitudes, not in the economy but in schools, health care and the like. Your average Turkish kid gets a fine education in Germany.

Perhaps, but that Turkish kid ain't getting a job in Germany.

That's true also. But within the Turkish communities in cities there are opportunities. In the 80's some Turks and Kurds found good jobs in places. There are Turkish food places everywhere.

The anti-Turkish racism is always high. You may be in a better position to know this than I am, a more casual observer at this point.

I have no particular insight, just the general observation that racial/ethnic issues everywhere are complicated.

Maybe it was two Jews and one black, maybe there was another case I'm thinking of or I'm just getting old.

And I don't want to get caught in the "all states are as racist" excuse. The South was more racist, even if there was a good amount elsewhere. There's a beauty there in the South and a horrid scar. Faulkner expresses a lot of this and he's quite damaged himself.

You have it right with Faulkner. The inheritance of a European literary tradition in close proximity to the vibrant oral traditions of of blacks produced a rich culture of literature-- a poetic culture.
And you are getting old on the four Jews. Many killed elsewhere, but two in the civil rights movement. Important murders sort of, and calculated politically by the radical side of the movement for political effect. The idea was that until whites were murdered in the movement, the government and country would continue to drag their feet. That proved true, as those murders changed the landscape for government involvement. Many blacks had been killed, and were killed after that. What was a surprise in the summer of 1964 was that only two were killed when the prediction was a hundred from some. When the early murders happened, caught the headlines, and Johnson sent in a small army to find the bodies, the rest of the rights workers were protected for a time. Civil rights workers going to Mississippi understood the plan, well many of them. The first murders were expected, the safety for a time after was not.

Desidero - not close to being like Otto. Not even in the same universe. Play on.

avatar

It doesn't have to be a zero sum game, but unfortunately, it generally is.

Well said. Thank you.

avatar

Good post.

Thanks for this.

I remember reading about the rocket boom in Huntsville in Tom Wolfe's "The Right Stuff".

avatar

Jade,

As a white guy, I can't even imagine what its like to live as an African American in this nation. But I have to say, I feel something that's got to be close to the same level of wonder, amazement, and pride at what's happening here. I realize that a lot of Obama's success is that he's somehow "post" racial, but that's OK - that's pretty much the point really, to GET post-racial. I don't know if enough Americans are color-blind enough to actually elect him - we'll find out in a few months. But to actually have him running in the general election campaign is something I don't think the most ardent civil rights fighter would have expected to see in his or her lifetime. And to have a woman get this close is also pretty amazing and wonderful - too bad she couldn't have played it cleaner and made us all proud of both of them. But I think most of us who have come to judge Hillary harshly have judged her just like we would have judged a guy acting the same way - her gender didn't much matter after a while, just her actions. As it should be. And I suspect that the vast majority of people who oppose Obama are doing it for political and ideological reasons too, with a relative few doing it because of racism. Which is also a victory. He should be judged on his character and positions and, for the most part, has been and will be.

Why would you say Obama is post-racial?

avatar

Very moving. Thank you for sharing this. My folks are in their 90's and I have had similar thoughts. You expressed it beautifully.

avatar

Jade that was a very moving article. I'm sure that Obama's success been very emotionally uplifting for you and your family.

This Democratic Primary has been very difficult for us as a party. I believe that it has been fatal to our chances of winning in the fall. I shouldn't say our, because while I am a liberal Democrat, I currently have no intention of voting for Obama in the fall. But my reasons for voting against Obama aren't why he'll lose.

I believe that he will lose because of the number of women Hillary supports who will not support him because they are feeling the opposite of the pride that you feel in Obama. They saw the opportunity to elect the first woman President, and fairly or not, they blame Obama for that not happening.

It's antedotal of coarse, but I'm suprised by the number of women who say that if they have to elected the 45th consecutive male president, it's not going to be Obama.

Wonderful post!

Here Here!

Didn't think I'd see in my life time, but I'm glad we're here in this time.

Hopefully Obama will reach t he magic number tonight 2,118.

avatar

Emigrating from Europe to the USA in the early '80s, I was amazed to discover how diverse and progressive the US society was in comparison to Europe's.
As an European, I always felt envious of the US especially of its AA population, because I regarded it as an untaped "asset" yet to fully maximize its potential.
My American wife's job takes us all over the world, and we live now in France, where we've been following the primaries with interest. This (an AA running for President of the USA )is indeed a lifetime phenomenum, We European are longing for an inspiring American leader like Obama, after the disastrous bush'e regime.
While not a US citizen, in a time like this, I can take solace and pride that my four children are Americans.


avatar

Jade, thank you for a wonderful post. I really love to read of the generational considerations and the movement of history such stories reflect.

My mom, who is soon to be 86 never misses Keith's Countdown!

This makes me think back to a story my mother often tells (our family is white). Her late father (born in rural Alabama, raised in rural Tennessee) was visiting us in Charlotte, NC. Watching the news, he was startled to see that we had a black mayor (Harvey Gantt). My mother noted "Yes, John (my late father) and I both voted for him." Granddaddy responded, with genuine curiosity and no malice "Did you sure 'nuff?" You see, it simply never occurred to him that white Southerners voting for a black person was even possible. One generation, his own daugther had not only considered it, but did it. And even he, despite being raised in some very racist places, knew it wasn't a bad thing. Mom was also still a Republican then, so she even had crossed party lines to vote for Gantt. Don't worry, she switched over in 1999!

Those of you not from NC may not know that Gantt came within a whisker of defeating the odious Jesse Helms in 1990, aiding by the infamous "white hands" ad. I was humiliated that such race baiting could still work in NC, but proud that my parents had tought me better than that (and both voted for Gantt).

18 years later, my home state of North Carolina effectively ended the nomination fight, handing the Dem nomination to a black man. I was a poll watching attorney, and saw a steady stream of voters of all ages and races vote over that long day. In a majority-white district in West Raleigh, Obama ended up winning by a magin of almost 3-to-1. At 3:30, a crucial undecided voted - my mother - called me on my cell phone to let me know that she prayed fervently in the voting booth, leaving the Presidential selection for last. She said that after praying, she knew that the only reasons not to vote for Obama were unfair to him, and so she voted for him.

It was a great day for this North Carolinian. I think we can pull it off in November, too.

I hear you.

Primary night here in Texas was like some kind of movie or something - it was the most amazing thing I've ever seen - the entire county turned out joyfully and voted and caucused for an African American candidate. They didn't integrate my schools until I was in high school; I remember "Colored's Only" waterfountains, though just barely.

If we get him elected, it's going to be the most incredible thing I've seen in my life and I am going to fall in love with my country all over again because I believe in the people, I believe in our better angels and I believe people want someone to speak to those angels and if we do this - O my god. I don't know what to say. It makes being old enough to really get this almost worth it.

;)


Awesome story, Mrs. X. My mother remembers being a little girl and asking her parents about the "colored" water fountains in Asheville, NC, too. Even then, there was no good answer that a fair-minded person could give or accept.

The historic nature of this candidacy means alot of different things to many different people. In the end, I think it brings us all more closely together.

We'll fix this country yet, by God!

Side note to Mrs. X - my mother also taught me how to swear creatively. I think you two would get along swimmingly!

avatar

I remember asking about one of those "colored" water fountains. My grandmother was a brilliant woman (college graduate in the south in the early part of the century) and, in addition, she spoke to us kids as if we were adults -- gave full and honest explanations when we asked questions, no matter what the subject. I remember - so vividly - being about 5 years old and holding her hand as we walked into a department store in our small Mississippi town. (There was one of those mechanical ponies you could ride for a quarter in the doorway.) I guess I must have been starting to read everything,to test out that new skill, but for some reason - for the first time - I focused on the two water fountains and read the signs above them.

And I asked her why, because it didn't make any sense to me. It wasn't like we had different germs or anything, because while we were shopping my grandmother's cook, who was 'colored,' was back home making our food. It just didn't make sense.

I honestly don't remember what my grandmother said -- I can only remember her talking, a little haltingly, for some time. And I remember feeling, with all the indignation of a 5 year old, really angry and upset, because I knew she was lying to me (or saying something that made no sense - pretty much the same to a kid). That day -- and my outrage, not at racism but at being told "stupid stuff" by my grandmother, whom I trusted, has stayed with me for a very long time.

It was, in ways hard to describe, a relief to white Southerners when segregation came to an end. You didn't have to keep lying to yourself and your children.

Thank you, Jade. What a wonderful post.

Right there with you Oh, Wolf-Person.

My monitoring assignment was at an almost entirely black urban precinct in my town. The campaign couldn't get monitors in my county inside, so I spent the day outside with the poll workers for local candidates. There were a lot of people who came to vote with their children but my sense was that in most cases that was because they had no other child-care options.

There was one man, however who came with his granddaugher or, for all I know, his great- granddaugher. I put him in his seventies, but a very vigorous and healthy seventy. A bald, mustschioed man, tall, slender, quiet dignity personified, holding the hand of a child. His granddaugher was one of the most beautiful children I've ever seen, almost supernaturally so. I imagine Halle Barry looked like that little girl when she was five, except that she had these extrordinary deep blue eyes.

There was just that something about this man, about him, about the set of his shoulders and the look in his eye, that said this man was not bringing this child to a polling place because he was babysitting. Instead, this man was bringing his granddaughter to this delapiddated community center because something important was happening this day. Today, history was bring made.

I think maybe a few people voted that day who might not have, if not for me. Perhaps I did some good, perhaps not. I spent fourteen hours outdoors that day, most of them on my feet, and the next day, I literally felt like I'd taken a beating. (And having taken a couple of quite expert beatings in my younger days, I know whereof I speak). Worse, all that time outside in the pollen storm that is late spring in North Carolina triggered an allergy attack from hell. By Thursday, my sinuses felt like that side of beef Rocky pounded on. I'm still not over that.

But I swear before God, all of it was a small price to pay for having had the opportunity to see that old man bringing his granddaughter to the polls to bear witness to history.

Very Nice Jade. I love reading your comments as well.

I'll be saying that alot in the coming years "I never thought I'd see (fill in the blank) in my lifetime" and "I'm so proud of my country". Thx Jade.

avatar

Thanks again for the kind words all... I am enjoying reading your thoughts and feelings about this day, too. They also bring me joy. Keep writing.

You know, we've spent a lot of this campaign ranting and raving about issues that are not really central to selecting a nominee. We've screamed at each other about a lot things. We've postulated on race and identity politics, sexism and class and more.

Sometimes in all of this bickering and cheerleading and snarking and cooing at each other we miss what politics is supposed to do beyond the day to day machinery of governing: bring change, bring hope, bring vision, bring direction.

That was what was -- is -- embodied in the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident..." It is the challenge laid forth in the Preamble to the Constitution: "We, the People, in order to form a more perfect union..."

So, today, tonight, tomorrow or whenever it happens, is not a day that just black Americans can be proud of this nation, but everyone can be proud of so many things we as a people have accomplished. Things large and small, things easy and difficult.

To remember another hero (awkwardly invoked by Sen. Clinton) whose sad anniversary will occur this week: We've seen wrong and tried to right it. Sometimes we have way too slow, and far too often, way too blind to plight of our brothers and sisters who struggle with injustice, poverty, bigotry, ignorance. Sometimes we have denied justice by delaying it. Sometimes we have shared it grudgingly.

This day is important to us all, without regard to race, color, gender or creed. We are all standing on that mountaintop. We can all see the promised land.

There is this phenomenom called the "tipping point," when the pressure on an object or in this case, an idea pushes it finally in direction or another. This nomination will be one of those points. For 143 years, this country has wanted to tip in a direction that will let us erase the terrible stain of slavery.

Selecting Obama as the Democratic Party's nominee will not erase the stain, but we will have starting bleaching it out instead of whitewashing over it again. There is work to be done. For about 30 of the last 40 years -- since Martin and Bobby -- we've stood still or in some cases gone backwards. We are moving again. It's slow, there is some resentment and resistance. Soon we can rely on physics of momentum to keep us propelled in the right direction.

Today we can all feel pride. This a good day for us all. It's a good day to say "I'm am an American. An American."

As you express, so clearly and eloquently, your views on this time in our history, I can only add that Barack Obama is not a black candidate. He is a great man, whose qualities would shine in any color. To me, he is a statesman, and a true statesman comes along only a few times in a person's lifetime. To me, he is a man of honor, of integrity and of restraint. In no way do I mean to take away from the "in my lifetime" impact of his candidacy, Jade, but I tell you, as a white man who has seen so much sad and despicable politics in my lifetime, Barack Obama is the candidate I've been waiting for, too.

Today we can all feel pride. This a good day for us all. It's a good day to say "I'm am an American. An American."

O hell, Jade, now you do have me crying.


Thanks again for this.

avatar

The personal and moving stories told here by Jade and NC State Dem and others beautifully compliment each other. Jade's post does not diminish the contributions of whites, or ignore the fact that progress has been made. She is simply telling her own moving story, own her own terms, at this particular moment in history. I can't understand why Desidero would want to censor that. There is no zero-sum game here. All of these stories fit neatly into the same volume.

Yes, they do and there is more than enough room for all these stories.

They are crying out to be told - in my opinion. I love this post, dearly.

avatar

Desidero did not call for censorship.

I'm not getting the Desidero reference. Perhaps you mean Otto?

Beautiful. Thank you so much for sharing it with us.

avatar

Thanks that too brought tears. I think I needed to cry a bit now that we are standing at the finish line for phase one.

avatar

And you might want to extend your empathy to the many women who thought they might see a woman elected as president in their lifetimes. For many women this is one of the greatest political disappointments in their lives, they are as emotionally invested in this as you are. I wish you could have written this without the petty insults and degrading comments about the Clintons who have done so much to advance the cause of full civil liberties for all.

buzzkill

avatar

BevD, then I encourage you to write your story.

But before you do, let me ask that you look to Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Frederick Douglass for a touchstone. They, in 1870, had one of the great debates during the "battles" over over women's or Negro suffrage. Some would suggest that Cady Stanton's reluctance to embrace the enfranchisement of black men, and her ultimate "my way or the highway" attitude (okay more like, "my way or the Post Road") led to women not continuing to pursue their own enfranchisement and receiving it until 1920.

Should you cut off your nose to spite your face?

avatar

That's not what happened. Douglass refused to include women in the equal rights amd. of 1869 saying "white women already have the vote through their fathers and husbands". Up until then the women's suffrage movement was very much for universal suffrage. Susan B. Anthony completely stopped campaigning for women's suffrage to throw herself into the abolitionist movement. All of their publications, before and after the falling out supported universal enfranchisement and civil rights. Women of the suffrage movement were very bitter about the abandonment and I don't blame them.

This of course, is not my point - my point is that there are many, many women who saw the election of a woman in the same light that you see the election of a black man. I don't object to that sentiment, I understand it - what I object to is the meanspirited characterization of Clinton who for many people in this country is as inspirational as Obama is. The remarks were gratuitous and hurtful to Clinton supporters and in my opinion lacks an empathy for those women who feel very much the same as you do.

This is not a criticism of you as a person, just your remarks.

avatar

I guess "what happened" depends on how you see history.

During a heated meeting in New York City’s Steinway Hall in 1869, Stanton wondered, “Shall American statesmen ... so amend their constitutions as to make their wives and mothers the political inferiors of unlettered and unwashed ditch-diggers, bootblacks, butchers and barbers, fresh from the slave plantations of the South?” At which point, Douglass rose, paid tribute to Stanton’s years of work on civil rights for all, and replied, “When women, because they are women, are hunted down through the cities of New York and New Orleans; when they are dragged from their houses and hung from lampposts; when their children are torn from their arms and their brains dashed out upon the pavement; when they are objects of insult and rage at every turn; when they are in danger of having their homes burnt down... then they will have an urgency to obtain the ballot equal to our own.” From the New York Times
Let's do this: First, BevD... Let us agree that next week we'll take this debate about what we can call "feminism or sexism" versus "racism" in American political life to separate posts here at TPM. You write from your perspective and I will write from mine.

Second, everyone else let's continue what is the first layer of the onion as we start the "real, long overdue, national discussion on race." We need to keep exchanges like what we're sharing here going... and we can do it from a political perspective.


In the meantime, I will continue to be fascinated by all

avatar

I agree it is pointless to engage in an argument on this subject - suffice it to say that your account is not accurate. (Stanton made her remarks in Jan. of 1869 in D.C., Douglass made his remarks in May of 1869 in New York.)

Again, that is not the material point - the material point is that by your gratuitous remarks about Sen. Clinton you show a lack of empathy for women who feel very much the same as you do - a longing for inclusion in the political process. This isn't about racism or sexism, this is about empathy for other people who are as emotionally invested in this campaign as you are, and for the same reasons.

avatar

Funny the last time I checked, I'm fully equipped with both XX chromosomes and all the fully functioning working parts. So don't tell me I don't know nuthin' about bein' no female.

I'll be blunt: Hillary Clinton did not lose this race because of sexism. She lost it because of lousy campaigning. Hillary Clinton was not the victim, but she played one on TV. She wasn't ganged up on. Hillary Clinton lost because people looked at her record and her husband's and decided they had had enough of the Clintons.

This is Obama's night. And it is the night of Americans who believe it is time for CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN.

I don't think Bev is saying that Clinton lost because of sexism. Rather, I think she's just asking for a measure of empathy that, in this case, Obama's win is Clinton's loss, and that for many women who wished to have a slightly different story to sell, they are grieving.

I found your story very moving, Jade, and Obama has always been my candidate for reasons having nothing to do with his race (nor do I discern that his race was the reason you voted for him either). It is very exciting that we have made this breakthrough.

At the same time, exactly because of how exciting it is, I can understand why others are now feeling frustration, or at the very least are having their excitement tempered somewhat by bittersweet feelings.

avatar

That's lovely, Ben - very well said and understanding.

Ben, I don't think Bev is reporting grieving at all.

I just don't think she believes an Obama win is any sort of victory for women (why should it be?), and it's doubly irritating to have the insinuation or blatant statement that Hillary doesn't belong in the race, ignoring and belittling all reasons her followers support her.

It's called being pissed off and unsatisfied, not crying.

avatar

You simply cannot grasp the point. I don't know why, but it evades you with every post. Hillary Clinton ran a good, close race. Like Obama she has good qualities and bad qualities, she would have been a fine president, just as Obama will be a fine president.

I'm going to try and explain this one more time because I think you are missing the material point. It's not a matter of qualifying suffering - that is impossible to do - for every moment of misery for blacks that you mention, women can match it with a misery of their own. Misery is the lot of second class citizenry in the world. What I am trying to explain to you in what is apparently a less than satisfactory manner, is that the gratuitous insults such as "daily temper tantrums" etc., are unnecessarily cruel to those women who thought, like you, that they would never in their lifetimes be represented in the highest office of the land. For many women who worked so hard in the movement, this is a dream that will not be fulfilled. They probably will not see a woman candidate within arm's length of the nomination in their lifetimes. These women love and admire and appreciate Clinton and her work over the decades and do not agree that she had "daily temper tantrums" or committed any crimes worse than any other politician does in campaigning. Now Clinton has millions and millions of supporters who are as deeply involved in this race as you are and just as emotionally invested in it. They don't need to have their noses rubbed in it and their candidate maligned just as I'm sure that if the shoe was on the other foot, you would not like to read gratuitous and cruel remarks about Obama. It is a matter of compassion and empathy for people who are on the same side as you are but supported another way of achieving their goals.

You quoted Douglass and now I'll quote Douglass from that same debate - "Let me tell you that when there were few houses in which the black man could have put his head, this wooly head of mine found a refuge in the house of Mrs. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and if I had been blacker than sixteen midnights without a single star, it would have been the same." So you see, things aren't always what we think they are and everyone can benefit from empathy and compassion.

Bev, they miss the "rights accorded due to aggrieved suffering" vs. "rights accorded due to natural state" argument. If the 14th & 15th Amendments had been seen as enfranchising all by nature of being human, it would have been a stronger statement. (I agree that the way they're written should have given voting rights to women even then).

Douglass saying women were enfranchised through their husbands is about as satisfying as saying slaves were enfranchised through their owners. (Perhaps allocating those 3/5 votes to the specific slave master would have appeased him?).

One might argue that Stanton could have gotten farther riding this bus and expecting a second. (Though not conclusively). One might argue that her increased racial invective did not help (though I don't recall a specific rule that requires the politically disenfranchised to be civil and respectful and politically correct at all times). But Douglass' dismissing women's urgency to vote based on their lack of persecution is certainly worth condemning as a bonehead way of splitting the voting movement. Perhaps we should give male gays the right to marry and leave out lesbians - after all, lesbians can stay at home and do housework, while men have to get out in the business world and deal with medical coverage and inheritance.

I also get a bit cracked up with "Barack...will stand for the women". Oh really. I remember when Andrew Sullivan declared himself a feminist. While daily blasting Hillary for being "Nixon in a pants suit" and worse sexist lines. For fuck's sake, women can't even manage to defend themselves half the time - see Maureen Dowd and Ann Coulter for obvious examples. Who voted Obama in as Saint? He wrote a whole book about his absent father while largely ignoring his mother, in the 2nd edition wishing she'd lived longer so he could ask her more about herself. She died when he was 34. Another incurious George we have here.

avatar

BevD,

I'm a woman and I am white, but tonight I have tears of joy because a black man, a *worthy* black man, is the nominee of my party. If you want to take a simplistic view, if someone should go first, it should be the blacks. Whatever women have suffered, they - men and women - have had worse, far worse. I have to disagree with you there. But then I grew up in the deep South in the 1950s: I saw, first hand, the comparison and I know full well that it has been far easier to be a white woman.

But it really doesn't *have* to be one or the other - the enemy is prejudice, against both groups(and others). I believe that Sen. Obama understands that... fully. If Frederick Douglass said what you report (and I have no reason to doubt you), then he was a sexist. Understandable, given what he had seen, but still a sexist. Barack Obama is not. He will stand for the women -- and the blacks, and the Asian-Americans and the Native Americans and the gays and lesbians and disabled and all the other "second class citizenry in the world"-- AND with the non-minorities because we all benefit if our problems are addressed effectively. If we (women) can put down anger at a loss and understand that we have been no more a victim of prejudice than the others, then we can support wholeheartedly someone who challenges prejudice, even if he isn't of our gender.

Sen. Clinton, I'm sorry to say, was not that inclusive. Perhaps she learned too well the techniques of her husband: triangulation, division. But isn't the real heart of equality where someone of "our own" (black, female, Native American, any of them) can be accepted or rejected on the basis of their own 'content of their character' .. not the color of their skin or shape of their body or slant of their eyes?

I oppose Sen. Clinton because I don't like her procedures, the way she treats others - voters and opponents. It has NOTHING to do with the fact that she is a woman. If I was looking only at that, I'd be for her, as fervently as you and the others of whom you speak. But I believe, deeply, in equality and I do not believe that a candidate should be supported because she is a woman, or he is a black, or he/she is gay/lesbian, or any other category. We all deserve to be judged by *who* we are, not *what* we are.

I hope very much that you and the women for whom you are speaking -- eloquently and feelingly, I should add (I've never been very impressed by your posts, to be honest, but tonight's have a real authenticity.) -- will understand that all opposition to Hillary Clinton was not based on her gender.

I wish as strongly as you that I would live to see a woman in the top position ... but I'm not going follow in the steps of historic and present-day sexists. I'm not going to give my allegience to someone just because they are a woman - or a man - or a black. Sen. Clinton is tremendously worthy of admiration - I can't imagine doing what she did for so long - but she is not as inclusive, or and broad-sighted, as Sen. Obama. And so I suppor the stronger, wiser candidate, and the one who is going to most effectively combat that common enemy: prejudice. I'm sorry for those who cannot see that this is not a loss for women - it's a deep, true victory for those who have been the victims of prejudice.

avatar

You know, Elizabeth, it is like pulling teeth to get people to understand my point. The gratuitous remarks in Jade's blog entry were meanspirited. They were unecessary, they were unhelpful to her point. She could have shown some empathy and compassion for those who had the same reason for hope that she did.

Barack Obama's run for the presidency has been an awesome jolt. What a great way for America to really start the 21st century . God knows there are many challenges ahead.

Thanks!

avatar

As a 37-year-old white male, I am certainly not in the best position to talk about opression and the struggle for equality, but I DO feel the moment. It MATTERS to me deep in my soul.

I want to share a couple of experiences I had while in Africa. Back in 1991 my best friend and I spent several months in southern Africa doing volunteer work for our religion. I was blessed to live with some of the most beatiful, open, warm-hearted people I have ever known.

We landed in Johannasburg when aparteid was still the law of the land. My friend had been there before so I let him lead the way. Having just concluded a long flight, I needed to use arestroom, so my friend led to to one in the airport. After taking care of business, I stood at one of the sinks and noticed the peculiar looks of several men as they washed and left the restroom. It wasn't until we were done that my friend smiled and pointed to the "colored only" sign by the door. He smiled and said, "you just broke you first law in a foreign country!" Of course, I was struck by the realization that being white, I could get away with breaking the law, but the gentlemen who had stared at me would not be so lucky if they had gone into the "whites only" restroom.

My second story happened in Lusaka, Zambia. That is the capitol.I was walking down the street when a man called out, "muzungu." I stopped and turned to him. I knew he was referring to me. Muzungu is a not so nice term for "white man" and of course Iwas the only one of those walking around.

avatar

Hehe...sorry...speaking of restrooms, I was sitting in Starbucks and suddenly needed to use one, so I hit submit and ran...anyway, back to my story...so I turned to the man, looked first to my left hand, then to my right, feined shock and and said, "oh my god, you're right!" After a pause, we both fell out laughing and had a good chat. I was a great moment for several reasons. Mostly I am thankful for it because for that one moment I was the minority being called a name for no other reason than the color of my skin.

Anyway, those are my stories.

avatar

DevD:

The sentiments you express are for your own post, not Jade's. It is not the story she chooses to tell at this moment. Today is not about Hillary, its not about you and its not about the trolls. Go away!

avatar

Stop being silly.

avatar

Back at you!

avatar

BevD:

Please accept my apology. My passions are getting the better of me today.

I didn't think we would, either. But here we are, by the grace of God. Thank you for the post.

A beautiful story, beautifully told.

avatar

I am misty party of one .... thank you for sharing your thoughts .....

avatar

"You know where the last lynching in this country took place? Not the south."

The latest lynching of which we know was of a black man dragged behind a pickup truck.

That was in Texas.

Texas is the south.

"There is institutionalized racism all over this country and anyone who fails to see that is fooling him or herself."

Exactly as there is also female sexism all over this country, though 90-plus per cent of women will lie about it.

"The south is not any more racist than Boston, Mass, which had riots for weeks over integrating the schools."

The South IS more racist than Boston -- which doesn't mean Boston isn't racist. There were riots in the 1970s against busing in Boston -- but there weren't any lynchings.

A bit of history:

The MA constitution was ratified in 1780. In 1783 the MA Supreme Judicial Court declared that slavery was inconsistent with the MA constitution. Shortly thereafter, African-Americans began seeking an equal education, knowing that that was essential to all other progress.

The history since then -- and this is all over the country, but in the south especially -- has been, in Boston, integrated schools, in which the racism was overt (bad behavior by white children was punished by making them sit in what was called "the igger seat").

Then segregated schools, because the abuse from whites was so egregious -- and at one point the Afrian American school had ONE book, while those for whites had HUNDREDS.

Then back to integrated schools.

I won't argue that Boston isn't racist. But throughout that history there weren't lynchings; but there were violations of the Fugitive Slave Act, and protection of runaway slaves from kidnapping by agents -- bounty hunters -- working for the slave-owners, which latter were in the South.

In short: its not so simple as "the South is racist and the North is not". It is: both the South and the North are racist, but the worst of the racism was in the South. And may still be.

Perhaps some here have heard Dick Gregory* speak of the "White Citizens Counsil"? That was the men-in-suits/pillars of the community which directed the KKK. They still exist; but because of the bad publicity they changed their name to "Conservative Citizens Council".

*"The KKK is out of style, because they don't wear colored sheets" -- Dick Gregory.

Otherwise: lovely story movingly told, Jade. There will be weepings for joy -- some of which weepers will by white (Dick Gregory's "pink people") -- when Obama wins, and again when he is inaugurated.

avatar

We still have coloured water fountains in public schools, though. This is mostly due to the challenge of affording a plumber with proposition 2.5.

I really am going to hell.

Yes he's free to be put in a cage
In Harlem in New York City
And he's free to be put in a cage in the South-Side of Chicago
And the West-Side
And he's free to be put in a cage in Hough in Cleveland
And he's free to be put in a cage in East St. Louis
And he's free to be put in a cage in Fillmore in San Francisco
And he's free to be put in a cage in Roxbury in Boston

avatar

to Jade, and to Markg8 whose dkoz post of 2007 was also uplifting, and to all those others in these comments who have given me back some of the hope, my thanks.

-and - riv at 11:01 post - I WANT one of those WONDERFUL sunrise pendant necklaces!!!

wow..........what a wonderful post. Thank you.

avatar

I was 19 and my mother had a breakdown after years of carrying excruciatingly painful secrets. She took off down the street without clothes on and started screaming. I wasn't home, but I heard that bunches of lights went on, but only one person came out to help her. That was Jackie Hoover, who was studying to be a nurse and later, a social worker. Her and her husband Willie brought my mother in with sweetness and warmth and called a doctor.

In a week or so, my mother flew out to Chicago to be with my father, who was starting a new job and preparing for her to join him. Jackie and Willie took me in too, fed me, and showered me with affection. To this day, she calls me son. I am an Irish American, white as a cotton field, and they are very dark blacks. They loved out of me most of the remaining, virtually genetic prejudice I had toward black people.

Perhaps that's part of why I'm so in love with the Obama in my mind, the guy I've researched for many days, hoping to prove what I initially saw in his books and in the words of people I know who know him personally. I've still got my doubts, but so far I'm thrilled by him. And every time I see him, I see my friends, Willie and Jackie. Things have changed one relationship at a time.

avatar

Nice post Jade. This whole thing makes me so damn proud to be an American, proud for the right reasons--because it can be a great country sometimes, reaching and at least partially achieving high ideals as our Founders hoped and tried to integrate into the Constitution.

avatar

How ridiculous that we take pride in having nominated a qualified person for a job! All of this national self congratulation makes me sick.

It took us 230 years to realize that a man with non-white skin is qualified to be President? Oh RAPTURE, that's really something to be proud of!!!

I'll be proud when we spend our money on treating the sick instead of killing the innocent, when we fight to eliminate poverty instead of fighting to increase profits, when we swear off wars, when we stop polluting our environment. Those are things to be proud of.

You don't get to be proud of something you're supposed to do. When my kids take out the garbage and wash the dishes, are they supposed to be proud of themselves? "Look at ME! I took out the garbage! I am so proud of myself!"

Feeling pride in doing something you should be expected to do is a fool's paradise. We need to grow the hell up and set our bar a lot higher.

avatar

It's hardly ridiculous that this country is FINALLY doing something which should have been done, but wasn't. But there is pride in some 18 million people coming together -- not by plan to simply nominate someone non-white as the Democratic Party's nominee for President -- but by choosing the best person for the job, finally selected someone who isn't white. There is pride that we have come together to do this.

See I do believe you get to be proud of something you should do, especially when you do it well. I do believe the pride begets action and action begets pride. Just doing the job is not good enough, it's doing it well.

I guess you're entitled to your cynicism. The rest of us will return to puffing out our chests and feeling proud now. We're entitled to that, too.

avatar

I dunno. I take pride in the fact that I have supported Obama from the beginning because I thought he was the best candidate. I am proud of the fact that he is the nominee, not that he is a man of color who got the nomination.

If people are only proud because we nominated a non-white man, then I think I have a right to be cynical...and for very obvious reasons.

avatar

And I didn't say it was ridiculous for doing something that should be done. If you actually read my post you would see that I said it was ridiculous for us to be congratulating ourselves for doing the right thing...many, many generations too late.

avatar

My mother started saying four years ago that what she wanted this year was someone really, really smart and really decent.

We both knew Obama was the guy who fit that bill.

I was the one who was afraid, afraid that other Americans would walk away from him and take second best because he wasn't white.

But this beautiful country has grown better, bit by bit and year by year, and this time we're going for excellence, rather than wasting it.

I thought that day was far away, and It is so wonderful to be here.

avatar

Jade, this is a sentence, a thought, for tonight that will stay with me forever:

"Selecting Obama as the Democratic Party's nominee will not erase the stain [of slavery], but we will have starting bleaching it out instead of whitewashing over it again. There is work to be done. For about 30 of the last 40 years -- since Martin and Bobby -- we've stood still or in some cases gone backwards. We are moving again."

Thank you. It needed to be said and you said it beautifully.

Elizabeth, in the 90's we made great progress on black issues. I've enumerated it so many times. Black shuttle astronauts, improved access to education and high positions in government, improved home ownership and stock ownership, greatly decreased poverty by 1/3 and halved crime - more in black neighborhoods, black households up to $46K/year income. While MLK noted that US blacks taken together would be the 9th largest world GDP, and now it's only 13th, that modern 13th place is a much bigger and more prosperous piece of pie.

So please, let's not take this as some kind of unexpected event, that it's not a natural progression that took place over the last 40-50 years, things we actively and successfully worked towards. Why do you think South Carolina was put in the first 4 states this year? (And not because of Obama). If Obama gets elected, it might be faster than expected, but Jackson's 2 very promising attempts at the presidency in the 80's were anything like standing still or going backwards. In short, it might be a milestone in history, but it's only a small step on what's a long continuing road.

One of the thrills of my life was to be back in Charleston during the week prior to, the day of, and the week after the South Carolina primary. Where people I knew -- some of whom I knew to be as Republican as they come -- were surprising each other by showing up at Obama headquarters to volunteer. I hadn't seen that expression of "a cause greater than ourselves" -- by young and old, rich and poor, black and white -- since the weeks following Hurricane Hugo in 1989. Other family and friends in Atlanta reported the same phenomenon, comparing it to the unity they felt hosting the Olympics.
These are two very different cities: one that is, in many ways, the bastion of the Old South, and the other which epitomizes the New. Yet everyone involved in the Obama campaign, in both places, apparently felt that there was only one place to be, with one purpose in mind: to elect this particular person (without regard to race or gender) so that sooner, rather than later, a sense of common purpose would be taken for granted, rather than being experienced as a rarity.
Jade, thank you again for your beautiful post, and thank the rest of you for sharing its meaning to you.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address