« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Easy to be hard
Troops, when they battle insurgent forces, as in Iraq, or Gaza or Vietnam, are placed in "atrocity producing situations." Being surrounded by a hostile population makes simple acts, such as going to a store to buy a can of Coke, dangerous. The fear and stress push troops to view everyone around them as the enemy. The hostility is compounded when the enemy, as in Iraq, is elusive, shadowy and hard to find. The rage soldiers feel after a roadside bomb explodes, killing or maiming their comrades, is one that is easily directed, over time, to innocent civilians who are seen to support the insurgents.
Civilians and combatants, in the eyes of the beleaguered troops, merge into one entity. These civilians, who rarely interact with soldiers or Marines, are to most of the occupation troops in Iraq nameless, faceless, and easily turned into abstractions of hate. They are dismissed as less than human. It is a short psychological leap, but a massive moral leap. It is a leap from killing -- the shooting of someone who has the capacity to do you harm -- to murder -- the deadly assault against someone who cannot harm you.
...
"This unit sets up this traffic control point, and this 18 year-old kid is on top of an armored Humvee with a .50-caliber machine gun," remembered Sgt. Geoffrey Millard, who served in Tikrit with the 42nd Infantry Division. "And this car speeds at him pretty quick and he makes a split-second decision that that's a suicide bomber, and he presses the butterfly trigger and puts two hundred rounds in less than a minute into this vehicle. It killed the mother, a father, and two kids. The boy was aged four and the daughter was aged three.
"And they briefed this to the general," Millard said, "and they briefed it gruesome. I mean, they had pictures. They briefed it to him. And this colonel turns around to this full division staff and says, 'If these f---ing hajis learned to drive, this sh-t wouldn't happen.'"
By Chris Hedges
(via Tomdispatch)
* * *
I've never seen actual combat, never served in a live war zone, never pointed a weapon at another human being and pulled the trigger. And thank whatever gods there may be that it is so. But in spring of 1985, I went through 13 weeks of Army Infantry Basic Training at Fort Benning, GA. The biggest joke in the universe may well be the piece of paper I have in a drawer somewhere that claims I am a fully trained and qualified infantry soldier -- I may well have been the worst 'soldier' ever to actually graduate Basic -- but it's not a funny joke, because there's nothing funny about the military. It is an evil institution, and while it may well be a necessary evil, it seems to me that as a culture we generally place far too much emphasis on the first word in that phrase when we find ourselves using it. We should always remember the second word as well. In fact, we should stress it to ourselves.
However necessary something may be, evil is still evil.
I've never shot at a real human being. But for 13 weeks in 1985 at Fort Benning, GA, I was taught that it was okay to do so, if my commanding officer told me to. 'Taught' is an understatement bordering on an irony as a description for military training; the exact word is 'brainwashed'. Military training is systematic, it is precise, it is purposeful. For 13 weeks I was forcibly exercised into utter exhaustion, humiliated, abused, denied sleep, placed in stress positions, exposed to extremes of heat and cold, punished for infractions as minor as not using the correct words in the correct sequence when speaking with a fellow trainee, and threatened that, should I commit graver offenses, I would receive worse punishments, ranging from fines to imprisonment to having the living crap beaten out of me.
One of my drill sergeants advised me, in a rare unguarded moment, that "We have a reason for everything we do". And the reason is a simple one -- they need to turn civilized, socialized civilians into brutal but disciplined killers. And they need to turn individuals into faceless, nameless cogs in their killing machine.
From my own experiences with military training, I can understand and empathize with the '18 year old kid' from the excerpt I've quoted, who ended up murdering an entire family of Iraqis with a rooftop mounted 50 cal. I can't imagine the personal hell he has gone through since he discovered the actual nature of his weapon's targets, but I can imagine what would be even worse -- not shooting at a vehicle that really was a suicide bomber, and having to live with the fact that by failing in his duty, he killed 30 or 40 of his fellow soldiers.
The military is an evil, ugly institution, and war is an evil, ugly thing. If we justify the existence of our military to ourselves with the phrase 'necessary evil', how, then, do we justify to ourselves the ongoing horrors of an entirely unnecessary war?
What is a necessary evil that isn't necessary?
Even the most foolish and ignorant among us should be able to work that semantic equation.














Comments (5)
Damn, dude. You're batting a thousand. Clicking Ye Old Recommended yet again.
June 4, 2008 11:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
IIOOII,
Thanks for the kind words and the recommendation. It's much nicer posting here than on my own blog; here I actually get comments. ;)
June 4, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The military is an evil, ugly institution, and war is an evil, ugly thing. If we justify the existence of our military to ourselves with the phrase 'necessary evil', how, then, do we justify to ourselves the ongoing horrors of an entirely unnecessary war?"
Militaries are just one expression of human character. It is not fair to say that the military is evil, unless you first say that humanity is evil.
It is impossible to justify the Iraq war or the Vietnam war. The people who started and nurtured those wars are evil. The politicians who could have stood up to stop those wars, but chose to go along, are evil.
June 4, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Militaries are just one expression of human character. It is not fair to say that the military is evil, unless you first say that humanity is evil.
No, the military is evil. What is evil? It is dehumanization. It is removing the dignity, the uniqueness, the sacredness of the individual human life. Any person or organization that deliberately sets out to make any human being into something faceless and nameless, to convert unique individuality into a mere cog in a machine that can be exploited for the worth of its productive labor, is evil.
When you treat people as if they are animals, or furniture, or furniture, or some kind of fungible resource to be used and then discarded, you are doing evil. This may be an uncomfortable realization for us, since to accept it means accepting that much of our corporate, capitalist culture is inherently, inescapably, uncurably, and irrefutably evil, but, well, that's the way it is.
There are, of course, degrees of evil. The corporation that treats its employees as numbers on an ID card roster is less evil than the military that does the same to its trainees. Both do some spiritual harm, but forcing people to adhere to a dress code and to do mandatory overtime is considerably less wicked than bending someone's mind to turn them into a killer. And when mind bending is done for purposes of dehumanizing an entire target nation, culture, society, or ethnicity, so that one's soldiers may kill them without hesitation or remorse, well, it just doesn't get much more evil than that.
People talk a great deal about the inherent nobility, the honor, the courage of soldiers. I don't deny any of that, but those are individual attributes attaching to the individuals within the military organization. The organization itself, the entity that is the military, is evil. And it is perfectly fair to call it that, when it's only purpose, as has often been wryly admitted, is to break things and kill people.
Breaking things and killing people is sometimes necessary, but, again, that's why we call it a NECESSARY evil. I've never heard anyone try to describe breaking things and killing people as, you know, a good thing to do. Although I suppose it's not past someone like Donald Rumsfield...
June 4, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
" I can't imagine the personal hell he has gone through since he discovered the actual nature of his weapon's targets, but I can imagine what would be even worse -- not shooting at a vehicle that really was a suicide bomber, and having to live with the fact that by failing in his duty, he killed 30 or 40 of his fellow soldiers."
I heartily agree with much of your post, but I don't agree with this part. If we are ever to sustain higher moral character in our behavior, it must be noted that true innocence trumps everything else.
And I have to disagree with some of your last comment as well. It is sometimes necessary to break things. It's never really necessary to kill people; it only seems that way after all the things have been bungled that lead up to it looking to be 'necessary' to kill people.
Excellent post, otherwise.
June 5, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment