For the third time in re POWs, the Supreme Court reminded the President the Constitution still applies. The majority again opposed the President, but the Chief Justice is in denial:

"The majority is equally wrong"

Earth to Chief Justice Roberts, 

You lose. You're wrong. 

The Majority decided the Chief Justice and other lawyers are in the minority on Constitutional issues. When given a chance to vote, the "lawyers" learn the hard way: They might be on the wrong side of the Constitution.
Equally wrong on issues of impeachment.
One of the lawyer's jobs is to maintain public confidence in your profession, not sandbag the discussion out of fear the public might have a different view. You failed to make your case. You lost. Time to step aside, and let the adult leadership -- not in the legal community -- examine facts, review, and make decisions about whether the charge the President and others with a crime; or decide something else.
* Impeachment Is Required, Otherwise Americans Are Not Civilized
Here is the plain language showing impeachment is a required legal tool for the American lawyers to use to enforce Geneva, otherwise they are not civilized:

"Under any civilized judicial system he could have been impeached and removed from office or convicted of malfeasance"

The Speaker needs to be removed, not enabled. It is reckless for anyone to argue impeachment should be taken off the table before examining facts of the case. Nuremberg requires impeachment or prosecutions to enforce the laws of war.

lawyers show they are not Gods, not divine saints, but fallible creatures, needing oversight. Had the vote gone the other way on Habeas, and the prisoners still denied a right to challenge their detention, the Italian War Crimes prosecutor might be discussing prosecuting the Supreme Court Justices per the Nuremberg Precedents.
* Lazy, Incompetent, Unimaginative Lawyers
The American lawyers have recklessly refused to assert power, check their own, nor aggressively challenge this President. The lawyers are the domestic enemies. They need better oversight, a tighter leash, and they do not control the government. The Constitution does.
The lawyers have assaulted the Constitution, and left it to wither in the wind, demanding the public accept their excuses for laziness.

* Unresponsive Lawyers Should Not Be Respected
We the People retain sovereignty. We may -- without notice -- compel the legal community to justify why anyone should continue paying them any money for their reckless assent to this President's and this Speaker's rebellion against the Constitution. The lawyers have put partisan goals before the legal requirement of Nuremberg to either impeach or prosecute. No lawyer has discretion to assent to war crimes; nor remain complicit. Your clients have apparently told you to not fully assert your oaths, and you have illegally obliged. Your illegal activity shows your judgement is flawed.

The problem is not the voters. The problem is the leadership and the reckless legal counsel who have not timely confronted this President's confrontation with the rule of law. The problem is the leadership's failure and the laziness of legal counsel to mobilize and organize to timely correct the problem:

Reckless, incompetent legal counsel and leadership.

Lawyers need wakeup calls. The impeachment would focus their lazy minds on facts today, not elections tomorrow. 
Nuremberg reminds us that when the lawyers pretend they know best -- which they do not, as evidenced by this continued assault on the Constitution for seven (7) years, without a timely remedy or resolution -- they forget who or what they're working for. 
Your oath is to the Constitution. Your excuse has been the election, the voter, or the lack of time. That is not leadership. Your real loyalty is to your client, not the Constitution.

* Unacceptable String of Abuses Under This Tyrant
Those who are satisfied with the home raids, intrusions upon our personal communications, warrantless interrogations, accusations on the presumption of guilt, you are free to do nothing: You have what you enjoy. Those who would like to discuss solutions, or consider alternative forms of oversight -- which is a lawful discussion -- you are free to present your views.

If the lawyers knew what they were doing, they would have -- in 1789 -- discussed the solution that would have prevented this problem: Reckless legal counsel advising a tyrant.  Self evidently the reckless, lazy, incompent legal community still -- after 200 years -- has no solution, but devised methods to exploit the American public's misplaced trust in "experts" and "leaders".
If you are satisfied with the state of affairs, there is no reason to fear a discussion about possible solutions. Legal counsel who -- for 200 years -- provide no leadership or solutions to ensure this abuse does not happen, cannot credibly ask any American to care that they are a lawyer, that they are certified, or that they are accredited to practice law. 
Those standards of "professional competence" have given us what we have: A tyrant and excuses to do nothing, while pointing to the possible shift in political winds. 

Where is the leadership in the American legal community to confront these war crimes, and alleged complicity of legal counsel with violations of Geneva and the Supreme Law?

The oath does not require any American to show deference, respect, or loyalty to those in the legal community who make excuses to do nothing, and rubber stamp legislation.
* DNC and GOP Legal Counsel Excuses For Complicity

The GOP today -- as a minority -- is still able to block the solutions. The DNC -- when it was the minority -- cannot explain why it did not block the unconstitutional bills. The lawyers rolled over.
No American should look to this leadership and believe the lawyers have done anything to help. They've rolled over, made excuses, and remain fearful of fully asserting legislative power. That's not something Americans are obliged to follow, respect, or continue.
Article II lawyers have run circles around the American legal community. One would think, in a system of checks and balances that worked, the lawyers in the ARticle I branch would have reciprocated, fully asserted their oath, and devised a plan to respond. There was no plan, but capitulation.
This lazy crew thinks it can "not rock the boat," secure a political victory, and start with their agenda: More capitulation, excuses, and thwarting discussions. The same people who refuse to entertain solutions today are the same ones repeating the abuses of the GOP and DNC leadership:
"Oh, we have more important things to do than the Constitution." No they don't. The error is their misplaced agenda, reckless loyalty, and unwavering commitment to the illusion of competence. 200 years, and the legal community still has no legislative agenda to timely thwart this abuse of power. "Trust us" was the refrain of this PResident on WMD; and the same noise from the GOP-DNC lawyers in 2008.
* America's Lawyers Have Not Fulfilled Their Legal Obligations To the Constitution
We see no reason or evidence to trust the lazy, incompetent, and unhelpful legal community. They deserves to be closely monitored, patrolled, and independently audited. The arrogant notion that a DNC lawyer is "better suited" for leadership defies reason. Lawyers, self evidently, are not leaders, statesmen, nor Generals: They're lawyers. The American lawyers have made a mess of Katrina, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the United States Constitution. 
They refuse to remove themselves, nor confront the leadership with an impeachment investigation. They are complicit. Their legal machine is glacially responsive to the Constitution, if the weather if favorable.
* The Looming War Crimes Problem for American Lawyers

The lawyers have not shown they can competently lead, advise, provide inputs, or make policy. But their reckless policies have given us illegal warfare, continued funding for that illegal activity, and no solution but excuses. The lawyers have not shown they can be trusted. They need to be prosecuted for complicity with war crimes. America's leaders are not leading that effort to reform the legal community. The public is not required to remain loyal to any lawyer or any tyrant who puts their personal agenda of power before the Constitution.
No American is obliged to follow, respect, or trust these lawyers who have led us astray, but then demand that we take responsibility for their betrayal. Americans have not seen leadership, but cowardly complicity from the American legal community. American citizens are not beholden to the American legal community. We are not your employees.
You work for us. You can be fired. And prosecuted.
The burden of proof, as always lies with the lawyer, not with the Client or the Constitution. Without notice, you can be fired, arrested, and adjudicated with war crimes. The public has the needed legal justification to unleash the full weight of the Constitution and Nuremberg precedents.
You wished this.