Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Chelsea Clinton for President

Today Hillary Clinton did the right thing, and I think she did it mostly the right way. She was strong in defending her own accomplishments in thanking those who supported her, she was adamant about supporting Barack Obama and made it clear that any other choice would be a disaster. She even used the slogan, "Yes We Can!"

Hillary was also strong in her personal message about being a woman running for president. She talked about the struggles of those who came before her, including not only those of the women's movement but of the civil rights movement, thereby including Obama obliquely in the message. It was the most inclusive speech from her yet, and I look forward to more.

Hillary is a gifted speaker, but what marked this speech, and what seems to have been missing lately from her speeches, was the serious intent that I read in her face. There were no more wide-eyed smiles that exuded confidence and a sort of above-it-all passion. This was the real passion that came from her eyes and her face, which seemed in some ways to relax at the same time that it underscored the absolute conviction she felt. For the first time in a while, I saw a Hillary Clinton that I could cheer for. A Hillary Clinton done with rules and arguments over how to interpret them, done with fighting for dubious principles in even more dubious circumstances. It was a Hillary Clinton who had returned to the issues that mattered, and to the only way to effect the change everyone in that room (presumably) wants to see.

She started in a room that was divided, and I think she ended in a room united. It was the speech she had to make, and she did it, and did it well.

What struck me during that speech was that she did make a great impassioned speech about women making significant cracks in that so-called glass ceiling. I thought that so many women are sad that they will never see a woman be president. And then I thought about Chelsea, sitting there next to her former POTUS father, campaigning with her mother, always up there - a trooper just like her mother. If Chelsea enters the political arena, she's got the best start she could have, and perhaps she will break through that ceiling.

Anyway, she's got a ways to go, but I think it's safe to say that there will be women who follow Hillary Clinton and will one day win this office. And meanwhile, Barack Obama is the standard bearer for our hopes and dreams in November and beyond, and he, too, is making history and breaking through barriers that had once seemed impossible.

I think today's speech by Hillary Clinton was a win-win for us all, and I look forward to the future today with a brighter and more hopeful outlook than I had yesterday.


Comments (9)

Yes, it's true. Only two sets of families could be involved in the White House.

Get an imagination man!

At least if you are going to say you want nepotism to be the political rule of the day, why not start trumpeting Nancy Pelosi's daughter? After all, Pelosi is already #2 in line for the presidency and her daughter holds an official post in the Democratic Party.

I guess you can see it the way you want to. The idea here was to acknowledge Hillary Clinton's speech and at the same time at least point out that other women will have a chance. I think it's possible, in a couple of decades or so, that Chelsea could turn out to be a great candidate. But it wasn't intended to be a continuation of any dynasty, just a thought that came to me while listening to Hillary's speech.

Anyway, sorry to so offend you. Seems that the bitterness hasn't really worn off, which is sad. I'm ready to move on.

I'm ready to move on as well.... so please open your mind up that in a country of 300 million people, there are more than a few qualified to run as POTUS.

Had you said you were thinking about who else might run in that room which was filled with women, I wouldn't have had a single issue. Instead, you invoked Chelsea -- and just did so again in your rebuttal.

It's hardly surprising that the people wanted to crown George Washington king after fighting for representational government. People have little imagination and always grasp at the familiar.

I think you're making more of this than I was. I couldn't agree more that we don't need dynasties. I just think you're latching onto one part of what I wrote. There's a certain irony in the title to this, in that I certainly wouldn't recommend a young woman just starting out in life for president. But at the same time.

Anyway, it was meant to be a slightly provocative title, but it ended up, in your case, to be a highly triggered one, and I'm sorry for that. If you can look past the implications of dynasty, I hope something I said resonated as true. I personally could care less if the first woman president comes from a political family or from left field, like Obama. What I care about is that we have good leadership and that we get ourselves out of the mess created by the neocon insanity.

I'm pretty sure we're not enemies, so I'll just apologize for in any way implying that I support a dynasty. I hope that's acceptable.

avatar

But I must say I do think it's sad that people supporting a feminist candidacy could/would automatically opt for someone who starts off with such a headstart advantage.

I want a woman who does the whole thing solely off her own efforts, not her connections.

"I want a woman who does the whole thing solely off her own efforts, not her connections."

What a concept! Thank you.

Let's get out of this dinatic frame of mind!
Yes we can!

Don't mind CT raider. Bout the biggest rampant clinton hater that I think I have ever come across.

avatar

One note to Fran and CT,

A long time ago, say 40 years ago, these two people, Bill and Hillary, had nothing. Nothing except brains, ambition and a desire to work for a better country. Bill comes from White Trash (excuse the stereotype). His father was an alcoholic and his mom was a nurse. A nurse! And Hillary was from a typical WASP suburban (not upper class by any means) household.

If these two people didn't do it solely on their own efforts, then nobody has.

It has come to my attention that the vitriol thrown at the Clintons by a few of the TPM bloggers is so spiteful that it is more than issue-related. In fact it may be psychological. Perhaps, in their unconscious, they feel they have the right to "trash" the Clintons because, in fact, the Clintons aren't a blue-blood Dynastic family like the Bushes and the Kennedys.

One more note: if you all think the Obamas aren't about to set sail on their own "dynasty", think again.

sassi2j, your post confuses me. Are you saying, because Bill comes from a poor family and Hillary from an only comfortable one, and they "did it on their own," the dynastic concept is okay? I mean, donald Trump is a self made guy too. You want a Trump presidency with a Trump dynasty to follow? I don't follow you here. And as far as your comments about Clinton bashing, I'm even more than confused. You really think people on this site show respect to the Bushes because they're bluebloods? I haven't seen respect for the Bushes here in any way shape or form, much less respect just because they are who they are. And when it comes to the Kennedys, people respect them for the contributions in blood and service they've made to this country, not because they're rich enough to own a place in Hyannis. I can't imagine where you're coming from. And your Obama comment is absurd.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address