« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
An Open Letter To HillaryIs44
I tried to post this on the HillaryIs44 website, but dissenting
opinions are not welcome there. Their echo chamber is well-guarded.
What
you are doing now goes against everything Hillary stands for and
against her lifetime of service to the Democratic Party and to women
around the world. If you write Hillary's name on the ballot in
November, you betray her, you betray the Party, but most of all, you
betray yourselves. John McCain is the sworn enemy of women everywhere.
He is disrespectful to women (he called his wife a cunt in
public), he is disrespectful to America's soldiers, he is disrespectful
to the Constitution, and he and his fellow Republicans want to make a
party hats out of Roe v. Wade. You may not prefer Barack Obama, but he
is a good Democrat and he is a fierce advocate for women's rights. And
he treats his wife and his daughters with respect and with love.
Today
Hillary has asked you to set your disappointment aside and work for the
Party. Your voices have become powerful, and you may still choose to
deny her request. You may even have it within your power to weaken
Obama so badly that he'll lose in November. But if you refuse her, at
least take her name and her picture off your website, because by
refusing to help the Democratic Party in November, you dishonor her
name and all of the work she has devoted her life to.
I know you
don't want to hear anything from people you disagree with, and I know
you won't publish this post. You've censored everything else I've
written. But perhaps you'll consider what the candidate you claim to
support has asked you to do. Perhaps you'll have a change of heart.
Hillary is right: this election is far too important to allow the
Republicans to get into the White House. As Democrats, you should know
what is at stake. You have freely given your energy to Hillary and to
her cause so far. Please don't refuse her now. Not after she's worked so
hard for you.








Comments (73)
The McCain campaign is now actively courting Hillary's disgruntled supporters, hoping they'll vote their anger without checking out his dismal record. They're really playing these people for a bunch of clueless suckers. From HillaryIs44:
June 7, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think allegiance to Senator Clinton is very deep for those who are willing to disregard her plea and current stance. If, as a supporter, you were ready to entrust her with your vote as a sign you valued her judgment as to the direction of America and yet are now willing to negate it, well that says it all. Very disrespectful of her supporters who do this - the policy differences between her and Obama pale in comparison to hers and McCains. Were you wrong then or are you wrong now?
June 7, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
see comment below, ie; "they're GOP trolls."
Especially the ones who keep repeating that they are loyal Dems...
Why even say it if it's true?
June 8, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's one of two things: either these so-called Hillary supporters are off their rockers or they're GOP trolls. Either way, they should be ignored. What they're claiming to be doing makes no sense whatsoever.
Michelle: "She asked the rest of us to support someone that many of us actually loathe. And that is putting it mildly."
Exactly what in the fuck do you have to "loathe" Obama for? What is it that went "snap" in your brittle brain to cause you to hate him?
Here's the problem. Far too many Hillary supporters made this election all about getting a woman in the White House. Everything else was secondary. Failing that, they want to destroy everything in sight and feel it's their right to do anything they want when they're angry, no matter what the consequences. There's a cure for that. It's called "growing up."
Obama's race means nothing to me. Until I actually heard what he had to say, I had no interest in him as a candidate. In fact, up until then, I thought it was too soon for him to run for president. Knowing what I know about him now, I want to see him in the White House because I know what he'll do when he gets there. It's not that he's laying out policies, it's because he communicates in a way that tells me how he thinks. And, it's an awful lot like the way I think.
June 7, 2008 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, the blog on Hillary's own web site is currently just as bad. A lot of the posts are calling for a vote for McCain. They just don't see that they are slapping Hillary in the face when they would vote for McCain over what she believes in.
One of the craziest posters said that she wanted Hillary to become a Supreme Court Justice - and then in the next line told everyone they should vote for McCain. Are these people insane? The only way Hillary will ever be on the Supreme Court is if she is appointed by a Democratic President. Hillary is pro-choice. McCain has expressly said he will appoint judges that will overturn Roe v. Wade.
I have to think some of these people weren't so much supporting Hillary and what she stood for as they just always hated Obama and they figured she was the best way to stop him.
How can these people keep disrespecting Hillary like this? Do they think she will have an easier time in the Senate with a Republican President in office? Her best chance of getting any of the things she wants and believes in passed - especially her signature universal health care plan - is if McCain is defeated. Hillary gets it. It is really sad that these crazed ex-supporters of her do not.
June 7, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Such dead-ender websites are not worth your time or effort. They believe they can break the code to what Hillary was really saying, sorta like crazy stalkers who believe celebrities are talking directly to them, often via coded messages. The lunatic fringe isn't as big as the echo chamber of their censored message boards makes them believe they are.
To the rest I say that the election is six months away and the differences between Sen. Obama and Sen. McCain are stark.
June 7, 2008 7:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Really good post.
The Great and Growing Divide
Many of us watched today as Hillary Clinton said something that physically hurt to hear. She asked us to support Barack Obama. Loyal Democrat that she is, and true to her word, Hillary did the unimaginable. She asked the rest of us to support someone that many of us actually loathe. And that is putting it mildly.
But Hillary did something else today that is already having ramifications throughout the country. Hillary supporters are taking sides. And there are basically two camps. One camp that is sticking with the party and one camp that isn’t
Reforming the party from within is wishful thinking. The only way a party reforms is by humiliating defeat, running off the rails, or egregious abuse in the opposition party.
If BO is elected, they will be in charge of the party…in fact are in charge of the party as we speak. Try to go talk to them about reform. Go talk to them about counting every vote…about changing the caucus system to transparent primaries. Tell them how you feel about it. I think we all know what the attitude will be.
For me…my only recourse is to withhold my support from the current party leadership and the BO party leadership. It’s a drop in the bucket but I don’t feel like I will be complicit in Republican style tactics…even if they worked.
Ronmaven echoed the sentiment and clarified it:
The defeat of Obama would be the best kick in the pants for the DNC we could possibly deliver. You want to CHANGE the party? Vote for McCain. You want the party to only get worse? Vote for O.
To some, NOT supporting Obama is the moral thing to do.
Ccwarrior perhaps says it best:
easy decision for me I will sellout the party that SOLD me out. and I can live with that. I would never dis-respect my daughters, and vote for Obama after the treatment they witnessed from him doing this election …NEVER
But I have saved the best for last. Before I put it out there I want to make one thing very clear. I have nothing but the deepest respect for linfar. She has been a staunch Hillary supporter and she is such an excellent writer. I just happen to totally disagree with her about Obama and unfortunately may have to write things in the future that criticize her positions. It isn’t something I look forward to.
But having said that I think that unfortunately linfar grabbed a mug full of the Cult-Aide today because low and behold, she quotes from none other than the Prince of Darkness himself (Jonathan Singer) to make her point.
from mydd
Singer: Can you speak to the online supporters, the people online who are so strong for Hillary, who don’t want to see her leave, as a strong
Hillary supporter yourself?
Sen. Chuck Schumer: As a strong Hillary support I say, look, I was for Hillary all the way. I was sort of the first Senator to endorse her and I guess I’ll be the last off the bandwagon, which I guess will be tomorrow. But, having said that, I would say to all of the people online, there’s too much at stake to sit this out, to be angry, to be bitter. There is too much at stake. A Supreme Court with more Alitos and Roberts. A continuation of the war in Iraq.
A failure to have a healthcare policy that helps people. A failure to have an energy policy that frees us from foreign oil. All these are such huge things that we have to do what Hillary said there, which is overcome, not look back, even though there are lot’s of disappointments, but look forward.
I expected these bugaboos coming from Schumer. But a little reality never hurt anyone. Except Cultists I’m told. We hear the same nonsense you would expect from otherwise seemingly reasonable people. The trouble is that they think they will be able to bamboozle and scare us with their line of bullshit.
Everything Schumer mentions is something that the Congress controls, not the President. Supreme Court… confirmed by the Senate. Iraq War funding…. controlled by Congress. Health Care policy…. written by Congress. Energy policy… written by Congress.
SO WAKE UP! And stop letting these people get away with lying to you.
The reason Bush has got away with so much and has done as much damage as he has these past 7 years is because of a weak, feckless and complicit Congress. A Congress that has allowed him to do everything he has done. Because a strong Congress acting in the best interests of the American people would never have allowed Bush to do many of the things they are so fond of complaining about.
Where were the Articles of Impeachment? The Speaker of the House said that they would never be introduced.
Why has the Congress continued to fund the war? The Senate Majority leader doesn’t know how to throw a knock out punch.
Why are Americans still being spied upon? WHY?!?
In fact, the Supreme Court that Schumer and others are warning us about has done more to stop Bush than all of the Democrats in Congress combined. So enough of these silly myths. I half expect Obama to come out next and state: “You are either for us or against us.” Wanna guess what my answer will be?
These spats. This falling apart is expected. And it will likely become more vicious and personal as the days wear on. I fully understand those that are toeing the party line. I used to be one of them. Until this year. Until the Democratic party proved to me that it didn’t really stand for anything any more.
June 7, 2008 7:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't glean from that article what about the DNC is so in need of reform. Caucasus were just fine for the last 8 years, now they're the moral disintegration of the party?
June 7, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
It appears 'michelle bociurkiw' is used as a psuedonym for many Trolls. 'Nuff said.
June 8, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
michelle, I pledged not to diss Hillary. I also said I would tell trolls in no uncertain terms that they are doofuses in sheep's clothing. So suck my ass.
June 7, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Coroner I must aver,
I thoroughly examined her.
And she's not only merely dead,
She's really, most sincerely dead.
Then this is a day of Independence,
for all true Democrats and their descendants.
June 7, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
OH, so now because Clinton couldn't win the party has to be reformed? Can you show us ONE quote from before this process started when Clinton said she was against caucuses because they are not transparent?
You are really willing to vote for more war in Iraq, torture, wiretapping, and Republican health care and economic policy because your choice didn't get elected?
Really?
And you call Obama people cultists?
June 8, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know you're hurting. But please, base your decisions on certain realities, such as this:
Have you checked out the DNC website? Within half a WEEK of Obama getting the nomination, the DNC has pledged to stop taking contributions from Federal lobbyists and PACs. How is this not reform?
Or this:
Did you not listen to your own candidate? In the last 10 elections, Democrats have lost SEVEN times. How were those losses not "kicks in the pants" that would change the DNC? How would this year's loss be different?
If you cannot deal with reality, than those of us who have to live in reality really can't talk to you.
June 8, 2008 8:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please be aware that 'michelle bociurkiw' has posted far-Right "lies" lists, all well debunked, in other threads. There is every reason to believe that this persona is a troll, or a McCain operative trying to stir up anger and disillusionment. Please IGNORE.
(I was suspicious of this poster from the first time I saw the post also posted here -- but the use of the '50 lies' clinches the case: these are paranoid rants, and exclude the poster from serious consideration)
June 8, 2008 10:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I posed this to you on another thread, but you didn't have an answer. Do you now? I didn't think so, but I'll repost it just so others can see how shallow your posts are:
June 8, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please see the the new thread on the top 10 list
TPM Community, Please Ignore "michelle bociurkiw"
June 8, 2008 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm with Jonze. We're a country of three hundred million people. Eighteen million people voted for Hillary. If just a tenth of one percent of the people who voted for her are deranged diehards, that's eighteen thousand people. That's enough to look scary when they all get on the Intertubes and wave their torches and pitchforks, but, in the grand scheme of things, they're a negligible fraction of the electorate. Until I see some actual polling data telling me I'm wrong, I'm assuminge these people are just a few looneys with a big cyber-megaphone. Twenty first century LaRouchites.
That said, there is a horrid fascination to watching them as they go ever-crazier. I'm eagerly waiting for the point when their journey to the Dark Side is complete. You'll know when its happen when they get around to denouncing Hillary for betraying them and their holy cause (a necessary final step to overcome the cognitive dissonance supporting McCain over her pleas will create).
Sure hope the Secret Service is keeping an eye on them, though.
June 7, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't be surprised to see a few of these nutjobs show up on Fox News or Hannity's show in the next few months, as "Dems for McCain" or some other nonsense.
Not that I would ever deign to watch any of that crap to begin with. Just sayin'.
June 7, 2008 11:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Already happened, but I think at this point it is less sensational than it was then. They showed up when it was still in question what would happen in FL and MI and whether HRC would take it to the convention. I think the big media wave over these women is shrinking.
June 8, 2008 3:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
What I want to know is this: how is it that so many Clinton supporters are going AWOL, and it's Obama supporters who're called "cult" members?
June 7, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
ripper...if you realize that your comments do not phase me at all you would stop embarrasing yourself.
June 7, 2008 10:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not quite following this so I am not sure what you are unfazed by, but no one thinks the His44 or the NoQuarter crowd is at all representative of Hillary supporters. They are few and their love of Hillary is so great they don't care about anything she says or stands for. And, yes, we can do without them. The rest I sincerely hope will listen to her words and help elect a Dem as president. It would, after all, be so much better for Hillary and her goals and dreams and values.
June 7, 2008 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
No one's trying to "phase" you, but it would be nice if you would stop for a moment and remember that the DNC is not the Democratic Party--WE the people are. And that includes you. And the issues that Hillary has fought so hard for and that we have fought so hard for have not gone away.
Were you opposed to the Iraq war? Because McCain wants to continue it.
Are you in favor of women's reproductive rights? Because McCain wants to end them.
Do you believe the Bush economic policies have helped America? Because McCain wants to continue them.
Do you believe it's right to spy on Americans without warrants? Because McCain thinks it's just fine.
You're angry, and that's understandable. But you're considering taking your anger out on yourself. You're trying to punish those who disagreed with you by doing something very, very self-destructive. And it's our job to remind you that you don't want to do that. This was a hard-fought contest, but now the battle is between the Democrats and the Republicans. And you seriously don't want to fight for the Republicans. Not unless you agree with what they stand for. Because they want to ruin your life. And what they want to do to you won't just last for four years. It's not that easy. They want to ruin your life for decades.
June 8, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
No one expects to phase you, michelle. You are a troll. You cannot be phased.
Most likely, in fact, you have never voted for a democrat in your life. I understand that McCain has started his efforts to win over Clinton voters to his cause. My guess is, since I don't remember you posting on this site before last week, that you are a paid McCain operative.
June 8, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure you mean 'faze' - but then, rationality hasn't been apparent in any of your previous posts, so perhaps 'phase' (as in something children go through) IS more appropriate.
:)
June 8, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
glad you think we don't matter and that there are so few. even more reason not to feel any guilt for not voting obama.
June 7, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
your logic is twisted
if you really feel this way, you clearly cannot be convinced otherwise. chances are you were a republican to begin with.
it would be interesting to hear a real thought - it is hard to tell where the cutting and pasting ends and the real writing ends.
if you really think the power structure is broken, then voting is moot regardless. This would mean you should take real umbrage with the duopoly we are stuck with. If that does not bug you, then you have to start somewhere - and you are right it begins with congress.
But voting so as to punish the DNC... good for some chuckles I suppose. Perhaps you can tell stories to your grandchildren how you really stuck it to those darn democrats when they dare nominate a negro over a woman. Talk about how a system that had been in place for years suddenly disenfranchised you. The same system that brought you your beloved Bill suddenly was corrupt and evil.
I am sure if you try hard enough you can convince those kids how you were the real hero that year.
June 7, 2008 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
She/he/it has been advocating for McCain for months now on this website...and other websites I imagine.
June 8, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Cutting off your nose to spite your face" would be an apt response to your comments.
But that seems rather pointless, since it is clear that you strongly support the Republican candidate for President as part of a hoped-for-strategy of the destruction of the Democratic Party.
Be proud of that which you do, don't hide in the weeds and blame others like Chuck Schumer or supporters of Obama, if you're dead set on voting for Senator McCain, by all means, be dead and set, that's your happy choice, thankfully, not mine or Senator Clinton's.
June 8, 2008 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Before you vote for McCain, do one thing: go to his website and find out where he is on the issues. Then go to Obama's website and do the same. At least go into this clear-eyed, knowing exactly what you're doing. Because you're considering voting for a very, very bad man. And he will be a very, very bad president. If you're going to sin, sin boldly. And don't go into it with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears. For yourself, just make sure McCain is who you really want.
June 8, 2008 9:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
And one other thing: ask yourself why no dissent is allowed on HillaryIs44. Doesn't it seem odd to you that NO ONE who disagrees is allowed to post there? Is that Democracy? What's wrong with this picture?
June 8, 2008 9:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
1. You cannot take the word of anyone on the internets that they are truly a "supporter" of the person they claim to be. When I encounter a virulent, intensely confrontational supporter of any candidate who claims to be a Democrat, I start from the assumption that the person is actually a GOP troll in disguise. Even if I've had prior dealings with such persons - then I just tell myself that they were very, very clever at keeping their true identities hidden until now. Alternately, I tell myself that my erstwhile friend/fellow traveler is simply suffering through a period of intense delusional breakdown, and that it will eventually pass and all will be good again.
2. You really can't convince GOP trolls and/or people in the midst of a psychological breakdown of anything. It's not worth your time to try.
3. Real supporters of real candidates need some time to come around. They will, eventually, on their own. Many will perceive even your best-intentioned gestures of "outreach" as invasive acts of proselytizing if they come too soon. Let them come to you. They will, honestly. I spent a good bit of time at the Edwards blogs in the last days of that campaign, as an Edwards/Obama supporter. There was a lot of hostility to people "inviting unity" or talking about other candidates in any way. And the history there was *nothing* like it is here.
Just my few cents. I appreciate the efforts you're making and agree that we all need to continue to work toward party unity. But the most conciliatory gesture at the moment might be to just leave the Hillary supporters alone for a little while. Acknowledge in "neutral" and "Obama" spaces how welcome they are and how much we look forward to a combined effort, and then make sure that we're gracious when they do come around. But we don't need to actively go in search of their "unity" at this moment. They'll come home in their own time.
A statistic I saw that I keep flashing on: while only about 25% of Clinton supporters (all told) have claimed they won't vote for Obama, in the 2000 Republican primary race, just over 50% of John McCain's supporters initially claimed that they would not support W. Hillary's speech said a lot more, far more convincingly, than Johnny's "hug." I just don't think we need to worry yet.
June 7, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, you're good! Well said and needed. Thanks.
June 7, 2008 11:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good points!
Hillary Clinton also made a very important point today, which I hope her supporters were listening to –
blockquoteWe made tremendous progress during the 90s under a Democratic President, with a flourishing economy, and our leadership for peace and security respected around the world. Just think how much more progress we could have made over the past 40 years if we had a Democratic president. Think about the lost opportunities of these past seven years - on the environment and the economy, on health care and civil rights, on education, foreign policy and the Supreme Court. Imagine how far we could've come, how much we could've achieved if we had just had a Democrat in the White House.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/07/clinton-concession-speech_n_105842.html
June 8, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
ack! I messed up the blockquotes! Sorry.
June 8, 2008 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you've touched upon something. If you feel inclined to have dialog with a Hillary supporter that doesn't want to vote democrat perhaps the best way to respond is with quotes from Hillary's most excellent concession speech.
June 8, 2008 3:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know she wanted to praise Bill here, but this is flat out not true. We had a tech bubble, but many of our current woes started during the Clinton years.
This was the time when finance became the major sector of the US economy -- replacing manufacturing.
In other words, those jobs that Hillary was concerned about being shipped out of the country were losing significant ground during the Clinton years.
June 8, 2008 5:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree completely. They are in a grieving process and it will need to run its course. Most will come out the other side and take Hillary's advice to unite and move forward for the good of everything she represents and works toward. Those that don't are probably lost causes who will work to further another lost cause. Ignore them. We need our energy for the fight to save our country.
June 8, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
My concern is that they're now easy pickings for the Republicans. They feel they've been jilted by the Democratic Party, and that the DNC is the enemy. And the Republicans are going to come to them with smooth talk and cheap trinkets and try to convince them that the Republicans love them and that the Democrats never did. And at least some of them will fall for the ruse. They'll even turn their backs on Hillary, and decide that she's now the "enemy" too. So they need some support. Because they're part of the Party, and they need people to remind them of what's really important.
June 8, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
sounds like your coping mechanism is more delusional than angry hilliary supporters. lol
June 7, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
How would you know anything about Hillary supporters? You're a GOP troll, so you're going to have a major disappointment in a few months!
June 8, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Piston Moaned, it seems like you're right and some kind of grieving thing has to happen but I find the whole concept just weird. I mean, when Bush won in 2006, I grieved. But as much as Obama's candidacy has thrilled me, if he had lost, I wouldn't be hanging crepe. I'd be disappointed, but I'd already be trying to look on the birght side about Hillary. And I'dbe doing that because this year, this election is about taking the White House. It's not about MY candidate or YOUR candidate. It's about stopping the continuing train wreck of Republican rule, and way too many people have lost sight of the issues and are just way too personally invested. It's a bit pathological, actually.
June 8, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think the problem may be that many of them haven't been supporting Hillary so much as opposing Obama. And that's a lot harder to deal with because that can continue forever. They're not voting for McCain because they like McCain (clearly, if they knew anything about him, they'd hate his guts). They're just voting against Obama. Because they've spent the last 16 months stoking the flames of Obama hate. Now they're stuck in their hate. I have no problem with someone who votes for McCain because they think he's the best candidate. But it seems so incredibly self-destructive to vote out of hate or anger for someone who opposes everything you believe in.
June 8, 2008 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think your wasting time worrying about hillaryis44. I think it is an anti-Obama site that used Hillary as it's lure to attract pro-Hillary dems, especially women to trash Obama. If it was really pro-Hillary I don't think it woulod would not be going on a pro_McCain bent now.
Huffington Post reported it was started by a man named Alex Rodriguez, a political activist in NYC.
Hillary has given her message, hopefully those who support and admire her will follow her advice and vote for the candidate who's policies fall closest to her positions.
June 8, 2008 3:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Respectfully, I disagree. Obama's success has shown us that every voter counts. He won the nomination because he took every voter seriously and courted every vote. I agree that there are many Republican trolls on these sites, but there are also many good Democrats who need to get their bearings back, and some of them just need a little help doing it.
I also agree with those who have said that they need time to grieve. But in the meantime, the Republicans will be courting them while they're most vulnerable. I'm committed to beating the Republicans in November. I don't think it's a mistake to strike up a respectful conversation with them.
June 8, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
No Avatar Yet
Some reflections, now that the dust is beginning to settle from the primary.
Hillary is doing the best she can. Her behavior throughout the campaign has been on a continuum, sometimes more toward one end or the other, but it’s all been of a type.
She and Bill and some followers believe she's been treated unfairly because she's a woman, that she’s been criticized for no reason, persecuted by the media, and forced by others from her previously-assigned place of Democratic nominee.
Publicly, she has not admitted that she and her campaign have made any mistakes or have had any part in her loss: Others made her lose.
These are statements of one who sees herself as a victim. She could no more act like Obama and be sincere than vice versa.
Hillary and Bill and her campaign have called to similar victim beliefs in many of her supporters, notably some women who probably comprise a small percentage of the 18M who voted for Hillary.
During the campaign, they recognized her themes as their own: They, too, are treated unfairly because they're women, criticized for no reason, persecuted by those in power, and forced from what is rightfully theirs in this world.
Hillary projected onto them her own emotions, and they responded by identifying with her. IF ONLY Hillary would win, THEN she'll rise above her victim status, and I will, too, and my life will be fixed.
Hillary's losing means they have lost their one chance to escape their deep misery.
For Hillary and these supporters, salvation or damnation comes from forces outside themselves, rather than from within. This is implicit in many cases of “if only/then” reasoning.
Virtually everyone uses this reasoning, just not always to this extent. As with all our beliefs and emotions, it’s not a rational process. Providing these women with additional information or logical reasoning is the language of the mind. They are speaking from the language of values and feelings.
Research suggests that, in these cases, those in the women’s position become more resistant to your rational stance, and their anger escalates.
It may be that, in the next 5 months, some will decide to vote for Obama. Some may not be able to act in their own best interests and may vote for McCain. I’m guessing that, either way, they’ll reach this decision by themselves, rather than from efforts by others.
If I’m ready for a concept, it’ll be everywhere - I’ll hear it in songs on the radio, see it in TV ads, practically have a sky-writing plane spell it out. If I’m not ready, nothing short of someone sawing off the top of by head and pouring in the concept will make a difference.
Because of the depth of these women’s hurts, it’s about them, rather than about Hillary, so of course they turn on her when she abandons them.
I wish peace for them and bless them on their way.
June 8, 2008 4:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Please think about posting this as a separate blog. Too good not to put it out there. Thanks.
June 8, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Avatar Yet
Apologies - meant to begin a new thread.
June 8, 2008 4:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I guess closed letters are so last century...
June 8, 2008 6:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
The Victorians thought that women shouldn't have the vote because they are governed by silly emotions. Why are so many Hillary supporters acting in a way now that can resurrect this view? To say out of anger and frustration that you will destroy everything out of petulance with a vote for McCain only resurrects the old Victorian view of women. Of course we all know that men often are just a stupid. The problem isn't that women are silly and ruled by their emotions. The problem is that human beings often are silly and rule by emotions. But this time it a set of feminists who are showing this trait, and this injures their cause more than they seem to realize. It plays into all of the old stereotypes that were used to deny women the vote and a place of power in society. Cut it out! For the sake of all of us.
June 8, 2008 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because Hillaryis44 squashes and censors dissent. They are propaganda. Talk to your friends - anyone who might be leaning in that direction - and bring them back to reality. As Hillary said, there's simply too much at stake.
June 8, 2008 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
So suddenly you think Hillary stands for something good. Grow up you little twat.
June 8, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh dear why do you think i am a GOP troll? i have been a dem all my voting life til this week. really i think hilliary was the only one who could beat mccain. in the beginning i considered barack but not anymore. i will for the first time in my life voting for a republican. i will vote dem on the down ticket. i would suggest you folks stop assuming anyone who does not care to elect obama a GOP troll to stop... it becomes boring after while.
June 8, 2008 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
You say right here that you plan to vote for the GOP candidate. And the things you post are undeniably trollish. So you are, like it or not, a GOP troll.
A week ago you may have been a Democrat. Or that may just be something you say to try to give your trolling some credibility. Either way, right now you are being a GOP troll.
June 8, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think you're a GOP troll. But I do think you will be very, very sorry if you cast your vote for John McCain. As I said, you may not have preferred Barack Obama, but he is INFINITELY superior to McCain. If the Republicans re-take the White House, no amount of down-ticket Democratic voting will save us from the shitstorm that will follow.
June 8, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
really good one from TM:
For me there is no threshhold an obama can reach to get my vote, the line was crossed long ago, when he directed his minions to behave the way they have. And learning about his friends and allies only makes me question what he really has in mind if he were to win the Presidency. There are so many similarities to his rise and the rise of facism and communism and some of their leaders Mussolini and Hitler and the fact that his stepfather was a communist and his mother supported sommunism while in Indonesia, paranoia? I don't think so but something isn't right and I too have the same feeling about him as I did with bush in 2000, but it is more profound.
When obama said "I could get her voters, but I doubt she could get mine" they were across the blogosphere chanting, "I will never vote for Hillary".
When obama's theme song in SC by JZ "I got 99 problems, but a bitch ain't one of them" his little minions were out in full force calling Hillary a bitch and every other word they could think of.
When obama was out last fall (after the PA debate and the media began their full frontal attack)calling her the most untrustworthy, will do and say anything, dishonest candidate; his minions were spewing the same rightwing garbage.
When the obama camp jumped on the RFK comment and claimed she was waiting for his assassination again there were the little evil minions suggesting she was calling for his assassination and demanding an apology.
The disenfranchisement of 2.5 million people and the supression of votes.
I could go on, but never in my life have I seen this type of vile, divisive, and hateful behavior and I don't care what anyone said, NO ONE ever had to go through what Hillary had to fight against this primary, not even in those good ole brawls of the past.
No, there is nothing obama can do or his snot nosed little punks to ever get me to support him.
But what I never thought is that I would no longer be part of a party I loved so much. The dem elites were just as culpable and what they did at the RBC drove the stake right through what they stood for and now I have to consider down ticket dems on whether or not I can vote for them, because voting for them is accepting the corruption they seem to believe is ok, in usurping the will of the voters for their own, this culture that began in 2000 and strengthened during the bush years (in his dictatorial aspirations)will bring down our country if it is allowed to continue.
To me my country comes first before any party. And people wonder why the Founding Fathers' didn't want Factions', they were wise and new history would repeat itself. We the People have to take our power back and set things right.
“No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her” -Susan B Anthony, 1872.
June 8, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If he's so horrible, why did Hillary endorse him?
June 8, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please stop abusing the Susan B. Anthony quote. The Democratic Party does not "ignore" women. In fact, the Democratic Party has been a fierce defender of women's rights. The Republican Party would take away or infringe not only the rights of women, but the rights of all Americans.
June 8, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
michelle, you said...
Yes, it was a tough campaign for Hillary. Perhaps even tougher than her ducking sniper fire in Bosnia. But I'll give her credit. She has been a trailblazer for women. Yet it seems to be a trail that you are intent on obliterating.
June 8, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nancy Pelosi (a woman) is the most powerful *person* in the Democratic Party.
Who's the most powerful woman in John McCain's party?
June 8, 2008 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Example of importance of the 'gut' vote:
A friend of mine with whom I am usually apolitical wrote in response to a tentatively political post to her that she did not like Obama.
She also professed that she liked neither McCain nor Hillary and that she would likely vote for Obama over McCain.
But there is no reason, I though to myself that I could allow the regret that this very bright woman would feel if she learned one basic fact AFTER becoming an accidental McCain supporter and voting for McCain on Nov 4th.
She is a survivor of domestic abuse, and can recognize the underlying global disrespect and dehumanization of women signaled by any man's verbally abusive language to his intimate.
Did you know, I told her, that John McCain called his wife a cunt and that he did so in front of other people who have confirmed this?
No thinking, feeling, breathing woman can imagine their president using that adjective about another woman ever, ever, ever at all - let alone in public - and my extremely bright friend was utterly appalled.
It's over for McCain as far as this voter is concerned.
On to the next.
June 8, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
When McCain called his wife a cunt in front of friends, campaign staff and reporters, he did so because she made a harmless joke about his thinning hair. I imagine when McCain goes to war against Iran or North Korea or Cuba, it will involve a similar hot-headed response to some minor slight.
The man is FAR too unstable to be in charge of our military.
June 8, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Character and instability is important, and in fact a crucial factor - perhaps even trumping policy.
But there was no need for me to have made that further analysis on a one-to-one basis with this dear frined - and what I realized in that isntant before writing to her could be instructive for any of us who have women / dear buddies whose politics are not known but whom we know do in fact understand - or perhaps have even endured what my friend has suffered:
misogyny at its most personal level. A verbal, emotional bludgeon.
June 8, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Recently somebody posted some information linking the Hillaryis44 site to a Republican address/domain.
I just can't trace my way back to that post. Does anyone else recall this?
June 8, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
When I posted this, I was using HillaryIs44 in its more generic sense--sort of a placeholder for all of the pro-Clinton, anti-Obama sites out there (many of which were clearly set up by the Republicans). Here's an interesting post about the HillaryIs44 site itself:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/24/163437/416/562/522170
June 8, 2008 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."
– Sen. John McCain, speaking at a Republican fundraiser, June 1998.
June 8, 2008 4:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
hillary is 44 site is ran by a republican.it was discovered by Ben Smith at politic.com.those people are being lead by a republican in a most stealth way. When you allow emotion fear,and not reason to control your thinking,your ripe for the repugnican picking.
great talking points on this ANTI Mccain one
www,therealmccain.com there's a place you can email it around please do
June 8, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
kos did an analysis of how many people visit the site and post most of the posts came from the same people, something like 80%... they are a very small group of not too bright individuals.
you might as well save your breath.
June 8, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
As I said, I was using HillaryIs44 in a more generic sense. You know--like Kleenex. Or Crapper.
June 8, 2008 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
michelle bociurkiw:
Pray to god your daughter never needs an abortion, or any young person in your life gets sent off to these sick wars. And if they do, pray to god they don't come at you on the other side of it. I'd pay money to see that.
You are a troll, there's no doubt.
Buh-bye, and don't let the door hit you in the ass.
June 8, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
regarding trolls. a long time ago when dinosaurs roamed the earth, i was living in nyc and had to fly a bunch for biz. sweet, kind, saffron colored zealots, more commonly referred to as hare krishnas, would constantly buzz around the arriving and departing souls at the airport. now, like fruit flies they became very annoying, but they were so kind that everyone was loathe to be unkind to them ... most of us that is.
then one day sir intrepid came upon a solution to the problem, he had a little froggy like clicker[an antedeluvian form of the bug zapper,] and whenever one of the saffrons approached him in an attempt to lure him into their swarm, he would hold the clicker at arms length and keep clicking this clicker. soon everyone seemed to have the darling little devices and after awhile the saffrons went away.
so the moral of the story is when one sees a troll, do not respond just type click or troll or whatever suits your fancy. and maybe, just maybe they will all go away.
June 8, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
regarding trolls. a long time ago when dinosaurs roamed the earth, i was living in nyc and had to fly a bunch for biz. sweet, kind, saffron colored zealots, more commonly referred to as hare krishnas, would constantly buzz around the arriving and departing souls at the airport. now, like fruit flies they became very annoying, but they were so kind that everyone was loathe to be unkind to them ... most of us that is.
then one day sir intrepid came upon a solution to the problem, he had a little froggy like clicker[an antediluvian form of the bug zapper,] and whenever one of the saffrons approached him in an attempt to lure him into their swarm, he would hold the clicker at arms length and keep clicking this clicker. soon everyone seemed to have the darling little devices and after awhile the saffrons went away.
so the moral of the story is when one sees a troll, do not respond just type click or troll or whatever suits your fancy. and maybe, just maybe they will all go away.
June 8, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes, you are correct... i saw that but i just felt like adding my two 'sense' for the uninformed.
hillary still seems to have everyones knickers in a knot with her threats about her '18 miilion' supporters. many of my friends were for hillary and many were for obama, the ones for hillary have told me, unequivocally, that they will vote for obama should hillary lose.
as hillary rosen at huffpost so aptly put it... 'i am a democrat not a bargaining chip.' hillary would like us to believe that 18 million voters will not do anything without her approval-- not so.
June 8, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment