« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
$6.11
I just finished sending copies of the U.S. Constitution to Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi, Rahm Emanuel, Harry Reid & Jay Rockefeller.
Basically, my note in each packaged said, "You should try reading this sometime" with only a slight variation on each.
It cost $6.11 each, shipped from Barnes and Noble. They had to be shipped separately obviously, but it was, for me, well worth the cost.
Here's the link/book:
The Constitution of the United States: With the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of ConfederationI know it probably won't do jack shit, but I thought it was important to make a statement other than my usual fax or email rant.
Here are the addresses for these guys.
Senator Jay RockefellerI'm sure there are others who need deserve to receive a copy, but I'll leave that to others. This is what I was able to do today.
531 Hart Senate Office
Build.
Washington, D.C., DC 20510
Sen. Harry Reid
528 Hart Senate Office Bldg
Washington, D.C., DC 20510
Rep. Rahm Emanuel
1319 Longworth
House Office Building
Washington, D.C., DC 20515
Rep. Nancy Pelosi
Office of the Speaker
H-232, US Capitol
Washington, D.C., DC 20515
Cong. Steny H. Hoyer
House Democratic Majority Lead
H-107, The Capitol
Washington D.C., DC 20515
You?
I had already given to ActBlue yesterday.
You?
I also had faxed Sen. Obama at his D.C. office, as well as at the campaign fax, also yesterday.
You?
D.C. Office
(202) 224-2854
(202) 228-4260 fax
Campaign
(866) 675-2008
(312) 819-2089 or 2088 (fax)
I'm so angry right now I'm dizzy.
digg this
crossposted at thejoshuablog
Advertisement











Comments (16)
UPDATE:
I forgot that the price I paid at B&N was at a member's price, so non-members will pay 20 cents more.
Also, I was thinking there are other books that could be sent, like this:
June 20, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
No offense, but you just wasted your money. And if I were them, I'd consider it a patronizing exercise. Just saying.
I understand the need to vent, but take a deep breath and think about what has happened here. The '70 FISA law was updated, and Obama's going after the immunity provision in the Senate. This is hardly over.
June 20, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't send one to Obama. And it was meant to be patronizing. They deserve patronizing. The entire 110 congress (say for a few worthy bills early on & the recent GI bill) has been one long patronizing act of capitulation.
June 20, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doowutchyalike.
June 20, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right. My original outrage and frustration at this has dissipated, and now I understand the real stakes her. A compromise is better than nothing, and even if Obama does vote for it, at least such acts will be prevented from happening in the future. Period.
June 20, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
at least such acts will be prevented from happening in the future
Without intending offense, how do you figure that?
Yes, the bill supposedly "makes clear" that FISA is the "exclusive means" for legal electronic surveillance - but it was the exclusive means before! The surveillance that was done by the Bush White House, was done illegally - that is the point of the argument - so how does restating what was already true "prevent" a repetition?
Don't forget that the Shrub gang did not exploit a loophole or even come up with one of their infamous twisted interpretations of law, they simply declared that the president could not be confined by the law, that he was free to ignore it. And what's happened now is that those who broke the law are going to walk. No penalty, no price paid.
So I really can't understand you being so sanguine about the future.
(Footnote: Please don't tell me about Obama's talk of perhaps having his Justice Dept. pursue criminal charges. Do you seriously think there is any rational chance of that?)
June 21, 2008 3:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Josh.
Don't forget to contact your senator(s).
June 20, 2008 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I, with other people, did the same thing a couple of years ago. I'd say you wasted your money, since they clearly haven't read it in the intervening years.
June 20, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just so people are aware: mail can take 3-4 weeks to get Congress because of anthrax monitoring. Longer if it is a package.
They do, however, deal with FAXes. That is the most effective way of getting a staffer's attention. Of course, the staffer will dutifully log the FAX.
A tip for the future: identify clearly what you are upset about. Presumably it was FISA. You could write something like:
"Re: Recent FISA vote in the House: You should try reading this sometime"
That way, you will be logged as disapproving of the measure. Of course, sending something to the Senate complaining about the House is an exercise in futility.
For the Senate, you could write something like:
"Re: Upcoming FISA vote in Senate: Please review the rights written here and ensure that your vote reflect them."
Also note that most members of Congress will trash mail unless it is sent to them by constituents. However, you can address something to their title, in which case they don't trash it:
"Re: Recent FISA vote in the House: Representative Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, I wish you to review the US Constitution before making another vote that takes more citizen rights away."
I applaud your effort -- because in an election year Congress is particularly sensitive to constituent mail. You just want to have the maximum effect. The first step is to get others to join you, the second step is to follow the suggestions here.
I suggest not getting cute and sarcastic with your direct representatives. They do remember people who take the time to write in... and if you build an impression that you are always mouthing off, the protest has less teeth.
Finally, avoid the email forms on their websites, always use FAXes to get their attention.
June 20, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Joshua.
I believe that in numbers there is power. If we all contacted our government representatives and got five others to do so too and so on....believe me, there'd be IMPACT.
As Obama states, it's up to the people - WE LEAD and THEY WILL FOLLOW! A friend who worked in Congressman's office said they only really pay attention when they get more than 100 (positively worded, no snark) communications from their own constituents and it takes 500 if not in their district. Doesn't sound like much, but seldom occurs unless it's mass form e mail or fax. It's the individual's (en masse) communications that influences them.
Post on other blogs and STAND UP & SPEAK OUT (TO YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS AS WELL AS OTHER VOTERS) OR SHUT UP!
June 20, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
If we only acted when we knew for sure that it would get results, then we'd never act or act rarely.
Obama did not begin to run for office because he was sure he'd win. He set out to try and look what happened.
I'm glad you did this because you did it from your heart. Don't let people tell you otherwise.
June 21, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was intiailly very disappointed with the House Dems, but honestly, Nancy Pelosi has been able to guage when to fight today, when to fight another day, and when to let things go if she won't get her way. She's doing just fine. It's Hill politics, and it's really frustrating for those of us on the outside.
That being said, I think contacting your Congressmen and Senators is worthwhile; how else will they know our thoughts. However, I'm betting Nancy Pelosi already has a copy of the Constitution--you're better off sending it to the White House.
June 21, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
There must be something about this FISA vote I don't understand, in that -- if it could be tabled until after the election, what was in it for House Dems to accept a vote now?
Many of you have already covered the legitimate distress over wiretapping and the Telecomms and immunity. But I am particularly concerned about the issue, embedded within the bill, that affirms Presidential usurpation, from Congress, to initiate acts of war -- which, according to this Bill, can now only be rejected by the Supreme Court.
If this is true, what is Congress thinking? That Scalia & Co. will say no? Have our Dems in the House just given Bush free rein to bomb Iran, or elsewhere, prior to the election?
Wracking my remaining brain cells to find a reason why they would take this action. Is it true, for example, that Webb's G.I. Bill got conflated with this? And that to vote "no" on Visa means voting "no" to an improved G.I. Bill?
June 21, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
That I typed "Visa" rather than FISA is a freudian slip; must be time to pay attention to that other bill.
June 21, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
lol!
June 21, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pelosi was being pressured for months for the standing Senate bill on FISA.
The attempt at a compromise shows leveled strength in the Congress to oversee or check the President's measures.
The FISA and immunity bills are separate and will be introduced as such.
June 21, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment