« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Why I Admire Donna Brazile
After sitting patiently thru all the arguments back and forth about
whether the Michigan election was flawed or a legitimate election, the
woman whom I admire more and more each day, cut to the chase. Donna Brazile said
her mother always told her that ["If you change the rules in the middle
of the game or at the end of the game, it's called cheating"].
So
whether it's a game of spades, horseshoes, or checkers, the same
principle should apply when determining the best solution for Michigan,
don't tolerate cheating. So Donna Brazile, I applaud you for continuing
to be unafraid to say that a naked emperor is not wearing any clothes
even when others tolerate such nonsense with their silent.








Comments (43)
She has shown to be herself a lady who is never disrespectful but always on point. I so respect and admire her demeanor and intellect. Her momma was also one smart lady.
May 31, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's the best. A uniter. She's seen most of this before is some other campaigns. She is obviously agonizing over how not solving this now may cost the Democrats the White House.
My hat's off to Madam Brazille, elder stateswoman of the Democratic Party. And I hope she sees these posts and knows how much many of us admire her.
May 31, 2008 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
How come she didn't advocate punishing new hampshire for violating the DNC schedule? Did her Momma also teach her that the rules only apply to some states but not others?
May 31, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I challenge you to take that up directly with Donna Brazile...if you have the courage :-).
May 31, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because New Hampshire was chosen as one of the 4 states that would be allowed by the DNC before Super Tuesday. It was Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina.
May 31, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't bother, logic and facts are lost on this one.
June 1, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
The reason Michigan agreed was to break the monopoly of Iowa and New Hampshire on the first two slots: New Hampshire was scheduled to go third and didn't.
June 1, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
I still have yet to see any evidence that NH or IA violated the rules. My understanding is that NH, NV, IA and SC would be the only states that can hold contests prior to Feb 5. Today is the first time I have heard anything about sequence.
May 31, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was decided as per Carl Levin (D-MI), that NH would allow NV, which included a more diverse population, to caucus BEFORE NH, which, like Iowa, like mostly white. While IA, NH, SC, NV were sanctioned to go before Feb. 5th, NH jumped ahead and received a waiver.
June 1, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Two wrongs make a right? Can't anything be about principles? About a non-Clinton/non-Obama partisan perspective? Can we set our bearings first without checking to see which candidate it benefits?
May 31, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
would it be too difficult to know what you are talking about?
May 31, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's put our more victim-minded feminist sisters to the test: Donna Brazile for VP = strong woman with tons of experience and plenty of fortitude.
Of course, that doesn't resolve the Appalachian problem, but instead, doubles down...but then, those states will probably vote McCain anyway.
Just wishful thinking.
May 31, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is that she's connected to a church whose leader said the shoah was all about them.
May 31, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
shoah? Please explain.
May 31, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holocaust.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust
May 31, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Lookingin. I really wanted Scalfin to elaborate on the connection he implied existed with Donna's church. Basically, he dropped a sound byte.
May 31, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Donna Brazile is a Catholic so what are you talking about.
June 1, 2008 10:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Something about her last name...I don't know...it sounds vaguely...foreign.
June 1, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
You really are an ass.
June 1, 2008 9:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love that Donna Brazile. She calls it as she sees it. She has said some great things in the brief moments she spoke. She is great....
May 31, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Despite some political postering, Donna came off as the star and Ickes came off as Clinton's planted hack.
May 31, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
As did Tina Flournoy, or whatever her name is....
June 1, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Donna is class, no doubt about it. Next chair of the DNC, perhaps?
What's sad, in a way, is that at the beginning of all this you could tell that she was very positive toward Sen. Clinton -- not hostile toward Obama but very proud and impressed by Clinton. Losing Brazile's good opinion is something that has to - or certainly should - hurt.
June 1, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
She already leads the DNC, so she might as well officially chair it.
June 1, 2008 1:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Donna is my Boo!
June 1, 2008 4:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, Caringthinkingperson, but I've already claimed her as my own.
Rachel Maddow too.
That being said, I'm open to openminded men too.
June 1, 2008 4:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of Maddow, I know I'm a man and all but I soooo want to gay marry Rachel in California. She is BRILLIANT!
June 1, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Get in line with my boyfriend. He perks up every time she comes on the screen!
I don't mind though. Given my not-so-secret crush on Keith Olbermann, it's only fair.
June 1, 2008 3:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hurray for Donna Brazille.
June 1, 2008 4:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, changing the rules and definitions of success are called cheating. But that is what the Clintons are good at and that is what they call experience. So yes, Mrs. Clinton is right, she would have been ready from day one - to continue the lying and cheating as usual. Her husband did not inhale, he did not have sex with that woman, he manipulated words to deceive. Mrs. Clinton now follows in his footsteps, manipulating words, manipulating rules for her purposes. One feels sad for the misguided Clinton die-hards that they do not how they have been manipulated by this husband-and-wife hit team of manipulators. After eight years of Clinton scandals and eight year of Bush attacks on the law of the land and the laws of the international community, we need fresh air, not "experience".
We have been Clintonized and Bush-whacked enough.
June 1, 2008 4:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
"My momma taught me to play by the rules and respect those rules. My mother taught me, and I'm sure your mother taught you, that when you decide change the rules, middle of the game, end of the game, that is referred to as cheatin'."
And cheatin' is what they ended up with.
Disregarding their own rules and common sense in their rush to curry favor and help Obama get to the top. I guess Judas Richardson called everyone and told them that "Obama will remember you".
So, I too admire Donna Brazile. At least she warns upfront when she's about to cheat.
June 1, 2008 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Could you please clarify, as to where the "cheatin" happened? I think the cheating occurred when two states tried to break in-line in the middle of the game.
June 1, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Little fella, the only cheating going on is your cheating yourself out of any dignity. Do you realize how ridiculous you are?
June 1, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Poached comment:
What Donna Brazille's Momma didn't teach her: Thou Shalt Not Steal.
June 1, 2008 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary Clinton's parents missed that lesson too.
June 1, 2008 12:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
...and Bill, Harold, Terry, Lanny, plus the ragin' Cajun. C'mon, and stop being so over the top, AJM. You should only hope that one day you'll be as respected as Ms. Brazille. You certainly aren't now, especially with outrageous comments like that considering Hillary's only strategy since Super Tuesday has been to steal it. Fortunately, there are still honorable Democrats like Donna Brazille and Al Gore. You insult Donna, you insult the Goracle.
June 1, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Donna is awesome. To watch her throughout this whole process has been amazing. She has shown class, reason and sound judgment. Now, I love her mom too!
June 1, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
dijimo,
Hillary won New Hampshire. Do you want that delegation to get 1/2 votes too?
June 1, 2008 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure - so long as the DNC acts based on consistency and principle I'm all for it - take away 1/2 the dels from NH too. How many times can I say this? It's not about what favors which candidate. It's about the principles of what the democratic party used to stand for. The hypocrisy of these folks talking about "RULES" when they simultaneously agrue super dels should rubber stamp whomever is ahead in the delegate race is rdiciulous. The hypocrisy of puniching one state which did their best to get back in compliance with party rules while giving a full pardon to NH is a joke.
You Obama supporters seem not realize that there are some people (myself included) who do play by a consistent set of rules and principles versus sitting down in some backroom to hammer out some BS deal to unite the party behind Obama.
June 1, 2008 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you do think they should've kept to their original decision not to give any delegates to Florida and Michigan?
June 1, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have enjoyed Ms. Brazile's commentary very much during this interminable primary and her performance yesterday, was, of course, stellar. I think she has a solid set of values and that's a rare thing in politics.
Don't know how good a strategist she is, though. The Kerry presidential campaign was a disaster. Maybe that solid values thing gets in the way.
June 1, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
lalo35adm--
Mrs. Clinton has said at great length that all the people must be represented. I live in MI. Our guy wasn't on the ballot because the Democratic Party said The Vote Wouldn't Be Counted. Biden, Richardson, Edwards, Obama AND Clinton signed a pledge not to "campaign or participate" in MI and FL and they all promised to take their names off the MI ballot. Mrs. Clinton waited until the others had already done so and then said she'd changed her mind but told the good people of New Hampshire that it didn't matter because "everyone knows that vote doesn't count anyway". Polls in Michigan and exit polls on the day of show that Michigan is evenly split between Obama and Clinton. 30,000 people wrote Obama's name in on ballots, but write ins don't count here. The Michigan democratic party and MI supporters of both Obama and Clinton worked very hard to come up with a reasonable compromise that best represented the will of the people in MI and this was the proposal that the Rules Committee ultimately voted to accept. Mrs. Clinton who says she wants all the people represented, tried to steal the entire election by trying to steal MI. She was insisting that Obama get zero votes in MI, that she get 55% and that the uncommitted votes stay uncommitted---News flash, the Clinton campaign "helped" in the selection of the "uncommitted" delegates. Also, MI has 26 super delegates who have all been in the bag for her since the beginning. If she had gotten her way, she stood a good chance of ending up with about 150 delegates out of MI. That number represents about 750% of the number of delegates she netted in her big win states of Ohio and Pennsylvania. If she had pulled it off, it would have helped her in her efforts to steal the nomination, but it surely would not have represented the will of the people of MI. The Rules Committee did their best to come up with a fair compromise and ultimately it was felt that the compromise that MI worked out for itself was reasonable. The committee worked hard and did a good job. And Donna Brazile is a peach and a down to earth wise woman!
June 1, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forgot to add that the reason that "uncommitted" was 40 percent of the MI vote was that the MI dem party ran adds telling people to vote uncommitted to represent their Obama choice. Many people did, but a great many people didn't go vote at all because we believed the DNC when they said MI's primary vote wouldn't count. A reasonably fair ending and a good job by the committee.
June 1, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment