Very interesting about the lack of post here. Personally, you'd expect to see a comment or two from those who would have a vested interest in her campaign, someone willing to go against the marker, but there isn't. I hate to say it, but the truth can always be found by following the money. Always has been, always will be. Money doesn't follow losing causes, and money detects strife. If there was an actual fear about his nomination chances, his rating would be considerably lower, but it isn't. So, how does one explain that? How does one reconcile that there are supposedly so many that won't vote for him, amongst democrats, but yet the value isn't falling, but actually rising? There really is only one way to analysis this; Barack will achieve the nomination of the Democrat Party, democrats will rally around him because the other options they have available are untenable, and that most of the news about internal party strife are nothing more than a very vocal minority expressing sour grapes, as well as the vocal sputtering of a dieing campaign. Pro Patria!

It is finally beginning to dawn on me that many of Hillary's supporters are rational people who intend to support the party's nominee, who happens to be Barack Obama. I know it seems like decades ago, but remember that before the Clinton campaign started playing its flush of identity politics cards, exit polls showed that the vast majority of democratic voters would have been happy to vote for whichever of the two candidates won.

In short, the Clinton supporters who post on the internet appear to be a cultish minority. The rest of them are democrats who preferred Clinton during the primaries, but are not sticking around to watch the 11th inning in a came that Obama already won after 9.