« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
What the hell is wrong with you people?
I was out the past few days - did I miss anything? Oh, I see that it's all over but the shouting, Clinton is toast and according to press reports Obama is already moving into general election campaign mode. Pretty much what I predicted several weeks ago, when I said that after voting for Clinton in the primaries I was now supporting Obama. So I cruised on over to TPM to see how all the Obama supporters were celebrating. So what do we have here:
*"Operation Chaos"
*Screaming headlines about Obama possibly retiring Clinton's campaign debt and hysterical threats to withold campaign contributions if he does
*More screaming headlines - Clinton says yet another stupid thing in interview
*TPM Cafe--let me see if I can distill all those posts into one thought. "It's not over until Clinton concedes, is drawn and quartered, gets a house dropped on her and is run over by a bus, and then I still want to poke her with a stick for a few more days."
Gee, I thought winners would be a lot more, I don't know, upbeat?
Here's a last little, teensy bit of advice - Obama won, get over it. Move on, people - your obsession with all things Clinton is starting to make this site look like Free Republic with PBS ads. Declare victory, ignore the sad remnant of the Clinton campaign and march forth to November.



Comments (167)
Unfortunately, there is a suspicion that the Clintons are not entirely convinced that it wouldn't be in their best interest to undermine Obama. Her demonstrably false remarks about her having the only viable winning voting coalition fro the general is the latest example.
Maybe that just a a gambit in a tough negotiation...to get what I am not sure.
But, ask yourself this, if they had to which would they choose: (1) stopping the campaign, throwing their support to Obama who then goes on to win and serve two terms, ending forever, their Hillary's chance to be president, or (2)weakening Obama so he loses against McCain and then preparing for a Hillary in 2012 "I told you so" campaign.
I am not saying I know the answer, but the fact that it is not 100% clear that they are going with (1) is very very troubling.
Everyone wants to move on. She just keep sucking us back in.
May 8, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I think your perceptions are absolutely spot on, DKDC. As has been the case since about February 26th, no one wants to let go of this race.
May 8, 2008 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think we'd all love to let go of it, but for the inconvenient fact that it's not over yet. Obama has not yet officially clinched the majority of the delegates, and HRC continues to go negative and undermine Obama (either in a gambit to blackmail him into paying off her campaign debts, or she's sincerely driving at the Supers). It's all well and good to take a deep breath and start planning for the next round, but unfortunately, this one ain't over yet.
As for some of the chatter between and among supporters, if you think banter on TPMCafe is going to have any effect on any election outcome anywhere, I suggest you get out more often.
May 9, 2008 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I recommend for the title alone.
Give 'em some time. They'll mellow.
May 8, 2008 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Recommended. I'm looking forward to the "Get Off My Lawn, You Damn Kids!" follow-up.
May 8, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the title gets really teeth, coming as it does from the mouth of Mr. Furley.
May 8, 2008 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I almost missed the avatar! That's awesome. Where's the follow-up from Mr. Wilson?
May 8, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Genghis' shirt makes him a Jack Tripper for all seasons.
May 8, 2008 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I, for one, like his shirt.
May 8, 2008 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
His shirt is okay, but in real life it doesn't actually change color. What a disappointment.
As for the original post.. I think we are all having a hard time believing this is really over.
By the way, I am trying to download a picture for myself and it does not seem to be working. I get an error message.
May 9, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Finally! A live report on the shirt! Thanks, AM.
May 9, 2008 2:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
What browser are you using? I can only upload photos to TPM with IE.
May 9, 2008 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
It works in Firefox, but the pic needs to be no larger than 64x80.
Paige, I like the new avatar, though I always find it disconcerting when people change. It's like someone you know getting major plastic surgery.
May 9, 2008 7:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't decided how I feel about the avatar yet, but I thought it'd be interesting to show my "face."
Also, I have never been able to upload here with Firefox, including the current avatar, which is only 70px high -- and the previous one, which, I think was 64px high.
May 9, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SAYING THAT!!!!! Honestly, with all the sore winners around here I think they've projected every frustration from their entire lives onto Hillary. After spending months blaming Hillary for all the divisiveness of this campaign, they seem intent on making sure that Hillary supporters find it impossible to vote for Obama.
May 8, 2008 1:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
By all means base you decision not on the candidates but on other voters. It is hard to have any respect for that sentiment, or anyone who even raises it. You just can;t let go of you contrarian attack dog persona, can you.
May 8, 2008 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Economides, the same can be said of you. Your accusations against Hillary are a bit conspiracy-minded. Can't you let it go? Otto, for once, is right: if you keep it up, you WILL alienate people whose support we want.
May 8, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Clinton's are only "conspiring" with themselves. My point is simply that it would be very easy for them to signal their true intentions if they mean to back down. It would be very easy for her to continue the campaign on a solely positive note, making the case why she has the right policies and experience without resorting to the "electability" canard, or anything else that argues that the other guy is not qualified/capable/ready, etc... That I even have doubts is not my fault, it's theirs.
If Otto is going to base his vote in November on what I say to him, then he's an immature twit. I'm pretty sure, however, he really couldn't care less what I say.
May 8, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I tend to agree with you Economides (nice avatar btw) and others like Rachel Maddow who warn that it's not quite safe to look away yet - while our guard is down Clinton is continuing divisive race- and class-based attacks while simultaneously negotiating for a place on the ticket and to have her enormous campaign debt paid by you and me.
We don't all have to respond in the same way. There are enough of us that some can act as uniters, some as analysts, planners, etc., and some can protect our flanks as we advance into the general election, or we can all multitask to some degree. Embracing Clinton voters doesn't mean that we should totally ignore the ongoing machinations of her toxic strategists.
May 8, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Honestly, with all the sore winners around here I think they've projected every frustration from their entire lives onto Hillary."
I think you're on to something Otto.
BTW, I've been lurking over at Taylor Marsh dot com and Hillaryis44 and have concluded the same about them. Both sides have heaped all their frustrations, despair, fears, and hatred on the hump of the great white whale ... err, I mean the other side's campaign. It's not exactly pretty.
FWIW, I think a little bit of reserve in celebrating by the Obama forces is called for at this point. There is still some potential damage the Clinton campaign is broadcasting that they may still do. Or not. Nobody really knows for sure. All I know is their campaign is starting to act like a crazy person. And crazy people can be scary.
May 8, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. I've been referring people to this piece from the Onion, circa December, 2004:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/swift_boat_veterans_still_hounding
We can stop the attack now, and work on rebuilding the unity. It's over, despite what happens int he death throes.
May 8, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sheesh! Building unity? Then Hillary should be leading that charge.
My new favorite political event on the horizon will be to see if Hillary Clinton can match Ted Kennedy's 1980 speech at the Convention. Then again, her hole may already be too deep to get out of.
May 8, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary will come around eventually. I don't think it is her responsibility to rebuild unity at this time.
Political elections are brutal contest for real applicable power. By design there will be winners and losers. The losers lose. That's the beauty of it.
She appears to be heading towards the loser spot in this one and, as such, is not in possession of power, regardless of how bitter she may be. Only the endless chatter and criticism gives her any influence at this point.
Ignore her for a while. Give her time, let her lick her wounds as her the realization sinks in that she will not be the Democratic nominee. I, personally, see nothing in her past or present behavior that would indicate that she will not, by convention time, be able to graciously support Obama and urge every last one of her supporters to vote for him in November.
May 8, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome back pfakin (I've not seen you for awhile), and a special welcome back to your voice of reason. I agree that Hillary Clinton will work hard to support Senator Obama as the nominee. It's in her political interest to do so if nothing else. Everything else is just chatter.
May 8, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes DKDC it is time. We need to remember even a dead body twitches sometimes.
May 8, 2008 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The post's last paragraph is spot on.
A little push back against parts above it. There are corpse-kicking moments in this neighborhood, you are right. But then, on one specific point, why should people who fear their hard-earned money being given away to a rival campaign not have the right to bitch and moan about it?
Mind you, I wouldn't mind if Obama retired her debt, and used my previous givings to do it. I just think others are entitled to find that distasteful, doesn't make them hyenas.
[Never mind that they're misinformed -- it's impossible! Obama's campaign is not a PAC, and cannot by law do what is suggested -- it would have to undertake a separate fundraising effort for people who wanted to retire Hillary's debt.]
So yes, everyone should let it go, Allsburg is right. Yet I think Hillary's white people comments are actually designed to provoke this reaction, and division. It's asking a bit much of Obama supporters not to have some reflux over them, given that race polarization in the party is probably our biggest liability for the fall.
But yes, it's best just to ignore the madness and be very adult about it.
May 8, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's not over until Clinton {...} gets a house dropped on her."
Hmmm... That's an angle I hadn't really considered before...
May 8, 2008 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent thoughts & advise. I think what we're witnessing is Terminator syndrome. People (especially after her "nuke" talk) are really leary of getting emotionally attached to the inevitable outcome until she either concedes or he clinches. I am stoked but I'll feel way more comfortable & ready to pop the cork when it comes from the horses mouth.
May 8, 2008 2:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a silly post. Obama is not the winner as long as HRC and her attack team are hiding in the bushes waiting for an ambush. We all know how low she will go. If she were a trustworthy person, none of this paranoia would be justified. Until she steps down and declares her support for Obama, this is not over.
May 8, 2008 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton is no longer relevant. Her (soon-to-be) former supporters are. Somewhere, someone just read your insult of Clinton and decided not to vote in this year's general election.
Whether you are right or wrong is irrelevant. It is time to woo Clinton's supporters. It's time to be persuasive, not accusatory.
May 8, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
You Yale-educated babies are all kumbaya.
May 8, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have nothing against Clinton supporters. It's her I don't trust to do what is right for the party and the country. I think her supporters are more honorable than she is.
May 8, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. So we must be careful not to alienate her supporters. Even honorable people have a sense of pride. Especially honorable people.
May 8, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I also believe she will do what is right and stand behind Obama when the time comes. I just don't know when that is going to be.
I have been trying to be nice to Clinton supporters, but the discussions can be frustrating. It tends to be an argument based on pure racism, or based on "electability." (I won't even touch the racists in this comment) Her focus, and her supporters focus, seem to veer more and more towards exclusively "electability." I want a democrat as much as anyone does, but I am turned off by that way of thinking. I guess I am still idealistic and think this should be about who is the real thing, the right person, an inspiration and who I trust, and less about beating the other guy.
May 9, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed, the scores of millions of Clinton supporters will be turned off by the discussion in this forum.
May 8, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did not say scores. Did not say millions. Said one.
This is going to merit its own post when I get time to write it:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/04/21/080421fa_fact_diamond
It applies equally to New Guinea tribesmen and Clinton and Obama supporters.
May 8, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I strongly agree with you on the issue of relating to Clinton supporters. I myself am doing plenty of wooing of a couple of friends who are quite hurt by the outcome of the campaign. I however do not see any practicality in extending this behavior to this sort of forum. In fact, I can see drawbacks, the main one being that the forum becomes insipid.
May 8, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's too late for me. That gem of a thread yesterday that led with a scream about Hillary saying on white voters count did it for me. And, I'm an activist voter. I don't intend to sit the campaign out.
May 9, 2008 8:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just read KateO's insult of Clinton and decided not to vote in this year's general election.
May 8, 2008 6:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn. I was afraid of that.
See? What did I tell you KateO!
It's ok, though--if you've been paying attention at all, you'll have learned that Genghis is a Republican plant designed to ridicule and demean the upcoming election. A very, very subtle plant. Perhaps even a Republican tree.
May 8, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am a Republican plant designed to ridicule and demean the upcoming election.
(As you can tell, I'm very sensitive to the power of suggestion.)
May 8, 2008 7:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry, I really am. I hope you all vote your conscience. I am just once voice of millions. I am one with Clinton supporters, just can't buy her MO right now. I don't get it.
May 8, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just read Genghis' comment and have decided to hold my own general election. No, you may not vote in my general election.
May 8, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a shame because what I really wanted more than anything in the world was to vote in DF's personal election. I feel so disenfranchised.
May 8, 2008 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
You look white enough, but you need to lock in the blue collar.
May 8, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought you lived in New York.
So is it FL or MI?
May 8, 2008 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you asking me? I live in MD, work in DC, although some of my best friends live in Florida and Michigan. Love them all, and they don't care in the least that their votes don't count.
May 8, 2008 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is relevant until she's officially no longer campaigning. Just because she can't win the nomination (short of Obama dropping dead ... or worse), doesn't mean she can't stir the pot more. And she will. Her campaign may have a mortal wound, but it's still holding several loaded guns. Treating her as irrelevant is risky.
May 8, 2008 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
As long as supporters on both side understand that it would be perplexing to many of us if either were not to support whomever the nominee happens to be! I understand the polls are the polls and that emotions are running high, but serioulsy whether you are an Obama supporter or a Clinton supporter to think that you would abandon the party if your choice is not the people's coice makes no sense to me whatsoever. Just look at the policies, forget about the candidates, when you do that it is hard to understand how you could vote for either Clinton or Barack and then look at John McCain's record and say, Yeah that suites me much better. It's fricken crazy and by any strecth of the imaginiation both Dem candidates records are far more in sync than McCain's record. Add his record with the fact that he has been running the George Bush campaign by pandering to the religious and neo-conservative right and his record would seem to be getting further and further away from either of the Dem's position. So I take the results with a grain of salt and chalk it up to emotion but if the case happens to be true than the country which happens to be my native one is as screwed up as all the lambasting I have railed against for the last 20 years. I believe this is the most important election in my life and perhaps the ost important since the 60's.
May 8, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's hilarious! I love it!
And I agree. We should all calm down and think about November.
May 8, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
well said. This isn't "Clinton talking points memo". The Clinton's thrive on media attention. On creating division.
We're not obliged to cooperate.
May 8, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The other part of this "retire Hillary's debt" thing would only matter if she dropped out. If she is running to the end of primary season then there is no quid pro quo and therefore Obama could not redirect his spending toward retiring her debt. She would have to drop out for this debt-retirement plan to become effective. And if she keeps running through end of May then the efficacy of doing so is null. I frankly doubt she will drop out till after June 3 so - no incentive.
May 8, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really don't understand why folks are getting so lathered up over that report. It is, after all, just an unconfirmed report.
May 8, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
Obama, Axelrod et al know far better than any of us how this game should best be played. So why not follow their leads and ignore Clinton and her campaign as they figure out the best way to call it quits?
May 8, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
When puppies have behavioral issues with biting, the best way to correct it is by gently but firmly redirecting their bites to an appropriate target.
Go gettim!
Good dog, good dog!
May 8, 2008 2:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
What purpose does this post serve. TPM has created TPM Election Central for people who want to practice their one-liners. Check it out.
May 8, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
may i ask why you folks think you can just say its's over and come back to the party? i really think you folks have misjudged this primary. there are a lot of dems who will never vote for OBAMA. your hatefulness will never be forgotten or forgiven. you insult again by thinking you will just patronize us and we will forgive. lol...life does not work that way kiddies.
May 8, 2008 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Roe V Wade, and other matters to become the Supreme Court, is the reason why democrats should vote for the eventual nominee.
I don not buy your contention that "a lot of dems who will never vote for OBAMA" nor do I think that the "hatefulness" expressed in these discussion boards will effect how anyone with the slightest grip on reality will vote in November.
May 8, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're wrong. It has affected a lot of Clinton supporters.
I originally saw Obama as an intelligent, articulate progressive candidate. He has a good message. And judging his executive capabilities by how well he's run his campaign, you have to feel he'll be a competent president.
Many Obama supporters seem new to all this. They haven't been engaged before. I'm tired of losing. And I been through too many cycles where we chose a really good progressive candidate who lost.
The Obamabots scare me. Their hatefilled, vitriolic posts against someone who advocated nearly the same progressive policies as their candidate scare me. You cannot decouple Hitler from the Brownshirts or Lenin and Stalin from Dzerhinsky. James Jones, Pol Pot, Milosevic and the Rwandan Hutu hunta had followers who were so zealous in their support that they willingly participated in mass murder.
Too many of you have drunk the cultists' kool aid. And that should be, and is, scary.
May 8, 2008 5:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're absolutely right, Redstateleroy!!!!!
Obama and his followers are JUST LIKE Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Jim Jones, Pol Pot, Milosevic, and the Rwandan Hutu and all of their sundry followers!!
Some of the things they've compared Clinton to are unbelievable. The Obamamamaniacs should be ashamed.
May 8, 2008 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I support Obama but if his and Hillary's situations had been reversed this week, I can guarantee you I wouldn't be on this blog trying to denigrate her. That would just seem pointless to me. For the other side of the coin, if the situations this week were reversed, I also wouldn't be on this blog in public denial, still touting my candidate as the best. I'd just be very quiet for a while, allowing the mental process of acceptance to begin to do its work, and I think that's what sane people are doing. The definition of insanity is behavior that is inappropriate to the reality of a given situation. Think about it.
May 8, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Godwin's law.
May 9, 2008 7:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know what you mean, man. One day people are being mean to you on the Internet, and the next you're working hard with a gun at your back for a bowl of rice a day.
May 9, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. Thanks for the sanity.
May 9, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Additionally, you vote for the candidate, not the bloggers who write about him...
May 8, 2008 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I vote solely based upon the caliber of the supportive blogging.
May 8, 2008 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
As the blog goes, so goes the nation.
May 8, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Says one Clintonite--yea, it does work. Give it time.
May 8, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
May 8, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
When the MSM starts treating Clinton's campaign the way they do Ron Paul's and Mike Gravel's, I will buy your comments.
Until then, she is a viable candidate until she formally concedes.
May 8, 2008 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
If the odds are less than 5% that she's going to get the nomination, what purpose does it serve to further alienate the other half of the Democratic party?
The family fight is coming to a close.
May 8, 2008 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, for starters I don't believe you are alienating 1/2 of the Dems. There has been a lot of buyers remorse since SuperTuesday that I've found.
Secondly, though I disagree with the practice, will vote Party not Candidate.
Third, the more decisive the defeat, the more unity can follow. That is, unfortunately, a human psychological reaction.
As any military leader will tell you, you cannot win until your opponent acknowledges their own defeat. (And yes, the *Clintons* used the words "War Room".)
The fact is that TPMers are not the common people who vote. Most people aren't following this election the way we are. What I do see is a notion that the battle on these boards is indicative of the battle in real-life.
I do not believe for a second that anyone intelligent here will vote or not vote for a candidate based on postings or perceived slights here. Those posters who claim it are either looking for attention or are using a thought process I cannot begin to fathom. TPMers like to think themselves thoughtful and independent-minded. How could someone with those traits decide to vote based on perceived slights?
It's the trolls (on both sides) that like those arguments.
Just as only Hillary can decide when it's time to withdraw, only Hillary can decide when the family fight will come to a close.
May 8, 2008 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have wondered if the thought process is one of a last-ditch attempt to salvage a losing candidacy. Not even limited to the blogosphere, but evident in the "real world" via exit polls.
As success in Senator Clinton's campaign has grown more improbable, there seemed to be evidence of a corresponding increase in the number of her supporters who "will never vote Obama". Is Obama truly doing something wrong versus the early stages of his campaign? Or is it more likely we witness here some sort of threat emanating from those who begin to see no reasonable avenue to victory for their candidate of choice, other than an if-not-her-than-nobody mantra?
May 8, 2008 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have you learned nothing from Jason, Freddy Krueger and Christopher Lee's Dracula flicks?
Seriously, her chances of winning are exhausted. Her opportunites for bringing the party, and the presumptive nominees chances in the general, are not. I'd just as soon not declare "Mission Accomplished" until the mission is actually accomplished.
May 8, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've tried to ignore posts like this for a while now because, generally speaking, I appreciate the lion's share of other posts by people who write them. But I'm so sick of these scolding posts. So, rhetorically: What the hell is wrong with you?
One teensy-weensie, itsy-bitsy, wittle-wittle bit of tiny, itsy-bitsy, teensy-weensie advice: People discuss things on this site. Often they're related to the stories being posted by the TPM staff. Currently, those stories are still largely about Clinton and Obama. Get over it. Move on. Stop obsessing about this.
If you'd like to lead by glorious example and post something that celebrates Obama's likely win in the primary or discusses issues related to Obama vs. McCain, then by all means do it. I guarantee many people on this site will be interested. Some here are doing that very thing. Some can even do that and also post about Clinton-related issues without getting confused.
What I'm guessing they won't do if you post such a thing is write a separate post dedicated to scolding you for your deficient grasp of what is and what isn't worthy of discussion. That will be pretty high-minded of them, won't it?
Anyway, to avoid turning into a scolding poster myself . . .
May 8, 2008 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah. There's a tendency to confuse what happens here with the national discussion. A natural tendency, since we'd like to believe we're more important than we are.
But in fact, much of what happens here is venting. It's closer to a form of therapy than to an attempt to persuade the other side. And it certainly isn't aimed at the mass of voters who are not paying much attention.
Anyway, DWS is spot-on about the national conversation. Time to talk about McCain. The correct response to Clinton shenanigans would be a sad headshake. And that's basically what the Obama campaign is doing.
But trying to stop TPM readers from venting is like trying to dam a river with sandbags. You don't stop the river; you just create little islands in it.
May 8, 2008 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Posting on Obama's win would be vilified because it would be "gloating". ;-)
The real children here are the ones that refuse to acknowledge what has happened. And so they don't you to continue to press on, nor do they want you to be happy with what happened.
Nice post, bdh.
May 8, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll tell you what the hell is wrong with me - I am utterly and hopelessly in love with you, Santa Poo. When you rake me over the coals like that and excoriate about my "deficient grasp" I get all goosepimply.
May 8, 2008 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
My avatar seems to have that effect I people. I have to admit I've been a little surprised (blush). Not that I wasn't going for sexy, but . . .
To be clear, my point was that this hypothetical post I speak of shouldn't be derided for having a deficient grasp, not that your current post has that particular deficiency.
Anyway, I realize my post eats itself (okay, something about this business is getting downright unsavory now) because it's a meta-critique of meta-critiques. I distance myself from it.
xxooxxoo,
Mr. Hanky
May 8, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have you learned nothing from Jason, Freddy Krueger and Christopher Lee's Dracula flicks?
Seriously, her chances of winning are exhausted. Her opportunites for bringing the party, and the presumptive nominees chances in the general, are not. I'd just as soon not declare "Mission Accomplished" until the mission is actually accomplished.
May 8, 2008 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wait, why is anyone recommending this post? What did you learn here? You heard someone list a complaint with no alternative solution. Just because you agree with the complaint DOESN'T make this a good post. If you agree with the complaint, go make a better post, fill up the Cafe with intelligent posts on the topic, don't bitch because other people aren't saying things you want to hear or taking things the way you want them to take it.
May 8, 2008 3:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree... as do others, I'm sure. But you can't see the "nonvotes"
May 8, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Our choice in November is to elect someone who "supports our troops" by ending the war in Iraq, and goes on to fix the economy, be that Obama or Clinton. We need to get over the campaign fight. I'm reminded of a cartoon I watched as a kid, about the sheepdog and the wolf. At the end of the day they clocked out as friends, and understood that the other was just doing his job. McCain is not (or should not be) an alternative for either camp.
The bothersome and unanswered question is what are Hillary's motives at this point. Is she trying to undermine Obama, so she can run in 4 years after he loses in November. Hmmm, maybe Clinton will do something McCain wouldn't do 8 years ago - jump parties for the VP slot.
May 8, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is some teensy advise, HRC does not seem aware that she has lost. Some of the MSM are already reviving a lost cause and frankly a lot of voters are aware of the fact that to drag this thing on ad nauseum with out closure is to further divide the party. If and when HRC concedes defeat, your post is entirely appropriate. But that day has not come, now has it?
May 8, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
The best that Hillary could hope for is a Cheney-style Vice Presidency.
Actually, she'll begin to realize that she'll be better off in the Senate, where she can stay and become even more powerful.
May 8, 2008 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to come off as overly contrarian, but I do wonder if Hillary Clinton sees a powerful senate roll as what she is really after at this point in her life. Only she knows for sure at this point. A graceful exit certainly paves the path, but she is also at her nadir of being a national player, at least as far as a presidential run is concerned. Perhaps we are seeing a one last stand approach. There is no doubt she spent the last eight years working up to the point she has achieved, and that is something to commend. But there is also no doubt she has been upstaged and beaten by Obama. Kinda strange for her to realize that she is obsolete, just as she has arrived. But then again, perhaps if she was willing to stand on her own two feet, rather than ride her husband's coatails, for all we know she might have suceeded.
May 8, 2008 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Without the name recognition, she wouldn't have even been a contender.
May 9, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to come off as overly contrarian, but I do wonder if Hillary Clinton sees a powerful senate roll as what she is really after at this point in her life. Only she knows for sure at this point. A graceful exit certainly paves the path, but she is also at her nadir of being a national player, at least as far as a presidential run is concerned. Perhaps we are seeing a one last stand approach. There is no doubt she spent the last eight years working up to the point she has achieved, and that is something to commend. But there is also no doubt she has been upstaged and beaten by Obama. Kinda strange for her to realize that she is obsolete, just as she has arrived. But then again, perhaps if she was willing to stand on her own two feet, rather than ride her husband's coatails, for all we know she might have suceeded.
May 8, 2008 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dont agree with the title or the post.
I dont know, my feelings arent hurt from reading TPM today, or yesterday. I think their is still a good reason to keep eyes on Hillary, we just dont know what she is going to do. And while she is still in it, the Primary has not ended.
Its just a fact. It may be over in your mind, and yes, I think I'd agree with you, but again, thats in your mind, its not a fact.
So I'll keep paying attention, and hopefully nothing crazy happens, but if it does, I wont be caught with my pants down.
They still have to figure out MI and FLA and we still have to see if Hillary was successful in telling everyone it was Obama's fault instead of blaming the appropriate parties within FLA and MI local government.
May 8, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ecellent points regarding MI and FL, the debate puts HRC at a decided disadvantage. But it was state and national leadership, not any candidate that created the messed. We take a "hit" regardless of the decision the DNC makes.
May 8, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ecellent points regarding MI and FL, the debate puts HRC at a decided disadvantage. But it was state and national leadership, not any candidate that created the messed. We take a "hit" regardless of the decision the DNC makes.
May 8, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
They have to hate just like the wingnuts.
May 8, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nuff said GL!
If there's one thing I dispise - it is the hateful Obamaniacs. These guys need to GO.
Keep up the awesome work - I am #1 fan.
May 8, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink