Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

War Crimes Allegations Touching DoD Public Affairs Civlians, DoD General Counsel

avatar

DoD Propaganda: Connecting Senate Inquiry To DoD Staffer

There is a potential war crimes issue the Senate may soon confront. DoD allegedly illegally used retired military officers to spread propaganda about Iraq. The names connected with this effort are allegedly linked with other deceptions involving the Secretary of Defense.

The emails are revealing and connect specific DoD public affairs officials to these alleged war crimes. The same name connecting Donald Rumsfeld to alleged war crimes was the source of an inadvertent, admissible disclosure of DoD public affairs internal discussions.

Department of Defense media planning cells include legal counsel.

The Senate has a copy of an email with the same name of the person who left notes at Starbucks. In late March 2004, DoD public affairs civilian Eric Ruff left a copy of notes of key names of Senior Administration officials discussing combat operations in Iraq. The notes were draft comments for late March 2004 Sunday talk shows

Within months, the DoD finalized a plan to use military officers to speared alleged propaganda to American civilians. The notes on page 5 of 7  show the President had still now yet finalized his reasons for military actions in Iraq.

The Senate is reportedly
poised to review the DoD domestic propaganda program.  Ask about the
media messaging analysis NSA contractors did on the domestic
intercepts, and how DoD knew which of the comments would most likely
mobilize public support.

The Senate must reconsider the DoD domestic propaganda. The issue is not narrowly inaccurate information. Other issues involve larger deceptions allegedly linked with the President, Secretary of Defense, DoD General Counsel, and the DoD public affairs office. It is a violation of the attorney standards of conduct for attorneys to transmit through the media or others information prohibited under the attorney standards of conduct. The Senate must review what information DoD General counsel knew was inaccurate, but passed through others to the media.

If proven true, domestic propaganda to support alleged illegal warfare could be a subsequent war crime. Nuremberg is precedent for prosecuting civilians.


Comments (3)

avatar

Testing ,
Maybe this is how we get the three Senators involved in the 2008 bid for President; to debate the larger issues of war crimes on the floor of the Senate.
Thank you for all of your excellent reporting /work on these issues. I still respectfully disagree with you that McCain wil win the general election -And do also still believe that an Obama presidency will begin to clean up the mess left us by gwb 43. My understanding is that former attorney general Eric Holder is already looking at how Team Obama can get the Hague referrals initiated in 2009 .
But meanwhile it would be excellent to see this openly debated in the Senate .

avatar

WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!

All beware the poster of this blog is a known spammer on TPM that throws unsubstantiated allegations on the news blogs that link to his unsubstantiated rants on this blog.

If you chose to leave a comment on his blog that does not agree with his conspiracy driven dribble, the blogger will in turn attack you. He has a history of flaming people throughout the TPM site.

He rants that anyone that disagrees with him is somehow connected to the DOJ, attempting to spread misinformation since the poster does not agree with him, attempts to connect the poster to another poster in a means of discrediting him/her, or attempts to claim the commenter is violating TPM policy for posting a divergent point of view.

While there may be some truth in the posting, it is only surely a result of pure accident on his part if there is so. Testing simply posts things he does not know about and then says because no one has stopped to explain the topic to him and the ins and outs, there must be a conspiracy.

Proceed at your own risk.

avatar

gsb27.
Hey buddy long time no see.. But you never did respond to testings questions regarding jury tampering in the Wecht matter - remember you were going to tell us the difference between jury tampering & jury polling . Furthermore ,it appears that out of control US Attorney in the Wecht matter did against a standing court order -have the FBI go questions those jury members after the court case was decided. Also there is still no answer to where was the FBI SPECIAL Agent in Charge -and did the SAC sign off on using his resources to countermand a court order. Finally testing did rise several valids ways that it appears that the Whitehouse is directly involved in this ongoing political prosecution of Wecht ,,,
GSB27 -tESTING has done a lot of credible post here-and accordingly testing has a lot of supporters here -so please be so kind to refrain from ad hominen attacks on testing -here.
thank you kindly gsb 27

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


October 20-24

Book Cover

October 27-30

Book Cover

November 17-21

Book Cover

December 1-5

Book Cover

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address