Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
VP Legal Counsel Private Email Linked to Outside Telecom Counsel, Allegedly Complicit With FISA Violations
The Vice President's Chief Counsel Kathryn L. Wheelbarger has used a private email account. This account has been linked with high profile issues.
The email account, contents, sending/receiving information contains information of wide public interest. Marcia Hofmann of Electronic Freedom Foundation was not provided all US government-telecom emails on FISA immunity..
The House Judiciary Committee is reviewing DOJ OLC legal counsel memos, but has not been given access to all prviate emails. Other legal counsel are reviewing alleged prisoner abuse, FISA violations, and telecom immunity requests.
This note discusses some of the implications of this private email, and the connection with outside counsel well connected with the White House and allegedly involved with the FISA immunity discussions.







Comments (8)
Wheelbarger's private email account has been linked with content sent to a law firm which conducted an internal audit of one of the telecoms, subject of the ongoing FISA litigation. The outside law firm has also been linked with the White House.
EFF FOIA Litigation
Marcia Hofmann of the Electronic Freedom Foundation recently won a FOIA case, getting access to telecom-US government communications seeking immunity for alleged FISA violations.
The government in a sworn affidavit stated there was no public interest in seeing private emails. These emails were not provided to EFF in response to the FOIA request.
It is not clear whether the US government adequately disclosed the Office of Vice President's legal counsel private email, her connection with the outside telecoms, or whether outside legal counsel still has records related to the ongoing FISA immunity discussions.
Growing Public Interest in Non-Disclosed Emails and Files
Until the EFF FOIA, there has been little if any public discussion of requesting copies of emails the US government sent to outside Counsel. Wheelbarger's private email shows there is a reasonable basis to doubt the US government's contention that it is acting in good faith in the affidavits.
It appears there are emails not only in the telecoms, but also the telecom legal counsel related to the FISA immunity discussions. It cannot be argued there is no public interest in the US government's private emails sent to legal counsel or telecoms; or the responses sent from teh telecoms and private counsel to the US government.
The link between Wheelbarger's email account and the law firm connected with the NSA telecom destroys a presumption of government good faith.
US Attorney Firings and FISA Violations
The original email request during the US Attorney firing scandal appeared to have narrowly focused on US government emails sent from US government and private email accounts on the US Attorney. There does not appear to have been an effort to focus on private emails outside legal counsel sent to the DoJ, White House, or OVP on the FISA issues; nor on records outside counsel sent to the US government, White House, NSA, OVP, or DOJ related to the FISA immunity.
US Attorney Firing Connection
The outside law firm connected with the Vice President's legal counsel private email account is reported to have hired a former US Attorney to silence her about an ongoing US government investigation into a Member of Congress.
Private email was used to coordinate the US Attorney Firings. Previously, the US government narrowly looked at whether the US government had or had not retained all emails. The White House is reported to have not retained all emails.
House Judiciary Hearing
The Judiciary Committee rejected Wheelbarger's request for abeyance and issued a subpoena for the Vice President's Chief of Staff to appear. Addington's privilege claim can be trumped under an an alleged fraud-corruption exception.
We recommend the House Judiciary, EFF, and other interested FISA litigants
A. Review the Office of Vice President's emails
B. Review all records of private emails sent to outside counsel on US Attorney firings, FISA violations, and requests for FISA immunity,
C. Require the OVP to safeguard all records of any private use of non-official emails,
D. Retain copies of all emails using private accounts to send/receive communications from outside counsel or telecoms related to alleged FISA violations or telecom immunity
E. Review the outside counsel, DOJ JCON, and telecom email archives for emails from the OVP or other US government computers using private email accounts
F. Require outside counsel, the OVP, and telecom contractors to provide an affidavit to the court that they have reviewed all records for all private email accounts sent from the OVP legal counsel.
May 8, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!
All beware the poster of this blog is a known spammer on TPM that throws unsubstantiated allegations on the news blogs that link to his unsubstantiated rants on this blog.
If you chose to leave a comment on his blog that does not agree with his conspiracy driven dribble, the blogger will in turn attack you. He has a history of flaming people throughout the TPM site.
He rants that anyone that disagrees with him is somehow connected to the DOJ, attempting to spread misinformation since the poster does not agree with him, attempts to connect the poster to another poster in a means of discrediting him/her, or attempts to claim the commenter is violating TPM policy for posting a divergent point of view.
While there may be some truth in the posting, it is only surely a result of pure accident on his part if there is so. Testing simply posts things he does not know about and then says because no one has stopped to explain the topic to him and the ins and outs, there must be a conspiracy.
Proceed at your own risk.
May 13, 2008 8:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
It appears Wheelbarger's comments to the House Judiciary staff counsel were, in part, designed to shield her private email.
Wheelbarger asserted there was an interest in protecting Addington's communications with the Vice President, and that there were institutional interests in shielding the Vice President's communications. Wheelbarger's private email casts these assertions to the wind.
It appears Wheelbarger has a personal interest to shield her private email account, and hide the contents of emails sent to outside legal counsel connected with the White House, US Attorney firings, FISA telecom issues, and other alleged illegal activity.
Trumping Privilege Claims
Wheelbarger asserted there were various privilege issues. However, The government counsel's asserted attorney-client privilege can be trumped when the fraud-crime exception is invoked.
The government in response to an EFF FOIA stated there was no public interest in these private emails. However, a presumption of good faith can be trumped when there is, as is the case here, non-speculative evidence. Inadvertent disclosures are admissible.
Nuremberg Evidence Retention Requirements
War crimes prosecutors have an interest in ensuring Wheelbarger adequately safeguards, retains, and preserves all emails sent from her private account. This private account does not appear to match the email accounts subject to the US Attorney firings. It is a different system.
Grand Jury Interest
We recommend the House Judiciary Committee, EFF, and counsel working the POW abuse cases, and FISA litigation identify the common link: Wheelbarger's private email account may contain some information to answer some unanswered Fitzgerald Grand Jury questions.
The US government should use Wheelbarger's private email account to identify the telecoms, outside counsel, and other non-US government entities that are discussing issues of interest to Congress.
Working Around Missing WH, GOP Emails
Wheelbarger's private email account may link to other legal counsel, contractors, or non-US government entities. Rather than focusing on the emails which the White House may have destroyed, another approach may be to focus on all entities connected with Wheelbarger's private email account, then subpoena those records from these outside entities, contractors, and legal counsel which the White House cannot or will not provide.
Wheelbarger must explain:
A. Wshe has used a private email account;
B. Why she has discussed legal issues using this private email account; and
C. Why she has discussed legal issues with outside counsel using this account. This firm is connected with the White House, FISA immunity issues, and the internal audits done on the FISA telecom.
May 8, 2008 12:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the language which would trump the presumption of good faith in re the Government affidavits in re FISA Immunity emails.
The VP legal counsels private email proves there is information, not provided, that is of public interest and related to the FISA immunity discussions.
VP Counsel cannot explain why her email is linked with legal counsel connected with both the White House and audits of the telecom industry; but the affidavit to the court in re EFF litigation says there is no public interest in these private emails or files.
May 8, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the language from the affidavit, which incorrectly states that there is no public interest in these emails.
May 8, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here another example of language in the affidavit in re FISA immunity discussions, incorrectly saying there is no public interest in the withheld information.
May 8, 2008 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the case citation for the fraud-crime exception, trumping legal counsel claims of attorney-client privilege.
May 8, 2008 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
First we need to thank and show support for EFF.
Next we need to ask if the appropriate Senatoral authorities are aware of this new opening for investigators . And particularly if Sen Durbin's office is aware of this new 'private email account ' controversy- as Durbin claims to be a strong opponent of torture -and also is a key adviser to the apparent Democratic nominee presidential nominee Obama.
Third we need to see if the data mining that the OVP appears to have been conducting - was prior to the WTC attacks - and if some of the data mining was directed at politic 'enemies " such as Congresswoman Pelosi -and if so for what purpose.
Then as a sidebar we might want to see if Yang has "lawyerd up" -and wonder what kind of other private emails might exsist between other outside counsel & the OVP -I'm thinking maybe even Theodore Olsen could actually have some "unfortunate e-mails " out there.
Good work testing ...it smells like some of our Federalist Society chickens are coming home to roost ..
( Paging Congressman jERRY Lewis !)
May 9, 2008 5:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment