Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

VP Guessing? Meet Brian Schweitzer, Your Gonna Like This Guy

Like many TPM readers I’ve been entertaining myself by tossing around VP ideas.  The person Obama runs with should bring qualities to the table that serve to round out his candidacy.  Things like executive and/or military experience come to mind.  Also an appeal to the regular, working class folks would help counter the “elitist” misnomer.  A woman candidate would appeal to the die hard Hillary feminists.  Several names are being thrown around as VP hopefuls, all of which have some of the qualities above.  Upon looking a little closer a firecracker of a guy popped out at me.

Gov. Schweitzer (D. MT) is an intriguing character.  Although the state doesn’t bring much for electoral votes Schweitzer is popular in the mountain west and represents a new breed of Democrat that is rising there.  He has a folksy and authentic appeal.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/08/magazine/08governor.html&amp;OQ=_rQ3D1&amp;OP=1e699b86Q2FQ7BQ3DvwQ7BUQ5B_mRQ5BQ5BQ5EQ7DQ7BQ7DbbNQ7BQ3FbQ7Bb)Q7BjTVTQ26cIvQ7Bb)VQ5B0vRIQ5BRBdQ5EjY">Mark Sundeen writes for NYT in 2006: </a>
<blockquote>As soon as Schweitzer was elected in 2004 — the same night that George W. Bush carried Montana by 20 percentage points — pundits began declaring him the future of the Democratic Party…………No fewer than four recent books by Democratic strategists have mentioned Schweitzer as the kind of guy Democrats need to win back rural America.</blockquote>
Several of Gov. Schweitzer’s positions dovetail nicely with Obama’s.  He didn’t take any PAC money for his campaign and enjoys going toe-to-toe with lobbyists.  He also spoke out against the war from the start.  Other qualities round out the package.  He’s more of a centrist and as an executive has a track record of lowering taxes while building a surplus.  He opposes gun control while being a strong proponent of alternate fuel sources.  And he reached across the isle by choosing a Republican as his running mate.

And then there’s the intangible.  He’s just plain likeable, campaigns well and doesn’t take any crap.  He cut’s to the chase and speaks in terms the sound bite crowd responds to.

“Schweitzer has the ability to reduce a complicated issue to a few sharp lines, reframing it with themes of patriotism and underdog know-how” says Sundeen.  When asked if he was sufficiently tested in his first session Schweitzer told the reporter
<blockquote>It was my first day on the job, and I was working with lobbyists and legislators who’d been there for years. We had a State Assembly that was deadlocked. But I pushed through the most progressive legislative agenda in the country. It was not easy. I took on the lobbyists. I wrestled them to the ground, and now I’m kicking them in the ribs.</blockquote>
There’s another quality he has that brings to mind Obama.  From the article:
<blockquote>"I’m just a rancher who ended up governor of Montana,” he likes to say. But Schweitzer is not a politician only in the sense that the young Cassius Clay was not a boxer; by the time his opponent realized he’d been hit, he was already on the mat.</blockquote>
Take a <a href="http://bademus.wordpress.com/">look for yourself</a>, I think your gonna like this guy.


Comments (16)

I think I need to give up trying with the html tags. If anyone can give me some pointers it would be much appreciated.
Anyway you can read this post with much better formatting here:
http://bademus.wordpress.com/

Thanks for the introduction. I've never heard of him before.

You say he has military experience?

No, he doesn't have military experience. He doesn't have formal foreign policy experience but he has lived and worked in several places around the world including living in the Middle East for a while. I like Jim Webb for the military stuff but I think his older misogynistic statements and the fact that he is a junior senator might make it hard.

http://www.brianschweitzer.com/meetbrian

You're right. I like this guy.

But the foreign relations/military experience, I'm not seeing yet.

Convince me.

Well, I don't think it is requisite that a president or VP have military experience. Bush, Cheney, Bill Clinton, Gore, etc. had none. The important thing with that is to have a top notch Secy of Defense and security team. I believe Obama would put an excellent team in place, maybe with a guy like Gen. Wesley Clark.

I think the soft spots are Hillary's women voters and also the blue collar white folks in the east/south central region. Webb, or perhaps other military guys might not appeal so much to the women, or even those guys. Bush got in because of his down home cowboy type appeal. Schweitzer has this quality but he's got smarts, toughness and a real likeable quality about him. I posted a video clip of him talking to a group in DC here (along with this post) http://bademus.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/meet-brian-schweitzer/
It's about 5 minutes long. Take a look if it isnt' on the link you put up. I will check the link you put up.

Okay, I see you tried to convince me, and I reiterate: I like the guy.

But he and Obama together against McCain might not be enough to convince the Obamacans.

But, I do like the guy.

Here is a good youtube vid speech for an introduction to Gov. Schweitzer -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUr48lg9Ocs

Yes! That's the one that I posted in the other place. I think it's a good one also.

I'm just not a 100% sure we have to have a military guy as a VP just because McCain is a military guy.

I disagree. 9/11, national security, proud Americans, all that means shit to Republicans these days.

I want a counter-argument, if you will.

If not Webb, how about the guy who doesn't blink?

Thereby giving Hillary's supporters a hand-hold?

My apologies. I reverted to "dumb-ism" language. I meant that "all that means SOMETHING" to Republicans these days.

I'm not sure who the "guy that doesn't blink" is. And I agree, because we do have a war that has a clear objective and that we should be focusing on it is and will remain a time of war. Also nary a week ago Webb was my #1 choice with his military creds weighing in.

The flipside is that most military people are more pro-war than regular politicians and I think we all want to move away from war. I think the only compelling reason that our President or VP would need to have military creds is because McCain does.

I'm wondering who the last President or VP we had that had military experience was. Do you know?

Wes Clark. He supposedly doesn't blink.

I like him. He's not a strong campaigner but I need to take a closer look. He's a very stalwart Hillary supporter so on the one hand that could be good because I assume her supporters like him. On the other hand it makes me a bit wary.

Wariness can make one blink, sometimes.

I'd like to see Schweitzer as Sec of Ag or Sec of Interior; I don't think he's quite right for a running mate but I definitely want him on the team. He is a fantastic campaigner, so watch for him in western states once we get deep into the GE. I think he'd also make an excellent panelist/pointman for the cable gauntlet.

Also, I can't be the only one thinking that a fishing trip with him and Richardson would be a hoot.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe

Recommended Reader Posts



Cafe Features


September 15-20

Book Cover

September 22-27

Book Cover

September 29-October 3

Book Cover

October 6-10

Book Cover

October 13-17

Book Cover

October 20-24

Book Cover

December 1-5

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address