« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The NARAL Endorsement and an Obama-Clinton Ticket
I have been virulently against an Obama-Clinton ticket for a while now for a few reasons. First and foremost, I think it undercuts his message of change. Adding the wife of a former president (and by default, the former president himself) to Obama's ticket doesn't seem all that revolutionary in terms of revising
Advertisement
Comments (5)
How would you like to see McCain for a change?
May 14, 2008 10:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is that why you want to see an incompatible VP?
Why do you want the VP's profile to supersede the actual candidate's?
May 14, 2008 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can someone explain why people are making such a big deal of the NARAl endorsement? I know they're a pro-choice group but I'm not sure I understand why some Clinton supporters are upset that they endorsed Obama. (I genuinely want to know because it doesn't seem like such a big deal to me.)
May 14, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
They're a pro-choice group based upon a feminist base, which essentially means that feminists are now telling Clinton to drop out (probably because she makes them look bad).
May 15, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gotcha. Thanks.
May 15, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment