Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The folks of Indiana aren't buying dirty politics. Check out what ran in the local paper

avatar

Comments (21)

avatar

Now this is a good and well-thought out column. It's worth reading by all. This country does deserve better than the 'same old same old' that Clinton/McCain represent. He of the last century, and the continuation of the GOP brand, and she of the two Clintons (who many in this country are tired of). And yes I voted for Bill twice so I have a 'right' to be tired of the Clintons. Obama is someone new, and the best thing going for this country now. the future of it at any rate. This country needs someone with his temperament, his intellect, his seriousness and unflappability to deal with serious national and international issues with the brevity they always deserve. after what Bush and his ilk have wrought we deserve a 'real' adult in the White House. and it's Obama. yes.

avatar

God help us if he ever even walks to the door of the White House

avatar

I think you are giving the American electorate too much credit. She started doing her dirty deeds since Ohio, and she has won 4 out of 5 of those contests. Those people obviously are low-information folks and/or they endorse Hil-liar-y Clinton duplicity, deceitfulness and do anything, say anything to win attitude.

avatar

Would you do me the courtesy of giving an honest reply to this question:

Who did you vote for, if anyone, in 2000 and 2004?

An Excerpt:

No waffles, no sexist slurs, no al Qaida, no Satan. Just a rational decision. My idea of the American Dream.

oh to dream again.

avatar

Brava, Ms. Salter, brava!

Barack Obama: http://nv.clari.net/perl/p/wed/az/Ayb117050933.RsL0_IA4.html?day=Sun&ycg&g=news.front_page

avatar

That link was supposed to be under a quote, sorry.

Barack Obama: "Why can't I just eat my waffle?"

avatar

Great column!

The reason I support Barack is exactly as what I heard Michelle Obama say on C-Span: "He will never do the easy thing, but he will always try to do the right thing."

avatar

I hope others get a chance to read this reporter's story.

there is hope....

screw em...

avatar

breakspear and everyone who are 'tired 'of the Clintons, were you better off after them or now 7 years after GWB?

how old are you? that you don't remember.....?

we've gone backwards with GWB, not forward.

with mc cain you'll have the same.

the Clintons love this country, and want it to be the best nation in the world and they left it in good shape.

heh - So the "the Clintons" are our only other option other than McCain? No one else in this entire country is capible of fixing the Bush mess other than "the Clintons"?

By the way there was one Clinton on the ballots in '92 & '96 and there is a different Clinton on the ballot this year so Clinton supporters should chill out with the "the Clintons".

Does anyone see the similarity in GWB's strategies in Iraq and HRC's strategies for this campaign? I'll try and point out the similarities:

1. Both were arrogant enough to think that they will just walk over the competition.

2. Both had the unfounded confidence that once they beat the so called opposition they will be greeted with flowers, no matter what it takes to win.

3. Both did not do any grass root work to find out what the ground reality is.

4. Both were adamant that their strategy was sound.

5. Both never anticipated a long drawn out battle.

6. Both surround themselves with 'yes-men' and appoint incompetent loyal cronies to high ranking positions.

7. Both wildly underestimated costs and overspent their budgets.

8. Both are reluctant to change their strategy because that would be tantamount to accepting that there was/is something wrong with it in the first place.

Scary isn't it?

And her new "economists are elitists" thing is totally ridiculous. More than a little like W and his attitude toward scientists.

Who buys this crap?

avatar

ouch

hillary, you have a problem ...

avatar

i agree that we would have the same with pretty much any Republican who'd presume to be president, besides McCain, but Hillary at times seems like a 'Republican', with her hawkish, needlessly reckless rhetoric about obliterating Iran. many Republicans don't mind being afraid or having more bogeymen pointed out to throw their vitriol at. but this American is sick of the fear-mongering and the needless tarnishing of the American image by the Bush administration and other war/fear mongers who purport to be patriots. we all live on the same planet yet Bush hasn't behaved like anyone else matters except Americans. enough of him, McCain and that party that has failed the American people. the Dems have problems, sure, but as we only have two real choices, they're 'better' than the GOP. the GOP doesn't deserve to keep the WH after shoving Bush on us.

avatar

It's amazing to me that the Obamabots think McCain and Clinton are the same when she's been championing progressive causes for 30 years and her policy prescriptions are almost the same as Obama.

I've asked over and over again, but never get an answer. Did you think Kerry and Bush were the same in 04? What about Gore and Bush in 00.

To Clinton supporters, Obama started the negativity, the tearing down of the other candidate 12 months ago with his constant mantra: You can't change Washington by giving different positions to the same old players. This theme is constant in his campaign; you can see in in Axelrod's appearance on Russert's Sunday morning show; you can see it in a new "New boss; same as the old boss" negative ad.

Virtually every one of the cool aid drinkers, having heard this mantra over and over again, really believe that McCain and Clinton would pursue the same policies.

If you respond to this post, you can call me any name in the book, denigrate my heritage, my career, whatever you want.

But please, please, tell me what you did in 04 and 00.

I think your premise is false. I strongly support Obama but have no issue supporting Hillary if she turns out to be th nominee, which I think is highly unlikely at this point. I do not know a single supporter of either democratic candidate who would now enthusiastically vote for the other, even after the media circus of the last 2 months. We know there is huge difference between Hillary and McCain.

Now, if Hillary wins the nomination through a superdelgate coup d'état, overruling the pledged delegates, and fighting some nuclear convention floor fight, I could see my two daughters (age 19 and 23) being less forgiving than I would be -- I think they would still vote for Hillary, but maybe not. And if I were African American, I might feel even more upset, since so much of the Clinton attack has been exploitive of his racial vulnerability, and a mirror of GOP talking points. But even those voting constituencies will vote for Hillary Clinton over John McCain. And my wife, who is as stong a Clinton supporter as I am an Obama supporter, will enthusiastically vote for Obama, as will every other Hillary supporter I know, and at least 10 different lifelong Republicans. Hillary is being pushed by Fox and the right wing media for a reason -- because if Obama is the nominee, McCain will lose by double digits.

Bottom line is that McCain sold his soul for the GOP nomination, and the democrats and independents know it. He has tepid support from republicans, hostility from the far right, has fosaken his reputation as a maverick to pursue Bush's domestic and foreign policy for a third Dubya term, and is ridiculously old and out of touch with the difficult realities that most families face. It won't sell this year -- the stakes are too high to make the decision based on who is more fun at a BBQ, or who is surrounded by scarier looking people. If the decision is based on merit, Obama will win in a walk. But Hillary will still enjoy my support if she is the nominee.

avatar

You're a thinking supporter of Obama; I'm a thinking supporter of Clinton. Both of us will support the Democratic nominee.

Nevertheless, you obviously haven't hung out here much. The number of Obama supporters who view Clinton as the anti-dem, no better or different (or worse) than McCain are legion on this site. See the first commenter for an example. It's these people I want to know more about.

Why is it that not one of them will answer my question? Who did you vote for in 00 and 04?

I ask over and over. They never answer.

Island -- She won 4 out of 5 contests, yes, but they were all contests that she was favored to win by much larger margins than ultimately materialized. Obama cut Texas from 15 to 4, he cut Ohio from 20 to 9, he cut PA from 20 to 9 and he cut Rhode Island from 30 to 12. When he won 13 in row, many by margins greater than 60-40, that did not change the reality of her core constituency and where it lives. This is a marathon, and Obama is ahead by a quarter mile with a mile or two left to run. If he maintains his pace, he wins. That is what he is doing -- methodically winning. And cutting her margins in places where he can't be expected to defeat her.

Post a Comment



Cafe Features



  • May 12-16



  • May 19-23



  • May 26-30



  • June 2-6



  • June 9-13



  • June 16-20



  • June 23-27



  • June 30 - July 4



  • July 7-11



  • July 14-18



  • Masthead

    Editor-in-Chief
    Josh Marshall

    Site Editor
    Andrew Golis

    Intern
    Charles Gelman



    Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
    Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address