« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
So, You're a 'Legal' American, Huh?
A year ago, illegal immigration stood out as the issue many of us feared would dominate the presidential campaign of 2008. First, there was Congress, where fiery speeches and anti-immigrant rhetoric soared in a fierce debate on whether illegal immigrants should be allowed access to public housing. Democrats pulled out all the stops to kill this Republican motion. While the GOP plan was defeated, the back-and-forth voting was so controversial that the chamber had the atmosphere of a near riot. [Congressional Record]
We had presidential candidates, early on, who blasted illegals [YouTube] and, as a result, the climate for immigrants, legal or not, became a fearsome one.
Our federal government was well on the way to building a non-stop wall between the United States, a land of freedom, and the United Mexican States, our poorer neighbor to the south. And self-styled ‘Minutemen’ patrolled the border "doing the job the federal government will not do". [BBC News]
Unfortunately, the trend in Europe continues in that direction with the recent election of Italy’s fiercely anti-immigrant Silvio Berlesconi. [Reuters]
And there's the continued influence in Russia of Vladimir Putin, who was quoted last year as saying his decision to ban immigrants from food market stalls will “ease tension on the labor market and make it more civilized.” [New York Times].
Mercifully -- thanks to the immigration reform policies of John McCain and Barack Obama -- immigrants, particularly Latinos, won’t be bashed at the national level.
While the GOP presidential field did have an aggressive anti-immigrant player, U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., his defeat in the primaries, and the failure of anti-immigration rhetoric at the polls, demonstrated that “candidates with a hard line – ‘close the border and kick them all out’ -- fared worse than those in favor of more nuanced reforms.” [Reuters]
State action is another matter.
And Virginia stands out as among the worst.
The Washington Post reported May 11 that Loudon County, Va., public schools have experienced a markedly slower enrollment growth in English as Second Language (ESL) courses, those provided for children who know little or no English. The Loudon Board of Supervisors last July passed a resolution to limit illegal immigrants’ access to county services. [Washington Post]
While decrease in construction activity in Northern Virginia was noted as a possible cause of the slump, Alessio A. Evangelista, supervisor of Loudoun's ESL program, said, “"I suspect the decrease in [ESL] growth also has to do with the general appearances’ that Loudoun has become less friendly to immigrants.” [Washington Post]
On May 7, the voters in the town of Herdon, Va., re-elected their mayor and town council, all of whom backed a policy that removed the city’s job center for day laborers. [Washington Post]
The most anti-immigrant jurisdiction in Northern Virginia, Prince William County, April 30 revised its October “check immigration status of all ‘suspects’” policy [Washington Post] and put in place one that allows county police to question the citizenship of arrested persons only. The motive for the change was described as giving the county “better protection from potential racial-profiling lawsuits” at the suggestion of its County attorney.
But, when asked if this move was a change in Prince William’s vicious anti-immigrant stance, County Board Chair Corey A. Stewart responded, "We have not rolled back or repealed any portion of it." [Washington Post]
Other examples of anti-immigrant policies include:
North Carolina, where the state’s Attorney General, Roy Cooper, “advised the [state’s] 58 community colleges to return to a 2001 policy that prohibited illegal immigrants from degree classes.” [Raleigh News & Observer]; and
Postville, Iowa, where, on May 13, according to the Des Moines Register, “federal agents conducted what they're now calling the largest raid of its kind in the nation's history” and arrested and detained 390 workers alleged to be illegal immigrants. [Des Moines Register]
The local school superintendent spent the day trying to help more than 200 immigrant children find out what happened to their parents. [Education Week]
Aren’t those of us who are ‘white’ lucky? We don’t have to go through the day wondering if the authorities will suddenly burst in and deprive us of our freedom.
While the presence of illegal immigrants from Latin America may be the most openly-expressed reason for these anti-immigrant policies, the unspoken reason could be a nationalist fear of the growing numbers of persons in the U.S. of Latin American descent. According to the U.S. Census, Hispanics are the nation’s fastest-growing minority, whose children are now one in four of all children under the age of five. [Washington Post]
Of course illegal immigration is a problem. But the way to handle it is to develop a “path to citizenship,” as Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain have proposed. [US News].
Looking at the origins of our nation, you have to agree that among our founding ‘fathers’ were persons who came here with no legal right to displace native peoples. They sailed into Massachusetts on the Mayflower and occupied what they chose to call “New England,” where native peoples already lived. They invaded Virginia and set up their own ‘illegal’ settlement at Jamestown. They conquered the West and Southwest with their invasion from Spain, illegally taking land from the Incas and Aztecs and well-established native nations of the area. And they illegally claimed all of the middle of North America in the name of the King of France, naming ‘their’ misbegotten land Louisiana.
So, who are the illegal immigrants among us? Ellis Island was established in 1892, long after these earlier invasions and occupations. [Bowling Green State University].
You see, we are not as ‘legal’ and ‘pure’ Americans as we would like to think. And those who also come here ‘illegally’ yearn for no more and no less than those who landed on this multi-nation continent prior to 1892. Imagine what emotions must tear at Native Americans when they hear us sing, “This land is your land; this land is my land.” It is? Really?











Comments (17)
I think your excellent post takes a hit forma poor headline. It makes a pro-immigrants post sound anti-immigrant.
May 17, 2008 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe we need to be very much tougher on those who hire, and thus exploit, illegal workers.
These people know what they are doing. And they are doing it for one reason - to increase their profit, done by depressing wages and minimizing benefits and workplace safety.
The second time someone's busted with an illegal worker, or if they're busted with more than one, enforce RICO-level sanctions, including asset seizure.
It's not the whole solution, not by a very long way, there's a lot more that needs work in our immigration and employment practices. No question of that. Still, it's one part of a comprehensive solution that is ignored on an ongoing basis.
May 17, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
My Ukrainian Jewish grandparents came here, fleeing from Cossaks, Bolsheviks (they were Mensheviks), and WWI. We're a classic immigrant tale--first generation barely speaking English, starting in trades noone else wanted, cold water flats, etc., then kids who assimilated and became middle-class Americans, and grandkids who, like me, move away and continue to pioneer wherever they like.
I always keep in mind how fortunate I am to be here, both as a Jew and as the grandchild of economic and political refugees.
So the whole anti-Mexican immigrant thing has been offensive from the start. Contractors in Utah have given enough pushback in Utah's legislature to prevent the harshest anti-immigrant bills, but in yet another culturally isolated state that hates change of any kind, it's only a matter of time. So long as we don't have any superceding federal immigration law we're going to continue to see this provincialism.
May 17, 2008 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nicholas Penning: "Unfortunately, the trend in Europe continues in that direction with the recent election of Italy’s fiercely anti-immigrant Silvio Berlesconi [sic]. [Reuters]" It's Berlusconi.
Be wary of what you read in Reuters -- or for that matter, anywhere else. Berlusconi is not "fiercely anti-immigrant." That is simply and blatantly false. Much of the rest of the Reuters story is exaggerated or relies on innuendo, not facts.
There is an immigrant issue in Europe; that's for sure. And Italy's is one of the worst -- in some respects. But there's no comparison between how it's viewed and handled here, and the hysteria and xenophobia with which it's viewed by so many Americans, or the despicable actions carried out by I.C.E.. None.
As with so many other issues, we're still far from sorting out immigration, but we're also far more civilised here.
May 17, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was having a hard time parsing that last sentence until I figured out that your "here" is not the same as my "here".
Also, for those not in the know (such as myself), I.C.E. = Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
May 17, 2008 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't even talk about "Europe" when discussing immigration. The immigrants in, say, Italy are quite different from those in the UK or France or Spain.
I also believe that European countries are much better at dealing with illegal immigration than the US. That's not to say there aren't any illegal immigrants, but it's nowhere near the scale of the problem in the US.
Small example: In Germany, every employee needs to have a social security card (rough translation). Most people simply need to keep this card with their records. But certain employees, such as construction workers, need to have this card on them, with a photo ID. German authorities regularly check construction workers and if they find illegal immigrants, their employer will be in serious trouble. The US wink wink, nod nod "enforcement" is the reason why there are perhaps fifteen million illegal immigrants in the country.
May 17, 2008 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, many have told me that waiting for the bus while brown in Germany can often elicit an ID request from a police officer.
May 17, 2008 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Illegal immigration not an issue in itself--it's a way to package discussion about immigration in general, in the larger context of "who is really American"--hence the obsession with the "reconquista," fanatical devotion to the meanings of the symbols and constitution of MEChA, obsession with the Mexican flag etc. among the anti-immigrant crowd.
codegen86 is exactly right--the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act was the first attempt in U.S. history to sanction employers of illegal immigrants, and it was intentionally weakened to benefit agribusiness.
And there has been as much legal immigration as illegal immigration since the 1965 Acts--but "illegal immigrants" in public discourse usu. signifies "Mexicans."
Roger Daniels, _Closing the Golden Door_ is an excellent source on the history of immigration restriction, BTW!
May 17, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Down here in Texas, we are rather surprised by the extreme measures and antipathy that Northerners have shown toward their new neighbors from south of the border.
May 17, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a natural born black American, who incessantly has his "Americaness" questioned--because I question U.S. foreign policy--, I find anything anti-immigration deplorable. I specifically find the current effort repugnant.
May 17, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I stand firmly for being kind to humans. I think that the immigrants who are here must be given a path to citizenship. But, I am also aware that there are a finite number of people who can fit in a lifeboat before the boat sinks. I know that it's very hard to provide education and healthcare for every one when the tax base isn't there because there is no income tax for people who don't have social security numbers. Is America really able to adopt and assimilate every single person from Mexico, Central America and South America who might want to come here. I'm not afraid of changing demographics, but I am concerned that the boat could sink. We all thought it was horrible last year when the woman died in the hallway of a hospital while waiting to be seen for hours, but the hospitals are over whelmed in some areas. The schools are overwhelmed in some areas. How do we balance the right of Americans to maintain the quality of life that draws everyone to want to live here with the kindness to all people that many, and hopefully most, of us find essential to our hearts and minds. What is the answer?
May 17, 2008 5:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some would suggest that people who pay taxes should get the services. Unless there is some serious effort to enforce laws against the employers, it's clear the present situation has the tacit support of the powers that rule. Many illegals work, pay taxes and get no refund.
The answer is some kind of normalization of the situation that will bring these people into the system officially.
May 17, 2008 8:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, many immigrants have received ITINs in the hope that it will give them an advantage in the case of a comprehensive solution (the IRS has internal policies against sharing info with other organizations, including immigration).
I find it telling that the Irish are the second largest source of illegal immigrants (according to a TIME article from the '90s), but nobody's checking Bill O'Reilly's papers (I would find that highly entertaining).
May 17, 2008 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
The answer is a path to citizenship. The problem is not that we have too many people in America. It's that we have too many people who, deprived of health benefits, public assistance, and public higher education, are banished to a permanent underclass and therefore rely on emergency hospital services and shelters when as citizens they would have access to food stamps, Medicaid, etc. Their younger children might get preventative care. Their older children might get college educations. I don't think anyone knows exactly how many people we can assimilate, but it's for damn sure a lot more than we can afford to have taxing public services because they're locked out of all of the cheaper, more preventative ways of dealing with poverty, education, and public health, and abused as cheap labor instead of having an opportunity to actually raise their socioeconomic status through their hard (often backbreaking) work.
Meanwhile, as Scalfin notes, many of these workers do pay income tax. That is, they pay for somebody else's child to get subsidized healthcare while their own go untreated.
May 18, 2008 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
You make the mistake of conflating being anti immigrant with being anti illegal immigration. People who break the law to come to America probably will not respect the law while in America and perhaps more importantly, will hesitate to seek the law's protection. Wanting the United States to gain control over its immigration process does not necessarily mean you don't treat everyone respectfully or that you don't welcome newcomers.
May 18, 2008 8:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Many of the points you make are factually true. And if the US actually provided a path to legal immigration to migrants from anywhere with brown people, or "welcomed newcomers" beyond those who are highly trained to do the jobs that our public education system can't qualify enough of our own citizens to do anymore, they'd be relevant. But since it doesn't, "immigration" means "illegal immigration" for the vast majority of those who would come to America. Their choices are not whether to immigrate legally or illegally. Their choices are whether to immigrate illegally and be able to support their families, or not to immigrate at all and watch their kids go hungry. We will NEVER gain control over our immigration process until we provide a way for people to get in as well as ways to keep them out.
As for immigrants and crime, data shows that immigrants commit crime at about the same rate as the general population, and have a much lower recidivism rate.
May 18, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect you can write all the blog posts you want but that would't change the minds of the supermarket cashier and packer I had in Mt. Vernon, NY last night. The packer said everyone sees those illegal guys over there on XXX boulevard taking work away from Americans, and nobody does anything about it, ranting and waving her hands that her father came from Puerto Rico legally and it just drives her nuts. The cashier said "damn straight, it's a joke how they don't do anything about it." Two customers in line were inspired enough to pipe up and dittohead the conversation, mentioning their own family legal immigration history. It was like a mini version of that scene from "Network" where everyone is yelling "I'm mad as hell and can't take it anymore."
I think "it's going to be the economy stupid", as in jobs and cost of living. When times are good, a lot fewer give a damn about illegals.
May 18, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment