Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Raise the Gas Tax!

On the theory that there can never be enough posts on energy policy (I'm clearly thinking of you, clearthinker!), let's have some more.

There is one thing that doesn't seem to get mentioned when discussing Hillary's gas tax holiday pandering: Attempting to lower gas prices is the stupidest possible thing to do now. It means digging a deeper hole instead of trying to get out of it.

I am not an economist, but I will try to explain why the oil market is rather tricky, and why it's all a matter of supply and demand.

First let's take a look at the supply side of the equation. Drilling for oil is an expensive and complex enterprise. There is very little excess capacity and it is simply impossible to substantially increase production at a short notice. That is exactly why any production outages (equipment failures, wars, terrorist attacks, embargoes) have immediate and wide-ranging effects. Worse, oil is not a renewable resource, and that is the killer (more on whether oil will run out below).

Now the demand side. In the short to medium term, the demand is highly inelastic. Translated into English this means that oil/gasoline consumption does not respond to changes in price. If gas was two cents a gallon, people wouldn't suddenly start driving ten times as much, and if gas was twelve dollars a gallon, they wouldn't drive five times less.

Globally, the demand for oil is rapidly rising. The Chinese and Indians want to drive cars too, and they now finally have enough money to afford them. With rising demand but relatively static supply, the price has to go up. This places Americans at an unique disadvantage, due to an almost perfect storm of multiple influences.

First and foremost, Americans are dependent on cars and gasoline more than any other nation. Furthermore, oil prices are sharply rising at a time when dollar is rapidly weakening. Because gas was never significantly taxed in the US (unlike many other countries), the government cannot lower the taxes to offset the rising oil prices (and no, 30 cents a gallon won't have any effect). This last point (low gas tax) is also partially responsible for the American dependence on oil.

A short digression about peak oil and running out. Oil is not running out as fast as doomsday scenarios predicted, and it will never completely run out. None of that will really help, either.

The reason why oil isn't running out so fast is simple: As oil prices rise, new oil sources appear. If there is an oil field where extracting a barrel of oil costs $60, this field is not available as a source when oil sells at $50 a barrel. However, when oil is $120 a barrel, this oil field will be developed.

Oil will also never quite run out. This is because at $500 a barrel, burning oil will not be such a smart idea. What will happen is that oil prices will rise high enough for other sources of energy to displace oil. When people say "oil will run out", it is a shorthand for saying "oil prices will be so high that oil will no longer be useful".

What to do about it? The worst thing to do is attempting to bend reality (like trying to lower gas prices) because reality <i>will</i> snap back. With a vengeance.

A less bad thing would be doing nothing and letting things take care of themselves. The invisible hand of the market etcetera. The greatest danger is that there might be some crash or shock with far-reaching negative consequences. It is a given that oil will run out, but no one knows when and how. That's why doing nothing is risky.

The smartest but hardest thing to do is getting rid of the oil dependency as quickly as possible. That means reducing energy consumption in general, and replacing oil with alternative sources of energy. Rising oil/gas prices help by making other energy sources more attractive.

There is much the US government could - but almost certainly won't - do for its citizens. Subsidies for developing alternative energy sources, possibly funded by higher gas taxes. Building or improving public transport, especially in large cities. Subsidies for fuel efficient cars, and/or higher taxes on gas guzzlers - remember, burning oil is practically as bad as funding terrorists! It should not be encouraged.

The important point is that higher gas prices more or less gently force people to stop wasting oil. The question is how fast the oil prices will rise and whether folks will have enough time to do something about it. That is where government can/should help - just keep in mind that giving out free cigarettes is not a way to help people stop smoking.

The sad fact is that the problems we are facing today have been dreadfully obvious for decades, but instead of solving them it's always been easier to let the problems fester. Which means the eventual solution will be more difficult and painful. But then humans have never been known for their foresight.


Comments (12)

Memo to self: Never post on this site after midnight. The "if blog post and comment editing worked the same, it'd be too easy to use" design and lack of edit functionality require the highest degree of concentration and mental acuity.

Codogen86 -- I'm totally excited to read your post, as I was wondering similar things myself, but I don't feel comfortable hitting "recommend" until I've had a chance to do so. And I suspect you'll get washed off the list by all-things primary related tonight, too. So maybe a second recommendation is, "don't post something long and complicated during the primary frenzy."

You're practically reading my mind...

The catch is that I usually have something like a fifteen-minute window to write down all I have on my mind before I forget most of it. So waiting for the primary madness to wash away ain't really an option for me :)

I've got a notepad file open on my home computer with all sorts of things thoughts-in-progress. You could always do something like that.

Ah, but you presuppose organized thought and tidiness. I don't have that.

I can always post this again - after Hillary concedes, it'll get boring around here.

(Disclaimer: May contain wishful thinking.)

avatar

You know what's really dumb? People who think that Clinton is lowering the price of a gallon of gas by .184 cents. She isn't. She's giving people a temporary break on the federal gasoline tax. The price of a gallon of gas will remain market driven.

Europe actually taxes gas heavily and that allows for a bit of a cushion if a quick spike hits.

As you know, I've recently recommended on one of the threads that I wouldn't be adverse to $5/gal gas -- with the proceeds going to augment the pot that will rebuild the rail systems.

Of course, first we need to have a pot to rebuild the rail system.

This year, the indie long-haul trucking guys will go out of business. And then the larger companies that use trucks. The new model will be mostly move freight by rail and then from depots to local areas by trucks.

Expect the prices of things to rise.

However, I'm not sure as to the point of your post. Between DF, Magister, and myself, there has been a lot of energy postings and -- it seems to me -- that the lines have been solidified:

All the Clinton supporters wanted the tax "holiday"... and the rest saw that as pandering. There is nothing I see changing that dynamic. For example, I posted several links well beyond my original blog at:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/the-moral-equivalent-of-war.php

and hardly anyone commented. These were links to the US government's own data and not received wisdom. So either (a) the Clinton supporters didn't want to have to actually argue from a concrete set of issues, (b) no one read the sub-posts, (c) everyone is burned out on the topic.

I've even posted substantial comments elsewhere on the main ElectionCentral page:

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/05/hillary_its_me_and_ordinary_fo.php#comment-2782458

with similar results.

I have been very disappointed what Clinton supporters at TPM have been pretty myopic in their discussions of Hillary, especially on this latest energy pander. I have, for example, been critical of Obama when he started down the same path:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/i-am-very-disappointed-in-obam.php

So what I learned is the following, there are 3 groups of TPMers regarding energy:

a) those well educated in it and/or have practical experience of alternate energy lifestyles via living abroad

b) those who have their rigid thinking mostly associated with dogmatic ideas of "evil" corporations, conspiracy theories, and how it's all about oil profits

and c) a few people who will take the deeper comments made here by a variety of people here and really start digging on their own. (CAPaige comes to mind, but DF has occasionally asked me on reading materials as well.)

I suggest people start with two books:

1) AMERICAN THEOCRACY by Kevin Phillips
2) THE LONG EMERGENCY by James Kunstler

Kunstler's book is easier reading but doesn't go as deep. Phillips' book will richly reward you by being very sophisticated of the interplay between oil, American politics, and the economy -- complete with historic precedents.

You know, I wonder if many folks try very hard not to think about gas prices. The writing is on the wall for everyone to see. The price of gas is only going to move in one direction - up. The current situation is totally unsustainable, but the changes will be painful and drawn out.

It's just so much easier not to talk about it. Psychologically, I can fully understand that. But intellectually, I know that's not a way to solve the problem.

If we someday get TPM archives, you will see that two months ago, I was predicting that energy will be the central crisis of the next POTUS -- not health care. After the past week, I fear we are still on track with that prediction.

By the way, I still would recommend that the thread you started is worth reading -- we heard from a number of TPMers who don't normally post and I learned a lot by people's actual experiences abroad in real time:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/gas-prices-us-vs-europe.php

Sorry for the split, but TPM only seems to allow one URL per post!

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


September 1-4

Book Cover

September 8-12

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover

October 6-12

Book Cover

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address