Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Private Equity Ain't The Free Market
Today, Robert Greenwald and Brave New Films launched a new film in their War On Greed series; Larry The Loophole. I co-produced and directed the project with Paris Marron from BNF. In his mailer about the fun little animated expose of the private equity game, Mr. Greenwald said...
<blockquote>How is it possible for us to be entering a recession while buyout billionaires like Henry Kravis saved $96 million through tax loopholes in 2006 alone? That's just one buyout billionaire, in one year, making use of one loophole! Just think how much these private equity crooks are costing taxpayers who are already battling financial hardships and home foreclosures.</blockquote>
I was honored when Brave New Films asked me to work on their 'War On Greed' project. It was a real challenge to explain Private Equity financing in a way that was easy to understand and fun to watch. My posting here is just my opinion, though; I'm not speaking for Brave New Films.
The reaction of some people in the financial community surprised me. They accused the video of being anti-capitalist and an attack on the free market. Some of them were pretty adamant about it and so my headline is a way of throwing their words back at them because I'm not sure what film they watched.
The video makes it clear that the Private Equity / Leveraged Buyout game is a creation of the government meddling in the economy on behalf of the ulltra-wealthy. When I say 'makes it clear' I mean the main character is named <em>Larry The Loophole</em> whose parents are 'a lobbyist and a politician'. Far from being an attack on productive people or companies that create wealth by creating innovative goods and services, the video explains an inherently corrupt system that uses the power of the state to benefit a few people without creating anything new.
The 'Free Market Bait And Switch' argument reminds me of a failed businessman a few years back. He managed to become part owner of a sports team and suddenly he got interested in politics because he wanted the taxpayers to buy the team a new stadium. He got the people in his city to actually raise their taxes. After a few years, he turned around and sold the team and the taxpayer funded stadium and pocketed the profits.
Who was this shining example of free market hypocrisy? George W. Bush, of course.
Here's the video...enjoy. And while you're at it, <a href="http://bravenewfilms.org/watch/21335607/37890?utm_source=rgemail">sign the petition!</a>
And here's the











Comments (6)
I've said this a million times but it bears repeating: "Stranahan Rules." Ever since Pablito Ali, I've been hooked.
Anyway, PRIVATE EQUITY. I'm not an analyst or a lawyer, but I know my way around this industry and have experience up to my elbows in it.
It's a scandal. We are witnessing nothing less than the final perfection of the "The Great Consolidation of Wealth" that started in 1980. This is beyond a threat to the middle class. The middle class is gone. What we have now is the ultra rich becoming untouchables.
THANKS STRANAHAN!
May 6, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
It should be noted that William Jefferson Clinton became a $100+ millionaire through Private Equity with Ron Burkle's The Yucaipa Companies.
"""[Warren] Buffett said that he was taxed at 17.7 per cent on the $46 million he made last year, without trying to avoid paying higher taxes, while his secretary, who earned $60,000, was taxed at 30 per cent. Mr Buffett told his audience, which included John Mack, the chairman of Morgan Stanley, and Alan Patricof, the founder of the US branch of Apax Partners, that US government policy had accentuated a disparity of wealth that hurt the economy by stifling opportunity and motivation."""
http://tusb.stanford.edu/2007/07/warren_buffet_has_a_lower_tax.html
May 6, 2008 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks a lot - very nice of you to say.
Great Buffett quote...
May 6, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've got a little bit of experience with the Private Equity concept.
In general, it was meant to allow (rich) people to create a private investment fund with their money (wealth) and allow them to profit from the sale of the company they invest in at some time in the future. The reason it isn't regulated by the SEC is because the money is contributed to the fund privately and given out privately. The profits earned would be taxed as capital gains vs. straight income.
The PROBLEM/SCANDAL arises when these private investment funds hire 3rd party/non-owner/non-investor executive types to RUN the fund - some loophole or abuse allows these hired hands to classify ALL their compensation for doing so as capital gains vs. straight income. Bascially exempting them from paying their fair share and what really is straight income.
In General, these hired hands tend to take compensation in the form of stock options instead of wages or salaries.
Not what the private equity fund was intended to do - provide a tax shelter for its employees. They were really meant to provide a means of private funding for new/start-up businesses who can't qualify for SBA backed loans or other conventional funding and an incentive for rich folks to invest in small/emerging businesses.
Look at it this way: say you have shitty credit, past bankruptcies and a foreclosure - but you just invented a means of heating a home that requires no petroleum based products - fabulous idea but your financial history dictates the limits of your ability to finance and therefore profit from your idea. Private equity funds have the ability to lend/purchase (stocks in your new company) without constraint.
Good for entrepreneurship overall, in theory. But terribly abused in practice.
May 6, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Private Equity just plain sounds creepy.
But Stranahan's Colorado Whisky is pretty good.
May 6, 2008 4:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
So does sleeping with your Professor to get an A, but sometimes ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
May 6, 2008 4:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment