Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Please Stick a Fork in Lieberman: Isn't He Done Yet?

President Truman's old adage that there are no friends in politics has been put on vivid display this election season.  Even in CampClinton, long time allegiances don't seem to hold water anymore. And, just as we did four years ago, we had the Democratic presidential nominee (John Kerry, for those of you who've blocked it out) diss his former running mate (my guy, John Edwards) and endorse someone else -- the junior senator from Illinois.

Which, of course, brings to mind my personal fav, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who turned his back on Democrats (again) when he endorsed Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for president. Never mind that Independent Joe caucuses with the Democrats or that it's our majority which provides him with the committee chairmanship (aka, bully pulpit) that he loves so much. It seems sadly appropriate that Joe gave the Dems the cold shoulder from the frozen tundra of New Hampshire.

Joe's really a piece of work when you think about it. Let's not forget that good ol' Joe lent his weighty support to McCain instead of home state Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), as is traditional -- yeah, remember, Joe, when Dodd was the only senator who endorsed your wannabe, also-ran candidacy back in 2004, when you had your own delusions of grandeur about the Oval Office having your name on it?

Now, I know Dodd endorsed Ned LaMont, Joe, after he beat you in Connecticut's Democratic primary -- as did the rest of the Democratic party. You lost the party's nomination fair and square and for good reason, Joe. Dodd was just playing by the rules. But paybacks are hell, huh? I guess you learned about that when your former running mate Al Gore endorsed Gov. Howard Dean over your two-faced self four years ago. Bet that stung.

What's next, Joe?  A McCain-Lieberman ticket? Hmmm.... well, you share bylines, write legislation in tandem, why not crisscross the country together in a vain attempt to show your mutual obsession with a failed war policy really ain't so bad after all?

While you say you have no ambitions to be VP (sure, Joe, 'cause your politics over the past few years haven't demonstrated an ounce of personal ambition), Sen. McCain credits good ol' Joe's endorsement with helping him out in New Hampshire, putting the wheels back on the Straight Talk Express. So, he owes you, right Joe?

Especially if you keep honing your skills at playing the gratuitous hitman role against the Dem's presumptive nominee, Barack Obama. The lastest bit about Obama being Hamas' candidate of choice was inspired -- and you even said it with a straight face. Way to memorize those talking points, Joe. I mean, hey, if you can show the Maverick up front that you're willing to be his lap, um, I mean, attack dog, he'll have to move you to the top of his Veep list, right?

Well, don't bet on it, Joe...there are no friends in politics, as you've amply demonstrated. Don't count on being rewarded for this latest sucker punch, Joe. I wasn't shocked by your endorsement/defection to Team McCain. And I wasn't shocked when you lumped your former party's frontrunner in with militant extremists. In fact, you're becoming depressingly consistent. It's no wonder you endorsed John McCain -- none of the other Democratic candidates asked for your support, and who could blame them? 

I just wish Majority Leader Harry Reid would get a clue, and boot you out of the Democratic caucus once and for all.  Becasue for you, Joe, I really hope that what goes around really does come back 'round again -- and slaps you upside the head. At the very least, Reid should take your chairmanship away and give it to a senator who will actually vote Blue in November, as he recently hinted.

But the sad fact is, for now, we still need your sorry ass to keep the Dems in power. But that won't be the case next year, Joe. The Democrats are looking good to take back some prime Senate seats, and hopefully that means your double agent days are numbered. It couldn't happen to a nicer guy. 


Comments (5)

And I wasn't shocked when you lumped your former party's frontrunner in with militant extremists.

well, I was shocked. Somehow, I never expected him to go that low. Really.

Stick a Fork in Lieberman: Isn't He Done Yet?

He's got a forked tongue, but he's definitely not done - he's got 5 more years to cause trouble in the Senate. But don't let that stop you from sticking a fork in him.

Here he is with his "captain":

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vs4NbmMNRZs

I wonder what he is up to. If you ask me do I believe if he believes this stuff, I would say no. Why do the Democrats need him now. Congress isnt doing shit right now anyway. He is laughing at you. Get rid of him. Yes, I understand Obama called him a good guy once, but in context, I dont give a shit, he wont always be right!

avatar

Obama did more than call him a good guy -- Obama went out of his way to give him a glowing endorsement during the Connecticut Primary against an anti-war candidate. Yes, I know Lamont has forgiven him but Obama's error of making that endorsement shows Obama's lack of sincerity in his opposition to the war, his valuing for personal relationships against policy outcomes for the country, his lack of judgment of other people and the frequency with which Obama will be sucker punched when he makes similar errors in the cause of unity in the future.

Currently all of Obama's calls for unity are costless because he does not have to come down and support a policy. The Nuclear Leak article in the NYTimes which recounts Obama lying to Iowa about his failure to pass a solution to the leaks problem and watering down his proposed legislation as a favor to the Exelon company which caused the problem and which is a heavy backer of Obama illustrates the corrupt and much middle to which Obama seeks to drive us.

Maybe because at the time, the only problem most, mooossst people had with Lieberman was his Iraq War support. shhhhu Possibly Obama really is a good guy and didnt want to throw lieberman under the bus. Maybe he really is trying a different approach lol....I know, hogwash Sean...perish the thought...:)

Lack of sincerity...as opposed to Clintons Sincerity when she wishes she could have it back, but swears she did nothing wrong....See, we can both spin things.....I like this republican approach attack him on his strengths....No, he didnt want to spit on Rev Wright, or Lieberman maybe, (one would have to consider the possiblity) because he doesnt pounce on people too much, you know that thing they say was good about people like king....anyhow......I wont respond anymore......

You guys keep swingin.....Pathetic!

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address