Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Obama's Victimization By Low Expectations: His Failure to Decisively Respond to the Wright Stuff

avatar

I'm into victory celebrations as much as the next guy, but I can't help fretfully obsessing about what seems the only powerful negative argument in the Republican's bag--the Wright stuff. The vast majority of my compatriot Obama supporters want to let sleeping dogs lie, as though talking about this issue can only make things worse. Speaking as a psychotherapist and politics junkie of 35 years, that depends on what's said. 

The now conventional companion arguments for ignoring this issue are that the damage done to him by the Wright stuff is insignificant and/or irreparable. My best response to those arguments is in my dailykos.com blog, To Build the Largest Possible Majority, Obama Must Deal Better With the Wright Stuff, which is an improved version of a blog published here at TPM. I argue that voters who initially were for Obama and then convinced by the Wright stuff that he is a closet radical are readily reachable in a major speech that addresses not only their complex list of damning facts but also the tricky illogic of guilt by association. I also suggested that, in the world of politics, races can be decided by a few percentage points, so even if there are just a few of the above kind of voters, it's worth trying to reach them. Moreover, I believe from talking with Clinton supporters that some of them who say they will vote for McCain are influenced most by the Wright stuff. There's more in that blog in favor of taking on the Wight problem more decisively now.

Incidentally, in response to the TPM version of the above dailykos blog, a blogger quoted what may be the most compelling demonstration that Obama was completely against black radicalism. He argues extensively for the positions and methods he has advocated throughout this campaign and his Illinois Senate career. Google What Makes Obama Run? by Hank De Zutter.

In this post, I only want to argue that, as odd as it may seem, I think Obama and his supporters are against more decisively addressing the Wright stuff partly because of low expectations. That seems absurd considering how high Obama has reached. But I think he can reach much higher.

In the beginning of the campaign, there was much more idealism in and around it. There was even talk of him being a kind of savior. After the Wright flap, that idealism partly disappeared, and it was widely observed that Obama's spirit flagged. He seemed stunned for several months. And he finally choose to try to let the Wright stuff pass into oblivion.

Now things are on the upswing, but I long for a return of the kind of blinding promise Obama's capacity for empathy coupled with his intelligence and other aspects of his temperament represent. The positive response of the radical militia in Nigeria to his call for a cease-fire is suggestive of the depth of his capacity to bring people together. But in America, his capacity to bring us together in the largest possible numbers definitely has been diminished.

If he can once again wow us with his capacity for empathy and sense making and thereby interest disaffected people in his presidency, his chances of having enough support to create substantial and lasting change will be greatly enhanced.

My enthusiasm for him is partly because of my belief that he will greatly enhance the forces of empathy that lay underused in many corners of America. Not the least of these is in the work of James Blight, who I think should be considered for Secretary of State. Blight is a professor of international relations at the Watson Institute at Brown, and he is well known throughout the world for his work on the Cuban Missle Crisis. Blight advocates "deploying realistic empathy" in international relations and makes a strong argument that, had we used it in the runup to Vietnam, that war would not have happened.

There is a flood of work also showing the power of empathy in dealing with our big ticket psychological/social problems, ranging from the break-up of the family to alcoholism and mental illness. In this vein, I believe that Obama can make a much bigger difference than you might imagine if you weren't schooled in the forces of empathy that are poised and waiting for a champion to encourage and support them.


Comments (5)

avatar

Barack knows that Wright is not a radical and knows that all of Wright's controversial statements (except blaming AIDS on the government) are true. Therefore Barack's rejection of Wright was dishonest. The more Barack tries to explain away this Wright "issue," the more dishonest he will be, and that dishonesty will disgust his detractors and supporters alike.

The main problem is poorly educated voters, and media that promote knee-jerk jingoism. But Obama's dishonesty is not helping. This country needs clear thought and clear talk.

I wonder what the public reaction would have been if Barack had said at the beginning, "I agree with all of Reverend Wright's recently publicized statements except about AIDS." Then he could have calmy explained the factual historical basis of the Wright statements, once again giving us a chance for fruitful public discussion.

I recall Barack's statement a year and a half ago: "I believe George W. Bush is a good person." To praise Bush and denounce Wright indicates a wavering moral compass.

avatar

I don't believe Obama will be able to ignore the attacks from GOP surrogates over Jeremiah Wright and the issues the controversy raises. I've seen very troubling signs that his response may rely in large degree on subtly painting those who raise questions as racists. This has been far less subtle when coming from Obama surrogates. If this continues he will further damage himself. There are legitimate questions, and he is going to have to answer them satisfactorily. And more important, his supporters are going to have to avoid the knee-jerk reaction to point fingers, because if they do, Obama will be seen in the same light. As soon as black preachers and political leaders start shouting "racists", Obama's campaign gets dragged into white versus black. If those leaders can not understand white concerns, they should remain silent or risk doing serious harm to Obama. They should let Obama do the talking. And Obama and his inner circle had better tread very carefully in that arena as well. Any further hint that Obama doesn't sympathize with white concerns will cost him crucial votes.

avatar

"There are legitimate questions."

Please specify at least one.

"I've seen very troubling signs that his response may rely in large degree on subtly painting those who raise questions as racists. "

That is a nice McCarthyesque line.

Again, what questions? Please name one so we can discuss it.

avatar

"Any further hint that Obama doesn't sympathize with white concerns will cost him crucial votes."

Because of slavery, blacks and whites are together in the USA for better or worse. Our fates are intertwined. It is not possible to separate white concerns from black concerns.

"If those (black) leaders can not understand white concerns, they should remain silent or risk doing serious harm to Obama."

Most black leaders understand white concerns better than white leaders understand black concerns. And many black leaders understand white concerns better than some whites understand white concerns.

avatar

In what way do you want him to distance himself more from Wright? What's he supposed to do, shoot the guy? This is ridiculous. You're not going to reach knee-jerk voters (my mother-in-law and brothers-in-law are some) and Wright's views are an excuse for them to vote, they will remain that regardless of what you say.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


July 21-25

Bill Bishop The Big Sort

July 28-August 1

Book Cover

August 4-9

Book Cover

August 11-15

James Galbraith The Predator State

August 18-22

Book Cover

September 1-4

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address