« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Obama Change - Dirty Biz as Usual
If you want to know a man's future,
look at his past.
Obama's marketing team brands Obama as the fresh
new change from "Old School" Clinton politics.
This link will give you a clue to what Obama means.
It isn't new, it isn't fresh and it sure isn't clean.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4 861699&page=1
Like the his campaign told Canada:
"Don't listen to what Obama tells voters. It's just rhetoric."
Advertisement
Comments (22)
Things over at Hillary 44 or Taylor Marsh getting boring?
I noticed this post got pretty roundly smacked even over at MyDD.
And as to the article. he helped minority owned businesses from his district and in Chicago. Well there is a real shocker.
May 17, 2008 9:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Paid Obama bloggers, like yourself, are hijacking every
democratic blog on the web.
"Roundly smacked" because the Clinton supporters
are being thrown off MyDD, and are going
elsewhere.
What Obama is doing is anti-democratic.
This is how totalitarian governments operate, buddy.
This sleazebag will never ben more than a candidate.
May 17, 2008 9:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
interesting how the same same people move from
blog to blog trashing Clinton supporters, and keeping
them from having a voice.
The good news is that they are the democratic majority.
May 17, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Clinton supporters ARE MyDD, to the point that people who only post to correct inaccuracies about Obama get thrown off.
And "Present," it's quite telling that you're complaining about people on your side getting thrown off sites, given that most people here think your a troll and have been complaining about your flaunting site rules by disabling replies because you know how easily rebuffed your "points" are.
May 17, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which brings up the question of how you manage to reply.
May 17, 2008 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"and keeping
them from having a voice."
Who is keeping anyone from having a voice? You are a fucking clown.
May 17, 2008 9:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Getting people kicked off Big Orange Urinal and Mydd
means they don't have a voice.
Wouldn't you say, little dildo?
May 17, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I calling people dildos a ban-able offense?
May 17, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Last time I looked, MyDD was pro-Clinton.
May 17, 2008 9:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Paid Obama blogger!? Hey would somebody get the number for the campaign 'cause I'm not getting my checks. If you are going to accuse me of something please have some proof. The fact I spend time here, DKos, MyDD is not proof. Get a grip.
Also I tend to go out of my way not to trash Hillary supporters. Pointing out fact from fallacy is not trashing.
May 17, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
er, the word is out that B.O. employs
a marketing firm with a squad of
blog hijackers.
The same people in the blogs 24/7.
No Job, No Life, just sitting there pecking on
the keyboard all day and night.
May 17, 2008 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Where do I sign up?
May 17, 2008 10:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
"The word is out..."
From who and where exactly is this word out? Care to provide some actual verification, rather than innuendo once removed?
(crickets...)
May 17, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't being paid to do something something that means a person has a job?
May 17, 2008 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Wouldn't you say, little dildo?"
Lets keep you and your mother's personal relationship out of this - that being said, there are many Pro-Hillary sites that perpetual losers can have their voices heard.
May 17, 2008 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
good god, what is this coming to? Pro Clintonites being kicked off MyDD? I just saw a rant by Alegre there yesterday... unless Alegre was kicked off, there is no 'anti Clintonite' policy on MyDD. There is no anti-Clintonite policy on DKos either - Alegre led her band of Clintonistas OFF DKos entirely of her own free will and declared a strike - which was greeted with 'Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.' Nobody drove anybody away. Being in a minority supporting a candidate who has fallen hopelessly behind and being out-argued is not 'being kicked off.' It means they are losing the debate, as Clinton is losing it in the national scene.
May 17, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Word is out" on pro-Clinton boards? There was also a word out that Clinton told her foot soldiers in Wisconsin after that primary was over that they could still help her by getting out on the blogs and making it look like she had a lot of support there as it would force MSM to cover her better then.
I want proof of these paid operatives for Obama, if there is so many like you profess, wouldn't at least one get disenfranchised by Obama over time and maybe want to leak a helluva story to the MSM - with pay stub proof and talking point marching orders?
Sounds like a Clintonite conspiracy theory that can easily be explained away in supporter demographics. Isn't it an accepted fact that Hillary's base is non-college educated, blue collar and 60+ whereas Obama's base is in young and new voters, college-educated and AA voters?
May 17, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you want to see something truly despicable, go over to Hillary is 44 and look at what the posters are saying about Ted Kennedy.
May 17, 2008 1:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Compare your allegations about Obama to what Rolling Stone says about The Queen of Pork:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20306341/the_queen_of_pork
May 17, 2008 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, have you been out of the loop. I suppose you did not see the news that it was actually Hillary's campaign that gave the old "wink wink" to Canada. But it typical Rovian style, you have to accuse your opponents of what you are guilty of yourself.
Don't believe me? Here is the news coverage for those who are mislead by your post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOLEK2lr3CM
May 17, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad you corrected that obvious inaccuracy, but in all fairness, the Canadian govt is saying the Clinton campaign didn't contact them.
And the guy they talked to from Obama's campaign told them the same thing Obama's been telling voters. I grow concerned about where Clinton supporters get their news. Here and on other sites, they're often inaccurate.
May 17, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're wrong about his campaing telling Canada to ignore what he'd been saying on the stump. His rep told the Canadians the same thing the campaign had been telling voters.
May 17, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment