Also interesting how the NYT didn't come out with
this piece until weeks after the Iowa election.
Kinda sad.

Notice that "Present" is actually Slumlord.

Two racist creeps in one.

We've been through this issue already. A few times, actually.

Has anyone noticed that "present" has somehow managed to disable his reply button. His profile url shows that notorious troll "slumlord" at the end.

While I am not into censorship in any way, I do think the management needs to look into this. If he can disable is reply button and change his name without changing his url, what other kind of meta damage can he do?

YOU, NOT OBAMA, IS THE LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIYER:

You misrepresented the article, especially Obama's response to the charges. Here is what the campaign is reported to have said by the author of the article you reference. It might be helplful to actually hear directly from Obama on this matter. But here's what the decidedly anti-Obama, hit piece offers on Obama's side of the ledger.

The Obama campaign said in written responses to questions that Mr. Obama “never discussed this issue or this bill” with Mr. Axelrod. The campaign acknowledged that Exelon executives had met with Mr. Obama’s staff about the bill, as had concerned residents, environmentalists and regulators. It said the revisions resulted not from any influence by Exelon, but as a necessary response to a legislative roadblock put up by Republicans, who controlled the Senate at the time.

“If Senator Obama had listened to industry demands, he wouldn’t have repeatedly criticized Exelon in the press, introduced the bill and then fought for months to get action on it,” the campaign said. “Since he has over a decade of legislative experience, Senator Obama knows that it’s very difficult to pass a perfect bill.”

Asked why Mr. Obama had cited it as an accomplishment while campaigning for president, the campaign noted that after the senator introduced his bill, nuclear plants started making such reports on a voluntary basis. The campaign did not directly address the question of why Mr. Obama had told Iowa voters that the legislation had passed.

Nuclear safety advocates are divided on whether Mr. Obama’s efforts yielded any lasting benefits. David A. Lochbaum of the Union of Concerned Scientists agreed that “it took the introduction of the bill in the first place to get a reaction from the industry.”.

You are what you're accusing him of being. Of course, passion gets the best of us. I'm imagining that you have many reasons for being so intensely against Obama. I would like to know what are the top items on your list, things that you believe mark him as a less than adequate candidate.