Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Missouri House Votes To Disenfranchise 240,000
Missouri lawmakers this week are working to rush
legislation that would prevent up to 240,000 Missourians from voting.
The proposed legislation would make Missouri one of the toughest states
in the country for eligible citizens who want to vote by requiring
voters to present a government-issued photo ID at the polls. If passed,
these changes could be in place by the November general election.
Joint Resolution 48
passed the Missouri House yesterday on a party-line 88-69 vote and now
awaits action in the Senate. If passed, it would place a referendum
before the voters in August which, if approved, would go into effect
for the November 2008 election.
This resolution is superfluous for Missouri, where proponents have yet to show a single case of voter impersonation from recent elections, yet imposes high burdens on eligible voters to comply, as noted by Denise Lieberman, a lawyer and voter protection advocate with Advancement Project in Missouri.
"Missouri already has a voter identification law that ensures that eligible voters are who they say they are on Election Day. Even if photo IDs are provided free of cost, obtaining the underlying documents needed to prove your identity costs money and can be difficult or impossible to obtain. No Missourian should be deprived of the right to vote because government bureaucracy will not provide them a copy of their birth certificate."
Lillie Lewis, St. Louis resident, knows that frustration.
"I have tried everything to get a copy of my birth certificate," says Lewis, "but Mississippi says they have no record of my birth."
Although she believes she was born in 1935, the social security administration says her year of birth was 1936. Because she is not able to obtain a birth certificate and because of the confusion surrounding her birth, Mrs. Lewis may not be able to vote under the proposed voter photo ID law.
Statistics on Proof of Citizenship
A survey by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law found that 52 percent of married women don’t have a birth certificate in their current name, and 17 percent of citizens age 65 and over don’t have access to citizenship documents. That translates into 600,000 Missouri women and 17,000 Missouri seniors.
Further, a February Rock the Vote survey also showed that 19 percent of citizens age 18-29 do not have their current address on their ID. Establishing these rigid documentation requirements could keep hundreds of thousands of Missourians from casting a vote at the polls this November.
A Taste of What’s To Come?
At Tuesday’s Indiana primary twelve nuns were turned away from the
polls because they lacked the needed government-issued photo IDs to
vote. When Sister Sandy Schwartz of the Franciscan
Sisters of Mary in St. Louis heard the story, she did an informal
survey of 35 nuns in her convent. Fifteen did not have state-issued
photo IDs.
"This may sound like a good idea at first," stated Sister Schwartz, "but once you stop to think about who would really be affected, this is going to keep a lot of our loved ones from being able to vote."
Sister Schwartz and others are concerned that strict documentary identification requirements would create hardships for Missouri nuns and other senior citizens.
Taking Action
Missourians for Fair Elections, a coalition of voting rights groups
that includes the League of Women Voters, AARP and others, convened in
St. Louis yesterday to encourage the Missouri State Senate to vote the
legislation down. Supporters included Secretary of State Robin Carnahan and citizens who would not meet the law’s strict documentation requirements.
If you would like to know what you can do about this issue, contact Laura Egerdal, Missourians for Fair Elections at 314-363-5571.












Comments (3)
This could be real disaster. Although it would admittedly be a best case scenario, it and Colorado are the only states we lost in the 2.5%-5% range last election that we have a chance to win.
I suspect some Rovian manipulation is behind all this.
May 9, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the US Attorneys scandal voter fraud end-game.
May 9, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
“Sometimes vote suppression is as important in this business as vote-getting.”
- Carl Golden, Republican Campaign Spokesperson, 1993, spokesman for Christine Todd Whitman, bragging about vote suppression efforts made in her 1993 successful gubernatorial race. Criminal Probe of Jersey Campaign, San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 13, 1993
It comes in all flavors and sizes. Diebold. Even Supreme Court Chief Justices:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/120200-101.htm
Project Vote, how do the party lines stack up in the Senate? How can we help?
May 10, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment