Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Liz Trotta: How to break the Blue Code of Silence

Well, as I pointed out, the MSM is ignoring LIz Trotta's hoof-in-mouth-disease joke. I suggested that perhaps they had a Blue Code of Silence for fellow journalists, and I think that I was right. Goggling: 
liz trotta obama osama assassination
yields over 1600 hits on the web while only 16 via news.google.com.
There are quite a few suggestions for what people can do about the remark. 
They have included signing a petition to get her fired (2700+ hits since last night):
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/fox-news-has-to-sack-liz-trotta

calling the sponsors of fox news and expressing outrage:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/re-liz-trotta-mainstream-media.php#comment-2846787


complaining directly to Fox and the FCC:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-vogel/fox-news-guest-says-obama_b_103522.html

Contacting the AP board about Rupurt Murdoch's programming:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/25/15389/8576/115/522617

Contacting local Fox Affiliates:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/25/23341/6138/940/522833


But no-one seems to know how to break the media's Blue Code of Silence. The Fourth Estate appears eager to protect one of their own, but unless the Fourth Estate polices itself in some way, why do they continue to deserve protections? Any ideas on this? I'm at a loss.


Comments (23)

I'd like to see if Media Matters picks it up.

FWIW, this is one time when I think it was wise for the MSM to have exercised restraint. Perhaps bloggers should emulate them. If that means letting go of the Trotta mishap, then so be it. Continuing to publicize this subject in my view is playing with fire. Trotta has apologized; the Obama campaign is telling all to move. I think we should follow suit. Just my two-cents.

You may be correct. However, I'm curious to know if there is an actual place that reporters and editors go to to air complaints about journalistic integrity. DOES the Fourth Estate practice self-policing or is it just a free market thing?

I wasn't aware that Trotta apologized.

You have a link?

Found it!

Good apology.

I'm impressed.

Huh. My own impression was that she was not even sincerely apologizing. The "clarification noted" remark by her interviewer suggested that he got that impression too.

To me the 'apology' sounded more like a sarcastic dog-whistle to FAUX News viewers indicating she thinks any reaction to her comment is politically correct liberals getting their panties in a twist.

Also, she said "It's a very colorful political season." Was she playing the race card? Colorful when applied to language usually means 'blue' language, not wishing for violence. Several YouTube commenters picked up on the same thing.

Sorry, quasar! Just came back online & read your question. I'm glad you found a link. I used this one.

Perhaps its deeper than I thought... How many were aware of this?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/250208Obama.htm

avatar

I have an idea. Look for a real issue.

"I have an idea. Look for a real issue."

I have an idea. Stop pretending you're anything but a GOP troll.

There is no fucking way that I would tell a Clinton supporter that it was no big deal for a cable news commentator to make a joke about assassinating Hillary. I wouldn't even think it to myself. So, either you're a right-wing troll pretending to be a Hillary supporter, or your brain is seriously jacked.

Yeah, it is serious. It needs to be stopped right now. I realize that Republican humor often revolves around scenarios where people they disagree with get killed, but I'll be damned if I'm going to start shrugging it off.

To send a comment to the US Secret Service Office of Government and Public Affairs go to http://www.secretservice.gov/contact_usss.shtml. I suggested she be questioned and that they should investigate to determine whether any criminal negligence took place. Our media should be held to even higher standards than our citizens based upon the audience they have and their ability to influence them.

Thanks for the links!

avatar

I would like to add that contacting the local media affiliates will not help. They will only refer you back to FNC. Every other avenue is absolutely worth pursuing. And, absolutely should be pursued.

Coincidentally, Canada's National Post reported today:

"Edmonton — A construction worker convicted of threatening Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach has been sentenced to four months in jail, a provincial court judge has ruled.
"Ronald Labelle, 57, was convicted in March of 31 offences in connection with threats he made against the premier last September. Mr. Labelle called the Premier's office and announced he was going to go to Mr. Stelmach's farm northeast of Edmonton, hurt him and kill his cattle."

The guy had been drinking; Trotta didn't appear to have that excuse.
And the only assassination mentioned was of the bovine variety.

So, Otto and you other guys who are saying this is a non-issue, if Olbermann or Matthews would have joked about doing away with Hillary on MSNBC you would have just brushed it off, right???

And I agree with the person above who did not find her apology sincere; I thought it sounded sarcastic and satirical.

avatar

It's Fox. Nothing unusual. Not much different than Fox and Friends and their daily slander.

avatar

I found the tape very troubling, all the more troubling because listening to the longer tape of the interview and Trotta's comments leading up to her gaffe and 'joke' seemed to be fairly well reasoned. So I gave the link to a friend of mine who is a defense attorney who played it four times, and he gave me this impression: What Trotta started to say before she slipped on the name 'Obama' was 'And now we have what some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Oh... Osama...(interruption) Obama...well both if we could..." she visibly stumbled before saying 'Osama' and at that point, my friend said she was visibly very embarrassed and her laughter was one of acute discomfort, and tried to construct a joke based upon the first part of her sentence about 'somebody knocking off Osama AND Obama' and said 'we' instead of 'they' as she ham-handedly, in her own words, 'fell all over herself.' He is not excusing what she said, but he is explaining that what she was trying to make a joke about was that in speculating about 'somebody wants to knock off Obama' (not herself) that they would be just as happy to knock off Osama too. Which goes to intent. He said it was obvious from her manner that she was laughing nervously about slipping up on the name, but that her inept joke was about somebody else wanting to murder him, not that she was expressing a hostile desire. Of course, with that apparent 'we' in there, it sounds terribly damning.

I was mildly relieved at the explanation, because I find it ghoulish that a senior correspondent with 40 years of television reporting experience would actually chortle over a personal expression of ill-will.

avatar

Wow. Reading this is actually believable.

Although the less charitable reading is not out of character for Fox News.

I would agree that she was embarrassed that the joke slipped out and that is why she laughed so hard, but I would be greatly surprised if the "we" wasn't an honest reflection of her own feelings. Even if she wouldn't pay for someone to do it, she likely wouldn't shed a tear if someone offed either Osama AND Obama. She's still firmly convinced that we were wrong to leave Vietnam, and here's Obama advocating the same thing for Iraq.

avatar

What is so funny?

Seriously, she said this was a joke, but I don't get what is supposed to be funny about imagining Barak Obama dead.
And I laugh at a lot of weird stuff.

In the interest of mutual understanding I think we should see if Liz or her friends at Fox News can explain what it is about killing a presidential candidate that is funny?

avatar

"Perhaps its deeper than I thought... How many were aware of this?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/250208Obama.htm

Posted by LDE
May 26, 2008 3:39 PM"

Conspirabunkering left-wing loons who don't know left- from right-wing paranoias.

Quite possibly. But, the article by the Star-Telegraph doe exist and it was the Dallas police who complained. Allegedly the USSS has a habit of doing this, presumably in a random way, to maximize their ability to screen vs their ability to do other parts of their job. I.E., screen for a while, then do other things, rather than screen and not have the manpower to do other things.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address