Let us try that again: "She is so irresponsible! It pains me to think that I ever defended her. Completely unwarranted provocation of nations is not something that you can build a trust relationship on. It does not help the U.S. re-establish its reputation as the responsible and fair superpower in the world."

See? THAT is change you can Xerox.

That's really cool. It's amazing how he's tapped into a need that's felt by many people around the world. Do you have a link for that?

Now that is extremely interesting. Doesn't Iran have its presidential elections next year? What do you think that this tells us about what is likely to happen in that election?

It would be down right miraculous considering that Iran has no nukes.

Next question: If Iran nukes Israel and the US nukes Iran, who nukes the US? Just asking....

The big deal is, that diplomatically it is unwise. You don't convince people to disarm by saying that you would destroy them. Granted, she said IF they attacked Israel. What if Israel attacked first? Then what? What should we expect Iran to do? What is our role in that? So, what would you do if you were an Iranian leader, you would figure you have enemies all around you so you better arm up and make sure that at least you're a part of the deterrence. Does she really want a return to the Cold War? It was an irresponsible thing to say but she knew what she was doing, she was pandering to Jewish voters in Pennsylvania.

"But unfortunately, everyone just takes Clinton's words and attempts to manipulate them into an active threat against Iran."

Actually Brand no one needs to twist anything Clinton said. That was such an irresponsible statement so as to make her unfit for the Office as a Democratic President.
It was absurd to make nuclear threats under the circumstances of that interview.

All that was necessary was to state that Israel is a very strong ally in the Middle East and the US simply will not permit an attack on them under any circumstances.

If you scan the world press you will find that they are comparing her to Ahmadinejad in Iran, whom most of the world recognizes to be a loony bin.

Such hawkish blustering is not befitting a candidate who is supposed to be a progressive feminist. But then neither is using racism to against a fellow democrat.

Some of Hillary’s supporters have become so blind in their support of her that they have left their reason at the front door. The statement she made was not that different from our idiot in chief's comment about Iran being part of the axis of evil in his State of the Union address in 2002.

At least some of the push back from Obama supporters against Hillary and company is because we ARE progressives. If Obama started conducting a stealth campaign against Clinton like a Republican I can assure you he would loose his core supporters, including myself.

I do not understand the behavior of Hillary's supporters as of late. Is it that you guys want to pull the party to the Center? That would be a legitimate position. Because if that is NOT what you want then how can you condone her kitchen sink strategy against Obama for the last 3 months?

I work with a Hillary Supporter who refuse to acknowledge that a TV ad showing Bin Laden was fear mongering. Or that hitting Obama for the positions of Wright is racist.

It seems to me that Hillary has lost her way and she is taking those supporters who claim to be progressives with her. What gives?