Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Closing the lid on Hillary
Not that it matters much now, but to slam the door once and for all on Hillary's desperate flailing about how she would be the better candidate in the fall, let's ask her this question: How can that be true when you you haven't even been the better candidate in the spring?
Last December and January she was a slam dunk: money, organization, name recognition, inevitability, endorsements, every tool in the toolbox to lock it all up early and preemptively. Then she got out-organized, out-campaigned and outsmarted by Obama. She ran a lousy campaign, surrounded herself with a lousy staff, and was a lousy candidate—whose negatives are still through the roof. And now she want everyone to believe she can beat McCain when she's $20 million in the hole.
Better candidate in the fall? Hillary, first you have to be the better candidate in the spring.













Comments (7)
Well said. How does the worst candidate through the process claim to be the best. Happily, Obama will prevail.
May 14, 2008 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ms. Hillary replies: I am a fighter and I will never let dumb facts get in the way of a good sound bite.
May 14, 2008 9:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
The worst candidate? That would have to be a race between Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich.
May 14, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought "best candidate in the fall" was just code for "white people won't vote for my opponent."
May 14, 2008 9:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo! She has the illiterate vote and the reacist vote wrapped up. You'd think she'd be embarassed to bring it up, but I do believe she is incapable of embarassment. Narcissists are like that.
May 14, 2008 10:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Never met a politician who knew how to blush, but Hillary does strike me as a more shameless self-promoter than most.
May 14, 2008 1:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just love how the press mindlessly reports her claim that she is the best candidate. As if Hillary is some sort of truthful source for what is a most biased opinion, which she masquerades as a plain fact. The voters get to determine that via the primary process, not the candidates themselves. Ridiculous, just like her entire campaign.
May 14, 2008 12:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment