I am curious to find the answers to some of these very questions.  To be fair, I am sure there are some good explanations, however the Clinton campaign when releasing these numbers to the FEC must have realized that these numbers are not succinct to their claims after Pennsylvania.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/21/04953/3738/252/519453


FEC REPORTS IN: HRC 20 Mil in Debt & Caught in Lie about April 23rd. by vertexoflife
[Subscribe]
Tue May 20, 2008 at 10:21:28 PM PDT

The FEC reports just came in, you can view them here, here and daily raising totals here.

Here is the info about HRC's two loans to herself.

Some money quotes:

  6.  Cash on Hand at BEGINNING of the Reporting Period 31711745.93

 7. Total Receipts This Period 26,911,626.98

 8. Subtotal (6 + 7) 58,623,372.91

 9. Total Disbursements This Period 28,956,919.81

1. Cash on Hand at CLOSE of the Reporting Period 29,666,453.10

1. Debts and Obligations Owed TO the Committee 0.00

 Itemize all on SCHEDULE C or SCHEDULE D

1. Debts and Obligations Owed BY the Committee 19,480,893.26

 Itemize all on SCHEDULE C or SCHEDULE D

1. Expenditures Subject To Limitation 0.00

1. NET Contributions (Other than Loans) 193,492,741.31

1. NET Operating Expenditures 185,147,033.59

$5 mill of receipts = loan from the candidate

Making HRC 19 million in debt, with 10 million of that her own money.

Unless the 10 Million dollar loan was not included in her debts, which then puts her at 30 million in debt.

She also said that she raised ten million on April 23, after the Pennslyvania Primaries, well, here are the totals:

April 23, 2008 1,738,154.61
April 24, 2008 2,578,730.28
April 25, 2008 787,048.99

Here is there Terry said that they would be raising ten million after PA:

Hillary On Track To Raise $10 Million Since Polls Closed Yesterday
By Greg Sargent - April 23, 2008, 1:11PM

On MSNBC just now, top Hillary adviser Terry McAuliffe claimed that by the end of today, the Hillary campaign will have raised $10 million since she was declared winner yesterday.

The number of new donors to the campaign, according to McAuliffe: Fifty thousand.

Plus, a bit down the way, third link at the top, there's something a little fishy:

April 26, 2008 314,722.71
April 27, 2008 126,573.57
April 28, 2008 203,280.36
April 29, 2008 432,857.69
April 30, 2008 9,504,619.08

They raised 9.5 million in one day? huh?

UPDATE: Rangermatt in the comments noticed that Obama has this too, but on April 1st. perhaps this is a case where a bunch of donators were lumped together in one day? is this legal? You can take a look at his donations by date here. Also in the comments jforeman notes that

A commenter on mydd (I know, I know) (0+ / 0-)

says that non-itemized donations (under $200) are often bundled and reported as a single line item on the last day of the month.

Still, that means that 84% of her small-dollar donations for the month would have had to occur on one day for the $10 million number to be plausible.

This sounds much more plausible, but is still interesting 84% of her under 200$ donations in one day?

This is also interesting. Mostof the money was raised in D.C.--   7,709,576.28  of it.

There are few questions about general vs. primary money. Here is the info about it:

NO ELECTION WAS SUPPLIED     7,466,272.73
General 2008  657,740.40
Primary 2008  12,922,677.91

I am not quite sure where this is going, but I feel like someone needs to start calling the HRC campaign on all of their little lies. (See: Florida, Michigan, 2200+ delegates needed, fund raising totals, etc.) I hope the MSM catches on to these little oddities. Why does a non-state (D.C.) have many more donations than the most populous state in the nation (Cali.)? Is most of this money from P.A.C's?