Today, Bill Clinton claimed there has been a "cover-up" of Hillary's chance of winning key states in November, and claims that "she is winning the general election today, and he is not, according to all the evidence." (Quote from CNN.com)
At RealClearPolitics.com, on just the first page of their "latest polls" page, four national polls are shown comparing Obama and Clinton running against McCain. Two show Obama doing better than Clinton, by 6% and 10% respectively, and two show Clinton doing better by 2% and 4% respectively. What "evidence" is Bill talking about? 
And how much do polls mean 5 months before an election? Someone should remind Bill that 5 months before the Democratic primary, Hillary was far ahead in all polls and was considered the presumptive nominee. What happened to her, and couldn't the same thing happen to her again?
Bill argues that because Hillary defeated Obama in several large swing states, Obama would lose those states in November. Polls listed at the above web site in the past three days show Obama winning in PA, OH and CA. Obviously most Democrats will line up behind Obama in the general election. Five months is a long time for this charismatic, articulate man to win the hearts and minds of voters, even those blue collar Appalachian whites of whose support Hillary brags. 
This primary is not over. Whatever the decision of the Credentials Committee next Saturday about the delegations from FL and MI, Hillary can appeal to the Rules Committee that meets at the end of June. The Rules Committee comprises at least 50% her supporters.
Bill is laying the groundwork for continuing Hillary's campaign to the convention by claiming that "It is just frantic the way they are trying to push and pressure and bully these superdelegates to come out". Superdelegates are not pledged; they can change their endorsement any time up until they cast their votes at the convention. Even if a large number of uncommitteds endorse Obama in the next two weeks, the Clintons will claim that these superdelegates were "bullied", and will argue that they should have time to change their minds (i.e., until the convention in August). They will argue that there should be no rush to judgement, it is good for the party for the supers to have time to think it all over. Meanwhile they will continue to agitate over the FL and MI issue, citing voting rights, Zimbabwe, slavery, as they have already done.
It is getting harder to imagine that Hillary Clinton will ever concede this nomination. Only forceful action by the party leadership and the superdelegates can end this destructive tragedy of the unmaking of Hillary Clinton.