Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

A Surprising Thank You for Hillary

This morning, I dropped my daughter off at daycare wearing pig tails, her new canvas boat shoes, and a pink t-shirt that said "Future President."  As I was getting my goodbye hug (highlight of my day), I had a surprising thought: Hillary Clinton has done an enormous service to the country this year, and I would like to offer my heartfelt thanks.

This thought was surprising because I am an ardent Obama supporter and I have been sickened and enraged by Senator Clinton over the past few months.  But I am also the father of a two-year old daughter.  I knew that my little girl had the potential to be president whether Senator Clinton existed or not, but I have no doubt that her run at the democratic nomination this year has made the hill a little less steep.  For that I am forever in her debt.  

Hillary Clinton has broken the glass ceiling for women at the highest levels of American politics.  She did not win, but she has changed the conversation in a fundamental way.  She has gotten the country beyond the point where the most important thing about a female candidate is her gender.  Jackie Robinson did not win the World Series the year he broke the color barrier, but he broke it nonetheless.  Hillary Clinton did not win the nomination the year she broke the glass ceiling, but she broke it nonetheless, and we ought not forget it.  I won’t let my daughter forget it, and I would bet that Barack and Michelle Obama won’t let their daughters forget it either.

Like most significant events in life, this one has not been entirely pleasant, but depending on how the period between now and November unfolds, we won’t remember the unpleasantness.  We’ll remember how an impressive woman paved the way for other impressive women in the near future.  Hopefully we can also look back with fondness at how we all put our differences aside, united behind Senator Obama, won back the White House and were a stronger nation for it.

Again, on behalf of my daughter, thank you Senator Clinton for changing the expectations of women politicians.  And please make sure that this historic election ends on a positive note - your legacy and our country will be stronger as a result.


Comments (60)

I have been against Hillary being the nomination ever since it was first proposed. It wasn't about gender, it was about having a Clinton dynasty perpetuate itself (which is no different in broad strokes than the Bush dynasty as the disasters associated with it's concentration of power).

Interestingly enough, many women are voting for Hillary because she is a woman.

Most of the comments I have heard for people voting against her center on her being Hillary Clinton.

At the end of the day, the sexism really seemed to come from the supporters.

You may want to inspire your daughter with the thought that the #2 person in line for the POTUS is already a woman -- Nancy Pelosi. That people stopped being hung up about *her* gender about a day after she became speaker said much more for a gender-neutral society than Hillary's run for president.

you make no sense...need to think harder.

Yes, instead they focused on her botox. Taroo Taray, another special day for women everywhere.

I don't know anything about focus on botox, but John Kerry also was accused of using Botox in 2004.

What if the media focused on her $400 hair cut in every story they reported?

I would have to say that the Botox crap is political and has little to do with gender.

avatar

MassDem, an Obama supporter, writes a nice enough post about Hillary Clinton, and clearthinker is the first one to take a giant crap in the thread.

Somehow clearthinker thinks its clear thinking to generalize his crabbed and stunted personal experience and piss on all Clinton supporters.

Classy! Hope you make it to the bathroom next time, clearthinker. We don't really need your "contributions."

He is not pissing on all Clinton supporters, just the sexist ones.

Nice post, MassDem. Good for you, for being able to recognize and express the positive contributions of Sen. Clinton's campaign.

I hope I get over my anger and disappointment with Senator Clinton soon so that I can follow your fine example.

avatar

You and your daughter should be thanking a number of other women who proved the fairer sex was capable of serving not only in government, but the military, in higher education, in religion, in science and medicine and music and the arts.

You might want to thank Sen. Margaret Chase Smith Republican of Maine. For years she was the only woman in the Senate. You might not have liked her husband's politics, but gee... Lurleen Wallace served as governor of Alabama when black folks were still having a real hard time just being able to vote. That took some real political chutzpah: to run in order to exploit a loophole and give your husband another term. You could offer thanks to Rep. Barbara Jordan of Texas who was the first woman to deliver a keynote address at the Democratic convention. Not to mention she was also an African American. As was Rep. Shirley Chisholm, who ran an anti-Vietnam war campaign at a time when it wasn't all that popular.

I know you have strong feelings about Hillary, but there are plenty more women who blazed trails on both sides of the aisle in politics. How about Dianne Feinstein? From city supervisor to Mayor of San Francisco. Do you remember when Supervisor Harvey Milk was killed? It was Dianne Feinstein who told the nation about it. Elizabeth "Liddy" Dole ran for President as a Republican. So did Kay Bailey Hutchison and Bay Buchanan.

The point is there are a lot more women who did more to open doors, smash the so-called "glass ceiling" than Hillary has done. She's not the first and will not be the last. She's just one of many. Like many, she has a political husband to thank for getting her into politics in the first place.

Say your thanks, but don't forget the thousands of other women who blazed the trail long before her. Hillary didn't accomplish anything today without their help and hard work yesterday.

Please do not take my recognition of Hillary as a lack of appreication for those who came before. We all stand of the shoulders of those who came before.

avatar

Perhaps I am suggesting that you give Hillary Clinton far too much credit for improving political opportunities for women, when there are some of us who might make a compelling case that she has done (and continues to do) more damage.

What does it say about a woman who runs for the Senate based on the name-brand of her husband in a state that is not her home? That she runs for President using his experience and accomplishments as her own? That she applies not the best political intentions and motives but the worst to foster her cause?

I would suggest that there have been women who have run to fill their husbands unexpired terms in the case where the husband dies or is incapacitated (recently think of Jeanne Carnahan of Missouri) and who have gone on to display political acumen in their own right. But Bill Clinton is alive and well.

Consider it a personal thing, but I do not see much redeeming in the presidential candidacy of Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton. Has she really been a "credit to her gender?"

I recommend this post in the same way you give yummy treats to a dog who does anything remotely like you want them to. It's almost a compliment to you just like this post is almost a compliment to Hillary.

I appreciate this dis in the same way I appreciate certain cubist paintings. Though they hurt my eyes, and I would never want to hang them in my living room, I realize that they are close to perfect examples of the kind of thing they are.

avatar

Wow. I love Cubism. Much of it is political and very beautiful. You must not know much about it or maybe you haven't seen any pieces in person. Yes, it takes some getting used to, but next time you're in New York, save half a day for the Metropolitan Museum of Art. You won't regret it.

I don't know much about Cubism, but I'll agree that knowing something about an art can definitely improve one's appreciation of one. For me, I would regularly deride Jackson Pollock's art as something a kindergartner could do (and has done). I then read an interesting Scientific American article on it, and how one can mathematically distinguish his art from most (if not all) of his imitators.

I realize that such an admission (especially requiring that it required math) might make some art aficionados sad, but there it is.

avatar

On the contrary, Ben, it makes me happy. I'm no art historian. As with politics, what little I know about art I've learned from others or taught myself. ;-)

avatar

P.S. Thanks for the SciAm article.

As a commercial artist who is free to manipulate perspective over time (video and graphics) the brilliance of both cubism and futurism makes me nauseous with awe.

To clarify, I understand that futurism and fascism were heavily intertwined. That I'm not into.

But the ability of painters like Carlo Carra` to represent dynamic time within the static frame makes my brain melt into a puddle.

Wow, thanks for warning us! We wouldn't wanna step in that. :-)

Not to sound to much like Walter Sobchak, but one can certainly appreciate and respect the aesthetics of a Riefenstahl without embracing the tenets of fascism or the ethos of the third reich.

You are correct that I know very little about cubism. As my avatar might suggest, I would usually rather be looking at something by Constable or Joseph Wright of Derby. Impressionism still strikes me as a dizzying and questionable movement. Those leek-eating paint splatterers were no better than they ought to be, I'll wager.

avatar

The Met has John Constable (just click on the titles or numbers in the text to see which ones). Turner, too. Only one Wright of Derby, it seems.

Just trying to boost NYC tourism. :-)

Good response here! Cubism to some extent was a reaction against stagnant Impressionism, not that Impressionism itself was not worthy. But geniuses like Picasso and Braque responded to the new ways of looking at reality that the revolution in modern thinking made possible.

If I may submit an analogy here, Hillary is to Impressionism as Obama is to Cubism. His is the way of breaking out of cliched old ways of doing and thinking about politics.

This is Hillary's biggest single mistake: she thought the need of the times was her old fashioned way of looking at and doing politics. Whatever political future she has remaining, she should contemplate this lesson.

Um, sure, if you want to forget about Post Impressionism, Art Nouveau Fauvism, Expressionism, and Futurism. Also, it should be noted that whereas Impressionism was all the rage in Paris, in England and America, Manet and Whistler were about something altogether different.

I'd say Cubism was more of a branch off of Fauvism, Expressionism,, and Futurism, then a rejection of Impressionism. Impressionism was a breakout of tradition on it's own.

If Cubism rejected anything, it was the idea of societal norms. They rejected the status quo of the French Salons and started their own. Socialist thought and politics also figured in. When you've got a contemporary Apollinaire singing your praises, it doesn't hurt either.

just sayin

avatar

MassDem's self-description is a little scary: "I am an ardent Obama supporter and I have been sickened and enraged by Senator Clinton."

A sick and enraged father with a two-year-old daughter!

avatar

My comment previous comment goes way too far. This battle between Obama and Clinton is driving all us Democrats crazy.

My apologies to MassDem.

Thank you for re-thinking that comment. There is a vast difference between the intellectual/ political rage and sickness I have felt for the way Senator Clinton has conducted her campaign of late, and the emotions of the personal/ family realm.

That's big of you buddy. I mean it. I hope this nightmare of a primary is over soon so we can all reconcile and accomplish what is most important, which is putting a democrat in the Whitehouse. You probably won't see this given how late I'm posting, but I'll say it nonetheless.

And thank you, MassDem, for a decidely sane post.

... decidedly sane ...

avatar

well its nice you paint that scene, but the real facts are as follows: we still are a country run by men, mostly white middle aged and older men, but still, its a man's world.

women still are second class citizens, my granddaughter, i will tell her, you can be anything you want, but do not try to crash the good old boys network, like in the us senate, for example, where i read now hillary will be received in a cold manner.

that is fine, the democrats can shun her for her audacious hopes and efforts, heck, she will just be a fairly low ranking member of the senate, and a woman at that, so her life is over politically

the slavering and drooling of the media over the ability to shovel in the dirt on her political grave would make for a dynamite portrait for their hallways.

hillary has taken slings and arrows from the left, the recitation of the blue dress and semen story i often recall seeing on this and other blogs in recent months, as if that were hillary's fault.

i am a 60 year old, life long democrat, i am on the fence now, i am uncommitted if it comes to obama and mccain..that in of itself ought to bother some folks, but then, i can be dismissed as just another gop mole or some such nonsense.

i am far to out of the norm to be a gop type, they would reject me like a bad heart transplant.

i am glad you have dreams for your daughter, keep up the good fight, i will do so for my granddaughter, but politics is a mans game, nancy pelosi notwithstanding

my granddaughter, i will tell her, you can be anything you want, but do not try to crash the good old boys network

Then that makes you part of the problem.

avatar

I'm sure you have heard this before, but it seems to require reiterating frequently. Please base your vote on the candidate and what he/she stands for - not based on what bloggers, media pundits, and other random "supporters" say. If you truly feel that Obama or his immediate campaign has participated or promoted the "slings and arrows" (outside of legitimate political wrangling) then I suppose this argument will not sway you. I challenge you, however, to produce an example of Obama denigrating Clinton for her gender or behaving in a low-class way to her. He is the candidate - not anonymous blog dwellers. Do you honestly believe that John McCain is the better candidate on women’s issues?

Thanks for your comments MassDem. It is worth reminding ourselves how transformational Senator Clinton's candidacy has been, though like all path breakers (Obama included), she herself has had trouble living up to her ideals.

I’ll say thank you to Sen Clinton also. I remember when, around two years ago, it was the buzz that she would be a good Dem candidate, my first thought was, “No she would not.” I thought about the baggage she would bring with her: Bill, Bill’s lies, her defense of those lies, the “-Gates”, the vote for the Iraq war, etc. and so I pooh-poohed the idea.
Then later I made a list of why, as a woman, I despise the current administration: 1) the global gag rule; 2) the so-called Partial-Birth Abortion Ban; 3) appointing supreme court justices that support that so-called Partial-Birth Abortion Ban; 4) abstinence-only programs; 5) appointing an anti-contraception activist to lead the federal family-planning office; 6) pressuring the FDA to bar the OTC sales of emergency contraception; etc.
Hillary could have put these things at the top of her priority list—and so should Sen Obama (but this isn’t about Obama—this is about Hillary.) I think she has made great strides for women politicians, she has shown us that she does have balls—and no, that is not sexist to me, it’s a term I use for courage just like being a pussy means weakness—she may have balls to a fault. I sit here and think that she has probably sacrificed her career to open the door, if even a little bit, to other women whether it was intentional or in desperation. No man could make the impact that she has—whether good or bad—and it be perceived by women in the same way. I think some women are so sick and tired of fighting the old boys club that they seen her gender as a way to overcome that fight. The old boys club would no doubt have wanted to pounce on every mistake, misspeak, or misunderstanding she experienced—oops, my bad, they already do that!
I do feel passionate about this part of the debate concerning Hillary and since I'm given the opportunity I'll say, "Thanks, Hillary."

My daughter was the one who emphasized the dynasty part--she thought it would be really weird (and not in a good way) that we would have potentially 28 years of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. She thought we were due for some other family!

I had the Hobbes avatar first. BLEH

It will ultimately be your posts that define your Hobbes avatar. Replies will not be enough. Hobbes is a highly revered cultural phenomenon. There can be only one. I suggest...a POST OFF!

We've had enough of the highlander mentality with the primary - I think we can co-exist...

This is clearly not something that the real Hobbs would say.

IMPOSTOR!

avatar

Thankyou is in order.
Not only has she raised the bar for my Daughters but she has also toughened Obama up for the fight he's entering.
Obama deserves a big thankyou as well, he has smashed all previous paradigms in connection with AA politics. The Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton mold has been shattered & that's also a good thing. So even though it has been a nerve racking experience, it does seem to be coming to a peaceful end & we will be stronger for it. Peace.

Lets also remember that whether or not we have a positive view of the last year depends entirely on Senator Clinton's actions over the next six months.

avatar

I think this is great.
I might have misread this, but I think a few people in here are discussing women voting for hillary because she's a woman. I think perhaps they're well-intentioned, but with the little bit of feminism that I've come to understand through my women's studies involved friend, most of the attacks on obama and elsewhwere to me show a surprising lack of understanding of how the patriarchal system works here.
Sort of how Obama gave his speeches putting racism to bed, but how clintonistas can only whine about sexism instead of confronting it honestly.

other than that, great post!

I wouldn't say that he "put racism to bed", but he did show an understanding of its roots in this country, and an unwillingness to use it as a tool to deflect problems.

The Clinton's have been fairly shameless in using whatever tools they could to advance their political hopes. But Hillary does deserve respect for her role in changing the cultural perception of women in the political arena.

More to the point, Michelle and Barack and you and millions of others won't have to "make sure" that their daughters don't forget. After this, it will be taken for granted that women can run for (and certainly will become) president.

I was born in 1975. No one needs to remind me that man has walked on the moon. I take it for granted. As far as my experience is concerned, man has ALWAYS walked on the moon.

For children born today, no one will need to remind them that a woman can become president. As far as their experience is concerned, women have ALWAYS been able to become president.

yes - my point exactly - thank you for distilling it so well

While I certainly appreciate the message you're preaching, I have issue with it because I don't really think Hillary Clinton got to where she is on her own merits. Would she have done as well if she was not Hillary Clinton, former First Lady to President Bill Clinton, a revered Democratic President? I have huge doubts. I don't consider her a truly viable candidate because of that, so I can't really say her success (comparable to other women who have ran for President in the past) is truly a huge step forward. Is it a step forward, though? Sure. Just not a giant leap like many people would have us believe.

I find myself in the strange position of defending the strength of a candidate that I oppose in the strongest of terms, but here goes:
To discount Sen. Clinton's accomplishments this cycle because of her marriage is not fair in the slightest. I could make the case that while Bill made Hillary a household name, he has hurt her as much as he has helped her in this campaign.

I'm sure you can call it unfair, as Bill has indeed hurt her campaign. But he hurt her campaign after the season began. He was fundamental in her a) being able to win a seat in the US Senate, b) in helping her campaign in 2007, c) funraising for her, which without it would have obviously put her into more debt that she's already in, on top of numerous other things.

Although I understand why you don't want to pin her successes this primary season solely on Bill, I think it's completely within the realm of rationality to make such a point. Let us not even forget all the people saying they wanted Hillary because of Bill when she announced her campaign. If that doesn't say something, I don't know what does.

primary season, I meant to say.

avatar

I'm sure you have heard this before, but it seems to require reiterating frequently. Please base your vote on the candidate and what he/she stands for - not based on what bloggers, media pundits, and other random "supporters" say. If you truly feel that Obama or his immediate campaign has participated or promoted the "slings and arrows" (outside of legitimate political wrangling) then I suppose this argument will not sway you. I challenge you, however, to produce an example of Obama denigrating Clinton for her gender or behaving in a low-class way to her. He is the candidate - not anonymous blog dwellers. Do you honestly believe that John McCain is the better candidate on women’s issues?

avatar

Oops. This was intended as a reply to Blackflag but I forgot to check the box.

A fair observation.

In line with that...

I watched HRC's new South Dakota ad.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Clinton_Responsibility.html

It made me really sad for what her campaign could have been. It might not have changed me from a supporter of Obama. But had she taken the approach reflected in this ad, it would have made me far more open to a joint ticket.

avatar

"Perhaps I am suggesting that you give Hillary Clinton far too much credit for improving political opportunities for women, when there are some of us who might make a compelling case that she has done (and continues to do) more damage."

Exactly. I hope, as with post-childbirth, we eventually forget all the PAIN she has caused so that we might welcome another woman running for President.

believe it or not, childbirth is exactly what I was thinking about when I referred to not remembering the unpleasantness when you look back on significant events.

All credit is due to Hillary Clinton for her accomplishment, my opposition to her and husband notwithstanding. She indeed touched if not broke the glass ceiling and that is an accomplishment. Whether she did it in an admirable way should be a topic for another thread.

But in all fairness we also need to recognize other women who became heads of state in the past, some with less help from their husbands: Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, and Margaret Thatcher come to mind. These women broke glass ceilings too, and it is not as if they did not in important ways help Hillary.

In some real ways, Hillary was standing on the shoulders of these women. It might have been nice if during the campaign she acknowledged her debt to them.

Great point, I wonder if she was reluctant to recognize the influence and trailblazing of those women out of some concern for being pigeon-holed as the "female" candidate. We heard plenty of discussion of Obama not wanting to be type-cast as the "black" candidate, but little discussion of this behavior in regards to Clinton.

we should also think of the more recent examples of Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and Benazir Bhutto.

avatar

This is the US, and in the US NO woman before this has made an even vaguely credible bid for the presidency. It just isn't done here.

This Hillary vs Barack battle has as much to do with the ridiculous American culture (sexism, racism, fascism, puritanism, etc.)as it does with the two principle actors in the drama.

I say "thank you" to both of them and I think this absurd spat between their supporters should STOP NOW!

avatar

Hillary has indeed changed the gender issue in Presidential politics'. Not just because she ran, but because she ran a close race.
The saying is "close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades", but close in party politics counts for something. The question is what? What does she want if she can't be the top of the ticket. Rumors are that she wants' the VP spot. By its self this is fairly useless. Without the "Tania Harding option", constitutional VP's have less power than a Senator. Cheney's power is given him by George W. Bush. I do not want her for VP unless we know what power Barack is offering her. Edward (my preferred candidate) asked for a poverty tour (his "issue"), but I do not know Hillary' issue. What does she want now that she can't win? That will make her legacy.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address