Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

50% Won't Vote For 'OTHER' Candidate?

avatar

Funny.......
In 2000, the exact same percentage of voters who were asked the same question about McCain vs. Bush said exactly the same thing......
and then turned out in November to vote for the 'other' guy.......
Apparently people (and especially the media) have extremely short memories.


Comments (4)

avatar

that is interesting. i hope that Dems realize the election this year is WAY too important to let the GOP keep the WH. they shoved Bush on us and don't deserve in the least to let that egomaniac and loose-lipped McCain enter the Oval Office. i certainly hope the feelings of many Dems (bitter ones) are merely from the 'now' and will not be present at the 'then' in November. Vote Democratic and all will be fine (or at least set on the correct track to being better).

avatar

my apology for the using the term 'bitter' as it wasn't to slight anyone. just to illustrate some Dem voters feelings. now don't turn to guns or religion because of it...

Yes, and many this year claimed they would NEVER support McCain but are not behind him 100%. It's the old American desire to vote for the WINNER!!!

Honestly, some people vote as though it's a test and you only get it right if you vote for the winning candidate. That's why polling gets so important to campaigns -- they want the swing voters who tend to decide the candidate leading in the polls must be the best candidate.

Yes, Clinton's supporters will likely vote for Obama and Obama's supporters will vote for Clinton - despite the demogoguery here against her.

It's something I have found difficult to understand - this intense need to hate the candidate your candidate is running against. IT makes no sense, particularly in a primary where one of the reason the candidates are so close is because their policies are so similar.

The thing is, though, that it makes folks sound like lunatics. Oh yes, I want us to go after McCain with both barrels, but not hating him and not sounding like idiots. Go after him on facts, not fevered conspiracy dreams that make us sound like we wrap our heads in tinfoil. Honestly, it's embarrassing.

If we sound as idiotic going after McCain as the Obama supporters have sounded going after Clinton - we will deserve to lose. Why would the American people listen to a bunch of fruitcakes?

Thankfully, the candidates on the Democratic side know better. McCain suggestion that Obama is the Hamas candidate means we may be able to hang the fruitcake label on him -- but with fact, not these crazy free associated what-if-allegation fests that has passed for discourse lately.

I suspect today may be the end of it - though I did already cast my ballot in the Oregon primary - for once voting with the feeling that my vote might actually be counted - an ephemeral feeling among all of you who want to deny me that right.

I will vote for OBama in November - if he wins the nomination. Not as happily as I would have if I had not read the kind of misogynist hatemongering his supporters indulged in daily. He will be the most conservative presidential candidate I will have ever voted for and I find it sad that there's such enthusiasm for such a conservative.

I also find it sad that this time we are the party under the spell of personality (yes, an inspiring and positive personality as opposed to a lazy and oafish one.) I comfort myself that despite his inexperience and his content free personality-based campaign - he is no empty shell like Bush. He's smart, well-educated and not a belligerent bully.

But I think we can take down our "reality-based" signs now. Certainly those signs belong in no homes of the Democrats claiming Clinton is Republican-lite. That's tinfoil talk, not reality-based.

avatar

Thanks for catching that. You'd think HRC supporters appreciate BO's restraint- he has plenty of opportunity to compare her to Bush (ignoring expert opinion, cowboy diplomacy, dirty attacks), and hasnt Sure hes not perfect at staying positive, but if perfect is your measure (which never makes sense in politics), why would those in glass houses chose these categories for comparison...

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


September 1-4

Book Cover

September 8-12

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover

October 6-12

Book Cover

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address