Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Wright: Now Repudiated, Is the Horse Dead Yet?
My hope is yes. Will the media continue to play Wright until October, or is it going to die after this week except snippets.
(tried to paste link but problems?).
Sure, any issue will be there, but is this a dead horse, like Bosnia Hillary got Bosnia to die, BO's campaign should take notes- or maybe the press conference was it. Clear repudiation, distancing, all questions forward are distracting, the issue sufficiently covered. Maybe 200 questions and hundreds of articles is enough (ionly the public wanted to talk about something else, hmmm).
Talking about positive changes and policy differences with McCain should help move the focus we apparently DONT want to hear about: Iraq withdrawal, torture, FISA, economy, environment, Iran, Israel, tax relief for the poor, healthcare, auditless voting machines, voter caging, subpoenas, war crimes impeachment (Nah, play the Black Man clapping white, talking Aids conspiracies)
BO said: You can't attribute what he says to me. He said multiple times he was angry. He looked angry.
Not a legitimate topic anymore. Can the swiftboats properly capitalize, or is it too late to have fatal impact? Regardless, the Right can't be happy Wright is cast out. Maybe a renewed talking point: BO's judgment to have a pastor like him. I'll take that over the Iraq vote and Kyl Lieberman anyday.
So, did Obama redress the issue well? Well enough? Or was Wright's damage this week too deep? I think with this past few days the biggest loser was Wright.













Comments (12)
Obama said he could not denounce Wright before. Now he has. As one commentator put it, what was said by Wright this week that has not been said in the past? Obama knew what Wright said on the Youtube videos, and Wright basically reiterated those points yesterday, adding only that Obama was a politician and implying that Obama did not necessarily disagree with him.
Why denounce now? In one sense, Obama can be seen as flip-flopping on this issue, as was beginning to be seen at the PA debate. In another sense, Obama's situation parallels Clinton. He says he has the better judgment because she voted for Iraq yet regretted her decision. Now he has had a spiritual advisor for 20 years and regrets it.
April 29, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but for the average CNN viewer, those questions would sound like a lot of over-subtle hair-splitting.
Barack's answer to them was "This is not the man I met 20 years ago." For people who don't already support Clinton or McCain, that answer will more or less do.
Wright's recent statements will be a story for about 48 hours, accompanied by Obama's clear denunciation and repudiation. I think Barack has done as good a job of insulating himself from this as he could do.
April 29, 2008 5:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. This is the man that preached to him as recently as 5 years ago. This is also the man that he had serving as a member of his campaign. Too many connections. Perhaps the very gullible voter (and there are indeed many) will consider the explanation sufficient, but I think many Independents will not.
The latest poll from AP shows Clinton capturing the Independent vote over Obama against McCain. That's one less argument, if this poll proves to be the norm.
April 29, 2008 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
In what capacity beyond being given an honorary title on a spiritual advisory board?
April 29, 2008 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone Tweety's had on this afternoon has said its dead. Flat out.
April 29, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
i'm sorry but what did wright do this week that he hadn't already said? why is he denouncing wright now? because his polls are tanking that's why. obama is sooo bogus and transparent it's funny and a bit insulting. for you folks here who live by his every word it is sad how gullible you have been.
i have my problems with hilliary but obama is worse and is even more manipulative. as a black woman i am sick of both obama and the reverend wright. could you both just please GO AWAY?
April 29, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dont share your perspective, but I would like to know more about it, i find it fascinating one finds Obama truly more dishonest than HRC. Such standards as when he repudiated, applied to Hillary, seem to be at least as damning. I can cite examples if you like.
April 29, 2008 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't subscribe to Single Spook animism and have long waited for the return of secular goverment in America. Perhaps this reverend-what's-his-name thing will give Senator Obama an opportunity to distance himself from crazy religious people generally. Then the Republican-Party-sponsored Confederate States of the New Middle Ages can pass away, giving Americans the chance to join the modern world and elect someone agnostic and sensible to the presidency.
I've certainly had enough of "higher fathers" instructing "leaders" like Deputy Dubya Bush to go and "smite" some country or other for not attacking America. Enough with the Single Spook animism already! I really wish Senator Obama would reject and denounce the more insidious mental illness of religion itself, but I suppose I'll just have to settle for him putting one over-the-hill-preacher behind him where the deluded man belongs. Too bad we can't simultaneously work in a denuciation and rejection of crusading popes, altar-boy-buggering priests, jewish rabbis, islamic imams, and evangelical protestant Elmer Gantries as well. We could make some real secular progress here, but we probably won't.
April 29, 2008 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
michelle, what did Wright do this week? Well, basically, he told the United States that Obama's just a politician who'll say whatever he needs to say. And not just once, with a smile (as in Ht Moyers' interview). He said it enough times and enough clear intentionality that those of us who saw it as neutral eventually had to realize there is something going on. If you listened to Obama's comments, this is a large part of what he was responding to. Beyond that, he displayed a rather mean spirit in front of the cameras in the Press question and answer session, and it wasn't within the context of a sermon with a larger message.
April 29, 2008 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a bad feeling that they will continue to play the clips ad nauseum until the race is over.
I am SOOO glad Obama said what needed to be said! Rev. Wright was not doing our man Barrack any favors , in fact I think he was mad and acting out!
Anyhow, I'm just hoping he'll shut up now because the media will continue to provide him with a forum as long as he wants to talk!
April 29, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
There were two things going on here: one with regard to Jeremiah Wright was his anger (and rightly so) at having been damaged by a lazy media that refuses to put any kind of context to his earlier sermons or understand him.
Any of us would be pissed off royal if our words were taken out of context and distorted as Wright's were. So yes, part of this is "restore Jeremiah Wright's good name and reputation."
Second, is the conflation in the media of Jeremiah Wright's words with Barack Obama. Barack is pissed as hell that that meme continued.
The part I don't think most of us get yet is that Wright created an environment that made it easier for Barack to sever ties with him, and did it in a way that saves face for Wright (high profile and in good standing with his supporters (and as a "pastor")) and for Barack to end his relationship with Wright in a way that shuts up his critics (the political Barack -- and there is nothing wrong with that) and as "son" and "father." That break is more painful, but necessary.
Don't be too hard on Wright. He pushed Obama to do something he was reluctant to do all along. In awhile, Barack Obama will actually thank him for what he did yesterday.
April 29, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reverend Jerry Wright is the gift that will keep on giving into November should Obama get the nomination.
The GOP 527s will not let him go.
As to the degree of damage, I'm gleefully looking forward to the REVs reply to Senator Obama comments today. Was BO in the Church when REV Wright on any of the REVs more repugnant comments? The REV knows. I look forward to hearing from Rev. Wright which should be good show.
April 29, 2008 7:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment