Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Why Nash McCabe Makes Barack Obama's Point
Cross-posted at kos.
First, I would imagine everyone has read some variation of the Nash
McCabe story. I think the McClatchy report is the best; it's posted HERE.
Second, it's impossible to not be completely sympathetic to her plight. I grew up in a single mother, living paycheck-to-paycheck household. It's an incredible strain; and terribly difficult to break the cycle.
Third, I think Nash McCabe perfectly encapsulates the larger point that Barack Obama was attempting to make with his "bitter" comments.
A little background regarding Nash McCabe and the circumstances that led her to ask this question to Barack Obama in Wednesday's debate:
Senator Obama, I have a question, and I want to know if you believe in the American flag. I am not questioning your patriotism, but all our servicemen, policemen and EMS wear the flag. I want to know why you don't.
Nash McCabe lives in Latrobe, PA, located forty miles southeast of Pittsburgh. The population of the city is less than 10,000 and the city lost more than 20% of its population between the 1990 and 2000 census. Latrobe is almost 99% white.
McCabe is fifty-two years old. She met her husband at a dance in 1983, and married him two months later. They have been married since.
Six months into the marriage, Nash's husband was injured in an accident at the coal mine in which he worked. He has been unable to work since then.
The McClatchy article stated:
They never had children. He had back surgery. The muscle relaxers he took damaged his heart. He's had three bypasses, nine angioplasties, seven stents and a pacemaker. Three months ago doctors found a brain tumor. His choice: surgery that he may or may not survive, or life in a wheelchair.
Over 25 years of marriage, McCabe was the breadwinner. She said it took eight years to get her husband disability payments, during which time they racked up huge bills.
"I was a nurse's aide, a cashier," McCabe said. "From 1996 to 2000, I was a manager of a cleaning company. I started out as secretary and worked my way up to manager, and then the company decided to close. It took me almost two-and-a-half years to find a job that I got laid off from recently" as a clerk-typist. She has a high school diploma.
Sometimes the McCabes borrow money from her parents, who are in their 70s. She has a request in to the local food bank to see if she and her husband qualify.
Basically, a heartbreaking account of someone with an incredible amount of economic uncertainty, long-term health care concerns and obvious uneasiness about the ability to find steady work. In sum, Nash McCabe is the perfect embodiment of the very real substantive concerns that are weighing heavily on many Americans.
So, what does Nash McCabe want to know about Barack Obama?
I want to know if you believe in the American flag. I am not questioning your patriotism, but all our servicemen, policemen and EMS wear the flag. I want to know why you don't.
That's not an indictment of Mrs. McCabe. She has every right to be concerned about whatever issue she wants, regardless of what I think of her question. Is a flag pin going to make it easier for her to find a job? Make sure her husband is getting his disability payments? Trying to find decent health care? Of course not; it's not relevant to anything that might be able to improve her family's day-to-day lives and allow them to be able to live with a little dignity and security.
All of which brings me to Sen. Obama. Here's what he said--and, by the way, I can't read these words, even as inartfully as he attempts to make his point and not think of Nash McCabe:
Here's how it is: in a lot of these communities in big industrial states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, people have been beaten down so long, and they feel so betrayed by government, and when they hear a pitch that is premised on not being cynical about government, then a part of them just doesn't buy it. And when it's delivered by -- it's true that when it's delivered by a 46-year-old black man named Barack Obama (laugher), then that adds another layer of skepticism (laughter). [Next paragraph edited out]
But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there's not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Again, the last sentence was not expressed in a manner that Sen. Obama would have preferred, as he himself has stated. However, up until the word 'bitter,' doesn't this sentiment both express and have sympathy for Pennsylvanians like Nash McCabe? Out of touch? Has a politician in our lifetime been more in touch with the struggles faced by folks in this country?
All of the problems that Nash McCabe faces and what's the issue with which she has chosen to express the most concern: whether Barack Obama has a flag pin on his lapel?
That's where we are in this country. That's why, imperfect as he is, Barack Obama is the best choice for president of the United States.
God bless.














Comments (27)
Fabulous post.
Hard to explain why, but it seems like she will vote (as many) against her own interests; but she'll have nothing to worry about though, as long as the President wears a lapel flag...
How much clearer do we need it:
"We are the change we've been waiting for."
April 19, 2008 8:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
FARC(ing) Hilarious!!
Did Barry FARC the pooch? Investors Business Daily thinks he has some explaining to do:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=289786626246641&kw=Obama,FARC
Can you spare some "Change I can believe in" so I can buy a my dog a bone?
April 19, 2008 7:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, I just want to know why he thinks he can be Mr. Different. Everybody else is wearing the flag pin, why won't he?
I don't want the President thinking he can just act however he wants.
Flag pins for everyone!
April 19, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everybody else is wearing the flag pin, why won't he?
But that's part of the point: Neither Clinton nor McCain has been seen wearing a flag pin recently!
(In case "NashMcCabe's" comment wasn't snark ....)
April 19, 2008 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's snark?
We don't have fancy elitist stuff like that in Latrobe, PA. Just a bowling alley and a Rolling Rock brewery.
April 19, 2008 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
LIES!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_Rock
You've been nailed, McCabe? What else are you hiding? Perhaps your supposed pride in your country is a phony as your pride in your beer! Just like the "average PA voter" in Hillary's attack ad, your Latrobe beer is just another New Jersey pretender!
I said good day!
April 19, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
And I said WEAR YOUR PIN!
April 20, 2008 12:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's too late for that. Your faux patriotism has been shown for what it is!
April 20, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
I originally thought that the question proves Obama's point, in that there's so little belief in "Washington" that its a waste of time to even ask one that deals with the issues.
Seeing McCabe's response though brings me up short. Apparently its as simple as wondering why Obama refuses to "be like everyone else."
I've raised my kids to not feel they have to follow the crowd than for no other reason that "everyone else is doing it." You do what is right, first.
Also, her question was supposedly not about patriotism, but to see if he "supported the flag." That makes no sense either. The flag is a symbol of the nation, and supporting what that symbol stands for is patriotism. The cloth that is the flag itself has no meaning. Does a person have to metaphorically wrap themsleves in one (as what "everybody" was doing with these pins were) as the only way to validate their patriotism? Of course not. McCabe implies that they do.
Obama made clear why he didn't wear one, becuase the over use of them cheapened the meaning of it. Many of the people wearing those pins, clearly, could give a rat's behind about America. But in McCabe's view, that was okay, becuase they "supported the flag."
In McCabe's view, conversely, Obama may have still been patriotic, but just didn't "support the flag."
Look, I respect people no matter what their background, but this is nonsense.
April 19, 2008 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's very easy to "support the flag": you just need to be a wooden pole. (Metal will also serve.)
April 19, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful. Yes. Yes. Yes.
April 19, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read that McNabe said she identified more with Senator Clinton because she felt that Clinton was more like her in that she'd struggled and had earned her way to where she was and Obama hadn't.
[rolls eyes]
Yes, Ms McNabe, I see your common struggle - you and Hillary like two hoboes sharing a boxcar. I know she struggled - she struggled through Wellesley - was it Vassar? I get those tony private girls' schools confused - and then god, she climbed that mountain in barefeet through Yale Law. And she struggled her way right into a partnership in a law firm, and right out of going to jail with her partners. And then, o god, it was hard - Hillary struggled and fought her way in to being First Lady of Arkansas, and we all know what a trial that was. But there's more! Yes, because what happened next was the hardest burden of all - First Lady of the United States. Think of the seating lists! My god - they shouldn't do things like that to mere people.
I don't mean to make light of your problems, Ms McNabe, only your irrational belief that Hillary Clinton shares your pain.
April 19, 2008 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
"two hoboes sharing a boxcar"
that's freaking hilarious. and you nail it.
Would it be too much to suggest that when Mrs McCabe looks at Obama, that lack of a lapel pin isn't the thing she sees that bothers her?
April 19, 2008 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hello Mrs. McCabe,
I do not speak for Barack Obama, but I voted for him.
I think that Obama treats the flag with much respect, and that he wears (or doesn't wear) a flag pin in a manner consistent with what he thinks is sacred. I think he stopped wearing his flag pin out of respect for the country, and out of respect for the flag.
I recent years, the label of patriotism has been used as a manipulative tool. A tool that has quashed arguments against some of the more flagrant acts of the current administration. The men who sent our military into Iraq, knowingly, under dubious circumstances were wearing flag pins. The men who engineered the no-bid contracts that are lining Halliburton executive's pockets with millions of dollars at the expense of our economy were wearing flag pins. Tax cuts to the rich while cutting programs for the poor? Flag pins. They wear flag pins while they fail to give our veterans the support they need when they return from war.
Our government is full of people who are wearing flag pins while they act in self interest and hurt the American people.
I suspect that since Obama is a man of deep faith, he treats the flag in a manner that is consistent with what Jesus taught. And Jesus had something to say about conspicuous displays of piety. And he had even stronger things to say about acts of hypocrisy.
Barack Obama does not refuse to wear a flag pin. In fact, he has owrn a flag pin on occasion. But instead of wearing a flag pin as an act of vanity, he chooses to express his patriotism by his works. By trying to help veterans when they return from the war. By actually trying to live up to this country's founding charter. By trying to give regular Americans a seat that their government's table.
I hope that you will reconsider your convictions about the lapel pin. Any turkey could wear one, whether or not he or she really loves this country.
Thanks for your time,
Robin Barnes
April 19, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry about misspelling your name in my previous letter, Mrs. McNabe. I didn't see the typo until I'd already sent the comment, and I can't figure out how to edit...
My sincere apologies. -rb
April 19, 2008 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I made that same mistake earlier on another thread, robina137.
:)
April 19, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tena...if you shift your weight to one side and lift your hind quarter some air can migrate to your brain.
by the way could you spare some "Change I can belive in" so I can buy you a frame for that purdy picture?
Sincerely
B. O'Reilly
April 19, 2008 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Put that loofah and that falafel away, Bill - and quit drooling.
I'll sue you just as fast as the last woman did.
April 20, 2008 12:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't see the "share" link and submitted this to Digg using the DKos version.
Please Digg it anyway, as this is a GREAT article on this subject that deserves wide reading.
Digg it here:
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/ABC_Debate_s_Flag_Pin_Stunt_Proves_Obama_s_bitter_Point
April 19, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, anyone with an account over at DKos, if you want, please post this link over there in the comments.
I can't post comments there until 24 hours after creating my account (which I just did).
Thanks!
BTW, we have 11 Diggs on this in the first 15 minutes!
April 19, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I did ... well worth the digg, and the read. The more people that see it, the better.
April 19, 2008 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
The McClatchy article says it quite directly:
" it's not really about the flag pin, she said in a telephone interview Thursday"
In Clinton, she sees someone who has struggled for years, just like her, and has earned the right to be president. In Obama, she sees someone who rose like a rocket, always has a smooth explanation for everything — whether it's about his former preacher or the flag pin — and who makes it all look too easy.
"That's what upsets me about Barack Obama," she says. "He takes everything so nonchalantly."
So, nope, it's not about patriotism at all. It's about something as common as envy - but the kind of envy that stems from always being at the wrong end of a raw deal.
April 19, 2008 10:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
As far as I'm concerned the woman is an idiot.
Sure, I have sympathies for the inordinate amount of bad luck she and her husband have had to deal with, but you get to ask a major presidential candidate a question on national television and you ask about a PIN!!!???
I'm sorry, but it is so assinine that if she had actually done that, I wouldn't think it was possible for someone to be so stupid.
Second, I really want to know how Hillary has struggled? She was brought up in a very nice home in PA and then Chicago. She went to excellent schools- Wesselyan (sp?) and Yale Law. Sure she has had to deal with Bill's infidelities- but does that entitle her to the White House?
Finally, does she think that for all her problems the GOP really gives a rat's ass about her? If she thinks that there are GOP policies out there that will help her, then she is even dumber and more ignorant than I originally thought.
Because they consistantly vote for politicians who work against their interests, people like McCab deserve the government we have. They are too stupid and too ignorant to understand something good even if they trip over it.
April 19, 2008 11:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Has anyone explained exactly HOW to go about "believing in the flag"? What about not believing in the flag? Is there a difference, what is it if there is, and how can you tell one action from the action?
Because in my universe, "I believe in the flag" is an example of content-free discource.
April 19, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
As Jon Stewart pointed out, "Unless you're asking him whether he believes in the flag on a molecular level, then you are questioning his patriotism."
April 20, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Many of you are missing the point, which David Brooks has made. The issue is not the flag per se, the question serves as a surrogate for "are you one of us?" If a Swede could be President and came over from Stockholm to run on a far left ticket that would guarantee to solve our health care and education problems, he still wouldn't win, because the Swede can't pass the he's one of us test. Obama being non-white, with the "funny name," and the "mysterious" international upbringing, already carries extra baggage before the Brooks test is even started - which I think is grounded in reason, even if shallow. Thus, Nash's question is one which matters to a certain type of voter who no matter how stupid we think they are still have a vote.
April 20, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
The fallacy here is buying into Brooks and actually believing that the average voter really thinks this affects their lives a priori, that is before someone comes along and tells them that they ought to care about it, select axe-grinding nutbars like Nash McCabe notwithstanding.
April 20, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment