Isn't curious how the scum love Clinton?

Daily Kos has some diary postings about this woman.

She seems sort of fruity. Her rep in some circles was crazy and untrustworthy, which she proved to be.

I agree, her pieces were sneeringly anti-Obama and her donations were just so she could pretend to be a donor. She's a Linda Tripp.

I wonder though is she a loose canon who tricked HuffPo or does she have connections to anybody in the Clinton campaign? I wish we knew.

More info can be found on Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=junehill+mayhill

Some fun facts:
*Donated to Fred Thompson
*Sister went to school with Hillary

So is she crazy or GOP or HRC?

"In the end, it won't make much difference."

I agree, but it would be interesting if a link to Hillary's camp was made. Was this a rogue or a hired dirty trickster?

IIf much of this were true it would be useful. Since a great deal of it is incorrect, it would be good if you all would check your sources better.

Look at HuffPost today.

Mayhill Fowler: An insurgent threat to the 2008 election.

http://www.politicalgroove.com/election-center-2008/6109-who-mayhill-fowler.html

The fact is, I'm glad Fowler did this, and I fully support Obama. What we need, especially after eight years of Bush, is more transparency. I want to know what's being said behind closed doors. If Obama's words are taken out of context, he can respond by providing the context--which he did. He's good at that.

As Justice Brandeis once wrote, "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the process of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."

So, is anyone in the MSM going to report that this undercover operations has links back to the Clintons? I won't hold my breath.

There's more context to be found in a post by David Coleman, a legitimate Obama supporter who also attended the SF fundraiser:

"In context and in person, Senator Obama's remarks about Pennsylvania voters left an impression diametrically opposed to that being trumpeted by his competitor's campaigns.

At the end of Obama's remarks standing between two rooms of guests -- the fourth appearance in California after traveling earlier in the day from Montana -- a questioner asked, "some of us are going to Pennsylvania to campaign for you. What should we be telling the voters we encounter?"

Obama's response to the questioner was that there are many, many different sections in Pennsylvania comprised of a range of racial, geographic, class, and economic groupings from Appalachia to Philadelphia. So there was not one thing to say to such diverse constituencies in Pennsylvania. But having said that, Obama went on say that his campaign staff in Pennsylvania could provide the questioner (an imminent Pennsylvania volunteer) with all the talking points he needed. But Obama cautioned that such talking points were really not what should be stressed with Pennsylvania voters.

Instead he urged the volunteer to tell Pennsylvania voters he encountered that Obama's campaign is about something more than programs and talking points. It was at this point that Obama began to talk about addressing the bitter feelings that many in some rural communities in Pennsylvania have about being brushed aside in the wake of the global economy. Senator Obama appeared to theorize, perhaps improvidently given the coverage this week, that some of the people in those communities take refuge in political concerns about guns, religion and immigration. But what has not so far been reported is that those statements preceded and were joined with additional observations that black youth in urban areas are told they are no longer "relevant" in the global economy and, feeling marginalized, they engage in destructive behavior. Unlike the week's commentators who have seized upon the remarks about "bitter feelings" in some depressed communities in Pennsylvania, I gleaned a different meaning from the entire answer.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-coleman/i-was-there-what-obama-re_b_96553.html

Funny how many elitists have followed the lead of this elitist to tell the small town folk that they should be offended.

"who cares who mayhill fowler is."

If she's a Hillary plant and it could be proven, that would be something!

Here is what Senator Obama was actually saying:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHodpyhXFSg&feature=user

The real story:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-rosen/the-uncharted-from-off-th_b_96575.html