Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Turdblossom Weighs in
Karl Rove is the acknowledged master of the dark arts. When he was in the White House, his thoughts were highly filtered and only sold under the counter to clients with "special tastes".
Now he writes in the Wall Street Journal and his political pornography is retailed and available to all.
In todays WSJ he reveals a detailed blueprint of what is going to be the Republican campaign if Barack Obama takes the nomination, as is likely.
T'aint pretty, but it's worth looking at. Here are some excerpts:
And what of the reborn Adlai Stevenson? Mr. Obama is befuddled and angry about the national reaction to what are clearly accepted, even commonplace truths in San Francisco and Hyde Park. How could anyone take offense at the observation that people in small-town and rural American are "bitter" and therefore "cling" to their guns and their faith, as well as their xenophobia? Why would anyone raise questions about a public figure who, for only 20 years, attended a church and developed a close personal relationship with its preacher who says AIDS was created by our government as a genocidal tool to be used against people of color, who declared America's chickens came home to roost on 9/11, and wants God to damn America? Mr. Obama has a weakness among blue-collar working class voters for a reason.Every word here is filled with meaningful menace . every paragraph holds the germs of dozens of attack ads. For me the most menacing is the last sentence quoted that is the summing up of all that precedes it:
His inspiring rhetoric is a potent tool for energizing college students and previously uninvolved African-American voters. But his appeals are based on two aspirational pledges he is increasingly less credible in making.
Mr. Obama's call for postpartisanship looks unconvincing, when he is unable to point to a single important instance in his Senate career when he demonstrated bipartisanship. And his repeated calls to remember Dr. Martin Luther King's "fierce urgency of now" in tackling big issues falls flat as voters discover that he has not provided leadership on any major legislative battle.
Mr. Obama has not been a leader on big causes in Congress. He has been manifestly unwilling to expend his political capital on urgent issues. He has been only an observer, watching the action from a distance, thinking wry and sardonic and cynical thoughts to himself about his colleagues, mildly amused at their too-ing and fro-ing. He has held his energy and talent in reserve for the more important task of advancing his own political career, which means running for president.
But something happened along the way. Voters saw in the Philadelphia debate the responses of a vitamin-deficient Stevenson act-a-like. And in the closing days of the Pennsylvania primary, they saw him alternate between whining about his treatment by Mrs. Clinton and the press, and attacking Sen. John McCain by exaggerating and twisting his words. No one likes a whiner, and his old-style attacks undermine his appeals for postpartisanship.
Mr. Obama is near victory in the Democratic contest, but it is time for him to reset, freshen his message and say something new. His conduct in the last several weeks raises questions about whether, for all his talents, he is ready to be president.
His conduct in the last several weeks raises questions about whether, for all his talents, he is ready to be president.No Swiftboating here, just condescension. This is a deadly game plan based on deflation of a balloon and not difficult to follow.
http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com/







Comments (17)
And naturally, not one dose of policy differences, because they have all the wrong positions this year.
I say:
Bring.
It.
On.
April 24, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do you honestly believe that "policy positions" can decide an American presidential election?
Have you ever fully analyzed how someone as obviously incompetent as George W. Bush had proven to be by 2004, could have been reelected?
Have you given any thought as to how someone as unsavory as Karl Rove can command the fees he does?
No?
As Hillel the Elder said, "Go study."
April 24, 2008 8:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent. Condescension is the worse possible way to attack one's opponents. That's partly what did in both Gore and Kerry.
As for the "empty suit" rhetoric and similar techniques, those are largely the same tactics used by the Clinton campaign. They didn't work so well.
Unlike with Hillary, Obama will feel quite comfortable attacking McCain tit-for-tat. There won't be any of these special rules in place.
Finally, when it comes to debates, Obama will have McCain's lunch. During this last debate Obama had to pull his punches to avoid alienating Hillary supporters. That will not be the case when he debates McCain. Also, Hillary is a good debater, whereas McCain is not.
April 24, 2008 8:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Still trying to scare people away from Obama.
April 24, 2008 8:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point. The take away message should be that Rove would rather run against Clinton than against Obama. As David correctly points out, Rove is all about the game—no integrity there. Is there any doubt that the timing of this message indicates that he'd rather have Clinton than Obama?
April 24, 2008 8:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Rove likes to make a lot of money being very good at his job. I think that bringing down Obama would bring him very high fees and reputation among his peers.
Hillary is a very tough lady and very mean and I don't think anybody relishes confronting her.
McCain is by far the most difficult Republican for Democrats to face.... he is real. People who don't agree with him (me for example) like and respect him.
April 24, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that, like Hillary, Rove relishes the fight. He'd much rather fight against someone like Hillary, who fights the way he understands, than against Obama, who confuses him.
To butcher a sports analogies, boxers don't like fighting martial artists.
April 24, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
How quickly some forget...
"Hillary is a very tough lady and very mean and I don't think anybody relishes confronting her."
It's too bad that it has been so long since we last heard a Republican debate. How clear it was in those days that the GOP hopefuls were just licking their chops to run against her. Just the other day I ran across an old item in which mentions of "Hillary" far outstripped any other key words (like "Iraq" or "economy" in one of those Republican debates.
April 24, 2008 9:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're quoting yet another irrelevant Republican talking mean about Obama (the meanies!) as if we should care about what a Republican says about our party. And then you quote all those Republicans who want Clinton as the Dem. nominee, as if we should care about what a Republican says about our party.
What's funny to me, is that you're scared silly because the GOP may be condescending to Obama (oh noes!), yet not too long ago, you said Obama was being condescending to Clinton and that was bad thing then. You said that he was arrogant.
How does it not occur to you that the Republicans will be mean to Clinton too and they'll bring up all the old baggage too? They won't let her lay claim to the 3 or 4 good things during the WH years, while backpedaling on all the stupid drama. No one can be so simple as to think that won't happen. It's what Republicans do. Senator Clinton has shown time and time again that she won't try to stand up to the GOP. She'll bend or break. It's the same thing her husband did, it's the entire point of the DLC.
But then again, you just said that your respect someone who condones torture. Someone who has changed his stances on just about everything even more than Romney has. You respect that. You respect a person who has embraced the man who started a whisper campaign about the child he raised. Ah...that makes sense, you respect Clinton and she considers McCain "a good friend", even though he said that horrible stuff about her daughter.
April 24, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
That is like calling Roger Federer an "irrelevant tennis player".
April 24, 2008 9:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
You give him too much power and it's really sad. It's Democrats like you, that do more harm to the party, IMO. Why does what an irrelevant Republican say about my parter matter? You quoted Bill Kristol, for goodness sakes, as a way to make your point against Obama. How very Liebermanesque of you. Most of us manage to think for ourselves and have decided that we're not going to let the GOP dictate how the DNC is run. I know that the Clinton's are the ones who have embraced these irrelevant Republicans, but they're not my president and I don't have to line up behind anyone who think that Mellon Scaiffe, Rove, McCain et al, are worth listening too.
April 24, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gee the Obamites are going to be bitter if they don't win this... I wonder what they'll end up clinging to?
April 24, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I'll be thrown into space if gravity stops working…
Little known fact amongst the non-technical: a=>b isn't very meaningful if a is not true.
April 24, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
And then the name-calling starts. What are you Hillbots going to do once "your girl" is down and out?
See how amazingly childish and stupid that was? Grow up.
April 24, 2008 9:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am not a Hillary supporter... I think the only chance the Democrats have is to draft Al Gore. And since the Republicans win most elections, it might be smart if the Democrats studied them a bit.
April 24, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Regurgitating their spin and quaking in your boots is not "studying them". That's called "rolling over for them...again." But Al Gore? You're part of the species Struthio camelus Democratus! You're in good company since a good chunk of our spineless Dems. in Congress are also Ostrich Democrats.
April 24, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Ostrich Democrat"
I like that!
I wish I had said that.
I think I will.
April 24, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment