Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Tao of Obama

He must have known it was a trap. Hillary grinning like a Chelsire cat and looking like she knows what ordeals lie ahead, and George Stephanopoulus, the indentured Bill Clinton apparatchik and media hitman, flanking his vision. The ratings have gone through the roof, the world is watching. The bear baiting starts, the bloodiest political inquisition this season unfolds in tortuous slo-mo, as one by one, the feared sadistic political contraptions - flagpins, Terrorist, Wright, 9/11 - are trotted out. 

Like most of you, I could feel my anger welling up like a percolating volcano. The torrent of letters, emails, calls to ABC, the MSM and blogosphere all attest to the collective revulsion. Amidst the uproar, a slew of reviews unanimously panning Obama's tepid, deflated performance and handing the trophy to Hillary suggest that he's lost this battle. Is he frail and vulnerable after all? Can he withstand the onslaught of McCain the White and the Republican Orgs this November?

It slowly dawns on me that Obama may have lost this battle and the ratings but won the war. By taking it on the chin to the point where it becomes too painful for *us* to watch, eliciting nausea (someone blogged about throwing up@), turning most of us physically ill, we, the audience, start screaming for this Rovian-boarding to stop.

If this was Obama's strategy all along, it has to be bloody brilliant. Had he spoken out early and forcefully to cut this line of attack short, he would have won hearty cheers and applause, but nary a commendation and certainly not a nation-wide outrage like we're witnessing now. And Hillary can boast smugly about her impenetrable skin, "rifled baggage" and repetitious Republican "vetting". 

As the protests well to a tsunami, it not only makes Hillary look like Rumsfeld in drag, Rove is probably breaking out in cold clammy sweat at the outpouring of unchained, stinging voter bitterness. Limbaugh, seized by uncontrollable paroxysms, downs fistfuls of valium. Has McCain put out word he's shopping for new campaign advisors yet?

The talk is now about "Gotcha!" politics as voters, sick of the dirt-mongering, demand that the candidates, media and the debates turn to *issues*, and of course Obama is ready there for them.

This is not only designed for a Hillary Clinton knock-out, it's a pre-emptive strike against his much more formidable and unscrupulous foes in November, all by not lifting a finger, yet the plates are shifting.

We are a gathering storm demanding accountability from the political and media elite, let's not rest, but press on, summoning fellow voters to raise voices in unison, lest the ailing country succumbs to more of the same toxic political filth.

Obama may be Taoist, even if he might not have heard of the Way. In a Taoist story I recounted on another blog,
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/my-82-year-old-mothers-debate.php
Cook Ting, a master of the knife said, "A good cook changes his knife once a year - because he cuts. A mediocre cook changes his knife once a month - because he hacks...However, whenever I come to a complicated place, I size up the difficulties, tell myself to watch out and be careful, keep my eyes on what I'm doing, work very slowly, and move the knife with the greatest of subtlety, until -flop! The whole thing comes apart like a clod of earth crumbling to the ground. I stand there holding the knife and look all around me, completely satisfied and reluctant to move on, and then I wipe off the knife and put it away."
... This principle of seeing the overall structure, seeing the way of least resistance and then using the least effort for the maximum returns, leads ultimately to the principle of wu wei, which can be translated as 'inaction', 'not doing' or 'not striving'.

A fellow poster, Slouch, summed up with quotes from the Tao Te Ching 36:

If you want to shrink something, you must first allow it to expand. If you want to get rid of something, you must first allow it to flourish. If you want to take something, you must first allow it to be given. This is called the subtle perception of the way things are.
The soft overcomes the hard.
The slow overcomes the fast.
Let your workings remain a mystery.
Just show people the results.


Comments (49)

avatar

Well done, Qwerty!

I agree that what we've seen in the past two days is game-changing. We need to be prepared for the same after Tuesday, when Hillary will likely win PA (by whatever margin). Part of the appeal of Obama's change message is how broad it goes: beyond just a new face in the White House, it's about changing the way we experience politics in our culture. The ABC debate was the tipping point. The next month is critical.

Fired up and ready to go.

Process is more important than policy which is more important than Gotya. The pundits have not awakend to the new reality.

OOoooo - pithy.

I likes it.

FARC This !

Did Barry send an envoy to FARC? Investors Business Daily has something to say on it:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=289786626246641&kw=Obama,FARC

Oops! Did I forget to pick up my "Change I can believe in" when I left the store?

Fired Up!!!

There are long-ballers and short ones. Ask Gandhi, King, Douglas, Truth or Tubman. The answer is always Patience.

Thanx Binx!

avatar

Obama did not have a good night, but I think it's a case of debate fatigue. Nothing that happened there is significant. My critique of the Obama campaign (and I hope they're listening) is to stay away from the divisive social issues. Obama is promising more than he can deliver -- especially repeal of the Defense Of Marriage Act. If he wades into that minefield as President, it will be a huge distraction. We are putting him there to deliver on the key issues that face all of us, and he will not be able to afford to spend political capital on social issues that rally massive support against him. Bill Clinton read the polls, which is why he signed the act in the first place. When it comes to domestic policy the President is only one powerful player among many, and Obama's campaign needs to project a more narrowly focused agenda. He risks his credibility otherwise.

YOU HAD ME THERE FOR A MINUTE !!

I thought this was going to be about a primordial state of non being but you just wanted me to know how guilty you feel.

Now go make me a sandwich.

Sincerely
J. McCain

ASK YOUR CASHIER FOR: "Change you can believe in"

By taking it on the chin to the point where it becomes too painful for *us* to watch, eliciting nausea (someone blogged about throwing up@), turning most of us physically ill, we, the audience, start screaming for this Rovian-boarding to stop.

Not to belabor the (somewhat hackneyed) Rocky analogies, but wasn't that precisely Balboa's strategy in the fight with Apollo Creed? Or am I mixing up my Rocky flicks? Becauase I could've sworn that sounds like it was lifted right from a synopsis of the climactic fight at the end of the first film. Good analysis on the Taoist front, too.

Yeah, kinda like Rocky, except at the end, the entire audience charged into the boxing ring and tore Rove to shreds. Love Hollywood endings.

Thank you. Hillary tries to beat the Republicans by turning the tables on them but Obama is turning the tide. The tide of public opinion. :)

avatar

I really like this post.
One of my favorite books is 'Don't Push the River [it flows by itself]'. It is about the sanity of being so attuned to the overall flow and keenly aware of a particular moment that a small effort at the exact right time is far superior to flailing away needlessly.

When I think of the Tao, I think of a master kayaker who stays calm and balanced and can run the rapids doing the smallest motions at the proper time, never too soon, and never too late, and never too much.

I think of casting a flyrod.

And then I do it.

To disappear into the fiddle, when everything is just right, is living tao.

I play other instruments too, and I can get to the same place even faster with many of them, but the fiddle is special.

"To disappear into the fiddle, when everything is just right, is living tao."

I see that whenever Obama "disappears" into the huge crowd, he's one with them in true synchronicity, hearts and minds.

avatar

There's a decency about Obama that makes people want to protect him from the ugly sleazy world of Clinton and McCain. He seems clean, he seems trustworthy. We want to protect him, his idealism, his intelligence, from the Freakshow.

I think this is part of the dynamic here, where when the GOP and MSM attack, he just gets stronger.

avatar

I'd rather see you guys protect Obama than watch him do it himself. He tends to favor the use of puerile insults and obscene finger gestures when people are mean to him. Quite unpresidential.

But then, I haven't been properly indoctrinated...Why don't I pass the time by playing a little solitaire..."Barack Obama is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life..."

I feel better already!

Maksutov66..obviously you have been sleeping with the pigs to the right of us for too long. What we are saying about Obama is that he will not change the party in Washington, he will change our mentality. Obama said he wanted to change the mindset that got us into a stupid war and this has been the real central theme of his campaign.

What we see is "Change", "Chamge we can believe in" and what it means is mindset, mentality and delivery of our politics will be changed. Obama was a professor at University for 6 years and he is extremely smart. He looked at the American public, our media and how we take in information and like a class room he is educating us all. We have to be more aware of the issues, more aware of our world and more active in our communities because we are all effected by what happens. When the crime rate increases in the city, it will effect me in the country side. There will be more people in my small town and more builders polluting my small lakes and when the jobs go overseas it will effect me as well even though it was not my job. There will be more unemployed, more foreclosed homes and less revenue for the state. This means my tax money is thinner and things will be bad in my country home as my tax money will have to go and compensate for the loss of revenues in the city. We are our brothers and sisters keeper, if only to save ourselves.

Exactly as I see it too, he perceives the whole, how they are inter-related, which is why he rejects the politics of division of the Republicans and some Democrats. It's not like Hillary moving from the left to the right to morph unconvincingly into the centrist, to triangulate. He's already at the center of gravity and understands how the world whirls around it.

avatar

I don't know about Tao (though I like the idea) but I do know he's a poker player, literally AND figuratively. Here's some words about the qualities of a good poker player:

http://www.flixya.com/post/baskun/595331/Becoming_a_Great_Poker_Player

"All the poker [players] in the poker hall of fame shared essential qualities that made them legendary.
Each one of them had self respect. They all knew what they worth, they all knew that they are excellent players and they all trusted their skills and experience. Each one of the greatest poker players in the world had confidence in themselves and knew that their abilities are enough to win the WSOP or other important tournaments.

Each one of the greatest poker players in the world used his wisdom. They were all wide and planned their future moves ahead. It doesn't mean that they all read tons of poker books and had vast technical knowledge, but they all shared that wisdom of the predator. They all thought about the future and were able to guess what their opponents will do next.

The last thing that all of them had is creativity. All the world's best poker players have unlimited creativity and the ability to act in ways that their opponents will never guess they'll act in."

And they don't tip their hands.

Speaking of Obama playing poker - there was a wonderful profile in the New Yorker a few weeks ago. Great cartoon, too.

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/02/04/080204ta_talk_mcmanus

In the last couple of years I read a more recent translation of the Tao Te Ching. The scholar who translated the work had a different take on the Tao. He contended that the actual translation of the Tao is really " Integrity" rather than "The Way". Given that definition; it would be a pure delight to have a president that was Taoist.

You probably know this, but Tao has over a dozen correlating concepts in American English alone. So I'd venture a guess that the Integrity translation is in addition to "the way."

avatar

You really don't know how you and others would have reacted had Obama decided that taking leadership was a better course than being a punching bag for Stephanopolous and Gibson. Instead of coming out more or less even, he might have gained some significant advantage. Hindsight is always 20-20, especially when seen through the prism of one's own prejudices.

I've thought hard about that of course, but what's key here is the mode of Hillary's attack. She makes him out as an "elitist" out of touch with the down-and-out small town voters. If he punches back hard, it buttresses the image she's trying to paint. He takes the pummeling, becomes the underdog, 3 against 1, and it looks like the elite+Hillary beating down on him. This resonates with those voters Hillary is trying to alienate him from and at the same time, makes such tactics revolting to the electorate at large. Brilliant!

The poker game analogy reminds me of a song "You've got to know when to hold, know when to fold, know when to walk away..."

Thank you for your recs and comments. Masters of Tao, Zen, Game/Chess, Jijitsu, they are all uncommonly perceptive, observant, strategic, coupled with a completely calm, unflappable center, but most important, great integrity and a disposition for public service. He can be a brilliant player, a master of the art of politics, and we should be so lucky that he bats for our side. In contrast, Hillary tries to show her competence, but even as she hacks away with her kitchen utensils, she wields them with a jumpy, frenzied, incoherent, desperate mind rather than a well-honed killer instinct. Obama is already 3 steps ahead, anticipating her moves and delivering a knock-out without even a lethal weapon, his eye on November. It's like watching Jet Li fight a cement mixer. :)

INDEED.

His shoulders must be black and blue by now, but he keeps brushing them off. And you do notice how it's never his butt that he has to brush off.

The crap never knocks him down.

Hello Everyone-
I'll preface this by saying I am a passionate Obama supporter.
I do not want us to fall into the same trap that HRC’s followers are in.
Make no mistake; HRC is a person with a brilliant mind. If any of you doubt that then you must not have any friends who are attorneys. She went to Yale which has always been one of the best schools in the country. Obama is not beating her because of intellect. He is beating her because he has a clearer mind and extremely good judgment which is a bye product of wisdom, which is separate from and unrelated to intellect.

What I see right now is a once proud and noble person who has lost her way. It is difficult to imagine the whirl wind that must surround a presidential campaign. I think Hillary has simply lost it and I am actually concerned for her well being. I find myself commenting to friends that I hope she has some close friends-real friends- around her who can support her and help her maintain her sanity.

I love all the things that you guys pointed out about Obama, but I think there is another dimension to his being that is equally extraordinary. His heart is turned on! He is so clearly inspired, and when taken together with his overall intellectual acumen and judgment, it amounts to tremendous, truly “generational” charisma. I understand why Hillary’s supporters are put off by that-I probably would b too if my candidate lacked it and was being beaten by someone who had it.

Someone above described the way that Obama projects a quality that makes us want to protect him. I have noticed myself today, that he is a current incarnation of a “Teflon” candidate. Nothing negative sticks to him. I think it is because even though many people may not be able to articulate their reasoning, the fact is, he has deep and uplifting heart energy. It is a natural gift that he seems to have been endowed with. And for so long our candidates have not had it, that that is why someone like George Bush could defeat Gore and Kerry (although I for one believe the mountain of evidence that the elections were stolen both times, but that is another discussion).

So I say to the Hillary supporters, I know it is heart breaking to see your candidate loosing and nothing seems to work against your opponent. But remember, after this primary is over, for all those of us that are progressives, we will need to unite so we can save the Supreme Court from Antonin Scalia!

There are a very few of the plenitude of vids out there that strike me as keepers. One was the 60 minutes interview when he was asked if he was going to bring out the dirt in the race. He said a single word - "no". That was it. "No."

The other vid that I wish I could keep is one where the interviewer asked him some speedy questions that he had to answer without too much thought. She asked him what he learned from his mother.

He said "empathy".

Those responses sort of summarize him for me. They are enormously appealing.

Not gonna play dirty politics
and
Try all the time to walk in the shoes of the other.

avatar


*** drw3344

You stated that beautifully. Thank you.

I perceive Obama as a man of integrity. He has a phenomenal mind and a superb sense of justice.

Many seem to be under the impression every one must fit into a pre-determined "box" and those who don't means they are unacceptable. That notion was learned based on one's social upbringing and conditioning and once realized makes it less difficult to overcome. IMHO.

This nation is a melting pot of every religion, nationality, culture, belief et al. Obama surrounded himself with diverse people, maybe not as "savory" or appropriate as some would like, through-out his entire life. That is one of the beautiful things about Obama: he accepts differing opinions, cultures, nationalities, etc. He not only talks about American values he represents them -- his life demonstrates it. That is what America is all about.

Obama has the confidence within himself not to adopt other's views, but accepts individuals for who they are because each has the right to believe as he or she does. Perhaps people are not used to that level of acceptance.

Obama seems to understand people. I do believe him and trust him.

Is Obama perfect? Hell, no, he is a politician who is imperfect, but has our interests in mind. People recognize that the more they get to know him. And that is why he stands apart from Hillary. IMHO


avatar

i am happy I found this site as I resonate with the ideas posted here. It is comforting, after all the harshness of MSM and the so-called debate on 4-16 to find my heart-home. I've found myself being consumed with hatred during this campaign so this site brings me back to my natural inclinations. Thank you.

Welcome Janet.

Either we get it or we don't.

Love your word choices - heart-home - yes.

Glad it reaches the right place, but don't lose that anger too quickly...coming from all walks of people, that anger can coalesce into action. I think we can safely assume that we won't be seeing any MSM help in changing the political tone of the campaign, with the exception of a few outstanding print/net journalists. If we don't act, the Mayberry Machiavellis, the masters of Hillary's dark arts, will swoop in for the kill. :)

avatar

Yes, welcome Janet, from another Oregonian. We have our chance to weigh in coming up on May 20th. Here in Astoria, at the mouth of the Columbia River, the 9th Obama 08 campaign headquarters just opened its doors. I think he'll win big in Oregon.

As if the speech in NC wasn't uplifting enough...

Here's a mashup of the speech where Obama made reference to Jay-Z's "get the dirt your shoulder"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yel8IjOAdSc

avatar

wu wei: literally, action/inaction.

wu wei as a concept implies knowing both when to act and when not to act.

avatar

Qwerty

Great piece.

I agree Obama has weathered Hillary's rovian attacks. If Obama were to use those tactics on Hillary they would backfire. It would alienate her supporters and definitely fracture the democratic party more than it currently is. For all intent and purposes the negative slurs and gutter-snipe gotcha politics are part of the problem and that in part explains Obama's teflon coating; It will insulate him from the republican mean-machine.

I've always believed that when someone puts another person down it is to overcompensate for his or her own "inadequacies." Politicians are really no different, I suppose. There can be no denying it is ugly and distasteful.

However what have the republicans got? They will build on Hillary's strategy adding their tired "liberal" BS about raising taxes. They will keep reiterating Obama is inexperienced. They will call him a phony, a liar, a fraud for pretending to be a uniter, unpatriotic, an elitist, and anything else plus exaggerate it by ten and fabricate whatever else they can get away with -- anything that flies, including race.

I expect it will probably get more intense during the general election, but nothing more than what Hillary has thrown at him. And I'll bet she has more coming. Hillary is out to destroy Obama completely. She is harming herself not Obama.

Like Obama says, he will let the public decide. When people meet him, they like him. The more they get to know him the better they like him. So Iam not concerned about the GOP as much as Iam about Hillary imploding. While trying to destroy Obama HRC is self-destructing. If she is to save her legacy as tattered as it is, Hillary needs to do what is best for the country.

Obama is not weak as she suggests. His weapon is humour, wit and political acumen not to mention his oratorical gifts. McCain will not be able to counter that; it will frustrate him to no end. That is why Hillary keeps piling it on, but at her own expense. Likewise the republican party because Obama is a different kind of candidate. They do not know how to deal with him.

Although McCain sent an email linking (?) Obama to Hamas because they want Obama to get elected. Sheesh how far removed does he need to be? Now a compliment links Obama to Hamas!

The GOP and the McCain & Hillary camps insult our intelligence with this kind of nonsense. By embracing politics as usual they epitomize everything wrong with politics today. It is no wonder the electorate prefers Obama's fresh approach. Plus he treats us like grown-ups.

FYI:

Hillary slammed MoveOn in a private fundraiser. That is over 3 million members. MoveOn was created when Bill was in trouble about to be impeached as a counter to the right-wing smear machine. Obviously she learned the wrong lessons by adopting the same rovian tactics that were used against her & Bill.


Thank you. I do think that he consciously makes the decision not to tear down Hillary for the good of the Party, and I suspect for the good of the Clintons. Hillary supporters will never believe it, but most of her wounds are self-inflicted. It's not because he's some saint, but it's because he's much like Bill when he was trying to pacify Hillary when she was angrily saying "Screw 'em!" to the Southern male voters, Bill was more interested about winning them over.

avatar

file this under the "obama can do no wrong" heading

uh, sometimes looking bad just is looking bad, not some mumbo jumbo feigned spiritualistic rationalization that he got waylaid and ransacked, give it up

If this was Obama's strategy all along, it has to be bloody brilliant. Had he spoken out early and forcefully to cut this line of attack short, he would have won hearty cheers and applause, but nary a commendation and certainly not a nation-wide outrage like we're witnessing now.

Sorry to switch religions on you, Great Zen Master, but it's Passover tonight. There's a famous Passover song called Dayenu, which means, "It Would Have Been Enough". And so, I sing...

It would have been enough to write that the debate aroused people's sympathy for Obama.

It would have been enough to write that the debate highlighted Clinton's negatives.

It would have been enough to write that the debate helped underscore Obama's criticism of Gotcha politics.

It would have been enough to write that the debate galvanized his supporters.

But to write that he planned the whole thing out, that he intentionally looked peevish and defensive, rather than forceful and aggressive, so he that would be seen as the victim of those mean moderators and Hillary Clinton...it's more than enough. It's too much.

When you try to twist every Obama negative into a positive, you sound like those Bush supporters who see genius in his Iraq strategy or the Clinton supporters we laugh at when idiotic tells us THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS...FOR HILLARY. Obama is a brilliant man, but he is neither omnipotent nor omniscient.

Plus, I don't think that Zen masters would approve of you using Tao for political spin.

Hillary=Windows. Obama= OS X

Another Mac user I see :)

heh, chalk that up there with lattes, Post-modernism, organic cotton and other out-of-touch silliness. :)

You forgot the Priuses and birkenstocks!

Oh, and Mac users are elitists.

Now seriously, the typical Mac user is probably exactly the sort of person who would vote for Obama.

Have I considered the possibility that Obama was stumped and just plain lost it during the debate? Of course. It is however very unlikely given the slew of ads run by Hillary - it is obvious that the possibility of her going on the attack, facilitated, um, moderated by George, is exceedingly high.

There is also enough fodder out there, including "Screwgate", NAFTA, Colombia, etc., offered on a platter should he decide to go for the jugular. Instead, he played defence. He also knows the full arsenal out there for them to take him down, Wright, Cling, etc., he did his homework for defensive purposes, his "comeback" is flat and contains no counterpunches.

Having run a smooth, well-prepared campaign, Obama and his advisors have obviously thought this over, and it was a conscious decision NOT to attack, and to accept the pummeling.

temperance mentioned "effect" and "affect", and others have wondered about the quasi spiritual mumbo-jumbo. I'd argue that all decisions are in fact binary in nature, "do" or "not do", 1 or 0. The effects follow. Nothing to do with the supernatural, more a philosophy perhaps, and Heraclitus proposed very similar thoughts and concepts.

The default for human behavior is to fight back when someone starts landing punches - I'd argue the instinct for self-preservation trumps others. To *resist* tit-for-tat, action and reaction, that takes a lot of will and incredible strength. Witness the post-debate outpouring - it is *painful* to watch, much less experience this in front of a 10 million audience. To look weak and stand humiliated for 2 hours, to hold his tongue and undertake the risk that he'll disappoint supporters who want to see Hillary clobbered, that is the path of least resistance for Obama? I doubt it.

It is assumed that it is easier to be passive than active, when in fact in situations when one is attacked, it takes sheer will to hold back and withstand the pain, especially when faced with a weaker opponent.

In the end, the test of the pudding is in the tasting. I first tried to blog about this when Gallup had Hillary coming within 3 points in national polls, not hindsight as someone else posted, but couldn't because of the Mac Browser, but did post about it during the Obama doldrums on the "82 yr old mom" blog. "Results", that was what got me thinking beyond my anger about his strategy in the first place, and I wasn't looking at the poll numbers, which were down, or the reviews, which were all bad, but at the emotional response. That was the most remarkable thing, the collective outpouring, and this potential is huge. Either it is an accident, a by-product, or it is not, and you build your case from there. Of course it won't pass muster in a court of law, but this is something that rings many bells with those familiar with the tenets of certain philosophical traditions.

So you have:

Obama - inept, unprepared, weak, flat, caught off-guard by attacks - Results: skyrocketing polls, collective disgust at media and Hillary attacks, anger at Gotcha politics, standing taller than ever and a true teflon candidate.

or

Obama - careful, strategic, deliberate, intentionally holds back, curbs his fighter instincts, 3 steps ahead of the game - Results: skyrocketing polls, collective disgust at Hillary, at media attacks, etc.

Ok, draw your own conclusions. :)

Incidentally, Zen is the progeny of Taoism. Zen Buddhism is really the bastard child of indigenous Taoism and Buddhism adopted from India.

avatar

This is not to demean your issue processing or obvious intelligence. I suggest you could improve your creds and communication by learning the difference between effect and affect. I enjoyed reading your commentary.

T'anks a mil Qwerty...

You're welcome, courgood. :)

Great blog at DailyKos, MaximusNYC, the aikido analogy is most ept. Never clash head-on with Hillary! She's had enough self-inflicted wounds. Martial arts, as opposed to just plain fighting, is really about restraint.

avatar

Interesting post. I wrote something similar about the aikido of Obama back in February.

avatar

Obama is winning because he is REAL!!!

What you see is inDEED what you GET!

Folks see he is authenic and genuine..he does not genuflect or grovel and get down in the muck and mire of UNPRINCIPLED politics...he refuses to.

When he looked peevish and frustrated at the debate it was because he was being CONSTRAINED. He understood he could not attack Hillary and would not attack her as it was against his principles no matter how much it cost him to take blow after blow. He refused to sink to the level of that American politics has SUNK.
He wrote all of this in his book. He has repeatedly said that politics is not a SPORT. Yet, Bill Clinton continued faces off with sports analogy saying if you do not want to get hit, don't put on the uniform.

Obama is REAL. Folks know it. He does not talk nonsense. He focuses on what is important and everyone knows that who bothers to listen. He is unafraid to show his flaws, imperfections and weaknessess.

He can't bowl worth a damn,but he is congenial enough to join in because he knows it will not cost him his self-assurance. He will be the same human being with the same values and principles whether he bowls 37 or 107.

Obama will be the same man whether you try and tar and feather him with guilt by association or folks listen and understand that is not who he is. He wrote books about who he is.

Obama will be the same person regardless of the negative connotations folks want to sling about his middle name.

Obama knows that the essence of the man that he is will not be bowed by the false accusations, the vacuous name calling the swiftboating.

He is like teflon because he will not engage it.

If he has to cheat to win he won't win, is his attitude. He would rather place his faith in the American people than to cow to crass foolishness.

He understands he cannot lead America nor can he help AMericans by stooping to those lows, it would be an endless game of lieing and deciet where he would have to sell his soul.

That is not why he is running. He is running to change the country he has said it over and over. He has told the citizenry that only WITH them can he change the country.

If americans cannot wake up and hear his message he knows he will be unable to govern. That is why he does not countenance, the petty bitterness and internecine warfare that has become so commonplace in american politics. Instead he resolutely standsfast and tells americans THAT is why they can't solve the problems of the economy, war, and healthcare and jobs.

Those DISTRACTIONs are costing us the American dream.

That is his message and you know what? Folks, know it is true. They know they have voted for all those friggin distractions and they have not made progress. Only Obama is offering them REAL change.

So, Obama is willing to play rope-a-dope with Hillary. He lets her and the media and the GOP swing away with all their best punches..he wants them tired and spent, he wants the world to see them in all their putrid glory...because when he comes off those ropes

He will be the CHAMPION...just like ALI.

The American people will be the REAL winners because we will finally have elected a true leader with a vision and strong sense of purpose of what is right and wrong with the judgment to lead and the wisdom to restore this countries greatness.

If we ignore the distractions we can vote to elect a great leader who will with our support reclaim this nation and the American dream of government by the people, of the people for the people.

Post a Comment

Cafe Features



Cafe Features


July 7-11

David Sirota The Uprising

July 14-18

Ross Douthat and Reihan Salam Grand New Party

July 21-25

Bill Bishop The Big Sort

August 4-9

Book Cover

August 11-15

James Galbraith The Predator State

August 25-29

Book Cover











Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address